[#46902] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7767][Open] Tempfileで自動的にファイルを削除する — "kyanagi (Kouhei Yanagita)" <redmine@...>
8 messages
2013/02/01
[#46908] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7774][Assigned] IFUNC上のbinding呼び出しでSEGV — "ktsj (Kazuki Tsujimoto)" <kazuki@...>
16 messages
2013/02/03
[#46921] Re: [ruby-dev:46908] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7774][Assigned] IFUNC上のbinding呼び出しでSEGV
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2013/02/05
> Issue #7774 has been reported by ktsj (Kazuki Tsujimoto).
[#46960] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7774][Assigned] IFUNC上のbinding呼び出しでSEGV
— Kazuki Tsujimoto <kazuki@...>
2013/02/09
辻本です。
[#46929] Re: [ruby-changes:27041] usa:r39093 (ruby_1_9_3): merge revision(s) 33210,33212: [Backport #5278] — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...>
須藤です。
4 messages
2013/02/06
[#46930] Re: [ruby-changes:27041] usa:r39093 (ruby_1_9_3): merge revision(s) 33210,33212: [Backport #5278]
— "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>
2013/02/06
こんにちは、なかむら(う)です。
[#46933] Re: [ruby-cvs:46289] zzak:r39120 (trunk): * doc/security.rb: Translate japanese kanji to english — "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@...>
Hello Zachary,
3 messages
2013/02/07
[#46990] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7101] 拡張ライブラリの質問 — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...>
1 message
2013/02/15
[#47075] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7924][Open] r39232 以降 net/http で正しく reponse を取得出来ないケースがある — "hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA)" <shibata.hiroshi@...>
15 messages
2013/02/23
[#47088] Test on NetBSD/amd64 6.0_STABLE — Takahiro Kambe <taca@...>
こんにちは。
3 messages
2013/02/24
[ruby-dev:46953] [ruby-trunk - RubySpec #7803][Open] RDoc documentation: `Array#&` clarification
From:
"sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada)" <sawadatsuyoshi@...>
Date:
2013-02-08 06:39:01 UTC
List:
ruby-dev #46953
Issue #7803 has been reported by sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada).
----------------------------------------
RubySpec #7803: RDoc documentation: `Array#&` clarification
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7803
Author: sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada)
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Target version:
In the RDoc documentation for `Array#&`, it does not mention whether the order of the elements in the returned array preserves the order in the receiver. There is a question raised regarding this point in stackoverflow:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14764135/is-order-preserved-in-arrays-when-intersection-is-done
and it mentions that that is included in the test for RubySpec
https://github.com/rubyspec/rubyspec/blob/master/core/array/intersection_spec.rb#L16
so it looks like that is taken for granted, but it is not guaranteed. If it is indeed a feature, then that should be written in the document. If not, (meaning the order might not be preserved in a future implementation), then that should also be mentioned in the document as a warning. The documentation for `Array#-` makes that point clear:
Array Difference---Returns a new array that is a copy of the original array, removing any items that ...
so, perhaps the docmentation for `Array#&` should be written along the same line.
--
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/