This	
  can	
  be	
  used	
  as	
  a	
  concept	
  checking	
  exercise.	
  	
  
	
  
Syllabus	
  topic:	
  
	
  
	
  
A1-­‐	
  What	
  does	
  the	
  word	
  
‘God’	
  mean?	
  The	
  
diversity	
  of	
  conceptions	
  
of	
  the	
  divine.	
  	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  Questions	
  for	
  review:	
  
	
  
1. What	
  is	
  a	
  deductive	
  argument?	
  	
  
	
  
2. What	
  is	
  the	
  difference	
  between	
  an	
  argument	
  being	
  philosophically	
  sound	
  and	
  
logical?	
  	
  
	
  
3. How	
  can	
  God	
  be	
  defined?	
  
	
  
4. What	
  is	
  your	
  understanding	
  of	
  the	
  term	
  theism?	
  
	
  
5. Religious	
  philosophers	
  throughout	
  the	
  ages	
  have	
  sought	
  to	
  define	
  the	
  being	
  
known	
  as	
  God-­‐	
  what	
  attributes	
  are	
  commonly	
  associated	
  with	
  the	
  classical	
  
monotheistic	
  traditions?	
  List	
  and	
  define	
  at	
  least	
  6.	
  	
  
	
  
6. Consider	
  the	
  statement,	
  ‘Many	
  have	
  argued	
  that	
  the	
  God’s	
  omnipotence	
  is	
  
self-­‐contradictory’.	
  Do	
  you	
  agree	
  or	
  disagree	
  with	
  this	
  statement?	
  Give	
  reasons	
  
to	
  support	
  your	
  response.	
  	
  
	
  
7. Are	
  the	
  attributes	
  consistent	
  with	
  one	
  another?	
  
	
  
	
  
Syllabus	
  topic:	
  
	
  
	
  
A2-­‐	
  Atheism,	
  
agnosticism,	
  humanism,	
  
Nihilism	
  	
  
Questions	
  for	
  review:	
  
	
  
1. Define	
  the	
  terms	
  atheism,	
  agnosticism	
  and	
  humanism.	
  	
  
	
  
2. Where	
  does	
  each	
  sit	
  on	
  the	
  spectrum	
  of	
  Non-­‐Religious	
  belief?	
  
	
  
3. Which	
  of	
  the	
  positions	
  do	
  you	
  consider	
  the	
  most	
  formed?	
  (philosophically	
  
strong)	
  
	
  
4. How	
  does	
  Nihilism	
  differ	
  from	
  the	
  terms	
  discussed	
  above?	
  Outline	
  the	
  Nihilistic	
  
argument	
  and	
  its	
  position	
  on	
  meaning.	
  	
  
	
  
	
  
Syllabus	
  topic:	
  	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
A3-­‐	
  Arguments	
  for	
  and	
  
against	
  the	
  existence	
  of	
  
God	
  	
  	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
Questions	
  for	
  review:	
  
	
  
1. Outline	
  the	
  Cosmological	
  Argument	
  and	
  the	
  counter	
  criticisms	
  to	
  it.	
  	
  
	
  
2. Outline	
  the	
  Ontological	
  Argument	
  for	
  the	
  existence	
  of	
  God	
  and	
  consider	
  the	
  
view	
  that,	
  while	
  it	
  may	
  strengthen	
  a	
  believer’s	
  faith,	
  it	
  has	
  no	
  value	
  for	
  the	
  
non-­‐believer.	
  
	
  
3. 	
  Examine	
  and	
  assess	
  the	
  view	
  that	
  the	
  Ontological	
  Argument	
  for	
  the	
  existence	
  
of	
  God	
  is	
  convincing.	
  
	
  
4. Outline	
  the	
  Ontological,	
  Cosmological	
  and	
  Teleological	
  Arguments	
  for	
  the	
  
existence	
  of	
  God.	
  Choose	
  one	
  of	
  these	
  arguments	
  and	
  examine	
  criticisms	
  that	
  
have	
  been	
  made	
  of	
  its	
  form,	
  content	
  and	
  conclusions.	
  	
  
	
  
5. ‘The	
  moral	
  argument	
  does	
  not	
  prove	
  that	
  God	
  exists,	
  but	
  it	
  does	
  make	
  it	
  
probable	
  that	
  God	
  exists’	
  Discuss	
  this	
  assertion.	
  	
  
	
  
Syllabus	
  topic:	
  	
  
	
  
A4-­‐	
  Problems	
  of	
  Evil	
  and	
  
Suffering	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
Questions	
  for	
  review:	
  
	
  
1. What	
  is	
  a	
  theodicy?	
  	
  
	
  
2. Define	
  the	
  terms	
  natural	
  and	
  moral	
  evil.	
  Which	
  do	
  you	
  consider	
  the	
  ‘easier’	
  to	
  
explain?	
  
	
  
3. Outline	
  the	
  two	
  classical	
  theodicies.	
  	
  
	
  
4. ‘If	
  God	
  were	
  the	
  omnipotent,	
  wholly	
  good,	
  creator	
  of	
  all	
  things,	
  then	
  evil	
  would	
  
not	
  exist.	
  Evil	
  exists.	
  Therefore,	
  God	
  is	
  not	
  the	
  omnipotent,	
  wholly	
  good,	
  
creator	
  of	
  all	
  things’.	
  Examine	
  this	
  argument.	
  	
  
	
  
5. ‘The	
  problem	
  of	
  evil	
  can	
  never	
  be	
  satisfactorily	
  resolved’.	
  Discuss.	
  	
  
 
Syllabus	
  topic:	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
A5-­‐	
  Religious	
  language,	
  
ritual	
  and	
  symbol	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
Questions	
  for	
  review:	
  
	
  
1. Define	
  the	
  following	
  terms:	
  Realism,	
  anti-­‐realism,	
  equivocal,	
  univocal,	
  
empiricism,	
  analytic	
  and	
  synthetic.	
  	
  
2. Outline	
  the	
  verification	
  principle-­‐	
  how	
  does	
  this	
  relate	
  to	
  the	
  topic	
  of	
  religious	
  
language?	
  
3. Outline	
  the	
  falsification	
  principle-­‐	
  how	
  does	
  this	
  relate	
  to	
  the	
  topic	
  of	
  religious	
  
language?	
  	
  
4. What	
  purpose	
  does	
  analogy	
  play	
  in	
  religious	
  texts?	
  	
  
5. ‘All	
  talk	
  about	
  God	
  is	
  both	
  without	
  meaning	
  and	
  purpose’	
  Discuss.	
  	
  
6. a)	
  What	
  is	
  meant	
  by	
  ‘language	
  games’?	
  b)	
  Why	
  have	
  some	
  scholars	
  claimed	
  
that	
  religious	
  language	
  is	
  a	
  language	
  game?	
  
7. 	
  In	
  what	
  ways	
  has	
  the	
  meaningfulness	
  of	
  religious	
  language	
  been	
  challenged	
  by	
  
the	
  twentieth-­‐century	
  empiricism?	
  
8. ‘Once	
  we	
  acknowledge	
  the	
  symbolic	
  character	
  of	
  religious	
  language;	
  can	
  we	
  be	
  
sure	
  we	
  are	
  talking	
  about	
  anything	
  at	
  all’?	
  Discuss.	
  	
  
	
  
Religious	
  Experience	
  and	
  
Behaviour	
  	
  
	
  
	
  
B1-­‐	
  The	
  nature	
  and	
  value	
  
of	
  religious	
  experiences:	
  
from	
  social	
  conformity	
  
to	
  personal	
  commitment	
  	
  
	
  
	
  
Reading-­‐	
  Pages	
  46-­‐60	
  of	
  
Questions	
  for	
  review:	
  
1. Should	
  we	
  trust	
  our	
  own	
  religious	
  experiences	
  and	
  the	
  experiences	
  of	
  others?	
  	
  
2. What	
  are	
  the	
  features	
  of	
  a	
  religious	
  experience?	
  	
  
text.	
   3. Outline	
  the	
  different	
  types	
  of	
  religious	
  experiences.	
  	
  
4. How	
  might	
  religious	
  experience	
  influence	
  ideas	
  about	
  the	
  meaning	
  of	
  the	
  word	
  
‘God’?	
  
5. Describe	
  what	
  is	
  meant	
  by	
  ‘numinous’?	
  To	
  what	
  extent	
  does	
  this	
  match	
  the	
  
traditional	
  theistic	
  ideas	
  of	
  God?	
  	
  
6. Discuss	
  the	
  view	
  that	
  mystical	
  experience	
  cannot	
  give	
  factual	
  knowledge	
  about	
  
God.	
  	
  
7. Outline	
  the	
  main	
  criticisms	
  to	
  the	
  argument	
  from	
  religious	
  experience.	
  How	
  
valid	
  are	
  these	
  criticisms?	
  	
  
	
  
	
   B2-­‐	
  The	
  pragmatic	
  view	
  
of	
  faith:	
  indoctrination,	
  
illusion,	
  projection	
  	
  
	
  
	
  
Reading-­‐	
  Pages	
  65-­‐72	
  of	
  
the	
  text.	
  	
  
Questions	
  for	
  review:	
  
1. What	
  is	
  faith?	
  	
  
2. To	
  what	
  extent	
  is	
  evidence	
  needed	
  for	
  one	
  to	
  have	
  faith?	
  
3. 	
  Why	
  does	
  religion	
  exist?	
  	
  
4. Do	
  you	
  believe	
  that	
  psychology	
  and	
  sociology	
  have	
  given	
  a	
  sufficient	
  
explanation	
  of	
  religion,	
  thereby	
  rendering	
  God	
  redundant?	
  	
  
5. From	
  a	
  psychological/sociological	
  position	
  is	
  religion	
  harmful?	
  
6. Should	
  religion	
  regard	
  Jung	
  as	
  a	
  friend	
  or	
  foe?	
  	
  
7. Is	
  Jung’s	
  view	
  compatible	
  with	
  traditional	
  Christian	
  beliefs?	
  	
  
8. Does	
  religion	
  give	
  society	
  its	
  moral	
  sense,	
  or	
  does	
  society’s	
  moral	
  sense	
  create	
  
religion?	
  (Durkheim	
  says	
  the	
  latter)	
  
9. What	
  did	
  Marx	
  mean	
  by	
  describing	
  religion	
  as	
  the	
  opium	
  of	
  the	
  masses?	
  	
  
10. Do	
  you	
  consider	
  this	
  to	
  be	
  a	
  positive	
  or	
  negative	
  view	
  of	
  religion’s	
  role	
  in	
  life?	
  	
  
11. Explain	
  what	
  Freud	
  meant	
  by	
  a	
  ‘universal	
  obsessional	
  neurosis’?	
  To	
  what	
  
extent	
  is	
  this	
  an	
  adequate	
  view	
  of	
  religion?	
  	
  
	
  
	
  
	
   B3-­‐	
  Faith	
  and	
  motivation	
  
for	
  belief	
  and	
  the	
  
postmodern	
  view	
  of	
  
faith	
  
	
  
Reading-­‐	
  Pages	
  65-­‐72	
  of	
  
the	
  text.	
  
Questions	
  for	
  review:	
  	
  
	
  
1. What	
  is	
  the	
  relationship	
  of	
  reason	
  and	
  evidence	
  to	
  religious	
  faith	
  and	
  belief?	
  	
  
2. Can	
  we	
  prove	
  the	
  existence	
  of	
  a	
  higher	
  being	
  through	
  reasoning	
  or	
  experience?	
  	
  
3. What	
  motivates	
  people	
  to	
  believe	
  in	
  God?	
  
4. What	
  does	
  the	
  word	
  fideism	
  mean?	
  	
  
5. Describe	
  Pascal’s	
  wager.	
  	
  
6. What	
  does	
  Plantinga	
  mean	
  by	
  the	
  statement	
  ‘religious	
  beliefs	
  are	
  properly	
  
basic?’	
  	
  
7. Why	
  does	
  Plantinga	
  reject	
  classical	
  foundationalism?	
  	
  
8. Kierkegaard	
  states	
  that	
  ‘religion	
  is	
  a	
  form	
  of	
  life’-­‐	
  what	
  does	
  he	
  mean	
  by	
  this?	
  	
  
9. Describe	
  what	
  is	
  meant	
  by	
  the	
  term	
  postmodernism?	
  
10. What	
  is	
  the	
  postmodern	
  view	
  of	
  faith?	
  
 
	
  
	
   B4-­‐	
  The	
  human	
  
experience	
  of	
  evil:	
  moral	
  
evil,	
  natural	
  evil	
  
	
  
Reading-­‐	
  Pages	
  61-­‐64	
  of	
  
the	
  text.	
  
Questions	
  for	
  review:	
  
1. How	
  can	
  evil	
  be	
  explained?	
  
2. What	
  is	
  the	
  distinction	
  between	
  moral	
  and	
  natural	
  evil?	
  
3. Is	
  one	
  evil	
  easier	
  to	
  comprehend	
  than	
  the	
  other?	
  
4. Has	
  the	
  notion	
  of	
  evil	
  changed	
  in	
  the	
  post-­‐holocaust	
  world?	
  
5. What	
  is	
  the	
  difference	
  between	
  Augustine	
  and	
  Irenaeus?	
  	
  
	
   B5-­‐	
  Sin,	
  alienation	
  and	
  
salvation	
  	
  
Questions	
  for	
  review:	
  
1. What	
  is	
  the	
  human	
  condition	
  in	
  relation	
  to	
  sin?	
  	
  
2. Is	
  there	
  a	
  need	
  for	
  human	
  beings	
  to	
  be	
  saved?	
  
3. What	
  are	
  the	
  different	
  religious	
  traditions	
  teachings	
  on	
  sin	
  and	
  salvation?	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  

Yr 12 revision questions section 1 and 2

  • 1.
      This  can  be  used  as  a  concept  checking  exercise.       Syllabus  topic:       A1-­‐  What  does  the  word   ‘God’  mean?  The   diversity  of  conceptions   of  the  divine.              Questions  for  review:     1. What  is  a  deductive  argument?       2. What  is  the  difference  between  an  argument  being  philosophically  sound  and   logical?       3. How  can  God  be  defined?     4. What  is  your  understanding  of  the  term  theism?     5. Religious  philosophers  throughout  the  ages  have  sought  to  define  the  being   known  as  God-­‐  what  attributes  are  commonly  associated  with  the  classical   monotheistic  traditions?  List  and  define  at  least  6.       6. Consider  the  statement,  ‘Many  have  argued  that  the  God’s  omnipotence  is   self-­‐contradictory’.  Do  you  agree  or  disagree  with  this  statement?  Give  reasons   to  support  your  response.       7. Are  the  attributes  consistent  with  one  another?       Syllabus  topic:       A2-­‐  Atheism,   agnosticism,  humanism,   Nihilism     Questions  for  review:     1. Define  the  terms  atheism,  agnosticism  and  humanism.       2. Where  does  each  sit  on  the  spectrum  of  Non-­‐Religious  belief?     3. Which  of  the  positions  do  you  consider  the  most  formed?  (philosophically   strong)    
  • 2.
    4. How  does  Nihilism  differ  from  the  terms  discussed  above?  Outline  the  Nihilistic   argument  and  its  position  on  meaning.         Syllabus  topic:           A3-­‐  Arguments  for  and   against  the  existence  of   God                         Questions  for  review:     1. Outline  the  Cosmological  Argument  and  the  counter  criticisms  to  it.       2. Outline  the  Ontological  Argument  for  the  existence  of  God  and  consider  the   view  that,  while  it  may  strengthen  a  believer’s  faith,  it  has  no  value  for  the   non-­‐believer.     3.  Examine  and  assess  the  view  that  the  Ontological  Argument  for  the  existence   of  God  is  convincing.     4. Outline  the  Ontological,  Cosmological  and  Teleological  Arguments  for  the   existence  of  God.  Choose  one  of  these  arguments  and  examine  criticisms  that   have  been  made  of  its  form,  content  and  conclusions.       5. ‘The  moral  argument  does  not  prove  that  God  exists,  but  it  does  make  it   probable  that  God  exists’  Discuss  this  assertion.       Syllabus  topic:       A4-­‐  Problems  of  Evil  and   Suffering                 Questions  for  review:     1. What  is  a  theodicy?       2. Define  the  terms  natural  and  moral  evil.  Which  do  you  consider  the  ‘easier’  to   explain?     3. Outline  the  two  classical  theodicies.       4. ‘If  God  were  the  omnipotent,  wholly  good,  creator  of  all  things,  then  evil  would   not  exist.  Evil  exists.  Therefore,  God  is  not  the  omnipotent,  wholly  good,   creator  of  all  things’.  Examine  this  argument.       5. ‘The  problem  of  evil  can  never  be  satisfactorily  resolved’.  Discuss.    
  • 3.
      Syllabus  topic:                                     A5-­‐  Religious  language,   ritual  and  symbol         Questions  for  review:     1. Define  the  following  terms:  Realism,  anti-­‐realism,  equivocal,  univocal,   empiricism,  analytic  and  synthetic.     2. Outline  the  verification  principle-­‐  how  does  this  relate  to  the  topic  of  religious   language?   3. Outline  the  falsification  principle-­‐  how  does  this  relate  to  the  topic  of  religious   language?     4. What  purpose  does  analogy  play  in  religious  texts?     5. ‘All  talk  about  God  is  both  without  meaning  and  purpose’  Discuss.     6. a)  What  is  meant  by  ‘language  games’?  b)  Why  have  some  scholars  claimed   that  religious  language  is  a  language  game?   7.  In  what  ways  has  the  meaningfulness  of  religious  language  been  challenged  by   the  twentieth-­‐century  empiricism?   8. ‘Once  we  acknowledge  the  symbolic  character  of  religious  language;  can  we  be   sure  we  are  talking  about  anything  at  all’?  Discuss.       Religious  Experience  and   Behaviour         B1-­‐  The  nature  and  value   of  religious  experiences:   from  social  conformity   to  personal  commitment         Reading-­‐  Pages  46-­‐60  of   Questions  for  review:   1. Should  we  trust  our  own  religious  experiences  and  the  experiences  of  others?     2. What  are  the  features  of  a  religious  experience?    
  • 4.
    text.   3.Outline  the  different  types  of  religious  experiences.     4. How  might  religious  experience  influence  ideas  about  the  meaning  of  the  word   ‘God’?   5. Describe  what  is  meant  by  ‘numinous’?  To  what  extent  does  this  match  the   traditional  theistic  ideas  of  God?     6. Discuss  the  view  that  mystical  experience  cannot  give  factual  knowledge  about   God.     7. Outline  the  main  criticisms  to  the  argument  from  religious  experience.  How   valid  are  these  criticisms?         B2-­‐  The  pragmatic  view   of  faith:  indoctrination,   illusion,  projection         Reading-­‐  Pages  65-­‐72  of   the  text.     Questions  for  review:   1. What  is  faith?     2. To  what  extent  is  evidence  needed  for  one  to  have  faith?   3.  Why  does  religion  exist?     4. Do  you  believe  that  psychology  and  sociology  have  given  a  sufficient   explanation  of  religion,  thereby  rendering  God  redundant?     5. From  a  psychological/sociological  position  is  religion  harmful?   6. Should  religion  regard  Jung  as  a  friend  or  foe?     7. Is  Jung’s  view  compatible  with  traditional  Christian  beliefs?     8. Does  religion  give  society  its  moral  sense,  or  does  society’s  moral  sense  create  
  • 5.
    religion?  (Durkheim  says  the  latter)   9. What  did  Marx  mean  by  describing  religion  as  the  opium  of  the  masses?     10. Do  you  consider  this  to  be  a  positive  or  negative  view  of  religion’s  role  in  life?     11. Explain  what  Freud  meant  by  a  ‘universal  obsessional  neurosis’?  To  what   extent  is  this  an  adequate  view  of  religion?           B3-­‐  Faith  and  motivation   for  belief  and  the   postmodern  view  of   faith     Reading-­‐  Pages  65-­‐72  of   the  text.   Questions  for  review:       1. What  is  the  relationship  of  reason  and  evidence  to  religious  faith  and  belief?     2. Can  we  prove  the  existence  of  a  higher  being  through  reasoning  or  experience?     3. What  motivates  people  to  believe  in  God?   4. What  does  the  word  fideism  mean?     5. Describe  Pascal’s  wager.     6. What  does  Plantinga  mean  by  the  statement  ‘religious  beliefs  are  properly   basic?’     7. Why  does  Plantinga  reject  classical  foundationalism?     8. Kierkegaard  states  that  ‘religion  is  a  form  of  life’-­‐  what  does  he  mean  by  this?     9. Describe  what  is  meant  by  the  term  postmodernism?   10. What  is  the  postmodern  view  of  faith?  
  • 6.
         B4-­‐  The  human   experience  of  evil:  moral   evil,  natural  evil     Reading-­‐  Pages  61-­‐64  of   the  text.   Questions  for  review:   1. How  can  evil  be  explained?   2. What  is  the  distinction  between  moral  and  natural  evil?   3. Is  one  evil  easier  to  comprehend  than  the  other?   4. Has  the  notion  of  evil  changed  in  the  post-­‐holocaust  world?   5. What  is  the  difference  between  Augustine  and  Irenaeus?       B5-­‐  Sin,  alienation  and   salvation     Questions  for  review:   1. What  is  the  human  condition  in  relation  to  sin?     2. Is  there  a  need  for  human  beings  to  be  saved?   3. What  are  the  different  religious  traditions  teachings  on  sin  and  salvation?