[#64210] Asking for clarification for exception handling usage — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
I've created a ticket for that but didn't get any feedback so I decided
[#64517] Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project — Tetsuya Kitahata <[email protected]>
What do you think? >> Ruby developers
What benefits are there to this? I have a feeling that adding unnecessary
On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 22:43:46 -0700
Here I am a Japanese. Before moving anywhere else answer to our question first: what benefits?
tax issue with each other.
[#64614] cowspace (work-in-progress) — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Hi all, I started working on a cowspace branch. Based on the mspace API
[#64615] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat() — oss-ruby-lang@...
Issue #10181 has been reported by Technorama Ltd..
I like this feature.
On 08/28/2014 02:53 PM, Eric Wong wrote:
Joel VanderWerf <[email protected]> wrote:
On 08/29/2014 12:55 AM, Eric Wong wrote:
Joel VanderWerf <[email protected]> wrote:
[#64627] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10182] [PATCH] string.c: move frozen_strings table to rb_vm_t — ko1@...
Issue #10182 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
[#64671] Fwd: [ruby-changes:35240] normal:r47322 (trunk): symbol.c (rb_sym2id): do not return garbage object — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Why this fix solve your problem?
(2014/08/30 8:50), SASADA Koichi wrote:
SASADA Koichi <[email protected]> wrote:
Eric Wong <[email protected]> wrote:
(2014/08/31 0:18), Eric Wong wrote:
[ruby-core:64292] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #10105] [Assigned] Mixed styles for class methods on Tempfile break RDocs.
I've tried to fix it only touching documentation, and it seems to be impossible, rdoc does not understand the `class << self` syntax (I understand rdoc in this point, ruby is not easy to parse). I've added an issue in Rdoc for it ( https://github.com/rdoc/rdoc/issues/317 ). So the Tempfile.open method needs to be redefined to be understand by rdoc. I've updated the pull request with the minimal change that will fix the issue **I don't like it** as it define class methods outside of the class itself (so the source is harder to read), and it hardcode the class name two times (that I think is ugly). I quite not understand why there is so much resistance to refactor the code for readability. --- Eloy 2014-08-07 21:36 GMT-03:00 <[email protected]>: > Issue #10105 has been updated by Zachary Scott. > > Status changed from Third Party's Issue to Assigned > Assignee changed from Eric Hodel to Zachary Scott > > This may be a bug in RDoc, but we can fix it without redefining the > methods by using the document method directive: > > See > http://docs.seattlerb.org/rdoc/RDoc/Parser/Ruby.html#class-RDoc::Parser::Ruby-label-Metaprogrammed+Methods > > Could you send a patch for this instead? > > ---------------------------------------- > Bug #10105: Mixed styles for class methods on Tempfile break RDocs. > https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10105#change-48241 > > * Author: Eloy Esp > * Status: Assigned > * Priority: Normal > * Assignee: Zachary Scott > * Category: doc > * Target version: > * ruby -v: 2.1.1 > * Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN > ---------------------------------------- > I've already made a little pull request here > https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/691. > > The diff is here: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/691.diff > > But to make the real changes clear is it better to ignore white-space (as > there are many indentation changes). > > Changes ignoring white-space: > https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/691/files?w=1 > > Regards. > > > > -- > https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ >