Search
+
    SEARCHED FOR:

    CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONARY POWERS

    If one wing of democracy fails, should court sit idle, SC asks Centre

    The Supreme Court is examining its role when other branches of government don't perform their duties. This involves presidential references on timelines for assenting to bills. The court questions if it should remain inactive when constitutional duties are not met. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta argued against judicial intervention in legislative functions.

    SC asks if it can remain idle when governors fail in their duty, reserves verdict on presidential reference

    The Supreme Court, acting as the Constitution's custodian, questioned its inaction if a Governor fails in their duties, while reserving judgment on presidential reference regarding bill assent. A Constitution bench, led by CJI Gavai, heard arguments on whether courts can set timelines for Governors and the President to approve bills.

    Will only interpret provisions of Constitution in President reference, not individual cases: SC

    The Supreme Court focuses on constitutional interpretation regarding governors and presidential power. This involves state bills. The court addresses a presidential reference. It concerns timelines for governors and the President. These timelines relate to handling bills passed by state assemblies. The Solicitor General and senior advocates presented arguments. The court clarified its scope. It will not delve into specific instances.

    Will strive for representation from all parties in par committee on 3 home ministry Bills: Om Birla

    Om Birla aims for diverse representation in the parliamentary committee. This committee will examine three controversial bills. These bills propose removing top officials arrested for 30 days. Several opposition parties may not join the committee. Birla plans to discuss the matter with all parties. He has requested parties to submit their representatives' names. The committee formation is expected soon.

    Can states move Supreme Court under Article 32? Court to decide on presidential reference

    President Murmu seeks the Supreme Court's opinion on whether a state government can invoke Article 32 against the Centre. The core issue revolves around governors' and the President's assent to bills under Articles 200 and 201. The Tamil Nadu government argued against governors withholding assent even to money bills, potentially making them "super chief ministers."

    SC: Wouldn't Guv's unlimited power render an elected govt defunct?

    The Supreme Court questioned the extent of a governor's power to withhold bills passed by a state legislature, raising concerns about the impact on a democratically elected government. Chief Justice of India BR Gavai's bench asked if indefinite delays would be beyond judicial review.

    The Economic Times
    BACK TO TOP