Skip to content

Gender pay gap noticed in recursion article.md #1759

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 18, 2020
Merged

Gender pay gap noticed in recursion article.md #1759

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions 1-js/06-advanced-functions/01-recursion/article.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ let company = {
salary: 1000
}, {
name: 'Alice',
salary: 600
salary: 1600
}],

development: {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ The algorithm is probably even easier to read from the code:

```js run
let company = { // the same object, compressed for brevity
sales: [{name: 'John', salary: 1000}, {name: 'Alice', salary: 600 }],
sales: [{name: 'John', salary: 1000}, {name: 'Alice', salary: 1600 }],
development: {
sites: [{name: 'Peter', salary: 2000}, {name: 'Alex', salary: 1800 }],
internals: [{name: 'Jack', salary: 1300}]
Expand All @@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ function sumSalaries(department) {
}
*/!*

alert(sumSalaries(company)); // 6700
alert(sumSalaries(company)); // 7700
```

The code is short and easy to understand (hopefully?). That's the power of recursion. It also works for any level of subdepartment nesting.
Expand Down