[#47383] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8469][Open] ABI checker とか導入しませんか — "kosaki (Motohiro KOSAKI)" <kosaki.motohiro@...>

21 messages 2013/06/01
[#47394] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8469] ABI checker とか導入しませんか — "usa (Usaku NAKAMURA)" <usa@...> 2013/06/04

[#47395] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8469] ABI checker とか導入しませんか — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2013/06/04

> CIに組み込んでもらえるとちょー助かる感じですぅ

[#47396] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8469] ABI checker とか導入しませんか — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2013/06/04

2013年6月4日 14:23 KOSAKI Motohiro <[email protected]>:

[#47397] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8469] ABI checker とか導入しませんか — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2013/06/04

>> CI って誰に相談すればいいんですかね。今のツールだと比較対象のバイナリまたは

[#47399] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8469] ABI checker とか導入しませんか — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2013/06/05

2013年6月4日 15:26 KOSAKI Motohiro <[email protected]>:

[#47402] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8469] ABI checker とか導入しませんか — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2013/06/05

>>> 比較対象を用意しないといけないのが面倒くさそうでほったらかしてたんですが。

[#47422] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8526][Open] Removing tk from Ruby repository — "naruse (Yui NARUSE)" <naruse@...>

26 messages 2013/06/14

[ruby-dev:47390] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7877] E::Lazy#with_index needed

From: "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <zachary@...>
Date: 2013-06-02 05:50:10 UTC
List: ruby-dev #47390
Issue #7877 has been updated by zzak (Zachary Scott).


@duerst You're probably right, since this feature was introduced in 2.0.0

If yhara-san wants to implement #with_index with a block then I see no problem with introducing this in 2.1.0
----------------------------------------
Feature #7877: E::Lazy#with_index needed
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7877#change-39621

Author: shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe)
Status: Assigned
Priority: Normal
Assignee: yhara (Yutaka HARA)
Category: core
Target version: next minor


=begin
So I wanted some real benefit of being lazy.  I wrote a Leibniz formula:

  def leibniz(n)
    (0..Float::INFINITY).lazy.with_index {|i, j| (-1 ** j) / (2*i+1).to_f }.take(n).reduce(:+)
  end

But it doesn't work (well, it does, indeed. It just doesn't stop working).  I got frustrated.
How about it?  Don't you feel it nifty?

Of course I can wait for the release next to 2.0.0.
=end


-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

In This Thread

Prev Next