[#59462] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9342][Open] [PATCH] SizedQueue#clear does not notify waiting threads in Ruby 1.9.3 — "jsc (Justin Collins)" <redmine@...>

9 messages 2014/01/02

[#59466] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9343][Open] [PATCH] SizedQueue#max= wakes up waiters properly — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>

11 messages 2014/01/02

[#59498] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9352][Open] [BUG] rb_sys_fail_str(connect(2) for [fe80::1%lo0]:3000) - errno == 0 — "kain (Claudio Poli)" <claudio@...>

10 messages 2014/01/03

[#59516] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9356][Open] TCPSocket.new does not seem to handle INTR — "charliesome (Charlie Somerville)" <charliesome@...>

48 messages 2014/01/03

[#59538] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed — "shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe)" <shyouhei@...>

33 messages 2014/01/03
[#59541] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2014/01/04

Hi, I noticed a trivial typo in array.c, and it fails building struct.c

[#59582] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2014/01/06

Intersting challenge.

[#59583] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9367][Open] REXML::XmlDecl doesn't use user specified quotes — "bearmini (Takashi Oguma)" <bear.mini@...>

12 messages 2014/01/06

[#59642] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9384][Open] Segfault in ruby 2.1.0p0 — "cbliard (Christophe Bliard)" <christophe.bliard@...>

11 messages 2014/01/08

[#59791] About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>

A while ago I created a proof-of-concept that I intended to use in my

16 messages 2014/01/15
[#59794] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Eric Hodel <[email protected]> 2014/01/15

On 15 Jan 2014, at 11:58, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <[email protected]> =

[#59808] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2014/01/16

Em 15-01-2014 19:42, Eric Hodel escreveu:

[#59810] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Eric Hodel <[email protected]> 2014/01/16

On 16 Jan 2014, at 02:15, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <[email protected]> =

[#59826] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2014/01/17

Em 16-01-2014 19:43, Eric Hodel escreveu:

[#59832] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Eric Hodel <[email protected]> 2014/01/17

On 17 Jan 2014, at 04:22, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <[email protected]> =

[ruby-core:59934] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9121] [PATCH] Remove rbtree implementation of SortedSet due to performance regression

From: e@...
Date: 2014-01-21 17:07:12 UTC
List: ruby-core #59934
Issue #9121 has been updated by Zachary Scott.


I just wanted to remind everyone of the discussion that took place regarding adding RBTree to stdlib in [Feature #2348]

----------------------------------------
Bug #9121: [PATCH] Remove rbtree implementation of SortedSet due to performance regression
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9121#change-44474

* Author: Xavier Shay
* Status: Assigned
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: Akinori MUSHA
* Category: lib
* Target version: Next Major
* ruby -v: 2.0.0-p247
* Backport: 1.9.3: UNKNOWN, 2.0.0: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
rbtree is slower than the pure ruby version.

I have provided benchmarks and a patch here:
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/451

> ruby sorted_set_benchmark.rb
using rbtree
       user     system      total        real
#add  0.010000   0.000000   0.010000 (  0.016446)
#delete  0.020000   0.000000   0.020000 (  0.013248)
#include? 1000 items  0.010000   0.000000   0.010000 (  0.011822)
#include? 2000 items  0.020000   0.000000   0.020000 (  0.012572)
#include? 3000 items  0.020000   0.000000   0.020000 (  0.013610)
#include? 4000 items  0.020000   0.000000   0.020000 (  0.014295)
#include? 5000 items  0.010000   0.000000   0.010000 (  0.018024)
#to_a 1000 items  0.580000   0.020000   0.600000 (  0.616104)
#to_a 2000 items  1.170000   0.040000   1.210000 (  1.213406)
#to_a 3000 items  1.730000   0.030000   1.760000 (  1.773069)
#to_a 4000 items  2.370000   0.040000   2.410000 (  2.420450)
#to_a 5000 items  2.920000   0.050000   2.970000 (  2.975497)
> ruby sorted_set_benchmark.rb
NOT using rbtree
       user     system      total        real
#add  0.010000   0.000000   0.010000 (  0.007889)
#delete  0.010000   0.000000   0.010000 (  0.004631)
#include? 1000 items  0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 (  0.005060)
#include? 2000 items  0.010000   0.000000   0.010000 (  0.005950)
#include? 3000 items  0.010000   0.000000   0.010000 (  0.005814)
#include? 4000 items  0.010000   0.000000   0.010000 (  0.005993)
#include? 5000 items  0.010000   0.000000   0.010000 (  0.006923)
#to_a 1000 items  0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 (  0.001863)
#to_a 2000 items  0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 (  0.002145)
#to_a 3000 items  0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 (  0.002129)
#to_a 4000 items  0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 (  0.002265)
#to_a 5000 items  0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 (  0.002428)



-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

In This Thread