Downloaded 17 times
Uploaded byPrabhu Guptara
What's the Root Problem with the discipline of Economics?
The document examines the critiques and historical development of various economic theories, including classical, neoclassical, and modern perspectives. It highlights significant criticisms of mainstream economics, such as its inability to predict economic crises and its detachment from real-world complexities. Furthermore, it discusses alternative economic approaches, including relational economics, that prioritize relationships and social cohesion over purely mathematical models.
More Related Content
Similar to What's the Root Problem with the discipline of Economics?
![[Challenge:Future] Moral underpinnings of capitalism](https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/moralunderpinningsofcapitalismalanstefanac-140505051223-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=640&height=640&fit=bounds)
More from Prabhu Guptara
What's the Root Problem with the discipline of Economics?
- 1. The Root Problemof the Discipline of Economics Professor Prabhu Guptara [email protected] 1
- 2. Please note • NOTthe official position of The Relational Thinking Movement, or of any of the other organisations, universities, etc with which I am or have been connected • The intention is to provoke us to think!!!
- 3. Few mainstream economistsregard themselves as members of a "school“, but the founding fathers of classical economics were people such as Adam Smith, David Ricardo, Jeremy Bentham, & John Stuart Mill
- 4. The founding fathersof neo-classical or “mainstream” economics were people such as Carl Menger, William Stanley Jevons, Leon Walras, John Bates Clark 4
- 5. Since then, “mainstream”economics has been enriched by Keynesians, Austrians (Böhm von Bawerk, Friedrich von Wieser, Mises), Monetarists (Friedman) and Behaviouralists (Gabriel Tarde, Amos Tversky, and Daniel Kahneman)
- 6. Mainstream economics mayindeed be “moving away from a strict adherence to the holy trinity - rationality, selfishness, and equilibrium“ - but it is to be doubted how far it has moved
- 7. - “Economic Imperialism”1999 paper by Ed Lazear (later, chief economic adviser to President George W Bush) "Economics is not only a social science, it is a genuine science. Like the physical sciences, economics uses a methodology that produces refutable implications and tests these implications using solid statistical techniques. In particular, economics stresses three factors that distinguish it from other social sciences: Economists use the construct of rational individuals who engage in maximizing behavior. Economic models adhere strictly to the importance of equilibrium as part of any theory. Finally, a focus on efficiency leads economists to ask questions that other social sciences ignore. These ingredients have allowed economics to invade intellectual territory that was previously deemed to be outside the discipline’s realm.” 7
- 8. Is there aconnection between mainstream economics and • the sovereign debt crisis? • excessive levels of executive pay? • short termism in share trading? • the dominance of the financial economy over the real economy of goods and services? • the increasing volatility and vulnerability of our global economic system? • … 8
- 9. Neoclassical economics * Believesprices, outputs, and income distribution in markets are determined through supply and demand, which are mediated through a maximization of *utility* by income-constrained individuals and of *profits* by cost-constrained firms who employ available information and factors of production * Postulates scarcity and “rational” agents (modelled as maximizing their individual welfare), with the “rational choice” for any agent being an exercise in mathematical optimisation (“Pareto optimality”). 9
- 10. Criticisms: Neo-Classical Economics •Does not focus on explaining the actual world, but instead on describing a "utopia" in which Pareto optimality applies • Do individuals really act “rationally”? Is “economic man” not quite different from the real people that you and I know? • Thorsten Veblen: Neoclassical economics posits that a human being is "a lightning calculator of pleasures and pains, who oscillates like a homogeneous globule of desire of happiness under the impulse of stimuli that shift about the area, but leave him intact” • "Utility is the quality in commodities that makes individuals want to buy them, and the fact that individuals want to buy commodities shows that they have utility"(!) - Joan Robinson 10
- 11. Neoclassical economics –criticisms (contd) • explains neither mass unemployment nor unused national production capacity • Are all attempts to model a system as complex as a modern economy inherently unrealistic? • A famous answer to this criticism is Milton Friedman’s claim that theories should be judged by their ability to predict events rather than by the realism of their assumptions ("Essays in Positive Economics” III, IV & V) 11
- 12. So what ISthe record? • The IMF’s 2002 study looked at "consensus forecasts" (the forecasts of large groups of economists) that were made in advance of SIXTY different national recessions in the 1990s: • in *97%* of the cases the economists did not predict the contraction a year in advance. • On those rare occasions when economists did successfully predict recessions, they significantly underestimated their severity - "How Accurate Are Private Sector Forecasts? Cross-Country Evidence from Consensus Forecasts of Output Growth", by Prakash Loungani, IMF, December 2002 12
- 14. The history ofEconomic Thought • Pre-modern (Greco-Roman, Indian, Persian, Arab, Chinese….) • Early modern (mercantilist, physiocrat…) • Modern (Adam Smith and other classical economists of the 18th century) • NEO-CLASSICAL, ORTHODOX OR MAINSTREAM ECONOMICS • Post-modern (from the 21st century)? 14
- 15. The Historical School •Founders (clockwise from bottom left): Georg Friedrich List, Bruno Hildebrand, Gustav von Schmoller, Max Weber • The orientation of most Economics in German universities from the 19th century – dominated not only Northern and Central Europe but also US economics, which was led by holders of German Ph.Ds till about 1900 • Formed the conceptual and practical basis of the social market economy - for many decades the dominant economic paradigm in most of continental Europe (concerned with social reform and improved conditions for average people during industrialisation) • The key source of knowledge about human actions and economic matters cannot be economic theorems, logic and self-referential mathematical models; economics can proceed only by careful empirical and historical analysis of politics and society, which are culture-specific: universals are simply not possible 15
- 16. Islamic (Jewish/ Christian)Economics • What is the Koranic/Jewish/Christian understanding of the best economic goals and policies? • Of tax? • Of interest rates? • Of gambling (speculation)? • Of monetary commissions while trading in money? • Of promissory notes? • Of modern (fractional reserve) banking? 16
- 17. John Kenneth Galbraith(1908–2006) The Affluent Society (1958): voters reaching a certain level of material wealth begin to vote against the common good • Coined the term “conventional wisdom” to refer to the orthodox ideas that underpin the conservative consensus • In an age of big business, it is unrealistic to think only of markets of the primitive kind • Big businesses set their own terms in the marketplace, and use their combined resources e.g. for lobbying and for advertising in supporting demand for their products. • So individual preferences come to reflect the preferences of entrenched corporations ("dependence effect“) • The economy as a whole tends to become geared to irrational goals 17
- 18. John Kenneth Galbraith(1908–2006) The New Industrial State (1967): economic decisions are planned by a private bureaucracy, a technostructure of experts, who manipulate marketing and public relations channels • This hierarchy is self-serving, profits are no longer the prime motivator, and even managers are not in control: the goals of an affluent society and complicit government serve primarily the irrational technostructure • Because they are the new planners, corporations detest risk, requiring steady markets • They recruit governments to serve their interests – that is, by creating suitable fiscal and monetary policy • Public space is simultaneously impoverished. 18
- 19. John Kenneth Galbraith(1908–2006) Economics and Public Purpose (1973) offers a "new socialism" as the solution, reducing inequality by: - nationalisation of military production & of public services such as healthcare - disciplined salary and price controls. 19
- 20. Modernisation Theory All societiesprogress through similar stages of development Today's underdeveloped areas are in a situation paralleling that in which today's developed areas were at some time in the past “Development” means greater speed along this supposed common path of development - e.g. by investment, technology transfers, and closer integration into the world market 20
- 21. Opposed to ModernizationTheory: • Resources flow from a "periphery" of poor and underdeveloped states to a "core" of wealthy states, enriching the wealthy at the expense of the underdeveloped • Poor states become poorer, rich states become richer, by the fact of being weaker members of a world market economy Underdeveloped countries are not merely primitive versions of developed countries, but have unique features and structures of their own which hold them back 21 Dependency Theory
- 22. World Systems Theory/Analysis/ Perspective • Immanuel Wallerstein traced the rise of “the world system” from the 15th century: Europe’s feudal economy suffers a crisis, transforms into a capitalist economy • Europe utilizes its advantages and gains control over most of the world economy, presides over the development and spread of industrialisation and financialisation, indirectly resulting in unequal development. • As the world system extends geographically and intensifies economically, a particular country becomes the world hegemon for a time (Portugal, Spain, France, Netherlands, Britain, and now USA) 22
- 23. World Systems Analysis- 2 • Uses the world system (not nation states) as the primary unit of analysis • Core countries focus on higher skill, capital-intensive production, while the rest of the world focuses on low-skill, labour-intensive production and extraction of raw materials • This constantly reinforces the dominance of the core countries, but the system is dynamic, in part as a result of revolutions in technology: individual states can, over time, move in or out of core/ semi- periphery/periphery • Considers itself a “knowledge movement”aiming to transcend the structures of knowledge inherited from the 19th century - especially, the divisions within the social sciences, and between the social sciences and history • Wishes to transcend the illusory separation of the “three supposedly distinctive arenas” of society/economy/politics (contra “Sphere Sovereignty”) 23
- 24.
- 25. Other perspectives: • Feministeconomics criticizes the valuation n of labour and argues female labour is systemically undervalued • Green economics criticizes externalized and intangible status of ecosystems and wishes to bring them within the tangible measured capital asset model as natural capital • Post-autistic economics criticizes the focus on formal models at the expense of observation and values, arguing for a return to the moral philosophy within which Adam Smith originally located economics as a human science • New institutional economics tries to integrate developments in the theory of organizations, of information, and of property rights. • Institute for New Economic Thinking “to inspire the economics profession to engage the challenges of the 21st century" 25
- 26. So there aredifferent views of the root problem! • We don’t look at the history of economic thought (Historical School…) • We don’t obey God (Islamic…) • In our times, big business distorts global priorities (Galbraith) • Hey, we’ve got to take power seriously (Dependency Theory) • Look, we’re in a World System! • It’s all to do with survival (Evolutionary) • …. 26
- 27. Relational Economics Could theroot problem be that Economics does not priorotise relationships? - In the 1980s, Michael Schluter threw up his hands at World Bank’s approach to development - The R Factor (1993): Only through creation of relational markets and democracies will we find personal fulfilment and build a truly stable global order - Transforming Capitalism from Within: Relational Business Charter (2011) - After Capitalism (2012): "The problems of economics are not of a mathematical nature - and so cannot be cured by mathematics. It is the philosophy, the questions of the soul, that must be addressed" - Dr Tomas Sedlacek, Member of the Czech Republic's National Economic Council and former adviser to Vaclav Havel Is it possible to build a system that promotes economic well-being, financial stability environmental care, and social cohesion?: www.relationalthinking.net 27