From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Fwd: Discussion - Search Objects |
Date: | 2011-07-04 21:23:47 |
Message-ID: | 1309814627.2202.4.camel@laptop |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 09:10 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 23:39 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote:
> > Could somebody review the patch and maybe commit it?
> >
>
> I'll look into it tonight, unless someone beats me to it.
>
Seems mostly good to me, but I have too questions:
* why do you use twice the Trim command in
"browser->GetItemText(parent).BeforeFirst('(').Trim().Trim(false)"?
* why is the search object menu only available to non maintenance DB?
(((pgDatabase *)obj)->GetName() != ((pgDatabase
*)obj)->GetServer()->GetDatabaseName())
--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jasmin Dizdarevic | 2011-07-04 21:42:12 | Re: Fwd: Discussion - Search Objects |
Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2011-07-04 19:53:03 | Re: [BUG] Index operator class + collation = bad SQL |