| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: plPHP and plRuby |
| Date: | 2006-07-17 16:06:00 |
| Message-ID: | [email protected] |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> PLRuby is written in C.
>
> Specifically on the matter of PL/Ruby -- and if you're trying to be such
> an advocate about it, you should at least spell it right -- I have
> never seen the author particularly active within this community, so I
> have my doubts whether the development processes will integrate well.
> In fact, shouldn't the inclusion request come from the author in the
> first place?
That is a good point. However in this case, it was CMD that worked with
the Author to change the license, specifically for this case. I don't
think the author really had any intent of submitting it until we
approached him.
From a personal perspective, I do not care if we include PL/Ruby. I
don't use Ruby. I am a Python guy. However I know a lot of Ruby folk
that use PostgreSQL. This would be a good way to improve the native Ruby
support for PostgreSQL.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-07-17 16:18:46 | Re: plPHP and plRuby |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-07-17 16:02:44 | Re: plPHP and plRuby |