[#64517] Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project — Tetsuya Kitahata <[email protected]>

What do you think? >> Ruby developers

13 messages 2014/08/23

[#64615] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat() — oss-ruby-lang@...

Issue #10181 has been reported by Technorama Ltd..

10 messages 2014/08/28
[#64616] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat() — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2014/08/28

I like this feature.

[#64671] Fwd: [ruby-changes:35240] normal:r47322 (trunk): symbol.c (rb_sym2id): do not return garbage object — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Why this fix solve your problem?

9 messages 2014/08/30
[#64672] Re: Fwd: [ruby-changes:35240] normal:r47322 (trunk): symbol.c (rb_sym2id): do not return garbage object — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2014/08/30

(2014/08/30 8:50), SASADA Koichi wrote:

[ruby-core:64208] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10105] Mixed styles for class methods on Tempfile break RDocs.

From: eloyesp@...
Date: 2014-08-05 19:35:45 UTC
List: ruby-core #64208
Issue #10105 has been updated by Eloy Esp.


I don't think that it is only a bug in RDoc.

There are at least 3 ways to define class methods in ruby, and I think that all are acceptable, but define two class methods in different ways in the standard library it's not a good example, nor a good practice and does not help in readability.

Ok, there is a lacking feature in RDoc, but I don't think that keeping it that way is the way to go.

----------------------------------------
Bug #10105: Mixed styles for class methods on Tempfile break RDocs.
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10105#change-48206

* Author: Eloy Esp
* Status: Third Party's Issue
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: Eric Hodel
* Category: doc
* Target version: 
* ruby -v: 2.1.1
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
I've already made a little pull request here https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/691.

The diff is here: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/691.diff

But to make the real changes clear is it better to ignore white-space (as there are many indentation changes).

Changes ignoring white-space: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/691/files?w=1

Regards.



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

In This Thread

Prev Next