[#64210] Asking for clarification for exception handling usage — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
I've created a ticket for that but didn't get any feedback so I decided
5 messages
2014/08/05
[#64517] Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project — Tetsuya Kitahata <[email protected]>
What do you think? >> Ruby developers
13 messages
2014/08/23
[#64524] Re: Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project
— Henry Maddocks <hmaddocks@...>
2014/08/24
[#64525] Re: Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project
— Brandon Weaver <keystonelemur@...>
2014/08/24
What benefits are there to this? I have a feeling that adding unnecessary
[#64526] Re: Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project
— Tetsuya Kitahata <[email protected]>
2014/08/24
On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 22:43:46 -0700
[#64527] Re: Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2014/08/24
Here I am a Japanese. Before moving anywhere else answer to our question first: what benefits?
[#64528] Re: Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project
— Tetsuya Kitahata <[email protected]>
2014/08/24
tax issue with each other.
[#64614] cowspace (work-in-progress) — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Hi all, I started working on a cowspace branch. Based on the mspace API
4 messages
2014/08/28
[#64615] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat() — oss-ruby-lang@...
Issue #10181 has been reported by Technorama Ltd..
10 messages
2014/08/28
[#64616] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat()
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/08/28
I like this feature.
[#64623] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat()
— Joel VanderWerf <joelvanderwerf@...>
2014/08/29
On 08/28/2014 02:53 PM, Eric Wong wrote:
[#64634] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat()
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/08/29
Joel VanderWerf <[email protected]> wrote:
[#64635] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat()
— Joel VanderWerf <joelvanderwerf@...>
2014/08/29
On 08/29/2014 12:55 AM, Eric Wong wrote:
[#64638] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat()
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/08/29
Joel VanderWerf <[email protected]> wrote:
[#64627] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10182] [PATCH] string.c: move frozen_strings table to rb_vm_t — ko1@...
Issue #10182 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
3 messages
2014/08/29
[#64671] Fwd: [ruby-changes:35240] normal:r47322 (trunk): symbol.c (rb_sym2id): do not return garbage object — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Why this fix solve your problem?
9 messages
2014/08/30
[#64672] Re: Fwd: [ruby-changes:35240] normal:r47322 (trunk): symbol.c (rb_sym2id): do not return garbage object
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/08/30
(2014/08/30 8:50), SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#64676] Re: Fwd: [ruby-changes:35240] normal:r47322 (trunk): symbol.c (rb_sym2id): do not return garbage object
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/08/30
SASADA Koichi <[email protected]> wrote:
[#64684] Re: Fwd: [ruby-changes:35240] normal:r47322 (trunk): symbol.c (rb_sym2id): do not return garbage object
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/08/31
Eric Wong <[email protected]> wrote:
[#64692] Re: Fwd: [ruby-changes:35240] normal:r47322 (trunk): symbol.c (rb_sym2id): do not return garbage object
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/08/31
(2014/08/31 0:18), Eric Wong wrote:
[ruby-core:64610] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10177] Hash#has_key? and Hash#has_value? should be deprecated
From:
eregontp@...
Date:
2014-08-28 12:29:11 UTC
List:
ruby-core #64610
Issue #10177 has been updated by Benoit Daloze. I guess your second sentence is meant the other way round: "And I agree with him, I supposed Hash#key? should be preferred over Hash#has_key?, " ---------------------------------------- Feature #10177: Hash#has_key? and Hash#has_value? should be deprecated https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10177#change-48529 * Author: gogo tanaka * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Category: lib * Target version: ---------------------------------------- I referred to this Matz's remark. http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/43765 And I agree with him, I supposed `Hash#has_key?` should be preferred over `Hash#key?`, so I replaced all of `Hash#has_key?` and `Hash#has_value?` in `lib/*` with `Hash#key?` and `Hash#value?` ---Files-------------------------------- Replace_Hash#has_something.PATCH (20.4 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/