Bug #1504
closed
installed ri docu is not where ri actually searches when compiled with program-suffix
Description
=begin
when I updated to the latest patch version I noticed that ri isn't working anymore.
I'm installing with program-suffix:
./configure --enable-shared --enable-pthread --prefix=/usr --program-suffix=19
make
make install
make install-doc
All binaries get installed with program-suffix "19" in /usr/bin/
the lib directory is also suffixed: /usr/lib/ruby19/1.9.1
but the ri directory isn't: /usr/share/ri/1.9.1
in instruby.rb on line 286 the install dir is defined this way:
ridatadir = File.join(CONFIG['datadir'], "ri", CONFIG['ruby_version'], "system")
in /usr/lib/ruby19/1.9.1/rdoc/ri/paths.rb the doc dir is build like this (around line 31):
if m = /ruby/.match(RbConfig::CONFIG['RUBY_INSTALL_NAME'])
m = [m.pre_match, m.post_match]
else
m = [""] * 2
end
ri = "#{m[0]}ri#{m[1]}"
base = File.join(RbConfig::CONFIG['datadir'], ri, VERSION)
so it searches for /usr/share/ri19/1.9.1
maybe instruby.rb should be patched to include prefixes/suffixes to binaries/directories as well.
(I'm on Arch Linux, using [and maintaining] the ruby19 package: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23973)
=end
Updated by yugui (Yuki Sonoda) about 16 years ago
=begin
Thank you, Jan-Erik.
On 5/22/09 6:46 PM, Yuki Sonoda wrote:
Bug #1504: installed ri docu is not where ri actually searches when compiled with program-suffix
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/1504Author: Yuki Sonoda
Status: Open, Priority: Normal
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.1p129 (2009-05-12 revision 23412) [i686-linux]
I cloned the issue #1502 on the Redmine and separated it to a issue on
the trunk and a issue on the 1.9.1 branch. This is why the duplicate
mail was sent to ruby-core. I'm sorry for confusing you.
The problem is just under discussion at ruby-dev too. And I fixed it at
r23539 on ruby_1_9_1.
Here is another problem. Where is the best location to place ri
documents for Ruby 1.9.2 or later?
On Ruby 1.9.2, --program-suffix and --program-prefix do not act on the
path to ruby libraries nor on the name of shared library. (r23368,
r23508). You must use --with-soname or --with-rubylibprefix in order to
modify them. Then, should ri does like this?
Suppose that --prefix=/usr/local and --program-suffix=-1.9.1,
(1) /usr/local/share/ri-1.9.1/1.9.1/
(2) /usr/local/share/ri/1.9.1/ (and you can modify it via
--with-riprefix)
Which is better? what do you think?
-- Yugui [email protected]
=end
Updated by drbrain (Eric Hodel) about 16 years ago
=begin
On May 22, 2009, at 03:22, Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) wrote:
Here is another problem. Where is the best location to place ri
documents for Ruby 1.9.2 or later?On Ruby 1.9.2, --program-suffix and --program-prefix do not act on the
path to ruby libraries nor on the name of shared library. (r23368,
r23508). You must use --with-soname or --with-rubylibprefix in order
to
modify them. Then, should ri does like this?Suppose that --prefix=/usr/local and --program-suffix=-1.9.1,
(1) /usr/local/share/ri-1.9.1/1.9.1/
(2) /usr/local/share/ri/1.9.1/ (and you can modify it via
--with-riprefix)Which is better? what do you think?
2 is better, it matches the RubyGems behavior for > 1.9.1.
=end
Updated by yugui (Yuki Sonoda) about 16 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Closed
=begin
applied in r23554.
=end