Data Insights

Bite-sized insights on how the world is changing, published every few days.

Poland’s GDP per capita has more than doubled since it joined the European Union in 2004

The image shows a line graph comparing Poland's GDP per capita to the average GDP per capita of the European Union (EU 27) from 2000 to 2023. The vertical axis ranges from $0 to $60,000, while the horizontal axis represents the years, marked from 2000 to 2023. 

A red line represents Poland's GDP per capita, starting at around $21,200 in 2004, the year Poland joined the EU, and increasing to approximately $44,400 by 2023. A blue line depicts the EU average GDP per capita, which trends higher than Poland's throughout the graph. 

A note emphasizes that between 2004 and 2023, Poland's GDP per capita more than doubled, reducing the gap with the EU average. The source of the data is the World Bank, projected for 2025, and the data is expressed in international dollars adjusted to 2021 prices.

In May 2004, ten countries joined the European Union in its largest expansion. These new members entered the EU’s internal market, allowing the free movement of goods, services, capital, and people.

Poland was one of these countries. At the time, its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita stood at $21,200 per year, around half the EU average.

Since then, this gap has narrowed. As the chart shows, Poland’s GDP per capita has more than doubled.

While many factors contributed to this growth, integration into the EU played a role. Since 2004, Poland’s inflation-adjusted exports have more than tripled, with around three-quarters going to other EU countries. This boost to growth is sometimes described as an “EU accession bonus”.

Poland has also been a major beneficiary of EU funding, receiving over €163 billion (net of its own contributions). Most of this money has supported areas such as transport infrastructure, research and development, and energy.

Compare levels of GDP per capita across other countries

Ten pathogens are responsible for three-quarters of diarrheal deaths in children

A data visualization presents a breakdown of pathogens responsible for diarrheal deaths in children under five years old. It features a title at the top, stating "Which pathogens are responsible for diarrheal deaths in children?" Below the title, there is an explanatory note highlighting that an estimated 580,000 children die annually from diarrheal diseases, with the box sizes representing the proportion of deaths attributed to each pathogen.

The categories are divided into three groups: Viruses, Bacteria, and Protists. 

- In the Viruses section, Rotavirus is the largest box, indicating it causes approximately 210,000 annual deaths (35.7%). Other viruses include Adenovirus (6.3%), Norovirus (6.2%), Sapovirus (3.9%), and Astrovirus (3.0%).
  
- In the Bacteria section, a significant box is allocated to Shigella, which results in 63,000 annual deaths (10.8%). It also includes smaller boxes for Salmonella (1.0%), Campylobacter (1.7%), and E. coli toxin (3.9%).
  
- The Protists category has a box for Cryptosporidium, accounting for 3.4%.

Additionally, there is a gray box labeled "Others & unidentified" that represents 24.1% of deaths but does not specify the pathogens involved.

The data source is attributed to Adam Cohen et al. (2022), and the chart is published by Our World in Data.

More than half a million children die from diarrheal diseases each year. This is tragic because many of these deaths could be prevented with the tools we already have.

Just ten pathogens are responsible for three-quarters of all diarrheal deaths in children; these are shown in the chart in red, blue, and gold. The leading cause is rotavirus, which kills over 200,000 children each year. Rotavirus vaccines already exist and are very effective in reducing death rates, but vaccination rates are still lagging in many poorer countries.

Other major killers include Shigella, Cryptosporidium, and E. coli, which can be tackled through better hygiene, clean water, improved sanitation, and new treatments.

These pathogens typically spread through contaminated food and water, respiratory droplets, and close contact with others. Basic tools like clean water and sanitation, access to vaccines, and oral rehydration treatment could go a long way in preventing early death, and give every child the chance to have a healthy, long life.

Explore more writing and data on diarrheal diseases on our dedicated page

Suicide rates are higher in men than women

A scatter plot titled "Suicide rates tend to be higher among men than women," depicting reported suicide death rates per 100,000 people. The horizontal axis represents female suicide deaths, ranging from 0 to 30, while the vertical axis represents male suicide deaths, also ranging from 0 to 30. 

Each dot represents a country, with specific labels highlighting significant points: Uruguay, South Korea (noted for having male rates twice as high as female rates), the US (with male rates four times higher), Japan, Sweden, and Denmark. The plot features a diagonal line indicating that no countries show higher rates of female suicides than male, as there are no dots below the line. 

The data source is the WHO Mortality Database (2024), and there is a note specifying that the data is an annual estimate for the years 2020 to 2022, depending on data availability for each country.

Globally, more than 700,000 people die from suicide every year.

Understanding the factors that increase the risk of suicide can help us provide the most effective interventions and support systems.

One thing we do know is that more men die from suicide than women. In the chart, you can see male suicide rates (on the vertical axis) plotted against female rates. One dot is one country. Since all of the dots lie above the line, male suicide rates were higher in all countries included in this dataset.

The size of this gender gap varies by country. In the United States, rates among men are four times higher than amongst women. In South Korea and Japan, they’re around double. Some countries lie closer to the line, meaning the gap is smaller.

The exact reasons for this gender gap are still debated. Factors could include the lethality of different methods, stigma around seeking help, different social pressures, and alcohol and drug abuse.

Every suicide is a tragedy. However, suicide death rates have declined in many countries, and we know that they can be reduced further with greater understanding and support. If you are dealing with suicidal thoughts, you can receive immediate help by visiting resources such as findahelpline.com.

Read my colleague Saloni Dattani’s article on how suicide statistics can vary across sources

Famines kill far fewer people today than they did in the past, but remain a major threat

A bar chart depicting the estimated deaths in famines, categorized by continent. The horizontal axis represents decades from the 1870s to the 2020s, while the vertical axis indicates the number of deaths, spanning from 0 to 30 million.

The bars represent different continents with distinct colors: South America is represented in a dark red hue, North America in orange, Africa in purple, Europe in blue, and Asia in green. 

Key trends highlighted in the chart include:
- Until the mid-20th century, famines caused millions and millions of deaths, especially in Asia.
- In recent decades, the death toll from famines has decreased significantly, averaging around one million deaths per decade, particularly in Africa.

The chart includes a source note stating that the data is from the World Peace Foundation (2025), and indicating that the figure for the 2020s is preliminary and only reflects data from 2020 to 2023.

Famines are still a major global problem. From 2020 to 2023 alone, they caused over a million deaths.

Yet the long-term trend shows significant progress. In the late 1800s and the first half of the 1900s, it was common for famines to kill over 10 million people per decade. This was true as recently as the 1960s, when China’s Great Leap Forward became the deadliest famine in history.

But as you can see in the chart, that number has dropped sharply, to about one to two million per decade.

This improvement is even more striking given that the world’s population has grown substantially. Despite many more people living on Earth, far fewer die from famines than before.

This progress has resulted from various factors, including increased food production, poverty reduction, fewer conflicts, and more accountable governments.

Learn more about why fewer people die from famines today

Despite being preventable and treatable, malaria is the leading cause of child mortality in much of Sub-Saharan Africa

A world map highlights regions in Sub-Saharan Africa where malaria was the leading cause of death for children under five years old in 2021. Countries affected are shaded in red against a lighter gray background. A text overlay states that in Nigeria, malaria led to over 190,000 deaths among children under five in 2021, more than any other cause. The data source is identified as IHME, Global Burden of Disease, 2024, with a CC BY license noted at the bottom.

In 2021, malaria was the leading cause of death among children under five in more than 20 countries in Sub-Saharan Africa.

In Nigeria, over 125,000 young children died from it — that’s 340 every day, one child around every four minutes. The country accounts for one-third of all under‑5 malaria deaths in the world.

Malaria is both preventable and treatable. But millions of children still lack access to basic protection: bed nets, timely treatment, and safe living conditions. We’ve seen malaria eliminated elsewhere.

The tools exist; the challenge is getting them to those who need them most.

Read more from my colleague Max Roser on why progress is possible — and how each of us can contribute

Over a hundred million infants receive measles vaccines annually, protecting them and communities against a deadly disease

A line graph showing the estimated number of one-year-olds who have received vaccinations for various diseases from 1980 to 2023. The y-axis represents the number of vaccinations in millions, ranging from 0 to 140 million.

The lines are color-coded: the blue line represents the total number of one-year-olds, while a dark red line indicates the number vaccinated against measles. Additional light gray lines represent vaccinations for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae b, rubella, and rotavirus.

A consistent rise is observed in all vaccination categories, with the most recent data indicating over a hundred million one-year-olds have received the measles vaccine. 

Data is sourced from the United Nations, World Population Prospects (2024), World Health Organization (WHO), and UNICEF (2024). The visualization is licensed under CC BY and published by Our World in Data.

Over 100 million infants are vaccinated against measles every year, which means more than 80% of one-year-olds are protected from this potentially life-threatening disease. This global effort has saved millions of lives.

That scale should be reassuring. Measles vaccines are safe and reduce the risk of infection by over 95%, making them one of our most powerful tools to prevent childhood deaths. Outbreaks have become increasingly rare in many countries, global infant mortality has fallen, and measles vaccination alone is estimated to have saved more than 94 million lives.

But that progress is under threat: vaccination rates have fallen in recent years, as the chart shows, and fewer children are getting the protection they need. When coverage slips, measles spreads rapidly; more children suffer and die from a disease we can easily prevent.

Read my colleague Hannah’s article on the number of lives saved by childhood vaccinations

The length of software tasks AI systems can do on their own has been increasing quickly

A chart illustrates the improvement of AI systems in performing longer software tasks over time. The horizontal axis spans from 2019 to mid 2025, marking the development of various AI models, such as GPT-2, GPT-3, GPT-3.5, and several iterations of GPT-4. The vertical axis indicates the length of time in minutes that tasks  take human professionals. Key points highlighted include:

- "GPT 3.5 (which came out in Spring 2022) could only do tasks that take humans a few seconds, such as selecting the right file"
- "OpenAI's o3(which came out in April 2025) can do tasks on its own that take humans 20 minutes," such as finding and fixing small bugs in code
- The observed trend shows a rapid progression in AI capability

Accompanying notes indicate that the data is based on 170 tasks across fields like software engineering and machine learning. The source for this data is the Model Evaluation & Threat Research (METR) from 2025, presented under a Creative Commons attribution license.

How will artificial intelligence (AI) impact people’s jobs?

This question has no simple answer, but the more AI systems can independently carry out long, job-like tasks, the greater their impact will likely be.

The chart shows a trend in this direction for software-related tasks. The length of tasks — in terms of how long they take human professionals — that AIs can do on their own has increased quickly in the past couple of years.

Before 2023, even the best AI systems could only perform tasks that take people around 10 seconds, such as selecting the right file.

Today, the best AIs can fairly reliably (with an 80% success rate) do tasks that take people 20 minutes or more, such as finding and fixing bugs in code or configuring common software packages.

It’s unclear how much these results generalize; other factors, like reliability, need to be considered.

But AI capabilities continue to improve, and if developments keep pace for the next few years, we could see systems capable of performing tasks that take people days or even longer.

Read more about how we can help make our future with AI go well

China is moving much faster on electric cars than the EU or the United States

A line graph illustrates the share of new cars sold that are electric in three regions: China, the European Union, and the United States from 2020 to 2023. The vertical axis indicates the percentage of electric cars, ranging from 0% to 40%, with marked points at 2%, 6%, 10%, and 22%. 

In 2020, China starts at 2%, showing a steady upward trend, culminating at 38% in 2023. The European Union begins similarly at 6%, increasing to 22% by 2023. The United States, starting at 2%, progresses to 10% over the same period, showing the slowest growth among the three.

The graph highlights China's significant lead over both the EU and the US in the adoption of electric cars. 

Data source is the International Energy Agency, specifically from the Global EV Outlook 2024 report. A note indicates that in China and the EU, two-thirds of these cars are fully electric, while in the US, 80% are.

Road transport is responsible for around three-quarters of global carbon dioxide emissions from transport. Switching from petrol and diesel to electric vehicles is an important solution to decarbonize our economies.

This chart shows the change in share of new cars that were electric in China, the European Union (EU), and the United States (US) between 2020 and 2023. This includes fully electric and plug-in hybrid cars, though most are fully electric.

In 2020, electric cars were rare everywhere. But by 2023, over one-third of new vehicles in China were electric, compared to less than a quarter in the EU and under a tenth in the US.

While we only have annual data up to 2023, preliminary figures suggest that in 2024, electric cars outsold conventional ones for the first time in China.

Explore data on electric car sales for more countries

In some countries, women still don’t have the same freedom to work as men

A world map that highlights countries where women face restrictions on their right to work compared to men. The areas shaded in dark red indicate where husbands can prevent their wives from working, or where women require additional permissions for employment. Included text notes specific examples: Afghanistan, where the Taliban imposes strict restrictions on women's right to work outside the home, and Yemen, where women may work but often need permission from a male guardian and could face legal repercussions if they do not comply. The map is surrounded by a header that reads, "Where are women not allowed to take the same jobs as men?" and provides context about the legal implications of these restrictions. Data sources listed at the bottom include the World Bank's report titled "Women, Business and the Law" for the year 2024, with a note stating that the data is from 2023. The copyright attribution is indicated as CC BY.

Many previous generations of women in my family would not have been allowed to do the work I do today — even if computers, the Internet, and Our World in Data had existed then. Thankfully, that’s no longer the case where I live: I’ve had the same right to get an education, work, and build a career as my brother.

Unfortunately, that’s not the case everywhere.

The map highlights the countries where women had legal restrictions on their rights to work in formal employment in 2023. All are in the Middle East, North Africa, or Sub-Saharan Africa.

These restrictions can include the need for permission or documentation from a male family member — such as a husband or brother — to work, or legal consequences if they don’t follow working restrictions.

While nearly 20 countries still have these legal barriers for women, this number was much larger in the past: in 1970, it was almost 70.

This data only reflects legal restrictions on working rights. In other countries, strong social or cultural pressures still mean that women are less likely to be in formal employment than men, even if they’re legally allowed to.

Explore more data on female participation in the workforce

Women in the US spend more time with children than men do, across all ages

A line graph illustrates the daily hours spent with children by women and men in the U.S., across men and women's lifetimes.

The y-axis indicates hours per day spent with children, ranging from 0 to 6 hours. The x-axis represents the ages from 15 to 80. 

Notable points include:
- Women aged 35 spend more than 5 hours daily with children.
- Men aged 35 spend about 3 hours daily with children.

Overall, the graph demonstrates that women consistently spend more time with children than men across all ages.

Data source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2023). Note: The analysis considers underage children related to the surveyed individual and those living in the same household (e.g. step-children) and includes all time spent with the child in the same room.

In the United States, women spend more time with children than men. This is true for adults of any age.

The difference is especially large for people in their 20s and 30s. For example, at age 35, women spend an average of five hours per day with children, while men spend around three hours. (Considered here are people’s children, step and foster children, grandchildren, and other family members under 18.)

Although the gap is smaller for older people, even in later life, women spend more time with children than men.

This gap reflects traditional gender roles, where women do more childcare and less paid work. But it also has broader implications: women spend less time with friends and alone than men, which may affect their social connections, leisure, and well-being.

This data comes from the American Time Use Survey by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Learn more about how men and women spend their time throughout life

Every global region has seen a steep rise in mobile phone subscriptions

The visualization illustrates the increase in mobile cellular subscriptions per 100 people across various global regions from the year 2000 to 2023. Each region is represented by a line graph with specific data points.

- North America: Increased from 38 subscriptions in 2000 to 110 in 2023.
- Europe and Central Asia: Rose from 34 in 2000 to 128 in 2023.
- Latin America and Caribbean: Grew from 12 in 2000 to 112 in 2023.
- East Asia and Pacific: Expanded from 11 in 2000 to 130 in 2023.
- Sub-Saharan Africa: Increased from 2 in 2000 to 89 in 2023.
- South Asia: Went from less than 1 in 2000 to 84 in 2023.

The chart notes that the data source is the World Bank with a publication year of 2025, and it explains that the number can exceed 100 in instances where individuals may have multiple subscriptions.

Mobile phones have achieved what few technologies do: they’ve been adopted rapidly by people all over the world, in both rich and poor regions.

The chart shows how mobile subscriptions grew between 2000 and 2023. This is given per 100 people in each world region. If the number is over 100, it means some people own more than one mobile device. (This data doesn’t tell us the percentage of people with a phone, as some individuals own multiple devices.)

Mobile phone subscriptions have risen sharply everywhere in just a few decades. Even in the poorest parts of the world, like Sub-Saharan Africa, subscriptions grew from just 2 per 100 people to 89. In South Asia, they went from less than 1 to 84.

Still, this rise matters because mobile phones allow people to learn, connect, and build, even in places without physical infrastructure (like roads or banks). For example, mobile money systems enable people to save, send, and receive money without needing a bank branch or an Internet connection. This has helped millions improve their financial security.

Explore more data on mobile phone subscriptions

People in richer countries spend more on food, but it’s a smaller share of their overall spending

The image presents a scatter plot illustrating the relationship between the annual amount spent on food and the share of total consumer expenditure that is allocated to food across various countries. The x-axis represents the annual amount spent on food in US dollars, ranging from $0 to $4,000. The y-axis indicates the percentage of total expenditure spent on food, from 0% to 60%. 

Several key data points are highlighted: 

- Kenya, where the average food spending is $900, accounting for 58% of total expenditure.
- Kazakhstan appears on the plot, contributing to the overall trend of expenditure.
- The United States, where the average spending on food is $3,400, making up 10% of total spending.
- Switzerland, with an average food spending of $4,100, represents only 9% of total expenditure.
- Venezuela is also marked on the graph.

The title emphasizes that people in richer countries tend to spend more on food overall, yet this spending constitutes a smaller portion of their total spending. 

In the footer, the data source is referenced as the USDA Economic Research Service (ERS) from 2023, indicating that the food expenditure is not adjusted for differences in living costs between countries. The graphic is licensed under Creative Commons BY, allowing for redistribution with proper attribution.

Three billion people worldwide cannot afford a healthy diet that gives them all the nutrients they need.

Most of these people live in low- to middle-income countries, where people have less money to spend on food. You might rightly guess that people in richer countries tend to spend more on food — but they also spend a smaller share of overall spending on food. You can see this in the chart, where each dot represents one country in 2022.

The average budget in Switzerland for food consumed at home was more than four times that of Kenya (when measured in US dollars). But food made up less than 10% of Swiss consumer spending, compared to almost 60% in Kenya.

This means people in richer countries don’t only have more money to spend on food; they also have far more left to spend on other important resources, like housing, education, clothing, and health.

Read more in my article “Engel's Law: Richer people spend more money on food, but it makes up a smaller share of their income” →

One in six people live in Sub-Saharan Africa, but it accounts for two-thirds of global extreme poverty

This visual representation displays two vertical bar graphs side by side. The left graph indicates the share of the global population, showing that Sub-Saharan Africa is home to 16% of the world's total population, while the majority resides in a section labeled "Rest of the World." The right graph illustrates the share of people living in extreme poverty, defined as those living on less than $2.15 per day. Here, Sub-Saharan Africa accounts for 67% of the global population living in extreme poverty, contrasting sharply with the much smaller percentage attributed to the Rest of the World. 

Text on the left states, "16% of all people live in Sub-Saharan Africa," and an arrow points towards it. The text on the right concludes with, "...but 67% of all people in extreme poverty live there." The infographic is attributed to Our World in Data, with a footer noting the data is sourced from the World Bank for the year 2024. The image is licensed under CC BY.

Every twelfth person in the world still lives in extreme poverty. That means surviving on less than $2.15 per day (adjusted for differences in living costs between countries).

For many, that means struggling to afford nutritious food, not being able to afford basic healthcare, safe sanitation, or electricity.

So, where do most people in extreme poverty live? The chart shows that Sub-Saharan Africa, which is home to just 16% of the global population, now accounts for 67% of people living in extreme poverty.

This distribution is very different from 25 years ago. In 2000, Asia was home to most of the world’s population living in extreme poverty. However, strong economic growth in recent decades has led to steep reductions in poverty. Progress in Sub-Saharan Africa has been much slower.

If we're serious about ending extreme poverty worldwide, supporting economic development in Sub-Saharan Africa has to be a top priority. The recent progress achieved by some African countries reminds us that meaningful change is within reach.

Explore more data on extreme poverty

Most food is transported by boat, so food miles are a relatively small part of the carbon footprint of most diets

A bar chart displaying information about global food miles and their associated greenhouse gas emissions. The chart has two main sections: the left side indicates the share of global food miles by mode of transportation, while the right side shows the greenhouse gas emissions in grams required to move one kilogram of food one kilometer.

- Shipping accounts for 59% of global food miles, with a low emission of 20 grams.
- Road transport is responsible for 31% of food miles, emitting 400 grams per kilogram.
- Rail contributes 10% to the total, with 60 grams of emissions.
- A small percentage, 0.2%, represents food transported by air, which has the highest emissions at 1130 grams.

The chart suggests that shipping is a very carbon-efficient method of transporting food compared to other means. The data source is credited to Joseph Poore and Thomas Nemecek, 2018.

Many people are interested in how they can eat in a more climate-friendly way. I’m often asked about the most effective way to do so.

While we might intuitively think that “food miles” — how far our food has traveled to reach us — play a big role, transport accounts for just 5% of the global emissions from our food system.

This is because most of the world’s food comes by boat, and shipping is a relatively low-carbon mode of transport. The chart shows that transporting a kilogram of food by boat emits 50 times less carbon than by plane and about 20 times less than trucks on the road.

So, food transport would be a much bigger emitter if all our food were flown across the world — but that’s only the case for highly perishable foods, like asparagus, green beans, some types of fish, and berries.

This means that what you eat and how it is produced usually matters more than how far it’s traveled to reach you.

Read my article “You want to reduce the carbon footprint of your food? Focus on what you eat, not whether your food is local”

Internet use became the norm for humanity only very recently

A line chart titled "Most of humanity has been connected to the Internet for only a brief moment in history" displays the percentage of the global population that used the Internet in the last three months. The vertical axis ranges from 0% to 75%, with key data points indicated. 

In 1997, only 2% of the world’s population used the Internet. By 2009, one in four people used the Internet. The year 2019 is highlighted as the first year that half of the global population (53%) was online, and by the most recent data in 2023, the percentage of Internet users rose to 67%.

Data source is credited to the International Telecommunication Union, referenced via the World Bank, with a Creative Commons Attribution license.

For many readers in high-income countries, the Internet might no longer feel revolutionary. But when I was born in 1997, only 2% of the world's population used the Internet. By 2019, that number had risen to over 50%; today, two-thirds of the global population is online.

It’s worth taking a moment to appreciate the novelty and speed of this change for two reasons. First, much of the potential progress enabled by the Internet is still unfolding, from expanding educational opportunities through free online resources to reducing the cost of sending money home for migrants.

Second, it’s good to remember that in 2023, a third of people still didn’t use the Internet. Accelerating connectivity could give these individuals greater freedom and access to new opportunities. The United Nations aims to get more than 90% of people online by 2030. Some regions are still far from universal access, with just 43% of South Asia and 37% of Sub-Saharan Africa connected.

Explore more data on Internet use, country by country

How old are you compared to the rest of the world?

A line graph titled "How old are you, compared to most of the world?" is displayed. The y-axis represents age in years, ranging from 0 to 45, while the x-axis represents the years from 1950 to 2100. The line starts below 25 in 1950, gradually rises to about 30 in 2020, and goes above 40 by 2100. The data points are connected by a smooth, dark blue line with dotted segments for future projections. Also noted is a data source, indicating that the information comes from the United Nations' World Population Prospects of 2024. The graphic is credited with "CC BY" for licensing.

Describing someone as “young” or “old” is rather arbitrary. However, something we can quantify is whether a given person is “young” or “old” compared to the rest of the world.

Imagine we sorted all 8 billion people alive today from youngest to oldest. The person standing right in the middle would be about 30 years old; that's the median age today. The chart shows the global median age and the UN’s projection to 2100.

In 2025, if you are over 30, you are older than most people in the world.

The chart also shows that if you were born in 1950, you stopped being “young” when you passed 20, as that was the median age in 1970.

As birth rates decline and life expectancy increases, the median age is expected to keep rising until the end of the century.

Whether you’re younger or older than most, the world is still relatively young, and this matters for many aspects of society, from the demand for resources and jobs to long-term planning for healthcare, education, and infrastructure.

If you want to dig deeper into this data, have a look at our Population & Demography Data Explorer →

Once widespread, smoking is now uncommon in Great Britain

Line chart showing the decline in smoking among adults over age 16 in Great Britain from 1974 to 2023. In 1974, around 51% of men and 41% of women reported smoking cigarettes. Over the decades, these rates fell steadily. By 2023, only about 12% of men and 10% of women reported smoking. The gap between men and women remained fairly consistent, with men having slightly higher rates throughout the period. The chart illustrates a dramatic and sustained decline in smoking for both sexes.

The data is sourced from the GLS & OPN surveys (2023) and published by OurWorldinData.org under a Creative Commons BY license.

Fifty years ago, almost half the adults in Great Britain smoked cigarettes, but this has become much less common.

In the 1970s, half of men and 40% of women over the age of 16 reported smoking cigarettes. Since then, smoking rates have steadily fallen. By 2023, this was just 12% of men and 10% of women.

This dramatic decline is the result of decades of public health efforts such as clear warnings on cigarette packs, bans on tobacco advertising, indoor smoking restrictions, and support to help people quit. Newer technologies — including vaping products, nicotine patches, and medications — have also helped many people quit.

Despite this, smoking remains the leading risk factor for preventable death in the UK, raising the risk of many cancers, heart attacks, and strokes. Fewer smokers means fewer people suffering from these serious diseases.

Read more about the global problem of smoking in an article by my colleague Max

Brazil, Venezuela, and Mexico account for 59% of people living in poverty in Latin America

A bar chart illustrating the number of people living in poverty in Latin America in 2023. The chart highlights that Brazil, Venezuela, and Mexico account for 59% of the population living on less than $3.65 per day, totaling 52.2 million individuals. Brazil is represented by the longest bar, showing 23.5 million people, followed by Venezuela with 15.5 million and Mexico with 13.2 million. Other countries displayed include Colombia (10.2 million), Guatemala (5.8 million), Peru (4.3 million), and several others, with the smallest bars indicating very few affected, such as Uruguay (0.1 million) and Costa Rica (0.3 million). The chart provides a clear visual representation of poverty levels across the region.

Data source: Chang, Evans and Rivas Herrera (2024), Inter-American Development Bank. Note: Data in international dollars at 2017 prices, adjusted for inflation and differences in living costs between countries. The graph is licensed under CC BY.

A recent report by the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) highlights the high concentration of poverty in Latin America. Across the region, around 89 million people — more than one in seven — live on less than $3.65 a day.

Poverty can be measured using various poverty lines; here, we’re looking at the $3.65 line, which the World Bank uses to define poverty in lower-middle-income countries.

The chart shows that 52.2 million people living under this line are in just three countries — Brazil, Venezuela, and Mexico — representing 59% of the region’s total.

As the report explains, while Brazil and Mexico don’t have the highest poverty rates, their large populations mean they have the largest number of people living below this line. Venezuela, in contrast, has a smaller population but one of the region’s highest poverty rates.

Identifying where poverty is most concentrated can help target efforts to reduce and eliminate it.

You can explore more data on poverty, including different poverty lines and world regions, in our Poverty Data Explorer

Recent surges in house prices have affected many — but not all — countries in the European Union

A chart titled "There is no universal trend in housing prices in European countries" presents price changes of residential properties purchased by households in the 12 most populous European Union countries. It displays a grid layout. 

In the top row from left to right: 
- Portugal shows a steep increase of +50% from 2010 to 2023.
- Czechia indicates a +44% rise.
- Sweden reflects a +36% increase.

In the second row:
- Germany has a +33% change.
- Netherlands exhibits a +17% increase.
- Poland shows a +11% rise.

In the third row: 
- Belgium and France both have a modest increase of +6%.
- Greece shows a decrease of -9%.

In the fourth row: 
- Spain indicates a decline of -13%.
- Romania has a notable decrease of -27%.
- Italy shows a -28% drop.

The chart indicates that data has been adjusted for inflation and cites Eurostat as the data source for 2025. A note at the bottom reminds viewers about the inflation adjustment.

One of the most pressing problems I hear from European friends is that they cannot find an affordable place to live. Housing costs represent one of the largest expenses for most Europeans. While many people rent, purchasing a home remains a goal for some.

The chart shows the change in house prices of residential properties purchased by households in 12 countries across the European Union since 2010. In many, prices have increased sharply (even after inflation). Portugal shows the most dramatic increase, with prices rising by 50%.

But this large increase has not happened everywhere. Rises have been more modest in France and Belgium, and prices have actually fallen considerably in Romania and Italy.

These huge differences matter to young Europeans hoping to find their first home after leaving their family house.

Every year, more than half of the global area burned by wildfire is in Africa

A bar graph illustrating the share of global area burned by wildfires across different regions from 2012 to 2024. The graph is divided vertically into segments representing five regions: Africa, Europe, Asia, Oceania, and North and South America. The deep red color represents Africa, which dominates the graph, showing more than half of the total area burned. Other regions, represented by lighter colors, fill the remaining sections of the graph. The year labels are placed along the horizontal axis, indicating the timeline of the data. The title emphasizes that more than half of the area burned by wildfire is in Africa. The data source is the Global Wildfire Information System, with the year of the data being noted as 2025. The graph is under a Creative Commons BY license.

It’s often difficult to understand the scale of wildfires globally. That’s because most news coverage focuses on only a few countries.

News headlines might be filled with stories about large fires in Greece, Portugal, the United States, or Canada, but when we look at the data, the global total is no higher than usual.

This is because the global trend is so strongly dictated by the extent of fires in Africa, which we almost never hear about. As you can see in the chart, Africa experiences more than half of the burned area globally every year. In some years, it’s as much as two-thirds of the total.

Whether it’s a “high” or “low” year for wildfires globally largely reflects whether it’s a high or low year for Africa. These global trends don’t tell us much about the extent of wildfires in other regions.

Track global, regional, and country-level data on wildfires, which we update weekly →

12345

Get Data Insights delivered to your inbox

Receive an email from us when we publish a Data Insight (every few days).

By subscribing you are agreeing to the terms of our privacy policy.