Re: Win64 warnings about size_t - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Win64 warnings about size_t
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Win64 warnings about size_t  (Tom Lane <[email protected]>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 20:33, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> writes:
>> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 20:12, Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> This shouldn't be a problem for the same reason that casting size_t to
>>> int is not a problem in the PostgreSQL backend code, but perhaps writing
>>> 1L << ... would fix it.
>
>> 1L didn't fix it. 1LL did, however.
>
> ... and would break things on many many other platforms.

That's what I was afraid of.


> Use "(Size) 1" instead of "1" if you really want to suppress this.

That fixes it as well. Will apply a patch to that effect.


-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Windows x64 [repost]
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: IntArray in c.h