| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Change backend launcher functions to take void * for binary data
instead of char *. This removes the need for numerous casts.
Reviewed-by: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/fd1fcedb-3492-4fc8-9e3e-74b97f2db6c7%40eisentraut.org
|
|
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
Cause parallel workers to not check datallowconn, rolcanlogin, and
ACL_CONNECT privileges. The leader already checked these things
(except for rolcanlogin which might have been checked for a different
role). Re-checking can accomplish little except to induce unexpected
failures in applications that might not even be aware that their query
has been parallelized. We already had the principle that parallel
workers rely on their leader to pass a valid set of authorization
information, so this change just extends that a bit further.
Also, modify the ReservedConnections, datconnlimit and rolconnlimit
logic so that these limits are only enforced against regular backends,
and only regular backends are counted while checking if the limits
were already reached. Previously, background processes that had an
assigned database or role were subject to these limits (with rather
random exclusions for autovac workers and walsenders), and the set of
existing processes that counted against each limit was quite haphazard
as well. The point of these limits, AFAICS, is to ensure the
availability of PGPROC slots for regular backends. Since all other
types of processes have their own separate pools of PGPROC slots, it
makes no sense either to enforce these limits against them or to count
them while enforcing the limit.
While edge-case failures of these sorts have been possible for a
long time, the problem got a good deal worse with commit 5a2fed911
(CVE-2024-10978), which caused parallel workers to make some of these
checks using the leader's current role where before we had used its
AuthenticatedUserId, thus allowing parallel queries to fail after
SET ROLE. The previous behavior was fairly accidental and I have
no desire to return to it.
This patch includes reverting 73c9f91a1, which was an emergency hack
to suppress these same checks in some cases. It wasn't complete,
as shown by a recent bug report from Laurenz Albe. We can also revert
fd4d93d26 and 492217301, which hacked around the same problems in one
regression test.
In passing, remove the special case for autovac workers in
CheckMyDatabase; it seems cleaner to have AutoVacWorkerMain pass
the INIT_PG_OVERRIDE_ALLOW_CONNS flag, now that that does what's
needed.
Like 5a2fed911, back-patch to supported branches (which sadly no
longer includes v12).
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
This is a continuation of 17974ec25946. More quotes are applied to
GUC names in error messages and hints, taking care of what seems to be
all the remaining holes currently in the tree for the GUCs.
Author: Peter Smith
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+Pv-kSN8SkxSdoHano_wPubqcg5789ejhCDZAcLFceBR-w@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Currently, when a child process exits, the postmaster first scans
through BackgroundWorkerList, to see if it the child process was a
background worker. If not found, then it scans through BackendList to
see if it was a regular backend. That leads to some duplication
between the bgworker and regular backend cleanup code, as both have an
entry in the BackendList that needs to be cleaned up in the same way.
Refactor that so that we scan just the BackendList to find the child
process, and if it was a background worker, do the additional
bgworker-specific cleanup in addition to the normal Backend cleanup.
Change HandleChildCrash so that it doesn't try to handle the cleanup
of the process that already exited, only the signaling of all the
other processes. When called for any of the aux processes, the caller
had already cleared the *PID global variable, so the code in
HandleChildCrash() to do that was unused.
On Windows, if a child process exits with ERROR_WAIT_NO_CHILDREN, it's
now logged with that exit code, instead of 0. Also, if a bgworker
exits with ERROR_WAIT_NO_CHILDREN, it's now treated as crashed and is
restarted. Previously it was treated as a normal exit.
If a child process is not found in the BackendList, the log message
now calls it "untracked child process" rather than "server process".
Arguably that should be a PANIC, because we do track all the child
processes in the list, so failing to find a child process is highly
unexpected. But if we want to change that, let's discuss and do that
as a separate commit.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected]
|
|
This allows ForgetBackgroundWorker() and ReportBackgroundWorkerExit()
to take a RegisteredBgWorker pointer as argument, rather than a list
iterator. That feels a little more natural. But more importantly, this
paves the way for more refactoring in the next commit.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected]
|
|
After several refactoring iterations, auxiliary processes are no
longer initialized from the bootstrapper. Using the InitProcessing
mode for initializing auxiliary processes is more appropriate. Since
the global variable Mode is initialized to InitProcessing, we can just
remove the redundant calls of SetProcessingMode(InitProcessing).
Author: Xing Guo <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CACpMh%2BDBHVT4xPGimzvex%3DwMdMLQEu9PYhT%2BkwwD2x2nu9dU_Q%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
For clarity, we've been slowly moving functions that are not called
from the postmaster process out of postmaster.c.
Author: Xing Guo <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CACpMh%2BDBHVT4xPGimzvex%3DwMdMLQEu9PYhT%2BkwwD2x2nu9dU_Q%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
Fixups for 17974ec259: Some messages were missed (and some were new
since the patch was originally proposed), and there was a typo
introduced.
|
|
After further review, we want to move in the direction of always
quoting GUC names in error messages, rather than the previous (PG16)
wildly mixed practice or the intermittent (mid-PG17) idea of doing
this depending on how possibly confusing the GUC name is.
This commit applies appropriate quotes to (almost?) all mentions of
GUC names in error messages. It partially supersedes a243569bf65 and
8d9978a7176, which had moved things a bit in the opposite direction
but which then were abandoned in a partial state.
Author: Peter Smith <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAHut%2BPv-kSN8SkxSdoHano_wPubqcg5789ejhCDZAcLFceBR-w%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
Introduce new postmaster_child_launch() function that deals with the
differences in EXEC_BACKEND mode.
Refactor the mechanism of passing information from the parent to child
process. Instead of using different command-line arguments when
launching the child process in EXEC_BACKEND mode, pass a
variable-length blob of startup data along with all the global
variables. The contents of that blob depend on the kind of child
process being launched. In !EXEC_BACKEND mode, we use the same blob,
but it's simply inherited from the parent to child process.
Reviewed-by: Tristan Partin, Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected]
|
|
as determined by include-what-you-use (IWYU)
While IWYU also suggests to *add* a bunch of #include's (which is its
main purpose), this patch does not do that. In some cases, a more
specific #include replaces another less specific one.
Some manual adjustments of the automatic result:
- IWYU currently doesn't know about includes that provide global
variable declarations (like -Wmissing-variable-declarations), so
those includes are being kept manually.
- All includes for port(ability) headers are being kept for now, to
play it safe.
- No changes of catalog/pg_foo.h to catalog/pg_foo_d.h, to keep the
patch from exploding in size.
Note that this patch touches just *.c files, so nothing declared in
header files changes in hidden ways.
As a small example, in src/backend/access/transam/rmgr.c, some IWYU
pragma annotations are added to handle a special case there.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/af837490-6b2f-46df-ba05-37ea6a6653fc%40eisentraut.org
|
|
Remove IsBackgroundWorker, IsAutoVacuumLauncherProcess(),
IsAutoVacuumWorkerProcess(), and IsLogicalSlotSyncWorker() in favor of
new Am*Process() macros that use MyBackendType. For consistency with
the existing Am*Process() macros.
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected]
|
|
Reported-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 12
|
|
Commit 44fc6e259b removed a bunch of references to
SignalHandlerForCrashExit, leaving these #includes unneeded.
|
|
The order of process initialization steps is now more consistent
between !EXEC_BACKEND and EXEC_BACKEND modes. InitProcess() is called
at the same place in either mode. We can now also move the
AttachSharedMemoryStructs() call into InitProcess() itself. This
reduces the number of "#ifdef EXEC_BACKEND" blocks.
Reviewed-by: Tristan Partin, Andres Freund, Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected]
|
|
The BackgroundWorker struct is now passed the same way as the Port
struct. Seems more consistent.
This makes it possible to move InitProcess later in SubPostmasterMain
(in next commit), as we no longer need to access shared memory to read
background worker entry.
Reviewed-by: Tristan Partin, Andres Freund, Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected]
|
|
Quotes are applied to GUCs in a very inconsistent way across the code
base, with a mix of double quotes or no quotes used. This commit
removes double quotes around all the GUC names that are obviously
referred to as parameters with non-English words (use of underscore,
mixed case, etc).
This is the result of a discussion with Álvaro Herrera, Nathan Bossart,
Laurenz Albe, Peter Eisentraut, Tom Lane and Daniel Gustafsson.
Author: Peter Smith
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+Pv-kSN8SkxSdoHano_wPubqcg5789ejhCDZAcLFceBR-w@mail.gmail.com
|
|
The comment claimed that it is "called from postmaster", but it is
actually called in the child process, pretty early in the process
initialization. I guess you could interpret "called from postmaster"
to mean that, but it seems wrong to me. Rename the function to be
consistent with other functions with similar role.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected]
|
|
The child processes don't need them. By allocating them in
PostmasterContext, the memory gets free'd and is made available for
other stuff in the child processes.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected]
|
|
In EXEC_BACKEND or single-user mode, we process
shared_preload_libraries at postmaster startup as usual, but also at
backend startup. When a library calls RegisterBackgroundWorker() when
being loaded into a backend process, we go through the motions to add
the worker to BackgroundWorkerList, even though that is a
postmaster-private data structure. Make it return early when called in
a backend process, without changing BackgroundWorkerList.
You could argue that it was intentional: In non-EXEC_BACKEND mode, the
backend processes inherit BackgroundWorkerList at fork(), so it does
make some sense to initialize it to the same state in EXEC_BACKEND
mode, too. It's clearly a postmaster-private structure, though, and
all the functions that use it are clearly marked as "should only be
called in postmaster".
You could also argue that libraries should not call
RegisterBackgroundWorker() during backend startup. It's too late to
correctly register any static background workers at that stage. But
it's a common pattern in extensions, and it doesn't seem worth the
churn to require all extensions to change it.
Another sloppiness was the exception for "internal" background
workers. We checked that RegisterBackgroundWorker() was called during
shared_preload_libraries processing, or the background worker was an
internal one. That exception was made in commit 665d1fad99 to allow
postmaster to register the logical apply launcher in
ApplyLauncherRegister(). The way the check was written, it would not
complain if you registered an internal background worker in a regular
backend process. But it would complain if postmaster registered a
background worker defined in a shared library, outside
shared_preload_libraries processing. I think the correct rule is that
you can only register static background workers in the postmaster
process, and only before the bgworker shared memory array has been
initialized. Check for that more directly.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected]
|
|
Both apply and tablesync workers were using ApplyWorkerMain() as entry
point. As the name implies, ApplyWorkerMain() should be considered as
the main function for apply workers. Tablesync worker's path was hidden
and does not have enough in common to share the same main function with
apply worker.
Also, most of the code shared by both worker types is already combined
in LogicalRepApplyLoop(). There is no need to combine the rest in
ApplyWorkerMain() anymore.
This patch introduces TablesyncWorkerMain() as a new entry point for
tablesync workers. This aims to increase code readability and would help
with future improvements like the reuse of tablesync workers in the
initial synchronization.
Author: Melih Mutlu based on suggestions by Melanie Plageman
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith, Kuroda Hayato, Amit Kapila
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAGPVpCTq=rUDd4JUdaRc1XUWf4BrH2gdSNf3rtOMUGj9rPpfzQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This commit increases the size of the bgw_library_name member of
the BackgroundWorker struct from BGW_MAXLEN (96) bytes to MAXPGPATH
(default of 1024) bytes so that it can store longer file names
(e.g., absolute paths).
Author: Yurii Rashkovskii
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson, Aleksander Alekseev
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BRLCQyjFV5Y8tG5QgUb6gjteL4S3p%2B1gcyqWTqigyM93WZ9Pg%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
In the 90s we needed to deal with computers that still had the
pre-standard signal masking APIs. That hasn't been relevant for a very
long time on Unix systems, and c94ae9d8 got rid of a remaining
dependency in our Windows porting code. PG_SETMASK didn't expose
save/restore functionality, so we'd already started using sigprocmask()
directly in places, creating the visual distraction of having two ways
to spell it. It's not part of the API that extensions are expected to
be using (but if they are, the change will be trivial). It seems like a
good time to drop the old macro and just call the standard POSIX
function.
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKG%2BKfQgrhHP2DLTohX1WwubaCBHmTzGnAEDPZ-Gug-Xskg%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
Currently, for large transactions, the publisher sends the data in
multiple streams (changes divided into chunks depending upon
logical_decoding_work_mem), and then on the subscriber-side, the apply
worker writes the changes into temporary files and once it receives the
commit, it reads from those files and applies the entire transaction. To
improve the performance of such transactions, we can instead allow them to
be applied via parallel workers.
In this approach, we assign a new parallel apply worker (if available) as
soon as the xact's first stream is received and the leader apply worker
will send changes to this new worker via shared memory. The parallel apply
worker will directly apply the change instead of writing it to temporary
files. However, if the leader apply worker times out while attempting to
send a message to the parallel apply worker, it will switch to
"partial serialize" mode - in this mode, the leader serializes all
remaining changes to a file and notifies the parallel apply workers to
read and apply them at the end of the transaction. We use a non-blocking
way to send the messages from the leader apply worker to the parallel
apply to avoid deadlocks. We keep this parallel apply assigned till the
transaction commit is received and also wait for the worker to finish at
commit. This preserves commit ordering and avoid writing to and reading
from files in most cases. We still need to spill if there is no worker
available.
This patch also extends the SUBSCRIPTION 'streaming' parameter so that the
user can control whether to apply the streaming transaction in a parallel
apply worker or spill the change to disk. The user can set the streaming
parameter to 'on/off', or 'parallel'. The parameter value 'parallel' means
the streaming will be applied via a parallel apply worker, if available.
The parameter value 'on' means the streaming transaction will be spilled
to disk. The default value is 'off' (same as current behaviour).
In addition, the patch extends the logical replication STREAM_ABORT
message so that abort_lsn and abort_time can also be sent which can be
used to update the replication origin in parallel apply worker when the
streaming transaction is aborted. Because this message extension is needed
to support parallel streaming, parallel streaming is not supported for
publications on servers < PG16.
Author: Hou Zhijie, Wang wei, Amit Kapila with design inputs from Sawada Masahiko
Reviewed-by: Sawada Masahiko, Peter Smith, Dilip Kumar, Shi yu, Kuroda Hayato, Shveta Mallik
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1+wyN6zpaHUkCLorEWNx75MG0xhMwcFhvjqm2KURZEAGw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Backpatch-through: 11
|
|
Most code prints PIDs as %d, but some code tried to print them as long
or unsigned long. While this is in theory allowed, the fact that PIDs
fit into int is deeply baked into all PostgreSQL code, so these random
deviations don't accomplish anything except confusion.
Note that we still need casts from pid_t to int, because on 64-bit
MinGW, pid_t is long long int. (But per above, actually supporting
that range in PostgreSQL code would be major surgery and probably not
useful.)
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected]
|
|
While at it, make ellipses formatting consistent when describing SQL statements.
Ekaterina Kiryanova and Alexander Lakhin
Reviewed by myself and Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/eed5cec0-a542-53da-6a5e-7789c6ed9817%40postgrespro.ru
Backpatch only the grammar fix to v15
|
|
Run pgindent, pgperltidy, and reformat-dat-files.
I manually fixed a couple of comments that pgindent uglified.
|
|
Some words were duplicated while other places were grammatically
incorrect, including one variable name in the code.
Author: Otto Kekalainen, Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
Backpatch-through: 10
|
|
Background workers without shared memory access have been broken on
EXEC_BACKEND / windows builds since shortly after background workers have been
introduced, without that being reported. Clearly they are not commonly used.
The problem is that bgworker startup requires to be attached to shared memory
in EXEC_BACKEND child processes. StartBackgroundWorker() detaches from shared
memory for unconnected workers, but at that point we already have initialized
subsystems referencing shared memory.
Fixing this problem is not entirely trivial, so removing the option to not be
connected to shared memory seems the best way forward. In most use cases the
advantages of being connected to shared memory far outweigh the disadvantages.
As there have been no reports about this issue so far, we have decided that it
is not worth trying to address the problem in the back branches.
Per discussion with Alvaro Herrera, Robert Haas and Tom Lane.
Author: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
For EXEC_BACKEND InitProcess()/InitAuxiliaryProcess() needs to have been
called well before we call BaseInit(), as SubPostmasterMain() needs LWLocks to
work. Having the order of initialization differ between platforms makes it
unnecessarily hard to understand the system and to add initialization points
for new subsystems without a lot of duplication.
To be able to change the order, BaseInit() cannot trigger
CreateSharedMemoryAndSemaphores() anymore - obviously that needs to have
happened before we can call InitProcess(). It seems cleaner to create shared
memory explicitly in single user/bootstrap mode anyway.
After this change the separation of bufmgr initialization into
InitBufferPoolAccess() / InitBufferPoolBackend() is not meaningful anymore so
the latter is removed.
Author: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
ForgetBackgroundWorker lacked any memory barrier at all, while
BackgroundWorkerStateChange had one but unaccountably did
additional manipulation of the slot after the barrier. AFAICS,
the rule must be that the barrier is immediately before setting
or clearing slot->in_use.
It looks like back in 9.6 when ForgetBackgroundWorker was first
written, there might have been some case for not needing a
barrier there, but I'm not very convinced of that --- the fact
that the load of bgw_notify_pid is in the caller doesn't seem
to guarantee no memory ordering problem. So patch 9.6 too.
It's likely that this doesn't fix any observable bug on Intel
hardware, but machines with weaker memory ordering rules could
have problems here.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
Also "make reformat-dat-files".
The only change worthy of note is that pgindent messed up the formatting
of launcher.c's struct LogicalRepWorkerId, which led me to notice that
that struct wasn't used at all anymore, so I just took it out.
|
|
Should be signed, not unsigned.
|
|
Traditionally, SIGUSR1 has been overloaded for ad-hoc signals,
procsignal.c signals and latch.c wakeups. Move that last use over to a
new dedicated signal. SIGURG is normally used to report out-of-band
socket data, but PostgreSQL doesn't use that facility.
The signal handler is now installed in all postmaster children by
InitializeLatchSupport(). Those wishing to disconnect from it should
call ShutdownLatchSupport().
Future patches will use this separation of signals to avoid the need for
a signal handler on some operating systems.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+hUKGJjxPDpzBE0a3hyUywBvaZuC89yx3jK9RFZgfv_KHU7gg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
An inconsistent set of debug-level messages was not using
errmsg_internal(), thus uselessly exposing the messages to translation
work. Fix those.
|
|
Backpatch-through: 9.5
|
|
If a database shutdown (smart or fast) is commanded between the time
some process decides to request a new background worker and the time
that the postmaster can launch that worker, then nothing happens
because the postmaster won't launch any bgworkers once it's exited
PM_RUN state. This is fine ... unless the requesting process is
waiting for that worker to finish (or even for it to start); in that
case the requestor is stuck, and only manual intervention will get us
to the point of being able to shut down.
To fix, cancel pending requests for workers when the postmaster sends
shutdown (SIGTERM) signals, and similarly cancel any new requests that
arrive after that point. (We can optimize things slightly by only
doing the cancellation for workers that have waiters.) To fit within
the existing bgworker APIs, the "cancel" is made to look like the
worker was started and immediately stopped, causing deregistration of
the bgworker entry. Waiting processes would have to deal with
premature worker exit anyway, so this should introduce no bugs that
weren't there before. We do have a side effect that registration
records for restartable bgworkers might disappear when theoretically
they should have remained in place; but since we're shutting down,
that shouldn't matter.
Back-patch to v10. There might be value in putting this into 9.6
as well, but the management of bgworkers is a bit different there
(notably see 8ff518699) and I'm not convinced it's worth the effort
to validate the patch for that branch.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
User-visible log messages should go through ereport(), so they are
subject to translation. Many remaining elog(LOG) calls are really
debugging calls.
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/92d6f545-5102-65d8-3c87-489f71ea0a37%40enterprisedb.com
|
|
We decided that the policy established in commit 7634bd4f6 for
the bgwriter, checkpointer, walwriter, and walreceiver processes,
namely that they should accept SIGQUIT at all times, really ought
to apply uniformly to all postmaster children. Therefore, get
rid of the duplicative and inconsistent per-process code for
establishing that signal handler and removing SIGQUIT from BlockSig.
Instead, make InitPostmasterChild do it.
The handler set up by InitPostmasterChild is SignalHandlerForCrashExit,
which just summarily does _exit(2). In interactive backends, we
almost immediately replace that with quickdie, since we would prefer
to try to tell the client that we're dying. However, this patch is
changing the behavior of autovacuum (both launcher and workers), as
well as walsenders. Those processes formerly also used quickdie,
but AFAICS that was just mindless copy-and-paste: they don't have
any interactive client that's likely to benefit from being told this.
The stats collector continues to be an outlier, in that it thinks
SIGQUIT means normal exit. That should probably be changed for
consistency, but there's another patch set where that's being
dealt with, so I didn't do so here.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
Because sigsetjmp() will restore the initial state with signals blocked,
the code path in bgworker.c for reporting an error and exiting would
execute that way. Usually this is fairly harmless; but if a parallel
worker had an error message exceeding the shared-memory communication
buffer size (16K) it would lock up, because it would wait for a
resume-sending signal from its parallel leader which it would never
detect.
To fix, just unblock signals at the appropriate point.
This can be shown to fail back to 9.6. The lack of parallel query
infrastructure makes it difficult to provide a simple test case for
9.5; but I'm pretty sure the issue exists in some form there as well,
so apply the code change there too.
Vignesh C, reviewed by Bharath Rupireddy, Robert Haas, and myself
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm1d1hHPZUg3xU4XjtWBOLCrA+-2cJcLpw-cePZ=GgDVfA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This fixes some comments and documentation new as of Postgres 13.
Author: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
Add a new global variable MyBackendType that uses the same BackendType
enum that was previously only used by the stats collector. That way
several duplicate ways of checking what type a particular process is
can be simplified. Since it's no longer just for stats, move to
miscinit.c and rename existing functions to match the expanded
purpose.
Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kuntal Ghosh <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/[email protected]
|
|
The init_ps_display() arguments were mostly lies by now, so to match
typical usage, just use one argument and let the caller assemble it
from multiple sources if necessary. The only user of the additional
arguments is BackendInitialize(), which was already doing string
assembly on the caller side anyway.
Remove the second argument of set_ps_display() ("force") and just
handle that in init_ps_display() internally.
BackendInitialize() also used to set the initial status as
"authentication", but that was very far from where authentication
actually happened. So now it's set to "initializing" and then
"authentication" just before the actual call to
ClientAuthentication().
Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kuntal Ghosh <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/[email protected]
|
|
Backpatch-through: update all files in master, backpatch legal files through 9.4
|
|
Where possible, share signal handler code and main loop interrupt
checking. This saves quite a bit of code and should simplify
maintenance, too.
This commit intends not to change the way anything works, even
though that might allow more code to be unified. It does unify
a bunch of individual variables into a ShutdownRequestPending
flag that has is now used by a bunch of different process types,
though.
Patch by me, reviewed by Andres Freund and Daniel Gustafsson.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZwDk=BguVDVa+qdA6SBKef=PKbaKDQALTC_9qoz1mJqg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Similar to commits 7e735035f2 and dddf4cdc33, this commit makes the order
of header file inclusion consistent for backend modules.
In the passing, removed a couple of duplicate inclusions.
Author: Vignesh C
Reviewed-by: Kuntal Ghosh and Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm2Sznv8RR6Ex-iJO6xAdsxgWhCoETkaYX=+9DW3q0QCfA@mail.gmail.com
|
