ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#23090] [Bug #1343] lib/rdoc/markup/simple_markup/ is empty — Hal Brodigan <redmine@...>

Bug #1343: lib/rdoc/markup/simple_markup/ is empty

2 messages 2009/04/01
[#24511] [Bug #1343](Closed) lib/rdoc/markup/simple_markup/ is empty — Eric Hodel <redmine@...> 2009/07/22

Issue #1343 has been updated by Eric Hodel.

[#23094] [Bug #1344] sleep(0) sleeps forever on Mac OSX 10.4 — "Sean O'Halpin" <redmine@...>

Bug #1344: sleep(0) sleeps forever on Mac OSX 10.4

3 messages 2009/04/01
[#24373] [Bug #1344] sleep(0) sleeps forever on Mac OSX 10.4 — Akira Tanaka <redmine@...> 2009/07/16

Issue #1344 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.
[#23100] Re: [Bug #1344] sleep(0) sleeps forever on Mac OSX 10.4 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/04/01

Hi,

[#23095] [Bug #1345] Ruby 1.9.1-p0 is incomatible with linux distributions that do not have NPTL thearding enabled. — Ville Mattila <redmine@...>

Bug #1345: Ruby 1.9.1-p0 is incomatible with linux distributions that do not have NPTL thearding enabled.

2 messages 2009/04/01
[#24375] [Bug #1345](Rejected) Ruby 1.9.1-p0 is incomatible with linux distributions that do not have NPTL thearding enabled. — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/07/16

Issue #1345 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

[#23096] [Bug #1346] Linkage errors compiling C++ extension with VC8 — Miguel Muñoz <redmine@...>

Bug #1346: Linkage errors compiling C++ extension with VC8

3 messages 2009/04/01
[#24374] [Bug #1346] Linkage errors compiling C++ extension with VC8 — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/07/16

Issue #1346 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.
[#24411] [Bug #1346](Closed) Linkage errors compiling C++ extension with VC8 — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/07/17

Issue #1346 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#23098] [Bug #1347] example in getoptlong.rb uses rdoc/usage which no longer exists — James Ponder <redmine@...>

Bug #1347: example in getoptlong.rb uses rdoc/usage which no longer exists

3 messages 2009/04/01
[#23106] [Bug #1347] example in getoptlong.rb uses rdoc/usage which no longer exists — Eric Hodel <redmine@...> 2009/04/02

Issue #1347 has been updated by Eric Hodel.
[#23107] [Bug #1347](Closed) example in getoptlong.rb uses rdoc/usage which no longer exists — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/04/02

Issue #1347 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23104] [Bug #1348] Crash in library under Ruby 1.9.1 — Nate Wiger <redmine@...>

Bug #1348: Crash in library under Ruby 1.9.1

3 messages 2009/04/02
[#23105] Re: [Bug #1348] Crash in library under Ruby 1.9.1 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/04/02

Hi,
[#23109] [Bug #1348] Crash in library under Ruby 1.9.1 — Nate Wiger <redmine@...> 2009/04/02

Issue #1348 has been updated by Nate Wiger.

[#23110] File.executable? always returns false on Windows machine — Shri Borde <Shri.Borde@...>

On my machine, File.executable? is always returning false. I have tried 1.8=

1 message 2009/04/02

[#23111] Re: [ruby-cvs:30347] Ruby:r23129 (trunk): * lib/irb/completion.rb (IRB::InputCompletor::Operators): Add — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>

Hi Phil,

1 message 2009/04/03

[#23112] [Feature #1349] Net::SMTP open_message and send_message always require from_addr, *to_addrs — Steve Jorgensen <redmine@...>

Feature #1349: Net::SMTP open_message and send_message always require from_addr, *to_addrs

2 messages 2009/04/03
[#29148] [Feature #1349](Rejected) Net::SMTP open_message and send_message always require from_addr, *to_addrs — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/03/30

Issue #1349 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23113] [Bug #1350] gem method with version dependency fails — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #1350: gem method with version dependency fails

3 messages 2009/04/03
[#23124] [Bug #1350] gem method with version dependency fails — Simon Haydon <redmine@...> 2009/04/05

Issue #1350 has been updated by Simon Haydon.
[#23125] [Bug #1350] gem method with version dependency fails — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2009/04/05

Issue #1350 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[#23115] [Bug #1351] Net::HTTP - set_form_data no longer allows symbols as keys. — "bryan o'connor" <redmine@...>

Bug #1351: Net::HTTP - set_form_data no longer allows symbols as keys.

2 messages 2009/04/04
[#29507] [Bug #1351](Closed) Net::HTTP - set_form_data no longer allows symbols as keys. — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/14

Issue #1351 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23117] [Feature #1352] Patch: Added missing TRACK method to lib/net/http.rb — Darshan Patil <redmine@...>

Feature #1352: Patch: Added missing TRACK method to lib/net/http.rb

1 message 2009/04/04

[#23119] internal_encoding() and write() — James Gray <james@...>

I'm I correct that internal_encoding isn't needed at all when writing =20=

3 messages 2009/04/04
[#23121] Re: internal_encoding() and write() — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2009/04/05

Hi,
[#23122] Re: internal_encoding() and write() — James Gray <james@...> 2009/04/05

On Apr 5, 2009, at 5:51 AM, NARUSE, Yui wrote:

[#23127] [Bug #1354] stacktrace on ppc — Jeroen van Meeuwen <redmine@...>

Bug #1354: stacktrace on ppc

2 messages 2009/04/06
[#26996] [Bug #1354](Closed) stacktrace on ppc — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2009/12/02

Issue #1354 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#23130] [Bug #1355] -O3 deemed uncessary — Ollivier Robert <redmine@...>

Bug #1355: -O3 deemed uncessary

4 messages 2009/04/06
[#23139] [Bug #1355](Closed) -O3 deemed uncessary — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/04/06

Issue #1355 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#23133] [Bug #1355] -O3 deemed uncessary — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/04/06

Issue #1355 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#23135] [Bug #1355] -O3 deemed uncessary — Ollivier Robert <redmine@...> 2009/04/06

Issue #1355 has been updated by Ollivier Robert.

[#23131] [Bug #1356] Be consistent in function declarations — Ollivier Robert <redmine@...>

Bug #1356: Be consistent in function declarations

3 messages 2009/04/06
[#24370] [Bug #1356](Third Party's Issue) Be consistent in function declarations — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/07/16

Issue #1356 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.
[#24372] [Bug #1356] Be consistent in function declarations — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/07/16

Issue #1356 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23132] [Bug #1357] Fixing variables into specific CPU registers deemed overrated & may disturb compilers' optimizers — Ollivier Robert <redmine@...>

Bug #1357: Fixing variables into specific CPU registers deemed overrated & may disturb compilers' optimizers

5 messages 2009/04/06
[#23136] Re: [Bug #1357] Fixing variables into specific CPU registers deemed overrated & may disturb compilers' optimizers — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/04/06

Hi,
[#23137] [Bug #1357] Fixing variables into specific CPU registers deemed overrated & may disturb compilers' optimizers — Ollivier Robert <redmine@...> 2009/04/06

Issue #1357 has been updated by Ollivier Robert.
[#23146] Re: [Bug #1357] Fixing variables into specific CPU registers deemed overrated & may disturb compilers' optimizers — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/04/07

Hi,
[#26345] [Bug #1357](Closed) Fixing variables into specific CPU registers deemed overrated & may disturb compilers' optimizers — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2009/10/27

Issue #1357 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#23140] [Feature #1358] net/http has no TRACK method - here's a patch — Bruno Antunes <redmine@...>

Feature #1358: net/http has no TRACK method - here's a patch

4 messages 2009/04/06
[#23141] [Feature #1358] net/http has no TRACK method - here's a patch — Dave B <redmine@...> 2009/04/06

Issue #1358 has been updated by Dave B.
[#23142] [Feature #1358] net/http has no TRACK method - here's a patch — Bruno Antunes <redmine@...> 2009/04/06

Issue #1358 has been updated by Bruno Antunes.
[#28829] [Feature #1358](Rejected) net/http has no TRACK method - here's a patch — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/03/20

Issue #1358 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#23144] Running ruby1.9 bytecode — James Coglan <jcoglan@...>

Originally posted to Ruby Talk, trying my luck here to see if it gets a

2 messages 2009/04/06
[#23147] Re: Running ruby1.9 bytecode — Daniel Bovensiepen <daniel@...> 2009/04/07

Hi James,

[#23148] [Bug #1361] Configure fails to recognize the absence of bison — Wesha the Leopard <redmine@...>

Bug #1361: Configure fails to recognize the absence of bison

2 messages 2009/04/07
[#23149] Re: [Bug #1361] Configure fails to recognize the absence of bison — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/04/08

Hi,

[#23150] 1.8.8 warning with Array("string") — Eric Hodel <[email protected]>

I've been using Array(obj) to ensure the obj is an Array. With 1.8.8

3 messages 2009/04/08
[#23151] Re: 1.8.8 warning with Array("string") — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/04/08

Excerpts from drbrain's message of Wed Apr 08 07:10:36 +0300 2009:
[#23163] Re: 1.8.8 warning with Array("string") — James Gray <james@...> 2009/04/08

On Apr 8, 2009, at 12:14 AM, Eero Saynatkari wrote:

[#23152] JRuby on Rails on Google App Engine — Ola Bini <ola.bini@...>

Hi friends,

2 messages 2009/04/08
[#23153] Re: JRuby on Rails on Google App Engine — Jeremy McAnally <jeremymcanally@...> 2009/04/08

That's awesome. I'm definitely giving this a second look now...

[#23154] [Bug #1363] Wrong value for Hash of NaN — Heesob Park <redmine@...>

Bug #1363: Wrong value for Hash of NaN

10 messages 2009/04/08
[#23423] Re: [Bug #1363] Wrong value for Hash of NaN — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/05/11

Hi,
[#23425] Re: [Bug #1363] Wrong value for Hash of NaN — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/11

Hi,
[#23427] Re: [Bug #1363] Wrong value for Hash of NaN — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/05/11

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#23434] Re: [Bug #1363] Wrong value for Hash of NaN — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/12

Hi,
[#23437] Re: [Bug #1363] Wrong value for Hash of NaN — Martin DeMello <martindemello@...> 2009/05/12

On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <[email protected]> w=
[#23438] Re: [Bug #1363] Wrong value for Hash of NaN — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2009/05/12

Martin DeMello wrote:
[#23441] Re: [Bug #1363] Wrong value for Hash of NaN — Martin DeMello <martindemello@...> 2009/05/13

On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:58 AM, Joel VanderWerf
[#23426] [Bug #1363] Wrong value for Hash of NaN — Heesob Park <redmine@...> 2009/05/11

Issue #1363 has been updated by Heesob Park.
[#29508] [Bug #1363](Rejected) Wrong value for Hash of NaN — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/14

Issue #1363 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23155] ENC_CODERANGE_7BIT is a bad optimisation — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

In my opinion, ENC_CODERANGE_7BIT is a bad optimisation. Unless it is

1 message 2009/04/08

[#23158] Inconsistent behaviour of String#strip — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

The following behaviour of String#strip seems inconsistent to me:

1 message 2009/04/08

[#23159] Problem with ri after updating — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

Anybody else having this problem with ri? This happened after I overwrote my

2 messages 2009/04/08
[#23167] Re: Problem with ri after updating — Eric Hodel <[email protected]> 2009/04/08

On Apr 8, 2009, at 04:19, Brian Candler wrote:

[#23160] [Bug #1364] /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/text.rb:375: [BUG] Segmentation fault — Kevin Murray <redmine@...>

Bug #1364: /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/text.rb:375: [BUG] Segmentation fault

2 messages 2009/04/08
[#24369] [Bug #1364](Feedback) /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/text.rb:375: [BUG] Segmentation fault — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/07/16

Issue #1364 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

[#23164] [Bug #1366] Pathname#relative_path_from should handle the scenario where the argument uses a different case for the Windows drive letter — Shri Borde <redmine@...>

Bug #1366: Pathname#relative_path_from should handle the scenario where the argument uses a different case for the Windows drive letter

2 messages 2009/04/08
[#23172] [Bug #1366](Assigned) Pathname#relative_path_from should handle the scenario where the argument uses a different case for the Windows drive letter — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/04/09

Issue #1366 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23165] FW: Case of drive letter — Shri Borde <Shri.Borde@...>

I have opened http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/1366 to track this i=

1 message 2009/04/08

[#23168] [Bug #1367] flatten(0) is not consistent with flatten(), flatten(1), etc. — Paul Lewis <redmine@...>

Bug #1367: flatten(0) is not consistent with flatten(), flatten(1), etc.

6 messages 2009/04/08
[#23213] [Bug #1367](Closed) flatten(0) is not consistent with flatten(), flatten(1), etc. — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2009/04/15

Issue #1367 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#23207] Re: [Bug #1367] flatten(0) is not consistent with flatten(), flatten(1), etc. — Rafael Crivellari Saliba Schouery <schouery@...> 2009/04/14

I did take a look in the problem:
[#23211] [Bug #1367] flatten(0) is not consistent with flatten(), flatten(1), etc. — Paul Lewis <redmine@...> 2009/04/15

Issue #1367 has been updated by Paul Lewis.
[#23214] Re: [Bug #1367] flatten(0) is not consistent with flatten(), flatten(1), etc. — Rafael Crivellari Saliba Schouery <schouery@...> 2009/04/15

I thought about that too.
[#23215] Re: [Bug #1367] flatten(0) is not consistent with flatten(), flatten(1), etc. — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2009/04/15

Hi,

[#23169] [Bug #1368] ruby19 trunk (svn revision 23160) build fails compiling dl ext on win32 — B Kelly <redmine@...>

Bug #1368: ruby19 trunk (svn revision 23160) build fails compiling dl ext on win32

3 messages 2009/04/09
[#26197] [Bug #1368](Closed) ruby19 trunk (svn revision 23160) build fails compiling dl ext on win32 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/10/21

Issue #1368 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#23580] [Bug #1368] ruby19 trunk (svn revision 23160) build fails compiling dl ext on win32 — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/05/27

Issue #1368 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23170] [Bug #1369] Typo in NKF rdoc — Luis Parravicini <redmine@...>

Bug #1369: Typo in NKF rdoc

2 messages 2009/04/09
[#23171] [Bug #1369](Closed) Typo in NKF rdoc — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/04/09

Issue #1369 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23173] [Bug #1370] in `glob': invalid byte sequence in UTF-8 — Heesob Park <redmine@...>

Bug #1370: in `glob': invalid byte sequence in UTF-8

2 messages 2009/04/09
[#24403] [Bug #1370](Closed) in `glob': invalid byte sequence in UTF-8 — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2009/07/17

Issue #1370 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#23174] [Feature #1371] FTPS Implicit — Daniel Parker <redmine@...>

Feature #1371: FTPS Implicit

6 messages 2009/04/09
[#26058] [Feature #1371](Rejected) FTPS Implicit — Shugo Maeda <redmine@...> 2009/10/12

Issue #1371 has been updated by Shugo Maeda.
[#26059] [Feature #1371] FTPS Implicit — Daniel Parker <redmine@...> 2009/10/12

Issue #1371 has been updated by Daniel Parker.
[#26064] Re: [Feature #1371] FTPS Implicit — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2009/10/13

Hi,
[#27598] [Feature #1371] FTPS Implicit — Daniel Parker <redmine@...> 2010/01/14

Issue #1371 has been updated by Daniel Parker.
[#27989] [Feature #1371] FTPS Implicit — Shugo Maeda <redmine@...> 2010/02/01

Issue #1371 has been updated by Shugo Maeda.

[#23175] [Bug #1372] Kernel.catch not accepting &block — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Bug #1372: Kernel.catch not accepting &block

2 messages 2009/04/09
[#23177] Re: [Bug #1372] Kernel.catch not accepting &block — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2009/04/10

Suraj Kurapati wrote::

[#23176] [Bug #1373] Typo in Time rdoc — Luis Parravicini <redmine@...>

Bug #1373: Typo in Time rdoc

2 messages 2009/04/09
[#23178] [Bug #1373](Closed) Typo in Time rdoc — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/04/10

Issue #1373 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23183] String Escapes and Encoding — James Gray <james@...>

I'm trying to document the affects of escapes like \x and \u on String

3 messages 2009/04/11
[#23184] Re: String Escapes and Encoding — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2009/04/12

Hi,
[#23185] Re: String Escapes and Encoding — James Gray <james@...> 2009/04/12

On Apr 12, 2009, at 12:50 AM, NARUSE, Yui wrote:

[#23190] [Bug #1376] inline symbols/fixnums in a case expression do not honor an overwritten #=== method — Laurent Sansonetti <redmine@...>

Bug #1376: inline symbols/fixnums in a case expression do not honor an overwritten #=== method

4 messages 2009/04/13
[#23192] [Bug #1376] inline symbols/fixnums in a case expression do not honor an overwritten #=== method — Heesob Park <redmine@...> 2009/04/13

Issue #1376 has been updated by Heesob Park.
[#24316] [Bug #1376](Closed) inline symbols/fixnums in a case expression do not honor an overwritten #=== method — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/07/13

Issue #1376 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.
[#24878] [Bug #1376](Closed) inline symbols/fixnums in a case expression do not honor an overwritten #=== method — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2009/08/12

Issue #1376 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.

[#23193] Regexp Encoding — James Gray <james@...>

I'm trying to document the Encoding Regexp objects receive for the =20

5 messages 2009/04/13
[#23196] Re: Regexp Encoding — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2009/04/13

[#23197] Re: Regexp Encoding — James Gray <james@...> 2009/04/14

On Apr 13, 2009, at 6:12 PM, NARUSE, Yui wrote:
[#23204] Re: Regexp Encoding — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2009/04/14

James Gray wrote:
[#23205] Re: Regexp Encoding — James Gray <james@...> 2009/04/14

On Apr 14, 2009, at 10:12 AM, NARUSE, Yui wrote:

[#23194] [Feature #1377] Please provide constant File::NOATIME — Johan Walles <redmine@...>

Feature #1377: Please provide constant File::NOATIME

5 messages 2009/04/13
[#23195] [Feature #1377] Please provide constant File::NOATIME — Johan Walles <redmine@...> 2009/04/13

Issue #1377 has been updated by Johan Walles.
[#23418] [Feature #1377] Please provide constant File::NOATIME — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <redmine@...> 2009/05/10

Issue #1377 has been updated by Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA.
[#23419] Re: [Feature #1377] Please provide constant File::NOATIME — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/10

Hi,
[#23424] [Feature #1377](Closed) Please provide constant File::NOATIME — Anonymous <redmine@...> 2009/05/11

Issue #1377 has been updated by Anonymous.

[#23208] [Bug #1381] Confusing Encoding Error — James Gray <redmine@...>

Bug #1381: Confusing Encoding Error

3 messages 2009/04/14
[#23212] [Bug #1381] Confusing Encoding Error — Tatsuhiro UJIHISA <redmine@...> 2009/04/15

Issue #1381 has been updated by Tatsuhiro UJIHISA.
[#24430] [Bug #1381](Closed) Confusing Encoding Error — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2009/07/18

Issue #1381 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#23210] [Bug #1382] inline functions ought to be static — Ollivier Robert <redmine@...>

Bug #1382: inline functions ought to be static

5 messages 2009/04/15
[#23472] [Bug #1382](Closed) inline functions ought to be static — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/16

Issue #1382 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#23474] Re: [Bug #1382] inline functions ought to be static — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/05/16

Excerpts from Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca's message of Wed Apr 15 12:13:39 +0300 2009:
[#23475] [Bug #1382] inline functions ought to be static — Akira Tanaka <redmine@...> 2009/05/16

Issue #1382 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.
[#23481] Re: [Bug #1382] inline functions ought to be static — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/05/16

Hi,

[#23219] [Bug #1383] ruby segfaults on redhat el3 amd64 — Ittay Dror <redmine@...>

Bug #1383: ruby segfaults on redhat el3 amd64

1 message 2009/04/16

[#23225] [Bug #1385] Wonderful undocumented feature in Ruby 1.8.7 & 1.9 — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1385: Wonderful undocumented feature in Ruby 1.8.7 & 1.9

2 messages 2009/04/17
[#23226] Re: [Bug #1385] Wonderful undocumented feature in Ruby 1.8.7 & 1.9 — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2009/04/17

Marc-Andre Lafortune wrote:

[#23228] [Bug #1385] Wonderful undocumented feature in Ruby 1.8.7 & 1.9 — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Issue #1385 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

1 message 2009/04/17

[#23229] [Bug #1386] Spurious class "ARGF.class" in ObjectSpace — Brian Candler <redmine@...>

Bug #1386: Spurious class "ARGF.class" in ObjectSpace

1 message 2009/04/17

[#23230] [Bug #1386] Spurious class "ARGF.class" in ObjectSpace — Brian Candler <redmine@...>

Issue #1386 has been updated by Brian Candler.

1 message 2009/04/17

[#23231] What do you think about changing the return value of Kernel#require and Kernel#load to the source encoding of the required file? — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Wolfgang_N=E1dasi-Donner?= <ed.odanow@...>

Dear Ruby developers and users!

8 messages 2009/04/17
[#23233] Re: What do you think about changing the return value of Kernel#require and Kernel#load to the source encoding of the required file? — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2009/04/17

Wolfgang N叩dasi-Donner wrote:
[#23234] Re: What do you think about changing the return value of Kernel#require and Kernel#load to the source encoding of the required file? — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2009/04/17

Michael Neumann schrieb:
[#23239] Re: What do you think about changing the return value of Kernel#require and Kernel#load to the source encoding of the required file? — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2009/04/17

Wolfgang N叩dasi-Donner schrieb:
[#23244] Re: What do you think about changing the return value of Kernel#require and Kernel#load to the source encoding of the required file? — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2009/04/17

Wolfgang N叩dasi-Donner wrote:
[#23245] Re: What do you think about changing the return value of Kernel#require and Kernel#load to the source encoding of the required file? — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2009/04/17

Michael Neumann schrieb:
[#23347] Re: What do you think about changing the return value of Kernel#require and Kernel#load to the source encoding of the required file? — Rafael Crivellari Saliba Schouery <schouery@...> 2009/05/02

I my opinion, doing that you're giving more functionality to this method
[#23349] Re: What do you think about changing the return value of Kernel#require and Kernel#load to the source encoding of the required file? — Florian Gilcher <flo@...> 2009/05/02

I'm actually in favour of that.

[#23236] [Bug #1387] first(0) and last(0) behavior — Loqi Tamaroon <redmine@...>

Bug #1387: first(0) and last(0) behavior

1 message 2009/04/17

[#23237] [Bug #1387] first(0) and last(0) behavior — Dave B <redmine@...>

Issue #1387 has been updated by Dave B.

2 messages 2009/04/17
[#23238] Re: [Bug #1387] first(0) and last(0) behavior — Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@...> 2009/04/17

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Dave B <[email protected]> wrote:

[#23241] [Bug #1388] cygwin-1.7, gcc4-4.3, and ruby-1.9. make btest #236 test_io.rb Segmentation fault — neomjp neomjp <redmine@...>

Bug #1388: cygwin-1.7, gcc4-4.3, and ruby-1.9. make btest #236 test_io.rb Segmentation fault

2 messages 2009/04/17
[#23255] Re: [Bug #1388] cygwin-1.7, gcc4-4.3, and ruby-1.9. make btest #236 test_io.rb Segmentation fault — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/04/19

Hi,

[#23242] [Bug #1389] Use of ":" as synonym for "do" and "then" — Rick Lloyd <redmine@...>

Bug #1389: Use of ":" as synonym for "do" and "then"

1 message 2009/04/17

[#23243] [Bug #1389] Use of ":" as synonym for "do" and "then" — Jeremy Kemper <redmine@...>

Issue #1389 has been updated by Jeremy Kemper.

1 message 2009/04/17

[#23246] [Bug #1389](Rejected) Use of ":" as synonym for "do" and "then" — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...>

Issue #1389 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

1 message 2009/04/18

[#23247] [Bug #1389] Use of ":" as synonym for "do" and "then" — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...>

Issue #1389 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

1 message 2009/04/18

[#23248] [Bug #1386](Rejected) Spurious class "ARGF.class" in ObjectSpace — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...>

Issue #1386 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

1 message 2009/04/18

[#23250] [Bug #1390] yaml converts DateTime to Time when dumping and parsing again — dohFee1u dohFee1u <redmine@...>

Bug #1390: yaml converts DateTime to Time when dumping and parsing again

1 message 2009/04/18

[#23251] [Bug #1391] yaml cannot parse dates which are very far in future — dohFee1u dohFee1u <redmine@...>

Bug #1391: yaml cannot parse dates which are very far in future

1 message 2009/04/18

[#23252] [Bug #1392] Object#extend leaks memory on Ruby 1.9.1 — Muhammad Ali <redmine@...>

Bug #1392: Object#extend leaks memory on Ruby 1.9.1

4 messages 2009/04/18
[#23258] Re: [Bug #1392] Object#extend leaks memory on Ruby 1.9.1 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/04/20

Hi,
[#23262] Re: [Bug #1392] Object#extend leaks memory on Ruby 1.9.1 — "Muhammad A. Ali" <oldmoe@...> 2009/04/20

Hi,
[#23263] Re: [Bug #1392] Object#extend leaks memory on Ruby 1.9.1 — "Muhammad A. Ali" <oldmoe@...> 2009/04/20

On second thoughts, I still believe there is a leak. I modified the test as

[#23256] File.expand_path tainting its return value — Tom Epperly <tepperly@...>

In the context of making a Ruby cgi script that generates a PDF using the

3 messages 2009/04/19
[#23257] Re: File.expand_path tainting its return value — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/04/20

Hi,
[#23261] Re: File.expand_path tainting its return value — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2009/04/20

Just to note that __FILE__ is not tainted in ruby 1.8.6 (although it is

[#23266] minimum ruby 1.9.1-p0 to be embedded? — Rolando Abarca <funkaster@...>

I'm trying to embed ruby 1.9 in my application. I'm using ruby 1.9.1-

1 message 2009/04/20

[#23267] StringIO: RubySpec violation — Hongli Lai <[email protected]>

I ran RubySpec against the 1.8.6-p368 release. It seems that

5 messages 2009/04/20
[#23268] Re: StringIO: RubySpec violation — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/04/20

Hongli Lai wrote:
[#23269] Re: StringIO: RubySpec violation — Hongli Lai <[email protected]> 2009/04/20

Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#23270] Re: StringIO: RubySpec violation — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/04/20

Hongli Lai wrote:
[#23271] Re: StringIO: RubySpec violation — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/04/20

Urabe Shyouhei wrote:

[#23272] [Bug #1393] Multiple assignment does not call to_a but to_ary — Vincent Isambart <redmine@...>

Bug #1393: Multiple assignment does not call to_a but to_ary

1 message 2009/04/21

[#23274] [Bug #1394] version.h is not being installed by "make install" — Graham Agnew <redmine@...>

Bug #1394: version.h is not being installed by "make install"

1 message 2009/04/21

[#23275] [Bug #1394](Rejected) version.h is not being installed by "make install" — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...>

Issue #1394 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

1 message 2009/04/21

[#23278] [Feature #1395] Steppable Kernel::eval — "G. Gibson" <redmine@...>

Feature #1395: Steppable Kernel::eval

2 messages 2009/04/22
[#23280] Re: [Feature #1395] Steppable Kernel::eval — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/04/22

Hi,

[#23282] [Bug #1396] Kernel.sleep fails with some Float values — Paul Lambert <redmine@...>

Bug #1396: Kernel.sleep fails with some Float values

1 message 2009/04/22

[#23283] [Bug #1396] Kernel.sleep fails with some Float values — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <redmine@...>

Issue #1396 has been updated by Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA.

1 message 2009/04/22

[#23284] [Bug #1397] to_f of rational — Karl Brodowsky <redmine@...>

Bug #1397: to_f of rational

1 message 2009/04/22

[#23285] [Bug #1397] to_f of rational — Karl Brodowsky <redmine@...>

Issue #1397 has been updated by Karl Brodowsky.

1 message 2009/04/22

[#23286] [Bug #1397] to_f of rational — Karl Brodowsky <redmine@...>

Issue #1397 has been updated by Karl Brodowsky.

1 message 2009/04/22

[#23287] [Bug #1396](Closed) Kernel.sleep fails with some Float values — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...>

Issue #1396 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

1 message 2009/04/22

[#23288] [Bug #1398] Segmentation fault is raised when the sdtin is redirected to Readline#readline — Koichiro Ohba <redmine@...>

Bug #1398: Segmentation fault is raised when the sdtin is redirected to Readline#readline

1 message 2009/04/22

[#23289] [Bug #1399] Segmentation fault is raised when you use a postgres gem — Marcel Keil <redmine@...>

Bug #1399: Segmentation fault is raised when you use a postgres gem

3 messages 2009/04/23
[#23290] Re: [Bug #1399] Segmentation fault is raised when you use a postgres gem — Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@...> 2009/04/23

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Marcel Keil <[email protected]> wrote:
[#23291] Re: [Bug #1399] Segmentation fault is raised when you use a postgres gem — KUBO Takehiro <kubo@...> 2009/04/23

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Dirkjan Bussink <[email protected]> wrote:

[#23292] [Feature #1400] Please add a method to enumerate fields in OpenStruct — Tomas Pospisek <redmine@...>

Feature #1400: Please add a method to enumerate fields in OpenStruct

2 messages 2009/04/23
[#23294] Re: [Feature #1400] Please add a method to enumerate fields in OpenStruct — James Gray <james@...> 2009/04/23

On Apr 23, 2009, at 8:34 AM, Tomas Pospisek wrote:

[#23293] [Feature #1400] Please add a method to enumerate fields in OpenStruct — Tomas Pospisek <redmine@...>

Issue #1400 has been updated by Tomas Pospisek.

1 message 2009/04/23

[#23296] Re: — Michael Fellinger <m.fellinger@...>

Hello,

3 messages 2009/04/23
[#23299] Re: Difference in constant lookup between 1.8 and 1.9 — Michael Fellinger <m.fellinger@...> 2009/04/23

On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:54:09 +0900
[#23300] Re: — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/04/23

Excerpts from Michael Fellinger's message of Thu Apr 23 17:54:09 +0300 2009:

[#23297] Ruby Oniguruma question — Ralf Junker <ralfjunker@...>

I see that the Ruby source code contains modified and more recent version of the Oniguruma regular expression library.

5 messages 2009/04/23
[#23301] Re: Ruby Oniguruma question — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/04/23

Hi,
[#23304] Re: Ruby Oniguruma question — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2009/04/24

Hello,
[#23327] Re: Ruby Oniguruma question — Ralf Junker <ralfjunker@...> 2009/04/28

At 03:53 24.04.2009, U.Nakamura wrote:
[#23328] Re: Ruby Oniguruma question — Ralf Junker <ralfjunker@...> 2009/04/28

At 03:53 24.04.2009, U.Nakamura wrote:

[#23302] [Bug #1401] ftools is not in the 1.9.1 — Brian Payne <redmine@...>

Bug #1401: ftools is not in the 1.9.1

3 messages 2009/04/24
[#23960] [Bug #1401] ftools is not in the 1.9.1 — Kristian Mandrup <redmine@...> 2009/06/21

Issue #1401 has been updated by Kristian Mandrup.
[#23303] [Bug #1401](Rejected) ftools is not in the 1.9.1 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/04/24

Issue #1401 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23305] [Bug #1403] Process.daemon should do a double fork to avoid problems with controlling terminals — Gary Wright <redmine@...>

Bug #1403: Process.daemon should do a double fork to avoid problems with controlling terminals

7 messages 2009/04/24
[#23306] Re: [Bug #1403] Process.daemon should do a double fork to avoid problems with controlling terminals — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/04/24

Hi,
[#23307] Re: [Bug #1403] Process.daemon should do a double fork to avoid problems with controlling terminals — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2009/04/25

[#23308] Re: [Bug #1403] Process.daemon should do a double fork to avoid problems with controlling terminals — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/04/25

Hi,
[#23309] Re: [Bug #1403] Process.daemon should do a double fork to avoid problems with controlling terminals — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/04/25

In article <[email protected]>,
[#23310] Re: [Bug #1403] Process.daemon should do a double fork to avoid problems with controlling terminals — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2009/04/25

[#23315] [Bug #1403](Closed) Process.daemon should do a double fork to avoid problems with controlling terminals — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/04/25

Issue #1403 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23311] [Bug #1404] Net::HTTP::Post failing when a post field contains ":" — Ignacio Martín <redmine@...>

Bug #1404: Net::HTTP::Post failing when a post field contains ":"

5 messages 2009/04/25
[#23317] Re: [Bug #1404] Net::HTTP::Post failing when a post field contains ":" — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/04/25

Hi,
[#23312] [Bug #1404](Closed) Net::HTTP::Post failing when a post field contains ":" — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/04/25

Issue #1404 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#23313] Re: [Bug #1404](Closed) Net::HTTP::Post failing when a post field contains ":" — daz <[email protected]> 2009/04/25

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#23316] Re: [Bug #1404](Closed) Net::HTTP::Post failing when a post field contains ":" — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/04/25

Hi,

[#23314] [Feature #1405] File::Stat have no marshal_dump/marshal_load — Oleg Puchinin <redmine@...>

Feature #1405: File::Stat have no marshal_dump/marshal_load

2 messages 2009/04/25
[#26532] [Bug #1405](Rejected) File::Stat have no marshal_dump/marshal_load — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2009/11/04

Issue #1405 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#23318] [Feature #1408] 0.1.to_r not equal to (1/10) — Heesob Park <redmine@...>

Feature #1408: 0.1.to_r not equal to (1/10)

19 messages 2009/04/26
[#23345] [Feature #1408] 0.1.to_r not equal to (1/10) — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/05/01

Issue #1408 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#23465] Re: [Feature #1408] 0.1.to_r not equal to (1/10) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/05/15

Hi,
[#23487] Re: [Feature #1408] 0.1.to_r not equal to (1/10) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/18

Hi,
[#23488] Re: [Feature #1408] 0.1.to_r not equal to (1/10) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/05/18

Hi,
[#23319] Re: [Feature #1408] 0.1.to_r not equal to (1/10) — Martin DeMello <martindemello@...> 2009/04/26

On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Heesob Park <[email protected]> wrote:
[#23324] Re: [Feature #1408] 0.1.to_r not equal to (1/10) — Heesob Park <phasis@...> 2009/04/27

2009/4/27 Martin DeMello <[email protected]>:
[#23325] Re: [Feature #1408] 0.1.to_r not equal to (1/10) — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/04/27

Heesob Park wrote:
[#23408] [Feature #1408] 0.1.to_r not equal to (1/10) — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2009/05/09

Issue #1408 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.
[#25662] [Feature #1408] 0.1.to_r not equal to (1/10) — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/20

Issue #1408 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#29596] Re: [Feature #1408] 0.1.to_r not equal to (1/10) — Matthias Wächter <matthias@...> 2010/04/18

Am 20.09.2009 06:17, schrieb Marc-Andre Lafortune:
[#29605] Re: [Feature #1408] 0.1.to_r not equal to (1/10) — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2010/04/18

Hi Matthias,
[#29622] Re: [Feature #1408] 0.1.to_r not equal to (1/10) — =?windows-1252?Q?Matthias_W=E4chter?= <matthias@...> 2010/04/19

Hello Marc-Andre,
[#29475] [Feature #1408] 0.1.to_r not equal to (1/10) — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2010/04/12

Issue #1408 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#29652] [Feature #1408] 0.1.to_r not equal to (1/10) — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2010/04/20

Issue #1408 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.
[#29663] Re: [Feature #1408] 0.1.to_r not equal to (1/10) — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2010/04/20

Hi,
[#29887] Re: [Feature #1408] 0.1.to_r not equal to (1/10) — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2010/04/29

Hi.
[#30037] Re: [Feature #1408] 0.1.to_r not equal to (1/10) — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2010/05/05

Maybe a kind Japanese reader can provide the gist of [ruby-dev:41061]
[#30042] Re: [Feature #1408] 0.1.to_r not equal to (1/10) — Kenta Murata <muraken@...> 2010/05/06

Float#rationalize is added again at r27503.

[#23321] [Bug #1412] 1.8.7-p160 extmk.rb fails when cross compiling — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #1412: 1.8.7-p160 extmk.rb fails when cross compiling

5 messages 2009/04/26
[#23322] Re: [Bug #1412] 1.8.7-p160 extmk.rb fails when cross compiling — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/04/26

Hi,
[#23323] Re: [Bug #1412] 1.8.7-p160 extmk.rb fails when cross compiling — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/04/27

On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <[email protected]> wrot=
[#31570] [Bug #1412] 1.8.7-p160 extmk.rb fails when cross compiling — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/07/31

Issue #1412 has been updated by Luis Lavena.
[#32348] [Ruby 1.8.7-Backport#1412] 1.8.7-p160 extmk.rb fails when cross compiling — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/09/12

Issue #1412 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[#23326] [Bug #1414] NameError (undefined method `path' for class `ActionController::UploadedStringIO') — Rick Lloyd <redmine@...>

Bug #1414: NameError (undefined method `path' for class `ActionController::UploadedStringIO')

5 messages 2009/04/27
[#23342] [Bug #1414] NameError (undefined method `path' for class `ActionController::UploadedStringIO') — Rick Lloyd <redmine@...> 2009/04/30

Issue #1414 has been updated by Rick Lloyd.
[#23343] Re: [Bug #1414] NameError (undefined method `path' for class `ActionController::UploadedStringIO') — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/05/01

Hi,
[#23336] Re: [Bug #1414] NameError (undefined method `path' for class `ActionController::UploadedStringIO') — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/04/30

Hi,
[#23360] [Bug #1414] NameError (undefined method `path' for class `ActionController::UploadedStringIO') — Rick Lloyd <redmine@...> 2009/05/05

Issue #1414 has been updated by Rick Lloyd.

[#23329] [Bug #1418] File.join repeats recursive array contents — Brian Ford <redmine@...>

Bug #1418: File.join repeats recursive array contents

3 messages 2009/04/29
[#23330] [Bug #1418](Closed) File.join repeats recursive array contents — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/04/29

Issue #1418 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#24335] [Backport #1418](Closed) File.join repeats recursive array contents — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/07/15

Issue #1418 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#23331] [Bug #1419] Tk, segmentation fault — Oleg Puchinin <redmine@...>

Bug #1419: Tk, segmentation fault

2 messages 2009/04/29
[#24726] [Bug #1419](Closed) Tk, segmentation fault — Hidetoshi Nagai <redmine@...> 2009/08/03

Issue #1419 has been updated by Hidetoshi Nagai.

[#23332] [Bug #1420] synchronize does not work as expected — Sergio Antoy <redmine@...>

Bug #1420: synchronize does not work as expected

2 messages 2009/04/29
[#23333] [Bug #1420] synchronize does not work as expected — Sergio Antoy <redmine@...> 2009/04/29

Issue #1420 has been updated by Sergio Antoy.

[#23334] [Bug #1421] Permission denied - ~/.ri — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <redmine@...>

Bug #1421: Permission denied - ~/.ri

6 messages 2009/04/29
[#29420] [Bug #1421](Closed) Permission denied - ~/.ri — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <redmine@...> 2010/04/10

Issue #1421 has been updated by Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA.
[#24515] [Bug #1421] Permission denied - ~/.ri — Eric Hodel <redmine@...> 2009/07/23

Issue #1421 has been updated by Eric Hodel.
[#28940] [Bug #1421] Permission denied - ~/.ri — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/24

Issue #1421 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#28997] [Bug #1421] Permission denied - ~/.ri — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <redmine@...> 2010/03/25

Issue #1421 has been updated by Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA.
[#29409] [Bug #1421] Permission denied - ~/.ri — Eric Hodel <redmine@...> 2010/04/10

Issue #1421 has been updated by Eric Hodel.

[#23335] [Bug #1424] [PATH] Documentation typo in Net::HTTP — Marius Mårnes Mathiesen <redmine@...>

Bug #1424: [PATH] Documentation typo in Net::HTTP

2 messages 2009/04/30
[#23337] [Bug #1424](Closed) [PATH] Documentation typo in Net::HTTP — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/04/30

Issue #1424 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23338] [Bug #1425] ruby/1.8/drb/drb.rb:1480: [BUG] Segmentation fault — Luca Pireddu <redmine@...>

Bug #1425: ruby/1.8/drb/drb.rb:1480: [BUG] Segmentation fault

1 message 2009/04/30

[#23339] [Bug #1426] REXML::Document.write wrong formatting — Luciano Zanotto <redmine@...>

Bug #1426: REXML::Document.write wrong formatting

2 messages 2009/04/30
[#23341] [Bug #1426] REXML::Document.write wrong formatting — Federico Builes <redmine@...> 2009/04/30

Issue #1426 has been updated by Federico Builes.

[#23340] [Bug #1388] cygwin-1.7, gcc4-4.3, and ruby-1.9. make btest #236 test_io.rb Segmentation fault — neomjp neomjp <redmine@...>

Issue #1388 has been updated by neomjp neomjp.

2 messages 2009/04/30
[#23378] Re: [Bug #1388] cygwin-1.7, gcc4-4.3, and ruby-1.9. make btest #236 test_io.rb Segmentation fault — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/05/07

Hi,

[ruby-core:23132] [Bug #1357] Fixing variables into specific CPU registers deemed overrated & may disturb compilers' optimizers

From: Ollivier Robert <redmine@...>
Date: 2009-04-06 08:43:20 UTC
List: ruby-core #23132 
Bug #1357: Fixing variables into specific CPU registers deemed overrated & may disturb compilers' optimizers
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/1357

Author: Ollivier Robert
Status: Open, Priority: Normal
Category: core
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.2dev (2009-03-31) [i386-darwin9.6.0]

I do not think that fixing specific variable into CPU registers is really reflected in performance gains (benchmarks welcome!).  It will also generally disturb compilers' handling of optimization (especially on register-starved CPUs like IA-32/i386) and may generate less efficient code.  Remove the i386/amd64-specific code.

As a side-effect, it enables successful compilation with recent versions of clang/llvm.


----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next