[#41908] [Backport93 - Backport #5844][Open] Can't install ruby-debug-base19 — Brian Osborne <bosborne11@...>
3 messages
2012/01/05
[#41916] Proposal: Bitmap Marking GC — Narihiro Nakamura <authornari@...>
Hi.
18 messages
2012/01/05
[#41919] Re: Proposal: Bitmap Marking GC
— Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
2012/01/05
> And, GC is a little bit slower. But, I think it's in acceptable range.
[#41968] Re: Proposal: Bitmap Marking GC
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2012/01/07
Narihiro Nakamura <[email protected]> wrote:
[#41969] Re: Proposal: Bitmap Marking GC
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2012/01/07
> Narihiro Nakamura <[email protected]> wrote:
[#41934] feature request: marshallable proc's — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Every so often I wish I could do something like
10 messages
2012/01/05
[#41936] Re: feature request: marshallable proc's
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2012/01/06
On 2012年01月06日 08:54, Roger Pack wrote:
[#42898] Re: feature request: marshallable proc's
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/02/25
What should happen on the following code?
[#41979] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5865][Open] Exception#== should return false if the classes differ — Hiro Asari <asari.ruby@...>
10 messages
2012/01/08
[#41997] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5865] Exception#== should return false if the classes differ
— Hiro Asari <asari.ruby@...>
2012/01/09
[#42000] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5865] Exception#== should return false if the classes differ
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2012/01/09
Hi,
[#42002] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5865] Exception#== should return false if the classes differ
— Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
2012/01/09
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:43, Yukihiro Matsumoto <[email protected]> wrote=
[#42003] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5871][Open] regexp \W matches some word characters when inside a case-insensitive character class — Gareth Adams <gareth@...>
14 messages
2012/01/09
[#42016] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5873][Open] Adopt FFI over DL — Heesob Park <phasis@...>
15 messages
2012/01/10
[#42035] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5873] Adopt FFI over DL
— Heesob Park <phasis@...>
2012/01/10
[#42125] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5873] Adopt FFI over DL
— Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
2012/01/13
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:01:26PM +0900, Heesob Park wrote:
[#42127] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5873] Adopt FFI over DL
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2012/01/14
Hi,
[#42129] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5873] Adopt FFI over DL
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2012/01/14
> To remove original DL completely, we have to bundle libffi itself
[#42042] RUBY 2 RCR: remove Thread#raise — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello.
6 messages
2012/01/10
[#42061] Re: RUBY 2 RCR: remove Thread#raise
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2012/01/11
Roger Pack <[email protected]> wrote:
[#42049] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5877][Open] Poor performance of initial and final UTF-8 substrings — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...>
4 messages
2012/01/10
[#42063] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5884][Open] Float::NAN and 0.0/0.0 is represented differently when packed with 'g' — Hiro Asari <asari.ruby@...>
9 messages
2012/01/11
[#42080] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5887][Open] The documentation of Module.constants is incorrect — Shugo Maeda <redmine@...>
9 messages
2012/01/12
[#42085] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5888][Open] JSON unittest fails — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
13 messages
2012/01/12
[#42093] Backport93 help needed for a few Windows requests? — Jon <jon.forums@...>
Currently the following Windows-specific backport requests to ruby_1_9_3 remain unassigned:
4 messages
2012/01/12
[#42113] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5893][Open] named return,next... — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...>
7 messages
2012/01/13
[#42114] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5893][Open] named return,next...
— Anurag Priyam <anurag08priyam@...>
2012/01/13
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Ondrej Bilka <[email protected]> wrote:
[#42115] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5893][Open] named return,next...
— Ondřej Bílka <neleai@...>
2012/01/13
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:11:28PM +0900, Anurag Priyam wrote:
[#42139] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5898][Open] raise and Exception#initialize — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
10 messages
2012/01/16
[#42149] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5899][Open] chaining comparsions. — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...>
12 messages
2012/01/16
[#42160] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5902][Open] Array#join with an unused, infected separator may or may not infect the result — John Firebaugh <john.firebaugh@...>
8 messages
2012/01/17
[#42164] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5903][Open] Optimize st_table (take 2) — Yura Sokolov <funny.falcon@...>
18 messages
2012/01/17
[#42189] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5914][Open] Calling extend with an anonymous module requires use of parentheses — Mark Somerville <mark@...>
3 messages
2012/01/20
[#42194] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5915][Open] Array#join with explicit nil should not use $, — John Firebaugh <john.firebaugh@...>
10 messages
2012/01/20
[#42222] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5925][Open] Lazy initialization is not thread safe. — Xuân Baldauf <xuan--2009--xbaldauf--redmine.ruby-lang.org@...>
5 messages
2012/01/23
[#42235] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5931][Open] Random SEGV during execution on YARD specs — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
9 messages
2012/01/26
[#42246] Fwd: RCR String#{last, first} — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello.
6 messages
2012/01/27
[#42256] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5945][Open] Add the ability to mark a at_exit as process-local. — Robert Gleeson <rob@...>
4 messages
2012/01/30
[#42257] [Backport93 - Backport #5942][Open] Backport r34309-34310 r34312-32414 — Yura Sokolov <funny.falcon@...>
4 messages
2012/01/30
[#42285] Why Ruby 1.9 GUI hangs if i do any intensive computation in separate Ruby thread? — Grigory Petrov <grigory.v.p@...>
Hello
4 messages
2012/01/31
[#42286] Re: Why Ruby 1.9 GUI hangs if i do any intensive computation in separate Ruby thread?
— "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...>
2012/01/31
the GIL is *not* supposed to lift if some threads enters native code...
[ruby-core:42188] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5912][Open] Interpreter crashes when trying to invoke implicit block via Binding#eval
From:
Ryan LeCompte <lecompte@...>
Date:
2012-01-20 06:07:58 UTC
List:
ruby-core #42188
Issue #5912 has been reported by Ryan LeCompte.
----------------------------------------
Bug #5912: Interpreter crashes when trying to invoke implicit block via Binding#eval
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/5912
Author: Ryan LeCompte
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Target version:
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.2p290 (2011-07-09 revision 32553) [x86_64-darwin11.0.1]
Here's how to reproduce the problem:
[1] pry(main)> def foo
[1] pry(main)* binding
[1] pry(main)* end
=> nil
[2] pry(main)> b = foo { puts 'hi!' }
=> #<Binding:0x007f8b7a0e2ec0>
[3] pry(main)> b.eval('Proc.new').call
(pry):5: [BUG] Segmentation fault
ruby 1.9.2p290 (2011-07-09 revision 32553) [x86_64-darwin11.0.1]
-- control frame ----------
c:0020 p:---- s:0071 b:0071 l:000070 d:000070 CFUNC :call
c:0019 p:0019 s:0068 b:0068 l:000fc8 d:001bc8 EVAL (pry):5
c:0018 p:---- s:0066 b:0066 l:000065 d:000065 FINISH
c:0017 p:---- s:0064 b:0064 l:000063 d:000063 CFUNC :eval
c:0016 p:0223 s:0058 b:0057 l:000056 d:000056 METHOD /Users/ryan/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/pry-0.9.7.4/lib/pry/pry_instance.rb:235
c:0015 p:0041 s:0049 b:0049 l:000048 d:000048 METHOD /Users/ryan/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/pry-0.9.7.4/lib/pry/pry_instance.rb:202
c:0014 p:0022 s:0044 b:0044 l:000028 d:000043 BLOCK /Users/ryan/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/pry-0.9.7.4/lib/pry/pry_instance.rb:187
c:0013 p:---- s:0042 b:0042 l:000041 d:000041 FINISH
c:0012 p:---- s:0040 b:0040 l:000039 d:000039 CFUNC :loop
c:0011 p:0009 s:0037 b:0037 l:000028 d:000036 BLOCK /Users/ryan/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/pry-0.9.7.4/lib/pry/pry_instance.rb:186
c:0010 p:---- s:0035 b:0035 l:000034 d:000034 FINISH
c:0009 p:---- s:0033 b:0033 l:000032 d:000032 CFUNC :catch
c:0008 p:0067 s:0029 b:0029 l:000028 d:000028 METHOD /Users/ryan/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/pry-0.9.7.4/lib/pry/pry_instance.rb:185
c:0007 p:0188 s:0023 b:0023 l:001858 d:001858 METHOD /Users/ryan/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/pry-0.9.7.4/lib/pry/pry_class.rb:97
c:0006 p:0164 s:0018 b:0018 l:000e60 d:000e60 TOP /Users/ryan/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/pry-0.9.7.4/bin/pry:93
c:0005 p:---- s:0013 b:0013 l:000012 d:000012 FINISH
c:0004 p:---- s:0011 b:0011 l:000010 d:000010 CFUNC :load
c:0003 p:0127 s:0007 b:0007 l:000fc8 d:000270 EVAL /Users/ryan/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/bin/pry:19
c:0002 p:---- s:0004 b:0004 l:000003 d:000003 FINISH
c:0001 p:0000 s:0002 b:0002 l:000fc8 d:000fc8 TOP
---------------------------
-- Ruby level backtrace information ----------------------------------------
/Users/ryan/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/bin/pry:19:in `<main>'
/Users/ryan/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/bin/pry:19:in `load'
/Users/ryan/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/pry-0.9.7.4/bin/pry:93:in `<top (required)>'
/Users/ryan/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/pry-0.9.7.4/lib/pry/pry_class.rb:97:in `start'
/Users/ryan/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/pry-0.9.7.4/lib/pry/pry_instance.rb:185:in `repl'
/Users/ryan/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/pry-0.9.7.4/lib/pry/pry_instance.rb:185:in `catch'
/Users/ryan/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/pry-0.9.7.4/lib/pry/pry_instance.rb:186:in `block in repl'
/Users/ryan/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/pry-0.9.7.4/lib/pry/pry_instance.rb:186:in `loop'
/Users/ryan/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/pry-0.9.7.4/lib/pry/pry_instance.rb:187:in `block (2 levels) in repl'
/Users/ryan/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/pry-0.9.7.4/lib/pry/pry_instance.rb:202:in `rep'
/Users/ryan/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/pry-0.9.7.4/lib/pry/pry_instance.rb:235:in `re'
/Users/ryan/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/pry-0.9.7.4/lib/pry/pry_instance.rb:235:in `eval'
(pry):5:in `<main>'
(pry):5:in `call'
-- C level backtrace information -------------------------------------------
[NOTE]
You may have encountered a bug in the Ruby interpreter or extension libraries.
Bug reports are welcome.
For details: http://www.ruby-lang.org/bugreport.html
Abort trap: 6
Interestingly enough, if you type it all on a single line, it works!
def foo; binding; end; b = foo { puts 'hi!' }; b.eval('Proc.new').call
But then afterwards, if you type:
b.eval('Proc.new').call
It will crash the interpreter.
--
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/