[#58730] [ruby-trunk - misc #9188][Open] r43870 make benchmark/bm_so_k_nucleotide.rb slow — "authorNari (Narihiro Nakamura)" <authorNari@...>

17 messages 2013/12/01

[#58732] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9189][Open] Build failure on Windows in case of nonascii TEMP environment. — "phasis68 (Heesob Park)" <phasis@...>

11 messages 2013/12/01

[#58750] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9190][Open] Expose serial helper macros — "simeonwillbanks (Simeon Willbanks)" <sfw@...>

13 messages 2013/12/01

[#58756] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9192][Open] Inconsistent comparison between Float and BigDecimal — "vatsu (Gustavo Sales)" <vatsu21@...>

18 messages 2013/12/02

[#58797] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9198][Open] Segfault in TestException#test_machine_stackoverflow — "vo.x (Vit Ondruch)" <v.ondruch@...>

11 messages 2013/12/02

[#58833] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9205][Open] Assertion failed: heap_pages_deferred_final == 0 — "phasis68 (Heesob Park)" <phasis@...>

11 messages 2013/12/03

[#58866] [ruby-trunk - misc #9215][Open] Maintenance Policy for Future Releases (2.1.0 & beyond) — "hone (Terence Lee)" <hone02@...>

17 messages 2013/12/05

[#58876] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9221][Open] Time.parse performance becomes exponentially worse as string length grows — "mpelzsherman (Michael Pelz-Sherman)" <mpelzsherman@...>

15 messages 2013/12/05

[#58948] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9226][Open] Getting method `inspect' called on unexpected T_NODE object (0x000000025ddea8 flags=0x109089c klass=0x0) (NotImplementedError) from Hash#inspect — "myronmarston (Myron Marston)" <myron.marston@...>

11 messages 2013/12/07

[#59032] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9239][Open] Array#to_h ignores flat arrays — "sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada)" <sawadatsuyoshi@...>

15 messages 2013/12/10

[#59122] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9251][Open] ! operator has lower precedence than = in an assignment expression — "rits (First Last)" <redmine@...>

26 messages 2013/12/15

[#59198] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9262][Open] global_method_cache should be configurable or grow automatically — "tmm1 (Aman Gupta)" <[email protected]>

28 messages 2013/12/19

[#59209] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9264][Open] Compiling error: encdb.bundle Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64 — "spastorino (Santiago Pastorino)" <santiago@...>

15 messages 2013/12/19
[#59211] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9264][Feedback] Compiling error: encdb.bundle Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64 — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <e@...> 2013/12/19

[#59212] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #9264][Feedback] Compiling error: encdb.bundle Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64 — Santiago Pastorino <spastorino@...> 2013/12/19

zzak, make distclean is the first thing I've ran. Read the gist again :),

[#59213] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #9264][Feedback] Compiling error: encdb.bundle Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64 — Zachary Scott <e@...> 2013/12/19

Sorry I missed the gist, can you try building outside of $srcdir?

[#59214] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #9264][Feedback] Compiling error: encdb.bundle Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64 — Santiago Pastorino <spastorino@...> 2013/12/19

It works if I do ...

[#59215] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #9264][Feedback] Compiling error: encdb.bundle Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64 — Zachary Scott <e@...> 2013/12/19

I've been using the following:

[#59255] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9276][Open] "RUBY_FREE_MIN is obsolete. Use RUBY_GC_HEAP_FREE_SLOTS instead" warning should not be issued when both ENV vars are set. — "myronmarston (Myron Marston)" <myron.marston@...>

10 messages 2013/12/21

[#59260] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9278][Open] Magic comment "immutable: string" makes "literal".freeze the default for that file — "colindkelley (Colin Kelley)" <colin@...>

12 messages 2013/12/22

[#59343] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9309][Open] Crash while running tests — "mdemare (Michiel de MAre)" <merloen@...>

12 messages 2013/12/27

[#59345] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9310][Open] inheritance.rb: 27: [BUG] Segmentation fault at 0x00000c — "jasnow (Al Snow)" <jasnow@...>

10 messages 2013/12/27

[#59349] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9312][Open] Build the ruby executable in bin/ — "postmodern (Hal Brodigan)" <postmodern.mod3@...>

13 messages 2013/12/28

[#59365] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9316][Open] BigDecimal division in Ruby 2.1 — "abernardes (Andre Oliveira)" <abernardes@...>

15 messages 2013/12/28

[#59398] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9321][Open] rb_mod_const_missing does not generate a c-return event — "drkaes (Stefan Kaes)" <stkaes@...>

41 messages 2013/12/30

[#59429] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9330][Open] [PATCH 0/3] avoid redundant fcntl/fstat syscalls for cloexec sockets — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>

10 messages 2013/12/31

[ruby-core:58910] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9123] Make Numeric#nonzero? behavior consistent with Numeric#zero?

From: "guigs (Guilherme Schneider)" <guigs81@...>
Date: 2013-12-06 13:37:13 UTC
List: ruby-core #58910
Issue #9123 has been updated by guigs (Guilherme Schneider).


I think current implementation of Numeric#nonzero? is fine, because, as was said, a predicate is expected to return truthy or falsey values.

On the other hand, Numeric#nonzero? should only be used as a predicate. So one should not rely on it returning self if is not zero. But, because so many do use nonzero? expecting that it returns self if it is not zero (and indeed the spec say so), changing it would break compatibility.

So, what about keeping current implementation of Numeric#nonzero? and adding Numeric#nonzero (with identical implementation), but intended to be used in non predicate cases, like

a.sort {|a,b| (a.downcase <=> b.downcase).nonzero || a <=> b }

And then maybe deprecate usage of Numeric#nonzero? in non predicate cases (and changing the spec saying that nonzero? returns true if the number is not zero).
----------------------------------------
Feature #9123: Make Numeric#nonzero? behavior consistent with Numeric#zero?
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9123#change-43461

Author: sferik (Erik Michaels-Ober)
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Category: core
Target version: 


Numeric#zero? returns true or false, while Numeric#nonzero? returns self or nil.

I've written a patch that fixes this inconsistency and adds a Numeric#nonzero (non-predicate) method that returns self or nil for chaining comparisons. I'd like for this to be included in Ruby 2.1.0.

https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/452.patch


-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

In This Thread