[#70977] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11473] Immutable String literal in Ruby 3 — arai@...
Issue #11473 has been updated by Shunichi Arai.
3 messages
2015/10/04
[#71062] [Ruby trunk - Bug #10892] Deadlock in autoload — eregontp@...
Issue #10892 has been updated by Benoit Daloze.
4 messages
2015/10/12
[#71127] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11607] [PATCH] fiddle: release GVL for ffi_call — normalperson@...
Issue #11607 has been updated by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2015/10/20
[#71164] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11614] [Open] [RFC] use id_table for constant tables — normalperson@...
Issue #11614 has been reported by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2015/10/22
[#71211] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11607] [PATCH] fiddle: release GVL for ffi_call — naruse@...
Issue #11607 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
6 messages
2015/10/27
[#71212] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11607] [PATCH] fiddle: release GVL for ffi_call
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/10/27
Yes, user must check if the function is MT-safe. Probably fine
[#71246] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11607] [PATCH] fiddle: release GVL for ffi_call
— Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
2015/10/28
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 08:54:07AM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
[#71254] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11607] [PATCH] fiddle: release GVL for ffi_call
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/10/28
Aaron Patterson <[email protected]> wrote:
[#71230] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11625] Unlock GVL for SHA1 calculations — tenderlove@...
Issue #11625 has been updated by Aaron Patterson.
5 messages
2015/10/27
[#71236] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11625] Unlock GVL for SHA1 calculations
— Юрий Соколов <funny.falcon@...>
2015/10/28
What's about other hashsum algos? MD5, SHA2, etc
[#71242] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11625] Unlock GVL for SHA1 calculations
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/10/28
Юрий Соколов <[email protected]> wrote:
[#71239] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11384] multi-threaded autoload sometimes fails — shugo@...
Issue #11384 has been updated by Shugo Maeda.
4 messages
2015/10/28
[ruby-core:71069] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11587] [Open] Make OpenStruct#new_ostruct_member and #modifiable fully private API
From:
eregontp@...
Date:
2015-10-13 08:27:17 UTC
List:
ruby-core #71069
Issue #11587 has been reported by Benoit Daloze. ---------------------------------------- Bug #11587: Make OpenStruct#new_ostruct_member and #modifiable fully private API https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11587 * Author: Benoit Daloze * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * ruby -v: * Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN, 2.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- #6056 made OpenStruct#new_ostruct_member and #modifiable protected, but they still appear in RDoc and normal user documentation: http://ruby-doc.org/stdlib-2.2.3/libdoc/ostruct/rdoc/OpenStruct.html#method-i-new_ostruct_member Also, it seems they should really be private and not just protected. These methods look like they should be implementation details and therefore be hidden from the user. Is it fine from a compatibility point of view to make them private and hide them from user documentation? -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/