Mission Design and Systems

Engineering for Spacecraft

Chris Cully
2008 April 3
[email protected]
 Jargon
There is a tremendous amount of jargon
and acronyms in space mission design.
Mission Design

I’ll do my best to keep the jargon under

control.

Please stop me and ask if I use a term

that you haven’t heard before!
 Today’s Lecture
„ Top Level:
“ Objectives / Applications
Mission Design

“ Sweden in Space
“ Systems Engineering
„ Mission Elements (not including the
actual spacecraft or payload)
“ Orbit
“ Launcher
“ Ground Support
“ Process and testing
„ Case Study: the Themis mission
 Exploration
„ Explore the solar
system and the
Mission Design

universe ESA Vision of exploration

“ Robotic missions
Cassini at Saturn
“ Planets, moons,
comets, asteroids,
the sun, ...
„ Manned missions
“ Not really covered
here
 Earth Observation
„ Environmental monitoring
“ Climate and atmosphere
Mission Design

“ Geophysics
“ Polar environments and ice
“ Marine
„ Resource monitoring
“ Water
“ Vegetation and forests
„ Land survey
Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS)
“ Urban planning
„ Weather forecasts
„ Disaster monitoring
 Space Research
„ Astronomy
„ Solar System
Mission Design

„ Plasma science
“ Northernlights
COROT exoplanet finder
“ Ionosphere and
Upper
Atmosphere
„ Basic physics
“ e.g. general
relativity tests
 Commercial
„ Television broadcasting
„ Digital multicasting/Video On Demand
Mission Design

„ VSAT (Very Small Aperture Terminal)

„ Digital Radio
„ Internet via satellite
 Military
„ Purely military
“ Surveillance
Mission Design

“ Anti-missile systems
“ Ground targeting
American DMSP satellite
“ ???
„ Civilian applications
“ Reconnaissance
“ Reliable communications
“ Navigation
“ Space environment monitoring
„ Treaty monitoring (eg. Comprehensive Test
Ban Treaty Organization)
 Navigation
„ Global coverage
„ GPS
Mission Design

“ American military
system
“ Meter resolution
“ Accurate time
„ Galileo
“ European civil version
“ Independence
“ Similar specifications
as GPS

ESA’s Galileo
 Sweden in Space
1986
Viking Scientific
1989
Tele X Commercial Telecom
Mission Design

1992
Freja Scientific
1994
Sirius 1 (Bought in orbit) Commercial Telecom
1995
Astrid 1 Scientific
1997
Sirius 2 Commercial Telecom
1998
Sirius 3 Commercial Telecom
Astrid 2 Scientific
2000
Munin Scientific / Technical test
2001
Odin Scientific
2003
SMART-1 ESA Technology test

Kronogård 1962
 Swedish Spacecraft, Research
„ Viking (1986)
„ Freja (1992)
„ Astrid-1 (1995)
Astrid-2 (1998)
Mission Design

„
„ Munin (2000)
„ Odin (2001)
„ SMART-1 (2003, ESA, moon)
„ Prisma (2008, technical test)
„ MicroLink (2009, technical test)

„ Instruments on
ESRO-1A (1967), ESRO-1B (1967), ESRO-4 (1972), GEOS-1
(1977), GEOS-2 (1978), Prognoz-7 (1978), Prognoz-8 (1980),
Phobos-1 (1988, Mars), Phobos-2 (1988, Mars), Ulysses (1990,
heliosphere), Interball-tail (1995), Interball-aurora (1995), Polar (1996),
Mars-96 (1996, Mars), Equator-S (1997), Cassini (1997,
Saturnus/Titan), Nozomi (1998, Mars), 4xCluster (2000), Mars
Express (2003, Mars), DoubleStar (2003), Rosetta (2004, komet),
Venus Express (2005, Venus)

Chandrayaan (2007, månen), 3xSwarm (2009),

2xBepiColombo (2012, Merkurius), 4xMMS (2013)
 Systems Engineering
„ Key Issues:
“ System is extremely
Mission Design

complex
Ariane-5 failure
“ Subsystems are tightly
interconnected
“ Once it’s launched, you
can’t physically reach it
„ Subsystems need to all work together
„ This is a key concept for this course and for
mission design in general.
„ Risks: assessed and managed (reduced)
 Systems Engineering
„ Need to examine the system and processes as a whole
„ General idea:
Mission Design

“ Identify and quantify system goals

ƒ ÆRequirements flow-down
“ Alternative design concepts
ƒ Æ Trade studies
“ Selection and implementation
“ Assessment and closure
„ Process is iterative, not linear
„ Identify and assess risks, work to minimize them
“ Single points of failure
“ Redundancy
“ Contingency plans
 Mission elements
„ Today:
“ Orbit
Mission Design

“ Launcher

“ Ground Support
“ Process and testing

„ Tomorrow:
“ Satellite bus
“ Payload
 Orbit fundamentals
„ Idealized case: 2-body point masses
„ Conic section orbits (closed = elliptical) in
Mission Design

inertial space
„ Some special cases:
“ Polar, equatorial, circular, hyperbolic
„ Earth rotates underneath
“ Best to launch East
(prograde)
“ Complicated ground tracks
„ Variable speed
“ Fast at periapsis
 Classical orbital elements
„ Ellipse size/shape:
“ a:Semimajor axis
Mission Design

“ e:Eccentricity
ƒ Circle: e=0

„ Plane Orientation:
“ i:Inclination
ƒ i < 90 prograde (direct)
ƒ i > 90 retrograde
“ Ω:Right ascension of the ascending node
„ Where in the plane
“ ω:Argument of perigee
“ v:True anomaly
 Perturbations
„ Non-spherical Earth
“ Regression of line of nodes (Ω)
Mission Design

ƒ Prograde orbit Æ westerly rotation

“ Precession of line of apsides (ω)
ƒ Zeroed for i=63.4o (Molniya orbit)

„ Atmospheric drag
„ Radiation Pressure
„ 3-body perturbations (sun, moon, Jupiter)
 A few specialized Orbits
„ Requirements flowdown from the mission
objectives
Mission Design

„ Earth orbits
“ Geostationary
ƒ GTO (Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit)
“ LEO (Low-Earth Orbit)
ƒ Sun-Synchronous
“ HEO High Elliptical Orbit
ƒ Molniya

„ Lissajous orbit
“ Lagrange points
 Transfer Orbits
„ Hohmann transfer:
connect 2 circular
Mission Design

orbits with an elliptic

section
“ Usually the most
efficient (least ΔV)
“ Need large thrusts

„ Other transfers possible

„ e.g. spiral orbits with low thrust from
plasma thrusters
 Interplanetary orbits
Approximation: patched conics between Hill spheres (spheres of influence)
Mission Design
 Launchers
Proton
„ Many expendible launch
vehicles available.
Mission Design

“ Launcher design not part of

mission design (”only” selection)
„ Main factors to consider:
“ Cost Delta-II

“ Orbit (ΔV requirements)

“ Spacecraft mass
“ Spacecraft size Pegasus
“ Reliability
“ Vibration envelope
“ Availability and politics
 Launchers
„ Launcher alternatives
“ Europe
Russia
Mission Design

“
“ Ukraine
“ USA
“ Japan
“ India
“ China
„ Note that Sweden has no
launches to orbit
“ Suborbital sounding rockets
and satellites/payloads
„ User’s manuals sometimes Fairing dimensions from
Soyuz user’s manual
available online
 Inexpensive launch options
„ Common issue
“ Launchers often sized
for large GEO sats
Mission Design

“ Launch cost significant

part of total budget
“ ESA’s Vega designed to
address this
„ Some alternatives:
“ Piggybacking
ƒ ASAP-5
“ Hitchhiking
“ Russian ICBMs Swedish Astrid-2
Piggybacked on Russian
“ Test launches
Launcher ”Kosmos”
 Ground Segment:
General principle
Mission Design
 Communications
„ Your only contact with
your treasure
Mission Design

“ Commanding
“ Telemetry
„ Ranging
“ Position and Doppler
shift of carrier
„ Large number of
architectures and
design parameters ESOC’s groundsation in Villafranca,
“ Frequency Spain, usable for deep space
“ Capacity (bitrate) missions
“ Content of communication
(think of the average bitrate
of SMS!)
 Mission Operations
„ Large part of mission cost is related to
mission operations and ground support
Mission Design

From Wertz
 Vaccum chamber for
space environment
Testing Thermal, outgassing
tests, IRF Kiruna

„ Vibration tests
Themis magnetic tests
„ Shock tests
Mission Design

„ Thermal / vacuum tests

„ Magnetic, electrostatic tests
„ Swedish facilities
“ Packforsk
“ Saab Ericsson space
“ others

„ Some tests are up to Munin Vibrational test

spacecraft prime contractor,

others are hard requirements
from the launcher (especially if
piggyback)
 Case Study: Themis
„ Designed to study the
cause of auroral
Mission Design

processes known as
substorms
“ Plasma disturbance that occurs on the night
side at 10-30 RE altitude (1RE=6378 km)
“ 2 major models

ƒ Plasma observations at multiple locations

ƒ Alignment over Northern Hemisphere
during winter nights to simultaneously
observe aurora from ground
 Themis Orbit Design
„ 5 Probes
„ Near-equatorial orbits,
Mission Design

highly elliptic
“ Perigees ~1000 km
“ Apogees: 3 sats at 10 RE,1
at 20 RE,1 at 30
“ Inclination: 9 deg
„ All orbits are integer
multiples of 1 day (1,2,4)
„ In Earth-fixed frame, line
of apsides rotates ~once
per year (13 months)
 Themis Launcher
„ Delta-II launch
vehicle
Mission Design

“ Spacecraft wet
mass:5 x 130 kg
“ 3-stage, 9 strap-ons

„ Probe Carrier
Assembly attached
directly to 3rd stage
solid motor
“ Eliminates need for
kick motor; 3rd stage
reaches required
parking orbit
 Themis Ground support
„ Mission Operations Center: Berkeley
„ S-band (2-4 GHz) communications
Mission Design

“ 400 kbit/s down, 1 kbit/s up

„ Ground stations:
“ Main: Berkeley
“ Secondary: Universal Space Network (USN) at
Australia, Hawaii
“ Contingency: NASA TDRS spacecraft, NASA Deep
Space Network
„ Orbit determination from angle and Doppler
tracking at ground stations
“ NORAD radar tracking backup
Mission Design

THEMIS LAUNCH VIDEO

 Today’s Lecture
„ System Engineering:
“ Need to examine the system and processes as a whole
Mission Design

“ Engineering process is iterative, not linear

„ Orbits:
“ Elliptic orbits are perturbed by small forces
“ Velocity change ΔV is the fundamental parameter when
changing orbits
„ Launchers
“ Many available launchers to choose from, but not many
inexpensive ones
„ Ground Support:
“ Communications link is vital for command and control, as
well as for orbit determination
Tomorrow: The spacecraft
itself...
Chris Cully
[email protected]
Mission Design
 Mission Design

~70 km
Mission Design