ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#23346] [Bug #1428] Net/http issue — Emmanuel Pinault <redmine@...>

Bug #1428: Net/http issue

3 messages 2009/05/01
[#25666] [Bug #1428](Feedback) Net/http issue — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2009/09/20

Issue #1428 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#23440] Re: [Bug #1428] Net/http issue — mathew <meta@...> 2009/05/13

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 15:41, Emmanuel Pinault <[email protected]> wrot=

[#23350] [Bug #1430] make check error — Ron Askew <redmine@...>

Bug #1430: make check error

2 messages 2009/05/03
[#23351] [Bug #1430](Rejected) make check error — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/05/03

Issue #1430 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23352] [PATCH] Fixing poor performance with --enable-pthread on Ruby 1.8 — Joe Damato <ice799@...>

Hi -

1 message 2009/05/04

[#23354] Ruby/DL Documentation — Aston <blackapache512-ticket@...>

Hello,=0A=0A=0Arecently i have been trying to learn and use dl library. whi=

4 messages 2009/05/04
[#23356] R辿f. : [ruby-core:23354] Ruby/DL Documentation — tad.bochan@... 2009/05/04

[#23359] Re: Ruby/DL Documentation — sh@... 2009/05/05

Hi,
[#23371] Re: Ruby/DL Documentation — Aston <blackapache512-ticket@...> 2009/05/06

thanks a lot [email protected] and [email protected]=0A=0Ata=

[#23355] [Feature #1431] Object#__class__ — Sven Schwyn <redmine@...>

Feature #1431: Object#__class__

2 messages 2009/05/04
[#25639] [Feature #1431] Object#__class__ — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/18

Issue #1431 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#23357] [Feature #1432] decrement and increment — Oleg Puchinin <redmine@...>

Feature #1432: decrement and increment

8 messages 2009/05/04
[#23403] [Feature #1432] decrement and increment — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/05/09

Issue #1432 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#23405] Re: [Feature #1432] decrement and increment — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...> 2009/05/09

Roger Pack wrote:
[#23409] Re: [Feature #1432] decrement and increment — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/09

Hi,
[#23413] Re: [Feature #1432] decrement and increment — Daniel Luz <dev@...> 2009/05/09

On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 08:42, Yukihiro Matsumoto <[email protected]> wrote=
[#23358] [Feature #1432](Rejected) decrement and increment — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/05/04

Issue #1432 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
[#23363] [Feature #1432] decrement and increment — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/05/06

Issue #1432 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#23364] Re: [Feature #1432] decrement and increment — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2009/05/06

[#23361] [Feature #1436] Please consider this addition to resolv.rb which adds methods for resolving LOC resources — JB Smith <redmine@...>

Feature #1436: Please consider this addition to resolv.rb which adds methods for resolving LOC resources

2 messages 2009/05/05
[#29032] Re: [Feature #1436] Please consider this addition to resolv.rb which adds methods for resolving LOC resources — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/03/26

Hi, akr

[#23366] [Bug #1437] 1.8.7-p160 compilation with CC fails on OpenSolaris — Matthias Marschall <redmine@...>

Bug #1437: 1.8.7-p160 compilation with CC fails on OpenSolaris

7 messages 2009/05/06
[#23368] [Bug #1437] 1.8.7-p160 compilation with CC fails on OpenSolaris — Matthias Marschall <redmine@...> 2009/05/06

Issue #1437 has been updated by Matthias Marschall.
[#23369] [Bug #1437] 1.8.7-p160 compilation with CC fails on OpenSolaris — Matthias Marschall <redmine@...> 2009/05/06

Issue #1437 has been updated by Matthias Marschall.
[#23370] [Backport #1437] 1.8.7-p160 compilation with CC fails on OpenSolaris — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/06

Issue #1437 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#23392] [Backport #1437] 1.8.7-p160 compilation with CC fails on OpenSolaris — Konstantinos Pachnis <redmine@...> 2009/05/07

Issue #1437 has been updated by Konstantinos Pachnis.
[#23688] [Backport #1437] 1.8.7-p160 compilation with CC fails on OpenSolaris — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/06/03

Issue #1437 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#24986] [Backport #1437](Closed) 1.8.7-p160 compilation with CC fails on OpenSolaris — Kirk Haines <redmine@...> 2009/08/20

Issue #1437 has been updated by Kirk Haines.

[#23372] [Bug #1438] dylib architecture error building 1.9.1-rc2 on osx10.5.6 — Matthew Moss <redmine@...>

Bug #1438: dylib architecture error building 1.9.1-rc2 on osx10.5.6

6 messages 2009/05/06
[#23375] [Bug #1438] dylib architecture error building 1.9.1-rc2 on osx10.5.6 — Matthew Moss <redmine@...> 2009/05/07

Issue #1438 has been updated by Matthew Moss.
[#23377] [Bug #1438] dylib architecture error building 1.9.1-rc2 on osx10.5.6 — Matthew Moss <redmine@...> 2009/05/07

Issue #1438 has been updated by Matthew Moss.
[#23380] Re: [Bug #1438] dylib architecture error building 1.9.1-rc2 on osx10.5.6 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/05/07

Hi,
[#23393] [Bug #1438] dylib architecture error building 1.9.1-rc2 on osx10.5.6 — Matthew Moss <redmine@...> 2009/05/07

Issue #1438 has been updated by Matthew Moss.
[#23373] [Bug #1438] dylib architecture error building 1.9.1-rc2 on osx10.5.6 — Ollivier Robert <redmine@...> 2009/05/07

Issue #1438 has been updated by Ollivier Robert.

[#23374] [Bug #1439] Array#sample returns wrong results for negative argument — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1439: Array#sample returns wrong results for negative argument

2 messages 2009/05/07
[#23379] [Bug #1439](Closed) Array#sample returns wrong results for negative argument — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/07

Issue #1439 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23382] [Bug #1440] Array#flatten!(0) should return nil, not self — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1440: Array#flatten!(0) should return nil, not self

2 messages 2009/05/07
[#23385] [Bug #1440](Closed) Array#flatten!(0) should return nil, not self — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/07

Issue #1440 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23386] [Bug #1441] String#gsub handles backslashes incorrectly — "shawn ." <redmine@...>

Bug #1441: String#gsub handles backslashes incorrectly

2 messages 2009/05/07
[#23387] [Bug #1441](Rejected) String#gsub handles backslashes incorrectly — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/05/07

Issue #1441 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#23389] [Bug #1443] String#gsub handles backslashes incorrectly — shawn landen <redmine@...>

Bug #1443: String#gsub handles backslashes incorrectly

2 messages 2009/05/07
[#23390] Re: [Bug #1443] String#gsub handles backslashes incorrectly — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/07

Hi,

[#23391] [Bug #1444] Building ruby 1.8.7 p160 on Solaris 10 u6 — Konstantinos Pachnis <redmine@...>

Bug #1444: Building ruby 1.8.7 p160 on Solaris 10 u6

5 messages 2009/05/07
[#23394] [Bug #1444](Closed) Building ruby 1.8.7 p160 on Solaris 10 u6 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/08

Issue #1444 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#23421] [Bug #1444] Building ruby 1.8.7 p160 on Solaris 10 u6 — Daniel Berger <redmine@...> 2009/05/11

Issue #1444 has been updated by Daniel Berger.
[#23399] [Bug #1444] Building ruby 1.8.7 p160 on Solaris 10 u6 — Daniel Berger <redmine@...> 2009/05/08

Issue #1444 has been updated by Daniel Berger.
[#23400] Re: [Bug #1444] Building ruby 1.8.7 p160 on Solaris 10 u6 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/05/08

Hi,

[#23395] [Bug #1445] win32 debug build broken — James Hughes <redmine@...>

Bug #1445: win32 debug build broken

3 messages 2009/05/08
[#23396] [Backport #1445](Assigned) win32 debug build broken — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/08

Issue #1445 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#24845] [Backport #1445] win32 debug build broken — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/08/09

Issue #1445 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#23402] [Bug #1448] [patch] Proper handling of recursive arrays — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1448: [patch] Proper handling of recursive arrays

6 messages 2009/05/09
[#23406] Re: [Bug #1448] [patch] Proper handling of recursive arrays — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/05/09

Hi,
[#23412] [Bug #1448] [patch] Proper handling of recursive arrays — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/05/09

Issue #1448 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#23463] Re: [Bug #1448] [patch] Proper handling of recursive arrays — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/05/15

Hi,
[#23539] [Bug #1448](Closed) [patch] Proper handling of recursive arrays — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/24

Issue #1448 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#23536] [Bug #1448] [patch] Proper handling of recursive arrays — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/05/23

Issue #1448 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#23404] [Bug #1449] [REXML] detected encoding isn't used correctly — Kouhei Sutou <redmine@...>

Bug #1449: [REXML] detected encoding isn't used correctly

2 messages 2009/05/09
[#29510] [Bug #1449](Closed) [REXML] detected encoding isn't used correctly — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/04/14

Issue #1449 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#23407] ruby-ffi problem — Aston <blackapache512-ticket@...>

Hello,=0A=0AI am trying to learn ruby-ffi now (after sadly leaving dl libra=

3 messages 2009/05/09
[#23414] Re: ruby-ffi problem — Hirotsugu Asari <asari.ruby@...> 2009/05/09

If you want to change the string value of a field in a struct through
[#23410] Re: ruby-ffi problem — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/05/09

You probably want to take this to the ruby-ffi project here:

[#23415] [Bug #1454] compatability of rational and bigdecimal (1.8 and 1.9) — Karl Brodowsky <redmine@...>

Bug #1454: compatability of rational and bigdecimal (1.8 and 1.9)

2 messages 2009/05/10
[#23417] [Bug #1454] compatability of rational and bigdecimal (1.8 and 1.9) — Karl Brodowsky <redmine@...> 2009/05/10

Issue #1454 has been updated by Karl Brodowsky.

[#23416] [Bug #1455] compatability of rational and bigdecimal — Karl Brodowsky <redmine@...>

Bug #1455: compatability of rational and bigdecimal

2 messages 2009/05/10
[#24315] [Bug #1455](Closed) compatability of rational and bigdecimal — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/07/13

Issue #1455 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

[#23422] [Bug #1457] Some grammar rules not terminated with semicolon; — Dave B <redmine@...>

Bug #1457: Some grammar rules not terminated with semicolon;

2 messages 2009/05/11
[#23428] [Bug #1457](Closed) Some grammar rules not terminated with semicolon; — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/05/11

Issue #1457 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23429] [Bug #1388] cygwin-1.7, gcc4-4.3, and ruby-1.9. make btest #236 test_io.rb Segmentation fault — neomjp neomjp <redmine@...>

Issue #1388 has been updated by neomjp neomjp.

1 message 2009/05/11

[#23430] [Bug #1459] x64-mswin64 ruby 1.9 binary package lack zlib.dll — Szilárd Zsolt Sztupák <redmine@...>

Bug #1459: x64-mswin64 ruby 1.9 binary package lack zlib.dll

1 message 2009/05/11

[#23431] [Bug #1460] IO#select returns wrong fd list after Kernel#sleep (Windows) — Romulo Ceccon <redmine@...>

Bug #1460: IO#select returns wrong fd list after Kernel#sleep (Windows)

2 messages 2009/05/11
[#23432] [Bug #1460](Assigned) IO#select returns wrong fd list after Kernel#sleep (Windows) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/12

Issue #1460 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23442] [Bug #1465] debug segmentation fault when starting RoR Webrick server — Jakub Kuźma <redmine@...>

Bug #1465: debug segmentation fault when starting RoR Webrick server

1 message 2009/05/13

[#23443] [Bug #1466] URI#parse fails on some working urls — Osama brekaa <redmine@...>

Bug #1466: URI#parse fails on some working urls

4 messages 2009/05/13
[#23447] Re: [Bug #1466] URI#parse fails on some working urls — danielcavanagh@... 2009/05/14

> i tried this snippet of code
[#23486] [Bug #1466] URI#parse fails on some working urls — Daniel Cavanagh <redmine@...> 2009/05/17

Issue #1466 has been updated by Daniel Cavanagh.
[#25665] [Bug #1466](Rejected) URI#parse fails on some working urls — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2009/09/20

Issue #1466 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#23444] [Bug #1467] Why doesn Ruby not use all cores on a Nehalem box (MacPro)? — Philipp Ringli <redmine@...>

Bug #1467: Why doesn Ruby not use all cores on a Nehalem box (MacPro)?

3 messages 2009/05/13
[#23445] Re: [Bug #1467] Why doesn Ruby not use all cores on a Nehalem box (MacPro)? — Michael Fellinger <m.fellinger@...> 2009/05/13

On Thu, 14 May 2009 00:18:35 +0900
[#29140] [Feature #1467](Feedback) Why doesn Ruby not use all cores on a Nehalem box (MacPro)? — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/30

Issue #1467 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23446] Some expect.rb miprovements — Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...>

Hello,

1 message 2009/05/13

[#23448] Fwd: Bug report involving class variables — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

Can we get the redmine issues fixed?

1 message 2009/05/14

[#23449] Submit bugs against 1.9.1? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>

Hi there,

5 messages 2009/05/14
[#23454] Re: Submit bugs against 1.9.1? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/15

Hi,
[#23458] Re: Submit bugs against 1.9.1? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2009/05/15

2009/5/15 Yukihiro Matsumoto <[email protected]>:
[#23462] Re: Submit bugs against 1.9.1? — daz <[email protected]> 2009/05/15

Robert Klemme wrote:
[#23478] Re: Submit bugs against 1.9.1? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2009/05/16

2009/5/15 daz <[email protected]>:

[#23450] where are the grammar bits? — Erik Scheirer <e@...>

HI everyone -

2 messages 2009/05/14
[#23451] Re: where are the grammar bits? — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/05/14

Excerpts from Erik Scheirer's message of Thu May 14 18:12:33 +0300 2009:

[#23452] [Bug #1469] Different behavior of class variables in 1.9.0 and 1.9.1p129 — Kenneth Ballou <redmine@...>

Bug #1469: Different behavior of class variables in 1.9.0 and 1.9.1p129

4 messages 2009/05/14
[#23453] Re: [Bug #1469] Different behavior of class variables in 1.9.0 and 1.9.1p129 — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/05/14

Kenneth Ballou wrote:
[#27611] [Bug #1469] Different behavior of class variables in 1.9.0 and 1.9.1p129 — _ wanabe <redmine@...> 2010/01/18

Issue #1469 has been updated by _ wanabe.
[#28383] [Bug #1469](Rejected) Different behavior of class variables in 1.9.0 and 1.9.1p129 — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/01

Issue #1469 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23455] TOK_INTERN not using argument? — daz <[email protected]>

Following this change ...

1 message 2009/05/15

[#23456] REXML Thread Safety — Weston Sewell <weston.sewell@...>

I've been using Ruby for several years but I just joined the list because I

2 messages 2009/05/15
[#23467] Re: REXML Thread Safety — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/05/15

FWIW, most DOM implementations are not thread-safe.

[#23457] [Bug #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — John Carter <redmine@...>

Bug #1471: "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7

17 messages 2009/05/15
[#23957] [Backport #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — Hans de Graaff <redmine@...> 2009/06/21

Issue #1471 has been updated by Hans de Graaff.
[#23459] [Bug #1471](Closed) "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/15

Issue #1471 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#23461] Re: [Bug #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/05/15

Sidenote--
[#23479] Re: [Bug #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2009/05/16

[#23480] Re: [Bug #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/05/16

Hi,
[#23489] [Backport #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — John Carter <redmine@...> 2009/05/18

Issue #1471 has been updated by John Carter.
[#23490] [Backport #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — John Carter <redmine@...> 2009/05/18

Issue #1471 has been updated by John Carter.
[#23500] [Backport #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — John Carter <redmine@...> 2009/05/19

Issue #1471 has been updated by John Carter.
[#23516] Re: [Backport #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/05/20

Hi,
[#24230] [Backport #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — Hans de Graaff <redmine@...> 2009/07/09

Issue #1471 has been updated by Hans de Graaff.
[#25311] [Backport #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — Daniel Azuma <redmine@...> 2009/09/03

Issue #1471 has been updated by Daniel Azuma.
[#31326] [Backport #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — Tadashi Saito <redmine@...> 2010/07/17

Issue #1471 has been updated by Tadashi Saito.
[#31327] [Backport #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — Tadashi Saito <redmine@...> 2010/07/17

Issue #1471 has been updated by Tadashi Saito.
[#35324] [Backport87-Backport#1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2011/02/21

Issue #1471 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#35334] [Backport87-Backport#1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2011/02/22

Issue #1471 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#35336] [Backport87-Backport#1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2011/02/22

Issue #1471 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#23460] [Bug #1472] rb_f_syscall converts string value to null terminated c string, but syscall structs can contain nulls. — John Carter <redmine@...>

Bug #1472: rb_f_syscall converts string value to null terminated c string, but syscall structs can contain nulls.

2 messages 2009/05/15
[#27548] [Bug #1472] rb_f_syscall converts string value to null terminated c string, but syscall structs can contain nulls. — John Carter <redmine@...> 2010/01/11

Issue #1472 has been updated by John Carter.

[#23464] [Feature #1473] Improvements on expect.rb — Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <redmine@...>

Feature #1473: Improvements on expect.rb

5 messages 2009/05/15
[#29141] [Feature #1473] Improvements on expect.rb — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/30

Issue #1473 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#23504] Re: [Feature #1473] Improvements on expect.rb — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2009/05/19

[#23518] Re: [Feature #1473] Improvements on expect.rb — Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...> 2009/05/21

If no one is interested, I can try to improve expect.rb. Is there anything I
[#29387] [Feature #1473](Closed) Improvements on expect.rb — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/09

Issue #1473 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23466] [Bug #1474] autoload causes "circular require considered harmful" warning without circular require — Eric Hodel <redmine@...>

Bug #1474: autoload causes "circular require considered harmful" warning without circular require

2 messages 2009/05/15
[#23477] [Bug #1474](Closed) autoload causes "circular require considered harmful" warning without circular require — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/16

Issue #1474 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23468] trunk thinks it is running ruby 1.8.6 (Was: Ruby:r23419 (trunk) [...]) — Eric Hodel <[email protected]>

On May 12, 2009, at 23:23, [email protected] wrote:

1 message 2009/05/15

[#23469] [Bug #1475] ruby -w warns about encoding for the wrong file — Eric Hodel <redmine@...>

Bug #1475: ruby -w warns about encoding for the wrong file

2 messages 2009/05/15
[#23471] [Bug #1475](Closed) ruby -w warns about encoding for the wrong file — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/16

Issue #1475 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23470] [Bug #1476] ruby -w warns about encoding used as RDoc — Eric Hodel <redmine@...>

Bug #1476: ruby -w warns about encoding used as RDoc

2 messages 2009/05/15
[#23473] [Bug #1476](Closed) ruby -w warns about encoding used as RDoc — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/16

Issue #1476 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23483] [Bug #1478] Ruby archive — Oleg Puchinin <redmine@...>

Bug #1478: Ruby archive

29 messages 2009/05/16
[#28983] [Feature #1478](Rejected) Ruby archive — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/25

Issue #1478 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#28990] [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/03/25

Issue #1478 has been updated by Hiroshi NAKAMURA.
[#29217] [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/04/02

Issue #1478 has been updated by Hiroshi NAKAMURA.
[#29225] [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/04/02

Issue #1478 has been updated by Luis Lavena.
[#30345] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2010/05/21

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 17:13, Luis Lavena <[email protected]> wrote:
[#30346] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Jonathan Nielsen <jonathan@...> 2010/05/21

> Thanks for your comment.
[#30347] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Jonathan Nielsen <jonathan@...> 2010/05/21

OK Hiroshi, I read some of the comments earlier in the thread that I
[#30352] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2010/05/21

[#30355] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/05/21

On 5/20/10, Jonathan Nielsen <[email protected]> wrote:
[#30364] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/05/22

Hi,
[#30367] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2010/05/22

(2010/05/22 19:58), Benoit Daloze wrote:
[#30369] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/05/22

On 22 May 2010 18:40, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#30370] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2010/05/22

(2010/05/23 2:38), Benoit Daloze wrote:
[#30973] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/06/30

On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Urabe Shyouhei <[email protected]> wr=
[#30975] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2010/06/30

Headius, I'm not against for the idea of archiving itself, and I don't th=
[#31097] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/07/06

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Urabe Shyouhei <[email protected]> wr=
[#30368] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2010/05/22

[#30429] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Eric Hodel <[email protected]> 2010/05/26

On May 22, 2010, at 09:41, Evan Phoenix wrote:
[#30969] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/06/30

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Eric Hodel <[email protected]> wrote:
[#30971] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/06/30

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 4:38 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter
[#30568] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2010/06/03

Hi,
[#30970] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/06/30

JRuby already supports loading scripts out of .jar files, either by
[#31102] [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2010/07/07

Issue #1478 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#31140] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2010/07/08

Hongli Lai <[email protected]> wrote:
[#31141] [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/07/09

Issue #1478 has been updated by Luis Lavena.
[#31154] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — James Tucker <jftucker@...> 2010/07/09

[#31160] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/07/09

On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:07 AM, James Tucker <[email protected]> wrote:
[#31210] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — James Tucker <jftucker@...> 2010/07/12

[#23484] [Bug #1480] Ruby/Tk infinite loop — Oleg Puchinin <redmine@...>

Bug #1480: Ruby/Tk infinite loop

2 messages 2009/05/17
[#23485] Re: [Bug #1480] Ruby/Tk infinite loop — Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...> 2009/05/17

From: Oleg Puchinin <[email protected]>

[#23491] [Bug #1482] Kernel.exec doesn't respect COMSPEC environment variable on Windows — Evgeniy Dolzhenko <redmine@...>

Bug #1482: Kernel.exec doesn't respect COMSPEC environment variable on Windows

6 messages 2009/05/18
[#26973] [Bug #1482](Feedback) Kernel.exec doesn't respect COMSPEC environment variable on Windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/12/01

Issue #1482 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#29145] [Feature #1482] Kernel.exec doesn't respect COMSPEC environment variable on Windows — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/30

Issue #1482 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#29147] [Feature #1482] Kernel.exec doesn't respect COMSPEC environment variable on Windows — Jon Forums <redmine@...> 2010/03/30

Issue #1482 has been updated by Jon Forums.
[#29150] Re: [Feature #1482] Kernel.exec doesn't respect COMSPEC environment variable on Windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/03/30

Hi,
[#29495] [Feature #1482] Kernel.exec doesn't respect COMSPEC environment variable on Windows — Evgeniy Dolzhenko <redmine@...> 2010/04/13

Issue #1482 has been updated by Evgeniy Dolzhenko.

[#23492] [Bug #1484] Ruby 1.8.6_p368 and Ruby 1.8.7_p160 have threading regressions — Hans de Graaff <redmine@...>

Bug #1484: Ruby 1.8.6_p368 and Ruby 1.8.7_p160 have threading regressions

8 messages 2009/05/18
[#23498] Re: [Bug #1484] Ruby 1.8.6_p368 and Ruby 1.8.7_p160have threading regressions — John Carter <john.carter@...> 2009/05/19

On Mon, 18 May 2009, Hans de Graaff wrote:
[#24212] [Bug #1484] Ruby 1.8.6_p368 and Ruby 1.8.7_p160 have threading regressions — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/07/08

Issue #1484 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#24220] Re: [Bug #1484] Ruby 1.8.6_p368 and Ruby 1.8.7_p160 have threading regressions — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/07/08

On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Roger Pack<[email protected]> wrote:
[#24231] [Bug #1484] Ruby 1.8.6_p368 and Ruby 1.8.7_p160 have threading regressions — Hans de Graaff <redmine@...> 2009/07/09

Issue #1484 has been updated by Hans de Graaff.
[#25120] [Bug #1484] Ruby 1.8.6_p368 and Ruby 1.8.7_p160 have threading regressions — Daniel Azuma <redmine@...> 2009/08/25

Issue #1484 has been updated by Daniel Azuma.
[#25250] [Bug #1484] Ruby 1.8.6_p368 and Ruby 1.8.7_p160 have threading regressions — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2009/09/01

Issue #1484 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#25450] [Bug #1484] Ruby 1.8.6_p368 and Ruby 1.8.7_p160 have threading regressions — Hans de Graaff <redmine@...> 2009/09/07

Issue #1484 has been updated by Hans de Graaff.

[#23494] [Bug #1486] DL::CParser#parse_struct_signature fails when argument is a String. — Minwoo Lee <redmine@...>

Bug #1486: DL::CParser#parse_struct_signature fails when argument is a String.

3 messages 2009/05/18
[#24943] [Bug #1486] DL::CParser#parse_struct_signature fails when argument is a String. — Minwoo Lee <redmine@...> 2009/08/17

Issue #1486 has been updated by Minwoo Lee.
[#24945] [Bug #1486] DL::CParser#parse_struct_signature fails when argument is a String. — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/08/17

Issue #1486 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23496] --enable-pthread: when should Ruby use getcontext()/setcontext() instead of _longjmp()/_setjmp()? — Hongli Lai <[email protected]>

When --enable-pthread is given, Ruby 1.8 will currently use getcontext()

2 messages 2009/05/18
[#23583] Re: --enable-pthread: when should Ruby use getcontext()/setcontext() instead of _longjmp()/_setjmp()? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/28

Hi,

[#23497] Interrupt < Signal, but initialize mismatched — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

this problem exists on 1.8 and 1.9 and was previously reported by Eric

1 message 2009/05/18

[#23499] [Bug #1487] String#each_char must return self — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1487: String#each_char must return self

9 messages 2009/05/19
[#23524] Re: [Bug #1487] String#each_char must return self — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/23

Hi,
[#23525] Re: [Bug #1487] String#each_char must return self — Michael Fellinger <m.fellinger@...> 2009/05/23

On Sat, 23 May 2009 10:20:50 +0900
[#23526] Re: [Bug #1487] String#each_char must return self — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/05/23

Excerpts from Michael Fellinger's message of Sat May 23 17:38:35 +0300 2009:
[#23527] Re: [Bug #1487] String#each_char must return self — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/23

Hi,
[#23528] Re: [Bug #1487] String#each_char must return self — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/05/23

Excerpts from Yukihiro Matsumoto's message of Sat May 23 18:34:35 +0300 2009:
[#23530] Re: [Bug #1487] String#each_char must return self — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/23

Hi,
[#23533] Re: [Bug #1487] String#each_char must return self — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2009/05/23

As per Eero Saynatkari's suggestion, my response is:
[#23529] [Bug #1487](Closed) String#each_char must return self — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/05/23

Issue #1487 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23501] [Bug #1490] DateTime::civil fails with second=59 and fractional second > 0 — Paul Harris <redmine@...>

Bug #1490: DateTime::civil fails with second=59 and fractional second > 0

4 messages 2009/05/19
[#23502] Re: [Bug #1490] DateTime::civil fails with second=59 and fractional second > 0 — Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@...> 2009/05/19

Hello Paul,
[#23507] [Bug #1490] DateTime::civil fails with second=59 and fractional second > 0 — Paul Harris <redmine@...> 2009/05/20

Issue #1490 has been updated by Paul Harris.
[#23509] Re: [Bug #1490] DateTime::civil fails with second=59 and fractional second > 0 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/20

Hi,

[#23503] [Feature #1493] [patch] lex_state as bit field / IS_lex_state() macro — Dave B <redmine@...>

Feature #1493: [patch] lex_state as bit field / IS_lex_state() macro

1 message 2009/05/19

[#23505] [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Nicholas Manning <redmine@...>

Bug #1494: tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows

19 messages 2009/05/19
[#24437] [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Eric Wong <redmine@...> 2009/07/18

Issue #1494 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[#24439] [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Niels Ganser <redmine@...> 2009/07/18

Issue #1494 has been updated by Niels Ganser.
[#25006] [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Jeremy Kemper <redmine@...> 2009/08/20

Issue #1494 has been updated by Jeremy Kemper.
[#25007] Re: [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/08/20

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Jeremy Kemper<[email protected]> wrote=
[#25008] [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/08/20

Issue #1494 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#25011] Re: [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/08/20

Hi,
[#25012] Re: [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/08/20

Hi,
[#25017] Re: [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/08/21

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto<[email protected]> wro=
[#25013] [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/08/21

Issue #1494 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#25018] [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2009/08/21

Issue #1494 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#25019] Re: [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/08/21

In article <[email protected]>,
[#25021] Re: [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Hongli Lai <[email protected]> 2009/08/21

Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#25022] Re: [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Hongli Lai <[email protected]> 2009/08/21

Hongli Lai wrote:
[#25026] [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2009/08/21

Issue #1494 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#25118] [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2009/08/25

Issue #1494 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#25128] [Bug #1494](Third Party's Issue) tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/08/26

Issue #1494 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#25129] [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2009/08/26

Issue #1494 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#25132] [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2009/08/26

Issue #1494 has been updated by Hongli Lai.

[#23506] [Bug #1495] warn_printf is an unhealthy thing to have in rb_thread_schedule as it can cause recursion. — John Carter <redmine@...>

Bug #1495: warn_printf is an unhealthy thing to have in rb_thread_schedule as it can cause recursion.

3 messages 2009/05/20
[#23510] Re: [Bug #1495] warn_printf is an unhealthy thing to have in rb_thread_schedule as it can cause recursion. — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/05/20

Hi,
[#23514] [Bug #1495] warn_printf is an unhealthy thing to have in rb_thread_schedule as it can cause recursion. — John Carter <redmine@...> 2009/05/20

Issue #1495 has been updated by John Carter.

[#23508] [Bug #1496] Net::IMAP#fetch incorrectly quotes message data item names — Eric Hodel <redmine@...>

Bug #1496: Net::IMAP#fetch incorrectly quotes message data item names

3 messages 2009/05/20
[#29327] [Bug #1496] Net::IMAP#fetch incorrectly quotes message data item names — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/08

Issue #1496 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#29820] [Bug #1496] Net::IMAP#fetch incorrectly quotes message data item names — Shugo Maeda <redmine@...> 2010/04/27

Issue #1496 has been updated by Shugo Maeda.

[#23512] [Bug #1497] test_exception fails in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1497: test_exception fails in windows

2 messages 2009/05/20
[#26843] [Bug #1497](Closed) test_exception fails in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/11/20

Issue #1497 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23513] [Feature #1498] rubygems tests fail on zlib dependency if you compile ruby without zlib headers — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Feature #1498: rubygems tests fail on zlib dependency if you compile ruby without zlib headers

3 messages 2009/05/20
[#26682] [Feature #1498] rubygems tests fail on zlib dependency if you compile ruby without zlib headers — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2009/11/11

Issue #1498 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#26685] [Feature #1498](Rejected) rubygems tests fail on zlib dependency if you compile ruby without zlib headers — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/11/11

Issue #1498 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23515] [Bug #1499] Commit 22478 has "that can't be right!" defect in rb_thread_schedule. — John Carter <redmine@...>

Bug #1499: Commit 22478 has "that can't be right!" defect in rb_thread_schedule.

2 messages 2009/05/20
[#24781] [Bug #1499](Closed) Commit 22478 has "that can't be right!" defect in rb_thread_schedule. — Akira Tanaka <redmine@...> 2009/08/05

Issue #1499 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.

[#23517] [Bug #1500] test_io runs forever in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1500: test_io runs forever in windows

8 messages 2009/05/21
[#23692] [Bug #1500] test_io runs forever in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/06/03

Issue #1500 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#24371] [Bug #1500] test_io runs forever in windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/07/16

Issue #1500 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#23669] [Bug #1500] test_io runs forever in windows — Jon Coppeard <redmine@...> 2009/06/02

Issue #1500 has been updated by Jon Coppeard.
[#24434] [Bug #1500] test_io runs forever in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/07/18

Issue #1500 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#24558] [Bug #1500] test_io runs forever in windows — Hal Perkins <redmine@...> 2009/07/25

Issue #1500 has been updated by Hal Perkins.
[#26850] [Bug #1500] test_io runs forever in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/11/21

Issue #1500 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#27400] [Bug #1500](Third Party's Issue) test_io runs forever in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/01/04

Issue #1500 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23519] [Bug #1502] installed ri docu is not where ri actually searches when compiled with program-suffix — "Jan-Erik R." <redmine@...>

Bug #1502: installed ri docu is not where ri actually searches when compiled with program-suffix

2 messages 2009/05/21
[#23521] [Bug #1502](Closed) installed ri docu is not where ri actually searches when compiled with program-suffix — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/05/22

Issue #1502 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

[#23520] [Bug #1504] installed ri docu is not where ri actually searches when compiled with program-suffix — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...>

Bug #1504: installed ri docu is not where ri actually searches when compiled with program-suffix

3 messages 2009/05/22
[#23522] Re: [Bug #1504] installed ri docu is not where ri actually searches when compiled with program-suffix — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...> 2009/05/22

[#23523] Re: [Bug #1504] installed ri docu is not where ri actually searches when compiled with program-suffix — Eric Hodel <[email protected]> 2009/05/22

On May 22, 2009, at 03:22, Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) wrote:

[#23531] [Bug #1504](Closed) installed ri docu is not where ri actually searches when compiled with program-suffix — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...>

Issue #1504 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

1 message 2009/05/23

[#23534] [Bug #1385] Wonderful undocumented feature in Ruby 1.8.7 & 1.9 — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Issue #1385 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

1 message 2009/05/23

[#23537] [Bug #1507] some windows make test failures — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1507: some windows make test failures

1 message 2009/05/23

[#23538] [ANN] RubyKaigi2009: Commiter Invitation — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Hi,

1 message 2009/05/24

[#23540] [Bug #1510] [patch] String#partition can return wrong result or crash — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1510: [patch] String#partition can return wrong result or crash

3 messages 2009/05/24
[#23541] [Bug #1510](Closed) [patch] String#partition can return wrong result or crash — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/24

Issue #1510 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#23542] [Bug #1510] [patch] String#partition can return wrong result or crash — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/05/24

Issue #1510 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#23543] a feature for ruby: Kernel#in? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Following a discussion on ruby-talk of a few ideas for ruby[1],

10 messages 2009/05/25
[#23545] Re: a feature for ruby: Kernel#in? — "Martin J. Dst" <duerst@...> 2009/05/25

On 2009/05/25 13:41, Roger Pack wrote:
[#23548] Re: a feature for ruby: Kernel#in? — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/05/25

Excerpts from rogerdpack's message of Mon May 25 07:41:36 +0300 2009:
[#23549] Re: a feature for ruby: Kernel#in? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/05/25

> I am pretty opposed to adding #in?; however, it is currently
[#23550] Re: a feature for ruby: Kernel#in? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2009/05/25

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 18:32, Roger Pack <[email protected]> wrote:
[#23552] Re: a feature for ruby: Kernel#in? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/05/25

> 5.between? 0, 10
[#23553] Re: a feature for ruby: Kernel#in? — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/05/25

Excerpts from rogerdpack's message of Mon May 25 20:22:56 +0300 2009:
[#23555] Re: a feature for ruby: Kernel#in? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/05/25

Roger Pack wrote:
[#23579] Re: a feature for ruby: Kernel#in? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/05/27

> The very strong argument against this is that membership in a collection is
[#24402] Re: a feature for ruby: Kernel#in? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/07/17

> thought I'd suggest them (one at a time) to core.

[#23544] [Bug #1511] "[BUG] Segmentation fault" with Win32API — Br Hug <redmine@...>

Bug #1511: "[BUG] Segmentation fault" with Win32API

4 messages 2009/05/25
[#23546] [Bug #1511] "[BUG] Segmentation fault" with Win32API — Br Hug <redmine@...> 2009/05/25

Issue #1511 has been updated by Br Hug.
[#23547] [Bug #1511] "[BUG] Segmentation fault" with Win32API — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/05/25

Issue #1511 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#23563] [Bug #1511] "[BUG] Segmentation fault" with Win32API — Br Hug <redmine@...> 2009/05/26

Issue #1511 has been updated by Br Hug.

[#23551] [Bug #1514] test_time.rb failure in windows (mingw) — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1514: test_time.rb failure in windows (mingw)

3 messages 2009/05/25
[#23554] [Bug #1514](Closed) test_time.rb failure in windows (mingw) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/25

Issue #1514 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#23562] [Bug #1514] test_time.rb failure in windows (mingw) — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/05/26

Issue #1514 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23556] [Bug #1515] [PATCH] Teach Matrix#square? About Non-Square Matrices; Fix Crasher — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1515: [PATCH] Teach Matrix#square? About Non-Square Matrices; Fix Crasher

1 message 2009/05/25

[#23557] [Bug #1516] Matrix#determinant Documentation Error — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1516: Matrix#determinant Documentation Error

2 messages 2009/05/25
[#25749] [Bug #1516](Closed) Matrix#determinant Documentation Error — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/24

Issue #1516 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#23558] AST changes in ruby 1.8.6-p368 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

I just did `multiruby_setup the_usual` and `rake multi` on ParseTree

4 messages 2009/05/25
[#23560] Re: AST changes in ruby 1.8.6-p368 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/05/26

Hi,
[#23570] Re: AST changes in ruby 1.8.6-p368 — Michael Furr <furr@...> 2009/05/26

[#23627] Re: AST changes in ruby 1.8.6-p368 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2009/05/29

[#23559] [Bug #1517] Matrix[] Performs No Argument Validation, Confusing Some of Its Instance Methods — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1517: Matrix[] Performs No Argument Validation, Confusing Some of Its Instance Methods

1 message 2009/05/26

[#23561] [Bug #1518] Matrix#[] Raises NoMethodError for Invalid Index — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1518: Matrix#[] Raises NoMethodError for Invalid Index

1 message 2009/05/26

[#23564] [Bug #1519] RDoc for Time.strftime() incomplete — Anthony Richardson <redmine@...>

Bug #1519: RDoc for Time.strftime() incomplete

4 messages 2009/05/26
[#23565] [Bug #1519] RDoc for Time.strftime() incomplete — Rick DeNatale <redmine@...> 2009/05/26

Issue #1519 has been updated by Rick DeNatale.
[#23575] [Bug #1519] RDoc for Time.strftime() incomplete — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/05/27

Issue #1519 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#29328] [Bug #1519](Closed) RDoc for Time.strftime() incomplete — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/08

Issue #1519 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23567] [Backport #1524] r22332 should be backported to 1.8.6 — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...>

Backport #1524: r22332 should be backported to 1.8.6

3 messages 2009/05/26
[#23568] [Backport #1524] r22332 should be backported to 1.8.6 — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/05/26

Issue #1524 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#25484] [Backport #1524](Closed) r22332 should be backported to 1.8.6 — Kirk Haines <redmine@...> 2009/09/08

Issue #1524 has been updated by Kirk Haines.

[#23571] questions on recv in windows 1.9 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Q291cGxlIG9mIHF1ZXN0aW9ucywgaWYgYW55b25lIG91dCB0aGVyZSBoYXMgZmVlZGJhY2s6Cgox

1 message 2009/05/27

[#23572] [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #1525: Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork?

27 messages 2009/05/27
[#23573] [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2009/05/27

Issue #1525 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#24490] [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Vanja Bucic <redmine@...> 2009/07/22

Issue #1525 has been updated by Vanja Bucic.
[#24492] Re: [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Lee Hinman <matthew.hinman@...> 2009/07/22

On Jul 21, 2009, at 9:06 PM, Vanja Bucic wrote:
[#24516] Re: [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — "none <" <tetsu.soh.dev@...> 2009/07/23

Lee Hinman wrote:
[#25839] Re: [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Stanislav Sedov <stas@...> 2009/09/29

On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:12:33 +0900
[#24491] [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Vanja Bucic <redmine@...> 2009/07/22

Issue #1525 has been updated by Vanja Bucic.
[#24543] [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Vanja Bucic <redmine@...> 2009/07/23

Issue #1525 has been updated by Vanja Bucic.
[#24563] Re: [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — "none <" <tetsu.soh.dev@...> 2009/07/26

Vanja Bucic wrote:
[#24565] Re: [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Hongli Lai <[email protected]> 2009/07/26

none < wrote:
[#24570] Re: [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/07/27

In article <[email protected]>,
[#24572] Re: [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Hongli Lai <[email protected]> 2009/07/27

Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#24573] Re: [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/07/27

Hi,
[#24583] Re: [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — "none <" <tetsu.soh.dev@...> 2009/07/28

Hongli Lai wrote:
[#24578] [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Eric Wong <redmine@...> 2009/07/27

Issue #1525 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[#24584] Re: [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — "none <" <tetsu.soh.dev@...> 2009/07/28

Eric Wong wrote:
[#24585] Re: [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2009/07/28

"none <" <[email protected]> wrote:
[#26783] [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2009/11/17

Issue #1525 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#26784] [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Vanja Bucic <redmine@...> 2009/11/17

Issue #1525 has been updated by Vanja Bucic.
[#26786] [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2009/11/17

Issue #1525 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#26804] [Bug #1525](Closed) Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/11/18

Issue #1525 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#26805] Re: [Bug #1525](Closed) Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/11/18

In article <[email protected]>,
[#26809] Re: [Bug #1525](Closed) Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Hongli Lai <[email protected]> 2009/11/18

Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#26815] Re: [Bug #1525](Closed) Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/11/18

In article <[email protected]>,
[#26859] Re: [Bug #1525](Closed) Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Hongli Lai <[email protected]> 2009/11/21

Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#26904] Re: [Bug #1525](Closed) Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/11/25

In article <[email protected]>,
[#26906] Re: [Bug #1525](Closed) Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Daniel Cavanagh <danielcavanagh@...> 2009/11/25

On 25/11/2009, at 5:57 PM, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#23576] [Bug #1526] Inconsistency with Matrix#row_vectors([]) and Matrix#column_vectors([]) — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1526: Inconsistency with Matrix#row_vectors([]) and Matrix#column_vectors([])

2 messages 2009/05/27
[#26187] [Bug #1526](Rejected) Inconsistency with Matrix#row_vectors([]) and Matrix#column_vectors([]) — Keiju Ishitsuka <redmine@...> 2009/10/20

Issue #1526 has been updated by Keiju Ishitsuka.

[#23577] compile difficulty with 4.4 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Just tried compiling ruby TRUNK with mingw 4.4

2 messages 2009/05/27
[#23578] Re: compile difficulty with 4.4 — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/05/27

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Roger Pack <[email protected]> wrote:

[#23581] [Bug #1527] 1.9 compilation fails on windows if you have the pthread library installed — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1527: 1.9 compilation fails on windows if you have the pthread library installed

4 messages 2009/05/27
[#23582] [Bug #1527] 1.9 compilation fails on windows if you have the pthread library installed — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/27

Issue #1527 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#23599] [Bug #1527] 1.9 compilation fails on windows if you have the pthread library installed — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/05/28

Issue #1527 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#24826] [Bug #1527] 1.9 compilation fails on windows if you have the pthread library installed — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/08/08

Issue #1527 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23584] [Bug #1528] setlocale is not initialized causing problems when using iconv — Hans de Graaff <redmine@...>

Bug #1528: setlocale is not initialized causing problems when using iconv

7 messages 2009/05/28
[#23585] [Bug #1528] setlocale is not initialized causing problems when using iconv — Manfred Stienstra <redmine@...> 2009/05/28

Issue #1528 has been updated by Manfred Stienstra.
[#23586] [Bug #1528](Rejected) setlocale is not initialized causing problems when using iconv — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/05/28

Issue #1528 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#23587] [Bug #1528] setlocale is not initialized causing problems when using iconv — Hans de Graaff <redmine@...> 2009/05/28

Issue #1528 has been updated by Hans de Graaff.
[#23589] [Bug #1528] setlocale is not initialized causing problems when using iconv — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/05/28

Issue #1528 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#25698] [Bug #1528] setlocale is not initialized causing problems when using iconv — Vincent Danjean <redmine@...> 2009/09/21

Issue #1528 has been updated by Vincent Danjean.
[#25744] Re: [Bug #1528] setlocale is not initialized causing problems when using iconv — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/09/24

Hi,

[#23588] [Bug #1529] unable to compile OOTB — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1529: unable to compile OOTB

3 messages 2009/05/28
[#23592] Re: [Bug #1529] unable to compile OOTB — Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@...> 2009/05/28

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Roger Pack <[email protected]> wrote:
[#23611] [Bug #1529](Closed) unable to compile OOTB — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/29

Issue #1529 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23590] [Bug #1530] configure option --program-suffix does not play well with runtime ri lookup — Robert Klemme <redmine@...>

Bug #1530: configure option --program-suffix does not play well with runtime ri lookup

2 messages 2009/05/28
[#23591] [Bug #1530] configure option --program-suffix does not play well with runtime ri lookup — Robert Klemme <redmine@...> 2009/05/28

Issue #1530 has been updated by Robert Klemme.

[#23593] Defining #name= at the class level — Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@...>

Hi folks,

10 messages 2009/05/28
[#23603] Re: Defining #name= at the class level — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/28

Hi,
[#23604] Re: Defining #name= at the class level — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/05/28

Excerpts from Yukihiro Matsumoto's message of Fri May 29 01:21:19 +0300 2009:
[#23605] Re: Defining #name= at the class level — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/28

Hi,
[#23606] Re: Defining #name= at the class level — Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@...> 2009/05/28

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <[email protected]> wr=
[#23618] Re: Defining #name= at the class level — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/29

Hi,
[#23624] Re: Defining #name= at the class level — Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@...> 2009/05/29

On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 3:12 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <[email protected]> wr=
[#23607] Re: Defining #name= at the class level — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/05/28

Excerpts from Yukihiro Matsumoto's message of Fri May 29 01:53:05 +0300 2009:
[#23615] Re: Defining #name= at the class level — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/05/29

Eero Saynatkari wrote:
[#23616] Re: Defining #name= at the class level — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/05/29

Excerpts from Charles Oliver Nutter's message of Fri May 29 06:12:49 +0300 2009:

[#23594] [1].cycle.to_a causes very tight loop — Ian Duggan <ian@...>

I'm not sure if this goes into the category of "just don't do that"

1 message 2009/05/28

[#23595] Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...>

The RUBY_PLATFORM constant is documented in the latest Pickaxe as "The

17 messages 2009/05/28
[#23600] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — "Daniel Berger" <djberg96@...> 2009/05/28

[#23596] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/05/28

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Rick DeNatale <[email protected]> wr=
[#23602] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/05/28

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Luis Lavena <[email protected]> wrote:
[#23608] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/05/28

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Rick DeNatale <[email protected]> wr=
[#23609] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/05/29

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Luis Lavena <[email protected]> wrote:
[#23610] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/05/29

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Rick DeNatale <[email protected]> wr=
[#23612] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/05/29

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Luis Lavena <[email protected]> wrote:
[#23619] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/05/29

> 1) The guy who wrote the gem fell into the trap of assuming that
[#23620] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/05/29

> Somewhat unrelated is that currently you can't tell from within ruby
[#23621] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Hongli Lai <[email protected]> 2009/05/29

Roger Pack wrote:
[#23622] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/05/29

>> =A0>> Rubinius::COMPILER
[#23623] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/05/29

Excerpts from rogerdpack's message of Fri May 29 16:14:22 +0300 2009:
[#23635] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/05/30

>> >> =A0>> Rubinius::COMPILER_VERSION
[#24456] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/07/20

> but not quite. =A0Maybe I should submit a patch to gems like
[#24457] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/07/20

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Roger Pack<[email protected]> wrote:
[#24458] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/07/20

> On Cygwin, Gem.win_platform? returns true, but Cygwin emulates a POSIX

[#23597] [Bug #1531] Matrix#determinant fails on some matrices — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1531: Matrix#determinant fails on some matrices

2 messages 2009/05/28
[#25608] [Bug #1531](Closed) Matrix#determinant fails on some matrices — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/16

Issue #1531 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#23598] [Bug #1532] Improved matrix.rb [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1532: Improved matrix.rb [patch]

5 messages 2009/05/28
[#25624] [Bug #1532] Improved matrix.rb [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/17

Issue #1532 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#26182] [Bug #1532](Closed) Improved matrix.rb [patch] — Keiju Ishitsuka <redmine@...> 2009/10/20

Issue #1532 has been updated by Keiju Ishitsuka.
[#26189] [Bug #1532](Open) Improved matrix.rb [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/10/20

Issue #1532 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#26267] [Bug #1532](Closed) Improved matrix.rb [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/10/24

Issue #1532 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#23601] [Bug #1533] Inconsistency Between Hash#to_s and Hash#inspect — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1533: Inconsistency Between Hash#to_s and Hash#inspect

2 messages 2009/05/28
[#23613] [Bug #1533](Closed) Inconsistency Between Hash#to_s and Hash#inspect — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/29

Issue #1533 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23614] [Bug #1535] Hash#merge! Inside Iterator Can Cause RuntimeError — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1535: Hash#merge! Inside Iterator Can Cause RuntimeError

7 messages 2009/05/29
[#23617] [Bug #1535] Hash#merge! Inside Iterator Can Cause RuntimeError — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/05/29

Issue #1535 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#23626] [Bug #1535] Hash#merge! Inside Iterator Can Cause RuntimeError — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/05/29

Issue #1535 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.
[#23629] [Bug #1535] Hash#merge! Inside Iterator Can Cause RuntimeError — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/05/30

Issue #1535 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#28189] [Bug #1535] Hash#merge! Inside Iterator Can Cause RuntimeError — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/02/16

Issue #1535 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#28190] Re: [Bug #1535] Hash#merge! Inside Iterator Can Cause RuntimeError — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/02/16

Hi,
[#28193] Re: [Bug #1535] Hash#merge! Inside Iterator Can Cause RuntimeError — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/02/16

Hi,

[#23628] [Bug #1539] [Docs] Hash#rehash Raises RuntimeError Not IndexError — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1539: [Docs] Hash#rehash Raises RuntimeError Not IndexError

2 messages 2009/05/29
[#25750] [Bug #1539](Closed) [Docs] Hash#rehash Raises RuntimeError Not IndexError — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/24

Issue #1539 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#23630] Expected Behaviour of Modifying an Iterator in the Block to Which it Yields? — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2009/05/30
[#23633] Re: Expected Behaviour of Modifying an Iterator in the Block to Which it Yields? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/30

Hi,
[#23637] Re: Expected Behaviour of Modifying an Iterator in the Block to Which it Yields? — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/05/30

On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <[email protected]> wr=

[#23636] feature request: Directory.dir? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

For some reason it seems odd to have to do File.dir?

6 messages 2009/05/30
[#23645] Re: feature request: Directory.dir? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/05/31

Hi,
[#23676] Re: feature request: Directory.dir? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/02

>> For some reason it seems odd to have to do File.dir?
[#23677] Re: feature request: Directory.dir? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/06/02

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Roger Pack <[email protected]> wrote:
[#23678] Re: feature request: Directory.dir? — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2009/06/02

Roger Pack wrote:
[#23679] Re: feature request: Directory.dir? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/02

> Aw, heck, why not

[#23638] [Bug #1540] read on win32 now defaults to blocking — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1540: read on win32 now defaults to blocking

2 messages 2009/05/30
[#23863] [Bug #1540] read on win32 now defaults to blocking — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/06/15

Issue #1540 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23639] [Bug #1541] mingw ssl: Errno::ENOTSOCK: An operation was attempted on something that is not a socket. — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1541: mingw ssl: Errno::ENOTSOCK: An operation was attempted on something that is not a socket.

5 messages 2009/05/30
[#30567] [Bug #1541][Feedback] mingw ssl: Errno::ENOTSOCK: An operation was attempted on something that is not a socket. — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/06/03

Issue #1541 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#30577] [Bug #1541][Closed] mingw ssl: Errno::ENOTSOCK: An operation was attempted on something that is not a socket. — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/06/03

Issue #1541 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#30581] Re: [Bug #1541][Closed] mingw ssl: Errno::ENOTSOCK: An operation was attempted on something that is not a socket. — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2010/06/04

Hello,
[#30582] Re: [Bug #1541][Closed] mingw ssl: Errno::ENOTSOCK: An operation was attempted on something that is not a socket. — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2010/06/04

Hello,

[#23640] [Bug #1542] test_inplace_rename_impossible(TestArgf) — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1542: test_inplace_rename_impossible(TestArgf)

2 messages 2009/05/30
[#26845] [Bug #1542](Closed) test_inplace_rename_impossible(TestArgf) — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/11/20

Issue #1542 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23641] [Bug #1543] failure: test_endblockwarn(TestBeginEndBlock) [c:/dev/downloads/ruby_trunk/test/ruby/test_beginendblock.rb:66]: — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1543: failure: test_endblockwarn(TestBeginEndBlock) [c:/dev/downloads/ruby_trunk/test/ruby/test_beginendblock.rb:66]:

2 messages 2009/05/30
[#29929] [Bug #1543](Closed) failure: test_endblockwarn(TestBeginEndBlock) [c:/dev/downloads/ruby_trunk/test/ruby/test_beginendblock.rb:66]: — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/05/02

Issue #1543 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23642] [Bug #1544] rb_io_write bug? — Brian Lopez <redmine@...>

Bug #1544: rb_io_write bug?

6 messages 2009/05/30
[#23650] Re: [Bug #1544] rb_io_write bug? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/31

Hi,
[#24089] [Bug #1544] rb_io_write bug? — Brian Lopez <redmine@...> 2009/06/29

Issue #1544 has been updated by Brian Lopez.
[#27880] [Bug #1544] rb_io_write bug? — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/01/27

Issue #1544 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#29382] [Bug #1544](Feedback) rb_io_write bug? — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/09

Issue #1544 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#29389] [Bug #1544] rb_io_write bug? — Brian Lopez <redmine@...> 2010/04/09

Issue #1544 has been updated by Brian Lopez.

[#23644] [Bug #1545] Patches for the Hash Documentation — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1545: Patches for the Hash Documentation

5 messages 2009/05/31
[#23647] Re: [Bug #1545] Patches for the Hash Documentation — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/05/31

Excerpts from message of Sun May 31 06:38:54 +0300 2009:
[#23667] Re: [Bug #1545] Patches for the Hash Documentation — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/02

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Eero Saynatkari
[#23673] Re: [Bug #1545] Patches for the Hash Documentation — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/06/02

Excerpts from Run Paint Run Run's message of Tue Jun 02 04:22:37 +0300 2009:
[#24067] [Bug #1545] Patches for the Hash Documentation — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/06/28

Issue #1545 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.

[#23646] Counterpart to File.extname — Martin DeMello <martindemello@...>

File.extname ought to have a complementary method that gets everything

6 messages 2009/05/31
[#23648] Re: Counterpart to File.extname — Ian Duggan <ian@...> 2009/05/31

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 1:52 AM, Martin DeMello <[email protected]> wrote:
[#23652] Re: Counterpart to File.extname — Michael Fellinger <m.fellinger@...> 2009/06/01

On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 03:35:47 +0900
[#23654] Re: Counterpart to File.extname — Martin DeMello <martindemello@...> 2009/06/01

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Michael Fellinger <[email protected]> wrote:
[#23655] Re: Counterpart to File.extname — George <george.ogata@...> 2009/06/01

FWIW, there is a precedent: man 1 basename . It was no doubt modelled after
[#23656] Re: Counterpart to File.extname — Martin DeMello <martindemello@...> 2009/06/01

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 12:52 PM, George <[email protected]> wrote:

[#23649] [Bug #1547] Fiber#alive? Returns 0 for true on 1.9.1 — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1547: Fiber#alive? Returns 0 for true on 1.9.1

2 messages 2009/05/31
[#27052] [Backport #1547](Rejected) Fiber#alive? Returns 0 for true on 1.9.1 — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/12/05

Issue #1547 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

[#23651] [Bug #1548] Segfault when Transferring to a Fiber which Resumes Itself — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1548: Segfault when Transferring to a Fiber which Resumes Itself

2 messages 2009/05/31
[#23653] [Bug #1548](Closed) Segfault when Transferring to a Fiber which Resumes Itself — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/01

Issue #1548 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[ruby-core:23478] Re: Submit bugs against 1.9.1?

From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>
Date: 2009-05-16 07:28:59 UTC
List: ruby-core #23478 
2009/5/15 daz <[email protected]>:
> Robert Klemme wrote:
>>
>> I use FF 3.0.10 on Win XP Pro 32bit.
>
> Works OK here with that config.
>
> IE7 OK, too, even Opera :)

Same story from home, if I go to
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-191/issues/new there are no
mailing lists in the drop down box and no categories.

> Javascript issue?

No idea, I have JavaScript enabled but disallowed status bar changes
and window context menue changes.  I can't remember having issues with
these settings on any other page.  Also, AdBlock Plus did not remove
or hide anything and deactivating did not make a difference either.  I
could try to disable all my FF extensions.  Any other ideas?

Kind regards

robert

-- 
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/

In This Thread

Prev Next