[#64210] Asking for clarification for exception handling usage — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
I've created a ticket for that but didn't get any feedback so I decided
[#64517] Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project — Tetsuya Kitahata <[email protected]>
What do you think? >> Ruby developers
What benefits are there to this? I have a feeling that adding unnecessary
On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 22:43:46 -0700
Here I am a Japanese. Before moving anywhere else answer to our question first: what benefits?
tax issue with each other.
[#64614] cowspace (work-in-progress) — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Hi all, I started working on a cowspace branch. Based on the mspace API
[#64615] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat() — oss-ruby-lang@...
Issue #10181 has been reported by Technorama Ltd..
I like this feature.
On 08/28/2014 02:53 PM, Eric Wong wrote:
Joel VanderWerf <[email protected]> wrote:
On 08/29/2014 12:55 AM, Eric Wong wrote:
Joel VanderWerf <[email protected]> wrote:
[#64627] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10182] [PATCH] string.c: move frozen_strings table to rb_vm_t — ko1@...
Issue #10182 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
[#64671] Fwd: [ruby-changes:35240] normal:r47322 (trunk): symbol.c (rb_sym2id): do not return garbage object — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Why this fix solve your problem?
(2014/08/30 8:50), SASADA Koichi wrote:
SASADA Koichi <[email protected]> wrote:
Eric Wong <[email protected]> wrote:
(2014/08/31 0:18), Eric Wong wrote:
[ruby-core:64302] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9875] ERB#result documentation incorrect
Issue #9875 has been updated by Tomoyuki Chikanaga. Backport changed from 2.0.0: REQUIRED, 2.1: REQUIRED to 2.0.0: REQUIRED, 2.1: DONE Backported into `ruby_2_1` branch at r47141. ---------------------------------------- Bug #9875: ERB#result documentation incorrect https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9875#change-48285 * Author: Mark Lorenz * Status: Closed * Priority: Normal * Assignee: Eric Hodel * Category: doc * Target version: * ruby -v: 2.1.1p76 and 1.9.3p484 verified * Backport: 2.0.0: REQUIRED, 2.1: DONE ---------------------------------------- This issue duplicates: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/619 --- ERB#result does not accept a proc, the documentation says: > Executes the generated ERB code to produce a completed template, returning the results of that code. > (See ::new for details on how this process can be affected by safe_level.) > b accepts a Binding object which is used to set the context of code evaluation. However, #result delegates to Kernel.eval, which says: > Evaluates the Ruby expression(s) in string. If binding is given, which > must be a Binding object... When given a proc, #eval errors with: > ruby-2.1.1/lib/ruby/2.1.0/erb.rb:847:in `eval': wrong argument type proc (expected binding) (TypeError) I verified on 2.1.1 and 1.9.3p484 Patch included. ---Files-------------------------------- 0001-ERB-result-does-not-accept-a-proc.patch (2.27 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/