Skip to content

MSC3975: rel_type for Replies #3975

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 13 commits into from
Closed

MSC3975: rel_type for Replies #3975

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
f9c53db
Add introduction for rel_type for replies proposal.
imbev Mar 8, 2023
46a4315
Update MSC0000 to MSC3975 for rel_type for Replies proposal
imbev Mar 8, 2023
4a07c6c
Add initial proposal section for MSC3975
imbev Mar 8, 2023
f1c7f7c
MSC3975: Add links to MSC2675
imbev Mar 8, 2023
f0848b8
MSC3975: Add Potential Issues, Alternatives, and Dependencies sections
imbev Mar 8, 2023
cc5956e
MSC3975: Remove Dependencies sections
imbev Mar 8, 2023
1ae9803
MSC3975: Change possible rel_type value to "m.reply"
imbev Mar 8, 2023
ceb9299
MSC3975: Improve introduction links to MSC2675
imbev Mar 8, 2023
9ab9c98
MSC3975: Provide clarification on `m.in_reply_to`
imbev Mar 9, 2023
b5cb6e5
MSC3975: Add details on MSC3051 as an alternative
imbev Mar 9, 2023
3145dfa
MSC3975: Suggest solution to rel_type conflicts
imbev Mar 26, 2023
820c8e1
MSC3975: Add more detail to potential issues
imbev Mar 26, 2023
274220b
MSC3975: Add unstable prefix `app.somix.msc3975.reply`
imbev Mar 27, 2023
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Next Next commit
MSC3975: Add more detail to potential issues
  • Loading branch information
@imbev
imbev authored Mar 26, 2023
commit 820c8e1e580d3d7167f6aa2f3725a7521fd005ee
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion proposals/3975-rel_type-for-replies.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ a new `event_id` field added for consistency with other relationship types.
## Potential issues

There is a possible conflict with threads, as a messages in threads use `m.thread`
as the `rel_type`. As a solution, clients could prefer other `rel_types`, and fallback with the current `m.in_reply_to`.
as the `rel_type`. As a solution, clients could prefer other `rel_types`, and fallback with the current `m.in_reply_to`. This problem would cease to exist upon approval of [MSC3051](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/pull/3051).


## Alternatives
Expand Down