0% found this document useful (0 votes)
161 views14 pages

Stereochemistry in Organic Chemistry

This document summarizes key concepts in stereochemistry including: 1. Conformation and configuration refer to 3D arrangements of atoms that may or may not be interconvertible by single bond rotation. Configuration describes double bonds and tetrahedral atoms using descriptors like Z/E, R/S. 2. Multiple stereogenic centers give rise to diastereomers with different physical properties. Chirality and symmetry determine if compounds are achiral or prochiral. 3. Separation of enantiomers can occur through formation of diastereomeric salts, chiral stationary phases in chromatography, or kinetic resolution exploiting differential reaction rates.

Uploaded by

Sam
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
161 views14 pages

Stereochemistry in Organic Chemistry

This document summarizes key concepts in stereochemistry including: 1. Conformation and configuration refer to 3D arrangements of atoms that may or may not be interconvertible by single bond rotation. Configuration describes double bonds and tetrahedral atoms using descriptors like Z/E, R/S. 2. Multiple stereogenic centers give rise to diastereomers with different physical properties. Chirality and symmetry determine if compounds are achiral or prochiral. 3. Separation of enantiomers can occur through formation of diastereomeric salts, chiral stationary phases in chromatography, or kinetic resolution exploiting differential reaction rates.

Uploaded by

Sam
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Chapter 2.

Stereochemistry

ˆ Conformation & configuration


‹ whether
or not interconvertible between two different 3D
arrangements of atoms by single-bond rotation

ˆ Configuration
‹ double bonds: Z & E; 120
 nonbonding electron pair: the lowest priority; 121 top
‹ cycles: cis & trans; 121 bottom

Carey-Chap2-5ed 1
Configuration (I)

ˆ Configuration
‹ tetrahedral atoms: R & S (CIP rules); 122-123
 stereogenic centers (stereocenters): chirality
 enantiomers: optical activity; [α]D20 = 100α / (c(g/100mL) x l(cm))
– different activity with another chiral compounds
 racemate (racemic mixture): different properties; 124 Fig. 2.1
 ee (enantiomeric excess; e.e.) = optical purity
 ORD (optical rotatory dispersion): 125 Fig. 2.2
– α vs λ; determination of absolute configuration
 CD (circular dichroism): circularly polarized light; 126 Fig. 2.3

Carey-Chap2-5ed 2
Configuration (II)

ˆ Multiple stereogenic centers: 126-129


‹ diastereomers: 2n; different physical properties
 epimers: different at only one stereocenter
 Fisher, extended & Newman projections: 128 Fig. 2.5
– erythro/threo & syn/anti: relative configuration

ˆ Other stereogenic elements


‹ centers: sulfur, nitrogent, phosphorus; 129 top & middle
‹ axis: allenes, spiro cyles, atropisomers; 129-30
‹ planes & helices: E-cyclooctene & helicenes; 130-31
 t1/2 = 1 h at 183.9 oC vs 4 min 0 oC (E-cyclononene)

Carey-Chap2-5ed 3
Configuration (III)

ˆ Chirality & symmetry: 132


‹ achiral
compounds with either a center of symmetry or a
plane of symmetry: meso

ˆ Prochiral centers: sp3 atoms with the same two groups


‹ enantiotopic (homotopic): pro-R & pro-S; 133 bottom
 diastereotopic (heterotopic): nonequivalent; 135 Fig. 2.6

ˆ Prochiral faces: cabonyls and alkenes


‹ two different groups on the sp2 atoms: re & si face; 134
‹ selectivity with chiral environment: enzymes; 135-136

Carey-Chap2-5ed 4
™ Resolution

ˆ Separation of enantiomers: under chiral environment


‹ types: conglomerate, racemic compound, pseudoracemate
‹ formation of diastereomeric relationship: 137 Scheme 2.2
 diastereomeric salts: resolving agent; 138 Scheme 2.3
 chiralstationary phase (CSP): differential adsorption; 137 Fig.
2.7 [Home Study] Topic 2.1
 kinetic resolution: differential reaction rate; 138 Scheme 2.4
– enzymatic kinetic resolution: 141 bottom
– ee depends on relative rate & conversion: 138 Fig. 2.8
– [Home Study] Topic 2.2

Carey-Chap2-5ed 5
™ Preparative Column Separation

C&EN
May 14,
2001
p. 45

Carey-Chap2-5ed 6
™ Conformational Analysis (I)

ˆ Conformation of acyclic compounds


‹ ethane: torsional barrier, 2.88 kcal/mol; 142 Fig. 2.10
 butane: van der Waals repulsion; 144 Fig. 2.11
‹ rotational barriers in alkanes: 145 top
 heteroatoms: 145 middle & 146 Table 2.1
‹ rotational barriers in alkenes: 146 middle
 more stable eclipsed conformation: 2.7 kcal/mol
 more substituted alkenes: 1,3-allylic strain (A1,3) vs 1,2-allylic
strain (A1,2): 147

Carey-Chap2-5ed 7
™ Conformational Analysis (II)

ˆ Conformation of acyclic compounds


‹ rotational barriers in carbonyls: aldehydes; 148 middle
 ketones: alkyl eclipsed; 148-150
‹ 1,3-dienes: coplanar = π-π overlap; 150 middle
 s-trans (3.9 kcal/mol) < skew ≤ s-cis
‹ conjugated enones: s-trans & s-cis; 151 top
 aldehydes: propenal, only s-trans conformation
 ketones: steric repulsion between C1 & C4; 151-152

Carey-Chap2-5ed 8
™ Conformational Analysis (III)

ˆ Conformation of cyclic compounds


‹ cyclohexane: chair << twist < boat; 152 mid -153 top
 conformational inversion & energy barrier: 153 Fig. 2.13
‹ monosubstituted cyclohexane: chair; 154
 equatorial < axial (1.8 kcal/mol): 1,3-diaxial interactions
‹ conformational free energies: A values; 158 Table 2.2
 measurement by 1H NMR: the inversion rate; 155 Fig. 2.14
– iodocyclohexane: 157 Fig. 2.16
 equilibration between diastereomers: 157 top
– large A value for tBu: conformationally biased equilibrium

Carey-Chap2-5ed 9
™ Conformational Analysis (IV)

ˆ Conformation of cyclic compounds (continued)


‹ dimethylcyclohexanes: 3 regioisomers; 158 bottom
 both Me groups at equatorial: ca. 1.8(1.9) for each axial Me
 1,3-diaxial Me-Me repulsion: 1.9(1.8) kcal/mol; 159 top
‹ decalins: configurational isomers: trans < cis; 159 bottom
 trans: conformationally locked vs cis: flexible (ΔG* = 12.3-12.4)
‹ cycles with sp2 atoms: smaller barriers; 160
 cyclohexene (7.7, half chair), cyclohexanone (4.9)
 axial Me at C-2 of alkylidenecyclohexane: A1,3 strain; 161
 cyclohexanone: axial Me at C-2 (ca 1.8), axial Me at C-3 (1.3-4)

Carey-Chap2-5ed 10
™ Conformational Analysis (V)

ˆ Conformation of other cyclic compounds


‹ strain energies for cycloalkane: 162 Table 2.3
 small rings: 3- & 4-ring; torsional & angle strains
 medium rings: 8- to 11-ring; cross-ring repulsions
‹ cyclopropane: planar; bent C-C 1.50 Å, ∠H-C-H 115o
‹ cyclobutane: puckered; 162 bottom
 smaller inversion barrier and energy preference for cis
‹ cyclopentane: half-chair vs envelope; 163 top
 less angle strain but large torsional strain
‹ cycloheptane: 4 conformations; 163 bottom

Carey-Chap2-5ed 11
™ Conformational Analysis (VI)

ˆ Conformation of other cyclic compounds


‹ cyclooctane: 5 conformations; 165 Fig. 2.18
 inversion barriers: 5-8 kcal/mol
‹ cyclodecane: 18 conformers; transannular strain
 the lowest energy conformers: boat-chair-boat; 166
‹ larger rings: many conformers; 166 Fig. 2.19
 diamond lattice: the most stable; cf: adamantane
‹ anomeric effect: [Home Study] Topic 2.3
‹ molecular mechanics: Estrain = E(r) + E(θ) + E(φ) + E(d)

Carey-Chap2-5ed 12
™ Dynamic Stereochemistry

ˆ Stereospecific reactions: mechanism; 169


‹ stereoisomeric
reactants afford stereoisomerically different
products under the same reaction conditions
ˆ Stereoselective reactions: 171 Scheme 2.6
‹a single reactant could give two or more stereoisomeric
products in principle, one of which is formed preferentially
‹ catalytic hydrogenation: entries 1-3, Scheme 2.6
 usually syn addition but some exceptions: mechanism; 172
 directed hydrogenation: hydroxy(l) groups; 173
 homogeneous catalysts: Ir+ & Rh+

Carey-Chap2-5ed 13
™ Stereoselective Reactions

ˆ Reduction of cyclic ketones: entries 4-6, Scheme 2.6


‹ carbonyl: prochiral face; 176 bottom
‹ axial attack: kinetically favored but sterically congested
 relief of torsional strain between carbonyl and C-H(eq): 177
‹ small Nu: axial vs bulky Nu: equatorial: 178 Table 2.4
ˆ Addition to acyclic carbonyls: entries 7-8, Sch. 2.6
‹ 1,2-asymmetric induction: Cram’s rule; 179 top
 Felkin-Ahn model: 179 middle; [Home Study] Topic 2.4
‹ 1,3-asymmetric induction: RL/C-O ⊥ C=O; 181 top
‹ chelation control:

Carey-Chap2-5ed 14

You might also like