[#64210] Asking for clarification for exception handling usage — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
I've created a ticket for that but didn't get any feedback so I decided
5 messages
2014/08/05
[#64517] Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project — Tetsuya Kitahata <[email protected]>
What do you think? >> Ruby developers
13 messages
2014/08/23
[#64524] Re: Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project
— Henry Maddocks <hmaddocks@...>
2014/08/24
[#64525] Re: Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project
— Brandon Weaver <keystonelemur@...>
2014/08/24
What benefits are there to this? I have a feeling that adding unnecessary
[#64526] Re: Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project
— Tetsuya Kitahata <[email protected]>
2014/08/24
On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 22:43:46 -0700
[#64527] Re: Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2014/08/24
Here I am a Japanese. Before moving anywhere else answer to our question first: what benefits?
[#64528] Re: Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project
— Tetsuya Kitahata <[email protected]>
2014/08/24
tax issue with each other.
[#64614] cowspace (work-in-progress) — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Hi all, I started working on a cowspace branch. Based on the mspace API
4 messages
2014/08/28
[#64615] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat() — oss-ruby-lang@...
Issue #10181 has been reported by Technorama Ltd..
10 messages
2014/08/28
[#64616] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat()
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/08/28
I like this feature.
[#64623] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat()
— Joel VanderWerf <joelvanderwerf@...>
2014/08/29
On 08/28/2014 02:53 PM, Eric Wong wrote:
[#64634] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat()
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/08/29
Joel VanderWerf <[email protected]> wrote:
[#64635] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat()
— Joel VanderWerf <joelvanderwerf@...>
2014/08/29
On 08/29/2014 12:55 AM, Eric Wong wrote:
[#64638] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat()
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/08/29
Joel VanderWerf <[email protected]> wrote:
[#64627] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10182] [PATCH] string.c: move frozen_strings table to rb_vm_t — ko1@...
Issue #10182 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
3 messages
2014/08/29
[#64671] Fwd: [ruby-changes:35240] normal:r47322 (trunk): symbol.c (rb_sym2id): do not return garbage object — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Why this fix solve your problem?
9 messages
2014/08/30
[#64672] Re: Fwd: [ruby-changes:35240] normal:r47322 (trunk): symbol.c (rb_sym2id): do not return garbage object
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/08/30
(2014/08/30 8:50), SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#64676] Re: Fwd: [ruby-changes:35240] normal:r47322 (trunk): symbol.c (rb_sym2id): do not return garbage object
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/08/30
SASADA Koichi <[email protected]> wrote:
[#64684] Re: Fwd: [ruby-changes:35240] normal:r47322 (trunk): symbol.c (rb_sym2id): do not return garbage object
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/08/31
Eric Wong <[email protected]> wrote:
[#64692] Re: Fwd: [ruby-changes:35240] normal:r47322 (trunk): symbol.c (rb_sym2id): do not return garbage object
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/08/31
(2014/08/31 0:18), Eric Wong wrote:
[ruby-core:64153] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10019] segmentation fault/buffer overrun in pack.c (encodes)
From:
poulwann@...
Date:
2014-08-01 09:57:57 UTC
List:
ruby-core #64153
Issue #10019 has been updated by Poul Wann Jensen.
This crash only triggers with -D FORTIFY_SOURCE. When calling rb_str_buf_cat at the end of encodes for the situation where the len variable ends up as 4. As in the example in ["a"*(3072*3-2)].pack("m3072"). This causes 1 byte corruption of the stack, triggering __fortify_fail at the epiloque of rb_str_buf_cat and the rb_bug will never be executed in this case, unless it is compiled without FORTIFY_SOURCE.
Stack canary protection on Windows should produce the same crash I suspect, but this was tested on GCC 4.8.2.
----------------------------------------
Bug #10019: segmentation fault/buffer overrun in pack.c (encodes)
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10019#change-48157
* Author: Will Wood
* Status: Feedback
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Category: core
* Target version:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.1.2p168 (2014-07-06 revision 46721) [i386-mingw32]
* Backport: 2.0.0: REQUIRED, 2.1: DONE
----------------------------------------
While working with an AWS sample I hit a segmentation fault. The same sample works under 1.9.3. It appeared to be coming from pack.c function encodes. After looking at the source there's a 4K buffer allocated on the stack. I made a minor change to base the buffer length off of the incoming buffer length with a pad and allocate it off the heap. Anyway, after fixing this my code sample runs fine. I'm including a patch file and the sample code.
---Files--------------------------------
pack.patch (2.74 KB)
BucketTest.rb (326 Bytes)
pack.c.patch (769 Bytes)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/