[#64210] Asking for clarification for exception handling usage — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
I've created a ticket for that but didn't get any feedback so I decided
5 messages
2014/08/05
[#64517] Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project — Tetsuya Kitahata <[email protected]>
What do you think? >> Ruby developers
13 messages
2014/08/23
[#64524] Re: Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project
— Henry Maddocks <hmaddocks@...>
2014/08/24
[#64525] Re: Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project
— Brandon Weaver <keystonelemur@...>
2014/08/24
What benefits are there to this? I have a feeling that adding unnecessary
[#64526] Re: Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project
— Tetsuya Kitahata <[email protected]>
2014/08/24
On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 22:43:46 -0700
[#64527] Re: Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2014/08/24
Here I am a Japanese. Before moving anywhere else answer to our question first: what benefits?
[#64528] Re: Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project
— Tetsuya Kitahata <[email protected]>
2014/08/24
tax issue with each other.
[#64614] cowspace (work-in-progress) — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Hi all, I started working on a cowspace branch. Based on the mspace API
4 messages
2014/08/28
[#64615] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat() — oss-ruby-lang@...
Issue #10181 has been reported by Technorama Ltd..
10 messages
2014/08/28
[#64616] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat()
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/08/28
I like this feature.
[#64623] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat()
— Joel VanderWerf <joelvanderwerf@...>
2014/08/29
On 08/28/2014 02:53 PM, Eric Wong wrote:
[#64634] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat()
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/08/29
Joel VanderWerf <[email protected]> wrote:
[#64635] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat()
— Joel VanderWerf <joelvanderwerf@...>
2014/08/29
On 08/29/2014 12:55 AM, Eric Wong wrote:
[#64638] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat()
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/08/29
Joel VanderWerf <[email protected]> wrote:
[#64627] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10182] [PATCH] string.c: move frozen_strings table to rb_vm_t — ko1@...
Issue #10182 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
3 messages
2014/08/29
[#64671] Fwd: [ruby-changes:35240] normal:r47322 (trunk): symbol.c (rb_sym2id): do not return garbage object — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Why this fix solve your problem?
9 messages
2014/08/30
[#64672] Re: Fwd: [ruby-changes:35240] normal:r47322 (trunk): symbol.c (rb_sym2id): do not return garbage object
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/08/30
(2014/08/30 8:50), SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#64676] Re: Fwd: [ruby-changes:35240] normal:r47322 (trunk): symbol.c (rb_sym2id): do not return garbage object
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/08/30
SASADA Koichi <[email protected]> wrote:
[#64684] Re: Fwd: [ruby-changes:35240] normal:r47322 (trunk): symbol.c (rb_sym2id): do not return garbage object
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/08/31
Eric Wong <[email protected]> wrote:
[#64692] Re: Fwd: [ruby-changes:35240] normal:r47322 (trunk): symbol.c (rb_sym2id): do not return garbage object
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/08/31
(2014/08/31 0:18), Eric Wong wrote:
[ruby-core:64574] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9121] [PATCH] Remove rbtree implementation of SortedSet due to performance regression
From:
shibata.hiroshi@...
Date:
2014-08-27 03:29:26 UTC
List:
ruby-core #64574
Issue #9121 has been updated by Hiroshi SHIBATA.
Related to Feature #2348: RBTree Should be Added to the Standard Library added
----------------------------------------
Bug #9121: [PATCH] Remove rbtree implementation of SortedSet due to performance regression
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9121#change-48502
* Author: Xavier Shay
* Status: Assigned
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: Akinori MUSHA
* Category: lib
* Target version: Next Major
* ruby -v: 2.0.0-p247
* Backport: 1.9.3: UNKNOWN, 2.0.0: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
rbtree is slower than the pure ruby version.
I have provided benchmarks and a patch here:
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/451
> ruby sorted_set_benchmark.rb
using rbtree
user system total real
#add 0.010000 0.000000 0.010000 ( 0.016446)
#delete 0.020000 0.000000 0.020000 ( 0.013248)
#include? 1000 items 0.010000 0.000000 0.010000 ( 0.011822)
#include? 2000 items 0.020000 0.000000 0.020000 ( 0.012572)
#include? 3000 items 0.020000 0.000000 0.020000 ( 0.013610)
#include? 4000 items 0.020000 0.000000 0.020000 ( 0.014295)
#include? 5000 items 0.010000 0.000000 0.010000 ( 0.018024)
#to_a 1000 items 0.580000 0.020000 0.600000 ( 0.616104)
#to_a 2000 items 1.170000 0.040000 1.210000 ( 1.213406)
#to_a 3000 items 1.730000 0.030000 1.760000 ( 1.773069)
#to_a 4000 items 2.370000 0.040000 2.410000 ( 2.420450)
#to_a 5000 items 2.920000 0.050000 2.970000 ( 2.975497)
> ruby sorted_set_benchmark.rb
NOT using rbtree
user system total real
#add 0.010000 0.000000 0.010000 ( 0.007889)
#delete 0.010000 0.000000 0.010000 ( 0.004631)
#include? 1000 items 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 ( 0.005060)
#include? 2000 items 0.010000 0.000000 0.010000 ( 0.005950)
#include? 3000 items 0.010000 0.000000 0.010000 ( 0.005814)
#include? 4000 items 0.010000 0.000000 0.010000 ( 0.005993)
#include? 5000 items 0.010000 0.000000 0.010000 ( 0.006923)
#to_a 1000 items 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 ( 0.001863)
#to_a 2000 items 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 ( 0.002145)
#to_a 3000 items 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 ( 0.002129)
#to_a 4000 items 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 ( 0.002265)
#to_a 5000 items 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 ( 0.002428)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/