[#18042] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — gdefty@...
Hi,
3 messages
2008/08/01
[#18052] Enumerators that know about a block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
8 messages
2008/08/01
[#18086] Suggestion to change Time#to_s format to an official standard — Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@...>
Hello people,
5 messages
2008/08/02
[#18110] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #403] (Open) Add support to Haiku — Anonymous <redmine@...>
Issue #403 has been reported by Anonymous.
7 messages
2008/08/03
[#18121] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #405] (Open) ssl.rb:31: [BUG] Bus Error — Anonymous <redmine@...>
Issue #405 has been reported by Anonymous.
14 messages
2008/08/04
[#18130] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>
> Seriously though... Array.first is a noun.
10 messages
2008/08/05
[#18145] [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal" — Otto Hilska <otto.hilska@...>
Hi,
9 messages
2008/08/06
[#18146] Re: [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal"
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2008/08/06
Hi,
[#18148] Re: [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal"
— Otto Hilska <otto.hilska@...>
2008/08/06
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#18162] Re: [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal"
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2008/08/07
Hi,
[#18174] Re: [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal"
— "Jeremy Kemper" <jeremy@...>
2008/08/07
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 1:37 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <[email protected]> wrote:
[#18180] Re: [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal"
— "Daniel Luz" <dev@...>
2008/08/07
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 15:48, Jeremy Kemper <[email protected]> wrote:
[#18164] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — gdefty@...
In message "Re: [ruby-core:18133] Re: New array
6 messages
2008/08/07
[#18237] Severe problem with garbage collection — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
Hi,
5 messages
2008/08/11
[#18247] Thread#priority(=) will be obsolete — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
4 messages
2008/08/12
[#18252] Re: result for mget [last:10 MIME/multipart] (1/1) (ruby-core ML) — "Giuseppe Bilotta" <giuseppe.bilotta@...>
>> We are planning to make Thread#priority(=) method as obsolete method
5 messages
2008/08/12
[#18255] Re: result for mget [last:10 MIME/multipart] (1/1) (ruby-core ML)
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2008/08/13
Hi,
[#18257] Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...>
Hi, all.
7 messages
2008/08/13
[#18266] Re: Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers
— Mohit SIndhwani <rcore_ml@...>
2008/08/13
HI! This answers the question that I asked a few days ago, thank you!
[#18267] Re: Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/08/13
Hi,
[#18270] Re: Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers
— Mohit SIndhwani <rcore_ml@...>
2008/08/13
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#18263] Am I right that this is wrong? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
13 messages
2008/08/13
[#18272] Re: Am I right that this is wrong?
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/08/13
Hi,
[#18275] Re: Am I right that this is wrong?
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/08/13
Hi --
[#18276] Re: Am I right that this is wrong?
— "Gregory Brown" <gregory.t.brown@...>
2008/08/13
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 3:04 PM, David A. Black <[email protected]> wrote:
[#18303] Ruby 1.8.6 yields 50%-100% performance gain when compiled at full optimization — kevin nolan <kpnolan@...>
After compiling Ruby 1.8.6 with '-O3 -mtune=K8 -march=K8' on an AMD 4800
7 messages
2008/08/14
[#18313] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 yields 50%-100% performance gain when compiled at full optimization
— "Shot (Piotr Szotkowski)" <shot@...>
2008/08/15
kevin nolan:
[#18316] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 yields 50%-100% performance gain when compiled at full optimization
— "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...>
2008/08/16
On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 03:39 +0900, Shot (Piotr Szotkowski) wrote:
[#18314] [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows — Anonymous <redmine@...>
Bug #449: File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows
8 messages
2008/08/15
[#18315] Re: [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2008/08/16
Hi,
[#18325] Re: [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows
— "John Lam (IRONRUBY)" <jflam@...>
2008/08/18
I submitted that original bug (first time using redmine :)). Here's some mo=
[#18326] Re: [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/08/18
Hi,
[#18327] Re: [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows
— "John Lam (IRONRUBY)" <jflam@...>
2008/08/18
Not at all - it means we're now free to do the right thing :)
[#18328] Re: [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows
— "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...>
2008/08/18
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:45 PM, John Lam (IRONRUBY)
[#18319] NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>
Core,
14 messages
2008/08/16
[#18321] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() --
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/08/18
Hi,
[#18322] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() --
— Trans <transfire@...>
2008/08/18
[#18323] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() --
— "michael greenly" <mgreenly@...>
2008/08/18
Are you sure you didn't mean to use "~/oracle/bin"
[#18332] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() --
— "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>
2008/08/19
Trans wrote:
[#18349] [Feature:1.9] autoload with a block — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
Hi,
2 messages
2008/08/20
[#18354] Retrieving bytecode for method — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>
Hi,
4 messages
2008/08/20
[#18381] [Bug #496] DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>
Bug #496: DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow
11 messages
2008/08/25
[#18387] [Bug:1.9] rubygems fails to cache spec file — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...>
Hi,
6 messages
2008/08/26
[#18396] problems with test_io.rb on cygwin — Martin Duerst <duerst@...>
I have run into problems with test_io.rb on cygwin.
6 messages
2008/08/27
[#18397] Re: problems with test_io.rb on cygwin
— "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>
2008/08/27
Hello,
[#18405] [Bug #512] String#% behavior — Federico Builes <redmine@...>
Bug #512: String#% behavior
7 messages
2008/08/27
[#18414] DoS vulnerability in REXML — "Shugo Maeda" <shugo@...>
Hi,
5 messages
2008/08/28
[#18424] [Bug #528] Several ruby-mode.el improvements — Nathan Weizenbaum <redmine@...>
Bug #528: Several ruby-mode.el improvements
8 messages
2008/08/31
[ruby-core:18259] Re: Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers
From:
"M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...>
Date:
2008-08-13 04:38:06 UTC
List:
ruby-core #18259
On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 13:10 +0900, Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) wrote: > == Support plan of Ruby 1.9.1 > Supported: > * Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 on IA32 1. You might want to change that to "Lenny" -- I believe it will be released/stable before Ruby 1.9.1 is. 2. Most of the Linux distros have Ruby maintainers/herds already, so I don't think you need to worry about supporting them. And Gentoo builds from source, so that one is more or less automatic once you release a source tarball. But I think it's a serious mistake not to support Fedora. At the very least, you should seriously consider building RPMs as well as .debs. > These 7 platforms are now "perhaps", they can be "best effort" if a > maintainer appears. > * x64 GNU/Linux I do builds from source on my Gentoo x86_64 all the time with no trouble at all. And, as I mentioned above, chances are pretty good it will be in Gentoo for all of the platforms where it compiles, or at least, it will be in the Ruby overlay. They've got jRuby and a rather ancient Rubinius too. > The tasks which a maintainer should do are: > * Subscribe [email protected] list. > * Also, subscribe [email protected] if you can read Japanese. > * Port thread_{win32,pathread}.c to the platform if it has no > implementation of pthread. Is there a Linux distro that *doesn't* have pthread? > * Resolve other build errors and platform specific problems. As noted above, I do this all the time on Gentoo x86_64. I don't have any plans to "downgrade" to a 32-bit box anytime soon, although if you're *real nice*, I might test it on my One Laptop Per Child XO. :) > * Constantly build and test the trunk version of Ruby on it. Define "constantly" ... is once a week enough? > * Effort to succeed in "make test-all" by 20 Dec. > > Please send a mail to [email protected] list and run for a > maintainer if you can. Well ... between me and the Gentoo Ruby herd, I think we can help out. See https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203706 for the status of Ruby 1.9.x on Gentoo. > > Regards, > -- M. Edward (Ed) Borasky ruby-perspectives.blogspot.com "A mathematician is a machine for turning coffee into theorems." -- Alfrテゥd Rテゥnyi via Paul Erdナ壮