Garcia, Thea Beatrice DS.
BSA-2A - CEU Manila
Module 5 - Post Task
Assignment: Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Instruction: Please formulate the null and alternative hypothesis before you compute. Use the excel in finding the re
1. Employees of a certain hospital company were divided into three categories according to the number of years in
Under 1 year 1- 5 years More than 5 years Anova: Single Factor
90 92 112 SUMMARY
70 75 75 Groups
80 84 120 Under 1 Year
81 92 94 1-5 Years
74 88 More than 5 Years
78
ANOVA
Source of Variation
Between Groups
Within Groups
Table: Total
Mean S.D. F-value Critical/tabular value
Under 1 year 78.83333333 6.823977335 4,04893 6,926608
1-5 years 86.2 7,085196 4,04893 6,926608
>5 years 100.25 20,03954 4,04893 6,926608
H0: There is no significant relationship between the three categories of whether longer employment means higher p
H1: There is a significant relationship between the three categories of whether longer employment means higher pr
Interpretation: Accept null hypothesis. There is no significant relationship between the three categories of whether long
1. A production plant manager claimed that there was no time difference to complete an assembly line job between
Company A Company B Company C Company D Anova: Single Factor
18 20 23 12
11 14 16 18 SUMMARY
14 16 21 17 Groups
12 18 25 13 Company A
15 17 24 15 Company B
Company C
Company D
ANOVA
Source of Variation
Test the claim using a 5% level of significance. Between Groups
Within Groups
Table:
Total
Companies Mean S.D. F-value Critical/tabular value
A 14 2.738613 7,577287 3,238,872
B 17 2.236068 7,577287 3,238,872
C 21.8 3.563706 7,577287 3,238,872
D 15 2.54951 7,577287 3,238,872
H0: There is no significant relationship between the time difference to complete an assembly line job of Company A
H1: Thre is a significant relationship between the time difference to complete an assembly line job of Company A, B
Interpretation: Accept null hypothesis. There is no significant relationship between the time difference to complete a
. Use the excel in finding the results. Tabulate the results and interpret the results.
ding to the number of years in service. Productivity records from each category were gathered. Test whether longer employme
actor
Count Sum Average Variance
6 473 78,83333 46,56667 6,823977
5 431 86,2 50,2 7,085196
4 401 100,25 401,5833 20,03954
SS df MS F P-value F crit
1105,617 2 552,8083 4,04893 0,045309 6,926608
1638,383 12 136,5319
2744 14
P-value Sig
0,045309 NS
0,045309 NS
0,045309 NS
er employment means higher productivity.
r employment means higher productivity.
three categories of whether longer employment means higher productivity.
an assembly line job between plants A, B C, and D. Samples from each of the plants yielded the following data, where a data
actor
Count Sum Average Variance
5 70 14 7,5 2,738613
5 85 17 5 2,236068
5 109 21,8 12,7 3,563706
5 75 15 6,5 2,54951
SS df MS F P-value F crit
180,15 3 60,05 7,577287 0,002251 3,238,872
126,8 16 7,925
306,95 19
P-value Sig
0,002251 NS
0,002251 NS
0,002251 NS
0,002251 NS
ssembly line job of Company A, B, C and D
embly line job of Company A, B, C and D.
e time difference to complete an assembly line job of Comp
est whether longer employment means higher productivity at 1% significant level. Use the following data.
following data, where a data value represents the time in minutes to complete the job.
