-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 538
HDDS-12209. Make replica verification concurrent #8363
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
ptlrs
wants to merge
3
commits into
apache:master
Choose a base branch
from
ptlrs:HDDS-12209-Make-replica-verification-concurrent
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev
Previous commit
HDDS-12715. fix review comments
- Loading branch information
commit ad2c3d1b68d311e3db7937059ce41662f9da847d
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not technically required in this context but
static ThreadLocal
is usually used to prevent confusion with multiple instances created by the same thread.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe a non-static approach would be simpler here. We wouldn't want to share the ThreadLocal verifiers across instances if the replicas-verify command is executed in parallel.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For parallel invocation at the command line, each command would be a separate process with a separate JVM and the static instance would not be shared. I don't think we need to worry about a CLI entrypoint having multiple instances invoked in parallel within the same process, so either option should work fine. However adding
static
conforms with best practices and example defined in the ThreadLocal javadoc.