[#64210] Asking for clarification for exception handling usage — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
I've created a ticket for that but didn't get any feedback so I decided
[#64517] Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project — Tetsuya Kitahata <[email protected]>
What do you think? >> Ruby developers
What benefits are there to this? I have a feeling that adding unnecessary
On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 22:43:46 -0700
Here I am a Japanese. Before moving anywhere else answer to our question first: what benefits?
tax issue with each other.
[#64614] cowspace (work-in-progress) — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Hi all, I started working on a cowspace branch. Based on the mspace API
[#64615] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat() — oss-ruby-lang@...
Issue #10181 has been reported by Technorama Ltd..
I like this feature.
On 08/28/2014 02:53 PM, Eric Wong wrote:
Joel VanderWerf <[email protected]> wrote:
On 08/29/2014 12:55 AM, Eric Wong wrote:
Joel VanderWerf <[email protected]> wrote:
[#64627] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10182] [PATCH] string.c: move frozen_strings table to rb_vm_t — ko1@...
Issue #10182 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
[#64671] Fwd: [ruby-changes:35240] normal:r47322 (trunk): symbol.c (rb_sym2id): do not return garbage object — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Why this fix solve your problem?
(2014/08/30 8:50), SASADA Koichi wrote:
SASADA Koichi <[email protected]> wrote:
Eric Wong <[email protected]> wrote:
(2014/08/31 0:18), Eric Wong wrote:
[ruby-core:64157] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10105] [Open] Mixed styles for class methods on Tempfile break RDocs.
Issue #10105 has been reported by Eloy Esp. ---------------------------------------- Bug #10105: Mixed styles for class methods on Tempfile break RDocs. https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10105 * Author: Eloy Esp * Status: Open * Priority: Low * Assignee: Zachary Scott * Category: doc * Target version: * ruby -v: 2.1.1 * Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- I've already made a little pull request here https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/691. The diff is here: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/691.diff But to make the real changes clear is it better to ignore white-space (as there are many indentation changes). Changes ignoring white-space: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/691/files?w=1 Regards. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/