diff options
author | Heikki Linnakangas | 2017-04-18 11:50:50 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Heikki Linnakangas | 2017-04-18 11:50:50 +0000 |
commit | c727f120ff50f624a1ee3abe700d995c18314a0b (patch) | |
tree | a3fb2b94b43e51f386d31dca2b056d004b787ae3 /src/backend | |
parent | 123aaffb5b881f3dadaac676877a90b50233a847 (diff) |
Rename "scram" to "scram-sha-256" in pg_hba.conf and password_encryption.
Per discussion, plain "scram" is confusing because we actually implement
SCRAM-SHA-256 rather than the original SCRAM that uses SHA-1 as the hash
algorithm. If we add support for SCRAM-SHA-512 or some other mechanism in
the SCRAM family in the future, that would become even more confusing.
Most of the internal files and functions still use just "scram" as a
shorthand for SCRMA-SHA-256, but I did change PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM to
PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM_SHA_256, as that could potentially be used by 3rd
party extensions that hook into the password-check hook.
Michael Paquier did this in an earlier version of the SCRAM patch set
already, but I didn't include that in the version that was committed.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected]
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend')
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/commands/user.c | 8 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/libpq/auth-scram.c | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/libpq/auth.c | 16 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/libpq/crypt.c | 10 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/libpq/hba.c | 4 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/libpq/pg_hba.conf.sample | 8 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c | 2 |
7 files changed, 25 insertions, 25 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/user.c b/src/backend/commands/user.c index de264974ae8..c719682274d 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/user.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/user.c @@ -140,8 +140,8 @@ CreateRole(ParseState *pstate, CreateRoleStmt *stmt) dpassword = defel; if (strcmp(defel->defname, "encryptedPassword") == 0) { - if (Password_encryption == PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM) - password_type = PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM; + if (Password_encryption == PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM_SHA_256) + password_type = PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM_SHA_256; else password_type = PASSWORD_TYPE_MD5; } @@ -548,8 +548,8 @@ AlterRole(AlterRoleStmt *stmt) dpassword = defel; if (strcmp(defel->defname, "encryptedPassword") == 0) { - if (Password_encryption == PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM) - password_type = PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM; + if (Password_encryption == PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM_SHA_256) + password_type = PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM_SHA_256; else password_type = PASSWORD_TYPE_MD5; } diff --git a/src/backend/libpq/auth-scram.c b/src/backend/libpq/auth-scram.c index 338afede9de..76c502d415d 100644 --- a/src/backend/libpq/auth-scram.c +++ b/src/backend/libpq/auth-scram.c @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ pg_be_scram_init(const char *username, const char *shadow_pass) { int password_type = get_password_type(shadow_pass); - if (password_type == PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM) + if (password_type == PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM_SHA_256) { if (parse_scram_verifier(shadow_pass, &state->salt, &state->iterations, state->StoredKey, state->ServerKey)) diff --git a/src/backend/libpq/auth.c b/src/backend/libpq/auth.c index 848561e188e..ab4be219431 100644 --- a/src/backend/libpq/auth.c +++ b/src/backend/libpq/auth.c @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static char *recv_password_packet(Port *port); /*---------------------------------------------------------------- - * Password-based authentication methods (password, md5, and scram) + * Password-based authentication methods (password, md5, and scram-sha-256) *---------------------------------------------------------------- */ static int CheckPasswordAuth(Port *port, char **logdetail); @@ -757,10 +757,10 @@ CheckPWChallengeAuth(Port *port, char **logdetail) * If the user does not exist, or has no password, we still go through the * motions of authentication, to avoid revealing to the client that the * user didn't exist. If 'md5' is allowed, we choose whether to use 'md5' - * or 'scram' authentication based on current password_encryption setting. - * The idea is that most genuine users probably have a password of that - * type, if we pretend that this user had a password of that type, too, it - * "blends in" best. + * or 'scram-sha-256' authentication based on current password_encryption + * setting. The idea is that most genuine users probably have a password + * of that type, if we pretend that this user had a password of that type, + * too, it "blends in" best. * * If the user had a password, but it was expired, we'll use the details * of the expired password for the authentication, but report it as @@ -773,9 +773,9 @@ CheckPWChallengeAuth(Port *port, char **logdetail) /* * If 'md5' authentication is allowed, decide whether to perform 'md5' or - * 'scram' authentication based on the type of password the user has. If - * it's an MD5 hash, we must do MD5 authentication, and if it's a SCRAM - * verifier, we must do SCRAM authentication. If it's stored in + * 'scram-sha-256' authentication based on the type of password the user + * has. If it's an MD5 hash, we must do MD5 authentication, and if it's + * a SCRAM verifier, we must do SCRAM authentication. If it's stored in * plaintext, we could do either one, so we opt for the more secure * mechanism, SCRAM. * diff --git a/src/backend/libpq/crypt.c b/src/backend/libpq/crypt.c index 34beab53342..03ef3cc6522 100644 --- a/src/backend/libpq/crypt.c +++ b/src/backend/libpq/crypt.c @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ get_password_type(const char *shadow_pass) if (strncmp(shadow_pass, "md5", 3) == 0 && strlen(shadow_pass) == MD5_PASSWD_LEN) return PASSWORD_TYPE_MD5; if (strncmp(shadow_pass, "scram-sha-256:", strlen("scram-sha-256:")) == 0) - return PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM; + return PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM_SHA_256; return PASSWORD_TYPE_PLAINTEXT; } @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ encrypt_password(PasswordType target_type, const char *role, elog(ERROR, "password encryption failed"); return encrypted_password; - case PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM: + case PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM_SHA_256: /* * cannot convert a SCRAM verifier to an MD5 hash, so fall @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ encrypt_password(PasswordType target_type, const char *role, } break; - case PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM: + case PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM_SHA_256: switch (guessed_type) { case PASSWORD_TYPE_PLAINTEXT: @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ encrypt_password(PasswordType target_type, const char *role, * cannot convert an MD5 hash to a SCRAM verifier, so fall * through to save the MD5 hash instead. */ - case PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM: + case PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM_SHA_256: return pstrdup(password); } break; @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ plain_crypt_verify(const char *role, const char *shadow_pass, */ switch (get_password_type(shadow_pass)) { - case PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM: + case PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM_SHA_256: if (scram_verify_plain_password(role, client_pass, shadow_pass)) diff --git a/src/backend/libpq/hba.c b/src/backend/libpq/hba.c index af89fe898a6..5561c399da4 100644 --- a/src/backend/libpq/hba.c +++ b/src/backend/libpq/hba.c @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static const char *const UserAuthName[] = "ident", "password", "md5", - "scram", + "scram-sha256", "gss", "sspi", "pam", @@ -1327,7 +1327,7 @@ parse_hba_line(TokenizedLine *tok_line, int elevel) } parsedline->auth_method = uaMD5; } - else if (strcmp(token->string, "scram") == 0) + else if (strcmp(token->string, "scram-sha-256") == 0) parsedline->auth_method = uaSCRAM; else if (strcmp(token->string, "pam") == 0) #ifdef USE_PAM diff --git a/src/backend/libpq/pg_hba.conf.sample b/src/backend/libpq/pg_hba.conf.sample index 6b1778a7213..c853e362329 100644 --- a/src/backend/libpq/pg_hba.conf.sample +++ b/src/backend/libpq/pg_hba.conf.sample @@ -42,10 +42,10 @@ # or "samenet" to match any address in any subnet that the server is # directly connected to. # -# METHOD can be "trust", "reject", "md5", "password", "scram", "gss", -# "sspi", "ident", "peer", "pam", "ldap", "radius" or "cert". Note that -# "password" sends passwords in clear text; "md5" or "scram" are preferred -# since they send encrypted passwords. +# METHOD can be "trust", "reject", "md5", "password", "scram-sha-256", +# "gss", "sspi", "ident", "peer", "pam", "ldap", "radius" or "cert". +# Note that "password" sends passwords in clear text; "md5" or +# "scram-sha-256" are preferred since they send encrypted passwords. # # OPTIONS are a set of options for the authentication in the format # NAME=VALUE. The available options depend on the different diff --git a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c index 9ad8361a9bd..a414fb2c767 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ static const struct config_enum_entry force_parallel_mode_options[] = { static const struct config_enum_entry password_encryption_options[] = { {"plain", PASSWORD_TYPE_PLAINTEXT, false}, {"md5", PASSWORD_TYPE_MD5, false}, - {"scram", PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM, false}, + {"scram-sha-256", PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM_SHA_256, false}, {"off", PASSWORD_TYPE_PLAINTEXT, false}, {"on", PASSWORD_TYPE_MD5, false}, {"true", PASSWORD_TYPE_MD5, true}, |