Skip to content

Update BDN config values for JSON.Operations #1211

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 22, 2025

Conversation

darrenge
Copy link
Collaborator

The BDN config values needed to be updated due to the inconsistencies of Net90 on Ubuntu. It was a significant bump on most as they Net90 Ubuntu "could" be higher than the others.

@darrenge darrenge requested review from badrishc and Copilot May 21, 2025 22:18
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates performance threshold values in the BDN benchmark config for JSON operations to account for higher Net90 timings on Ubuntu, ensuring Ubuntu benchmarks no longer falsely fail.

  • Bumped expected timings for all JSON operations (GetCommand, SetCommand, DeepPath, ArrayPath, FilterPath, Recursive) across ACL, AOF, and None modes.
  • Aligned “ArrayElementsPath” values remain unchanged.
  • Adjusted values reflect Ubuntu-specific performance characteristics.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

test/BDNPerfTests/BDN_Benchmark_Config.json:362

  • [nitpick] This JSON config repeats large numeric thresholds across ACL, AOF, and None sections. Consider extracting common values or generating this file programmatically to reduce duplication and simplify future updates.
"expected_ModuleJsonGetCommand_ACL": 330000,

@badrishc badrishc merged commit 4fc4a35 into main May 22, 2025
46 of 47 checks passed
@badrishc badrishc deleted the darrenge/fixJsonOperationsBDN branch May 22, 2025 16:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants