From: | steven(dot)winfield(at)cantabcapital(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | No reference to postgres_fdw in FTS docs |
Date: | 2017-10-31 10:50:39 |
Message-ID: | [email protected] |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/textsearch-indexes.html
Description:
The last paragraph mentions the dblink module, but surely postgres_fdw
deserves a mention here too - especially with its increasing ability to push
more of the query onto the foreign servers.
Also, I think it would be worth mentioning elsewhere in the documentation
(e.g. https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/indexes-types.html) the
impact that maintenance_work_mem has on the creation time for different
index types - currently I can't find this anywhere else except on this FTS
page.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | fournier.ph | 2017-10-31 13:18:34 | hyperlink not valid |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2017-10-30 13:39:30 | Re: Typo in word "closest" |