[#88240] [Ruby trunk Feature#14759] [PATCH] set M_ARENA_MAX for glibc malloc — sam.saffron@...
Issue #14759 has been updated by sam.saffron (Sam Saffron).
[#88251] Re: [ruby-alerts:8236] failure alert on trunk@P895 (NG (r64134)) — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
[email protected] wrote:
[#88305] [Ruby trunk Bug#14968] [PATCH] io.c: make all pipes nonblocking by default — normalperson@...
Issue #14968 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
[#88331] [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid — samuel@...
Issue #13618 has been updated by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).
[#88342] [Ruby trunk Feature#14955] [PATCH] gc.c: use MADV_FREE to release most of the heap page body — ko1@...
Issue #14955 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
[#88433] [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid — ko1@...
SXNzdWUgIzEzNjE4IGhhcyBiZWVuIHVwZGF0ZWQgYnkga28xIChLb2ljaGkgU2FzYWRhKS4KCgpX
a28xQGF0ZG90Lm5ldCB3cm90ZToKPiBJc3N1ZSAjMTM2MTggaGFzIGJlZW4gdXBkYXRlZCBieSBr
[#88475] [Ruby trunk Misc#14937] [PATCH] thread_pthread: lazy-spawn timer-thread only on contention — ko1@...
Issue #14937 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
[#88491] Re: [ruby-cvs:71466] k0kubun:r64374 (trunk): test_function.rb: skip running test — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
[email protected] wrote:
SSBzZWUuIFBsZWFzZSByZW1vdmUgdGhlIHRlc3QgaWYgdGhlIHRlc3QgaXMgdW5uZWNlc3Nhcnku
Takashi Kokubun <[email protected]> wrote:
[#88523] [Ruby trunk Bug#14999] ConditionVariable doesn't reacquire the Mutex if Thread#kill-ed — eregontp@...
Issue #14999 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
[email protected] wrote:
[#88549] [Ruby trunk Bug#14999] ConditionVariable doesn't reacquire the Mutex if Thread#kill-ed — eregontp@...
Issue #14999 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
[#88676] [Ruby trunk Misc#15014] thread.c: use rb_hrtime_scalar for high-resolution time operations — ko1@...
Issue #15014 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
[email protected] wrote:
On 2018/08/27 16:16, Eric Wong wrote:
[#88716] Re: [ruby-dev:43715] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #595] Fiber ignores ensure clause — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Koichi Sasada wrote:
[#88723] [Ruby trunk Bug#15041] [PATCH] cont.c: set th->root_fiber to current fiber at fork — ko1@...
Issue #15041 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
[#88767] [Ruby trunk Bug#15050] GC after forking with fibers crashes — ko1@...
Issue #15050 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
Koichi Sasada <[email protected]> wrote:
Koichi Sasada <[email protected]> wrote:
[#88774] Re: [ruby-alerts:8955] failure alert on trunk@P895 (NG (r64594)) — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
[email protected] wrote:
[ruby-core:88343] [Ruby trunk Feature#14759] [PATCH] set M_ARENA_MAX for glibc malloc
Issue #14759 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada). sam.saffron (Sam Saffron) wrote: > Koichi / Nobu > > Is there any chance we can merge this in and even backport to 2.4/2.5. > > It is a very safe change for now and users can override the behavior if they need to using ENV (rare cases where you say host a ton of V8 runtimes) > > It will give Ruby a much better reputation to have this out there and guilds are a few releases out. We are not maintainers for both versions, but I think we shouldn't backport it because we can change this parameter by an environment variable. ---------------------------------------- Feature #14759: [PATCH] set M_ARENA_MAX for glibc malloc https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14759#change-73371 * Author: normalperson (Eric Wong) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: ---------------------------------------- Not everybody benefits from jemalloc and the extra download+install time is not always worth it. Lets make the user experience for glibc malloc users better, too. Personally, I prefer using M_ARENA_MAX=1 (via MALLOC_ARENA_MAX env) myself, but there is currently a performance penalty for that. gc.c (Init_GC): set M_ARENA_MAX=2 for glibc malloc glibc malloc creates too many arenas and leads to fragmentation. Given the existence of the GVL, clamping to two arenas seems to be a reasonable trade-off for performance and memory usage. Some users (including myself for several years, now) prefer only one arena, now, so continue to respect users' wishes when MALLOC_ARENA_MAX is set. Thanks to Mike Perham for the reminder [ruby-core:86843] This doesn't seem to conflict with jemalloc, so it should be safe for all glibc-using systems. ---Files-------------------------------- 0001-gc.c-Init_GC-set-M_ARENA_MAX-2-for-glibc-malloc.patch (1.46 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>