100% found this document useful (1 vote)
10K views21 pages

Phenetic vs Phylogenetic Classification

This document discusses the differences between phenetic and phylogenetic classification. Phenetic classification groups taxa based on overall similarity, considering all characteristics equally. Phylogenetic classification analyzes characters to determine evolutionary relationships and detect common ancestry. It recognizes only monophyletic groups that include an ancestral species and all its descendants. The key difference is that phylogenetic classification aims to reflect evolutionary history, while phenetic classification does not consider ancestry.

Uploaded by

Issa Avena
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
10K views21 pages

Phenetic vs Phylogenetic Classification

This document discusses the differences between phenetic and phylogenetic classification. Phenetic classification groups taxa based on overall similarity, considering all characteristics equally. Phylogenetic classification analyzes characters to determine evolutionary relationships and detect common ancestry. It recognizes only monophyletic groups that include an ancestral species and all its descendants. The key difference is that phylogenetic classification aims to reflect evolutionary history, while phenetic classification does not consider ancestry.

Uploaded by

Issa Avena
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Phenetic vs Phylogenetic

Classification

 Process of arranging taxa into groups of accordance with a plan and in conformity with a naming
system
 Biological classification
o A process carried out in order to communicate certain interrelationships of organisms

Function/ Purpose

 Information storage & retrieval


 Reflect nature
 Easy to use
 Stable
 Predictive
 Concise

Linnaeus and Classification

Carolus Linnaeus- designed our hierarchical classification scheme

- Kingdom
- Phylum
- Class
- Order
- Family
- Genus
- Species

I. Phenetic Classification
 The grouping of taxa on the basis of their overall similarity
o The more features two taxa share, the more likely they will be put in the same group
o Any feature can provide information for a classification

1.a Artificial Classification

>ancient phonetic system

> based on a limited number of characters

>a priori classification


- the characters are selected first, then the taxa are analyzed and grouped based on the criteria
selected

Early classification systems- Artificial

- Based on habit and/or characteristics important to humans (i.e medicines, food)

Examples:

- Theophrastus
o Habit (i.e tree, shrub); cultivated and wild kinds;annual, perennial and biennial life
cycles; superior vs. inferior ovaries; determinate vs.indeterminate; and distinct vs.
connate petals
- Linnaeus
o Stamen number with style number

1.b Natural Classifications

>more recent phonetic systems

> makes use of many different characters

- the taxa are studied, data are recorded and the similarities and differences are used to allow
the taxa to order themselves “naturally”

>a posteriori classification

- the groupings are made after the features are observed

1.c Numerical Taxonomy

>computerized phonetic systems

> use of comupters to study large data sets and determine the similarity of the taxa in a critical
unbiased manner.

- computer calculates the similarity for every pair of taxa then plots a phenogram (based on a
cluster analysis) that shows the similarity between the taxa

> popularized by Robert Sokal and Peter Sneath

Three important assumptions:

 The greater the amount of information for a taxon, the greater the strength of the classification
 Every character gets equal weighing
 Classification is based on overall similarities in the taxa
Method

 Select taxa
 Select characters
 Estimate similarity
 Create phenogram (groups constructed)
 Interpret results

Advantages

- Reproducible
- Greater predictive value than other phonetic classifications
- Objective and free from bias
- Integrate data from many sources
- Can handle large amounts of data

Disadvantages

- Doesn’t really account for evolutionary change


- Convergent evolution
o Two species exposed to same selection pressures share similar features
o
o
o

II. Phylogenetic Classification


 Characters are analyzed in a way that detects their evolutionary development
o Phylogeny is the eveolutionary history of a species or group of related species
 Synonyms
o Phylogenetic systematics; Cladistics

Phylogeny

 Phylogenies are inferred by identifying characters that vary among species


 These characters can be:
o Morphological
o Chromosomal
o Molecular
o Behavioral or ecological
o

 Phylogenetic diagram (tree)
o Also called a cladogram
 Cladogram depicts patterns of shared characteristics among taxa
o If shared characteristics are homologous thus, it is explained by common ancestry
 Each branch in the tree is called a clade
o A group of species that includes an ancestral species and all its descendants
When constructing a cladogram…

 The greater the number of homologous parts between two organisms, the more closely related
they are
 Homologous characters
o Are shared characters that result from common ancestry
 The classification scheme must reflect these similarities

Analogous characters
 Similarity between two species due to convergent evolution rather than to descent from a
common ancestor with the same trait
 Convergent evolution
o The independent evolution of a similar feature in two or more lineage
o Occurs when a similar environmental pressures and natural selection produce similar
(analogous) adaptations in organisms from different evolutionary lineages
 Also called homoplasies/homoplasy
Plesiomorphic Vs Apomorphic

Plesiomorphic character

 Ancestral or primitive character


o Symplesiomorphy
 Shared primitive characteristics
 Homologous characters that are shared by more than one taxon
 E.g. backbone is shared by mammals and reptiles
 Do not provide useful information for forming of nested series of clades

Apomorphy

 Derived or advance character


 Kinds:
o Synapomorphy
 Shared derived characters
 A new evolutionary feature that is unique for a particular clade
 Most useful for determining evolutionary relationships
o Autapomorphy

A derived character that occur in a single lineage


Cladistic analysis and Classification:

Kinds of Groups

Monophyletic group

Includes a common ancestor and all of its descendents

- Represents a valid clade


Paraphyletic group

Includes a common ancestor and some but not all of its descendents
Polyphyletic group

A group whose members do not share a recent common ancestor


 Phylogenetic classification recognizes only monophyletic groups
 Paraphyletic and polypheletic groups distort the accurate portrayal of eveolutionary history
and should be rejected

You might also like