[#35446] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4477][Open] Kernel:exec and backtick (`) don't work for certain system commands — Joachim Wuttke <j.wuttke@...>

10 messages 2011/03/07

[#35476] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4489][Open] [PATCH] Encodings with /-(unix|dos|mac)\Z/ — "James M. Lawrence" <quixoticsycophant@...>

20 messages 2011/03/10

[#35552] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4523][Open] Kernel#require to return the path of the loaded file — Alex Young <alex@...>

14 messages 2011/03/24

[#35565] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531][Open] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

33 messages 2011/03/28

[#35566] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4532][Open] [PATCH] add IO#pread and IO#pwrite methods — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

12 messages 2011/03/28

[#35586] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4538][Open] [PATCH (cleanup)] avoid unnecessary select() calls before doing I/O — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

9 messages 2011/03/29

[ruby-core:35512] Re: Why has defined? been changed for autoloaded constants in 1.9?

From: Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
Date: 2011-03-17 10:57:03 UTC
List: ruby-core #35512
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:49, Magnus Holm <[email protected]> wrote:
> What about something like this?
> defined?(Gem) && Gem.const_defined?(:Specification)

Yes, that=E2=80=99s how I did things before (Object.const_defined? :Gem and
Gem.const_defined? :Specification, even), but I was hoping that there
was something a bit more, well, simple.

In This Thread