[#88925] [Ruby trunk Feature#15095] [PATCH] share VM stack between threads and fibers if identical — ko1@...
Issue #15095 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
4 messages
2018/09/09
[#88927] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#15095] [PATCH] share VM stack between threads and fibers if identical
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/09/09
[email protected] wrote:
[#88926] [Ruby trunk Feature#15095] [PATCH] share VM stack between threads and fibers if identical — ko1@...
Issue #15095 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
3 messages
2018/09/09
[#89218] [Ruby trunk Bug#15130] open-uri hangs on cygwin — duerst@...
SXNzdWUgIzE1MTMwIGhhcyBiZWVuIHVwZGF0ZWQgYnkgZHVlcnN0IChNYXJ0aW4gRMO8cnN0KS4K
5 messages
2018/09/30
[ruby-core:88967] Re: Fwd: [ruby-alerts:9024] failure alert on trunk@P895 (NG (r64706))
From:
Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Date:
2018-09-13 02:00:02 UTC
List:
ruby-core #88967
Koichi Sasada <[email protected]> wrote: > any idea? Maybe r64707, except spawn shouldn't call fork there (only vfork). Seems similar to [ruby-core:88774] and very rare to hit. Any other CI machines hit EINVAL on pthread_mutex_unlock? I'm 99% sure r64707 fixes A bug, but I don't know if it fixes THIS bug... Do you have ./configure log output? > rsult : NG (r64706) > detail: https://gist.github.com/6a8e880353fc1220cba65d38e247dd7b > @logfile="/home/ko1/ruby/logs/brlog.trunk.20180913-100644", > http://ci.rvm.jp/results/trunk@P895/1313604 I can't find configure output in those. Thanks. Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>