Adobe

Lizzy Lawrence leads STAT’s coverage of the Food and Drug Administration. She was previously a medical devices reporter. You can reach Lizzy on Signal at lizzylaw.53.

Ed Silverman, a senior writer and Pharmalot columnist at STAT, has been covering the pharmaceutical industry for nearly three decades. He is also the author of the morning Pharmalittle newsletter and the afternoon Pharmalot newsletter.

WASHINGTON — In an unprecedented move, federal regulators published about 100 warning letters sent to pharmaceutical companies and health care providers, ordering them to stop or alter ads or other promotions the government considered misleading.

The letters went to major drugmakers like Novartis and Eli Lilly, and to telehealth firms like Hims & Hers, shortly after the Trump administration announced the advertising crackdown. But experts questioned whether the Food and Drug Administration has the resources to prosecute this aggressive campaign after laying off many of the experienced staff who would lead the effort.

Advertisement

“What happens when those 100 responses come in, and how is FDA going to prioritize its review of those?” said Joshua Oyster, a partner at Ropes & Gray. “How is the FDA going to prioritize follow-up actions, if any, in response to those responses?”

STAT+ Exclusive Story

STAT+

This article is exclusive to STAT+ subscribers

Unlock this article — plus in-depth analysis, newsletters, premium events, and news alerts.

Already have an account? Log in

Monthly

$39

Totals $468 per year

$39/month Get Started

Totals $468 per year

Starter

$30

for 3 months, then $399/year

$30 for 3 months Get Started

Then $399/year

Annual

$399

Save 15%

$399/year Get Started

Save 15%

11+ Users

Custom

Savings start at 25%!

Request A Quote Request A Quote

Savings start at 25%!

2-10 Users

$300

Annually per user

$300/year Get Started

$300 Annually per user

View All Plans

To read the rest of this story subscribe to STAT+.

Subscribe