BROCK UN IVERS ITY

Campus Plan
2016

In association with:
MMM1 Group
CHAPTER INTRODUCTION i
BROCK UN IVERS ITY

Campus Plan
Approved by the Board of Trustees on March 10, 2016

Produced by: In association with:

Urban Strategies Inc. MMM Group
TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 2 CHAPTER 3

Introduction Campus Evolution Campus Vision

1.1 Overview of the Campus Plan 2 2.1 History of Campus Planning at Brock 12 3.1 Campus Vision 24

1.2 The Campus Planning Team 3 2.2 The Campus Today 15 3.2 Campus Planning Principles 30

1.3 The Study Process 4 2.3 Academic and Strategic Planning 17 3.3 Key Directions for the Campus Plan 32

1.4 University Lands and Study Area 6 2.4 Key Opportunities and Challenges 18

1.5 How to Read the Plan 8

CHAPTER 4 CHAPTER 5 CHAPTER 6
Campus Plan Implementation Building Design Guidelines
and Precinct Plans
4.1 Physical Structure and 36 5.1 University Projects 114 6.1 Building Design Guidelines 132
Key Place-Making Moves
5.2 Near-Term Demonstration Plan 116 6.2 Precinct Plans 137
4.2 Land Use, Renewal and Development 38
5.3 Building Design Guidelines and 120 Precinct A: East Precinct 144
4.3 Movement Network 56 Precinct Plans
Precinct B: Centre Precinct 150
4.4 Landscape and Open Space 76 5.4 Administering the Plan 122
Precinct C: West Precinct 156
4.5 Infrastructure, Utilities and 104 5.5 Municipal and Government 128
Sustainability Integration Precinct D: South Precinct 162
1
INTR O DU C TION

vi BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

CH A P TE R 1

Introduction

This chapter provides an overview to this report and

the campus planning process. It provides readers with
a background by outlining the purpose and scope of
the Campus Plan, the members of the Campus Plan
team and the consultation process.

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1
INTR O DU C TION

1.1 Overview of the Campus Plan

The 2016 Campus Plan is a major undertaking and a

significant milestone in Brock University’s evolution.
The planning process allows for a re-examination of
the framework and directions for physical changes that
support the university’s far-reaching academic goals while
enhancing the campus experience for students, staff,
faculty and the Niagara community.
This Plan builds on the momentum and direction of the 2003 Campus
Plan, reinforcing and building on the vision and many important
initiatives identified more than ten years ago. It provides a long-term
framework for the evolution and future growth of the campus, and
details a structure of development sites, open space, vehicular and
pedestrian circulation, and guidelines for campus development.

The Campus Plan provides the foundation and structure to continue

to strengthen Brock University’s campus as an inspiring and beautiful
place that encourages academic excellence. The plan is one of the key
tools Brock will have as it embraces the challenges and opportunities
that lay ahead and plays a key role in the University’s efforts to
maintain itself as a competitive institution with the full complement
of facilities necessary to attract the best and brightest students,
faculty and staff.

2 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

1.2 Campus Planning Team Steering Committee Members

The Campus Plan Update was guided by the Campus Plan Steering Tom Arkell Associate Vice-President, University Services
Committee, consisting of administrative, academic and student
representatives, and was managed by the office of Facilities Lee Belding Graduate Students Association
Management. The Steering Committee met regularly to review and
Bryan Boles Associate Vice-President, Finance
refine the Plan as it was developed.
Rob Cargnelli Interim Director, Athletics & Recreation Services
The consultant team appointed to the project provided a variety of
expertise, as well as past experience working with Brock University. Jamie Fleming Director, Residences
The team was led by Urban Strategies, who provided campus planning,
urban design, landscape design and consultation expertise. MMM Group Darren Fox Alumni Association
provided transportation planning expertise.
Brian Hutchings Vice-President, Administration
The Brock University Campus Plan is the result of the efforts of many
individuals, including the Campus Plan Steering Committee, the Board David Hutchison Senate IT&I Committee
of Trustees, the Senate and the many members of the Brock University
community who shared their thoughts and comments. Topographic Scott Johnstone Director, Maintenance and Utilities
data was provided by the Brock University Map, Data & GIS Library.
Deb Kalvee Librarian Services & Facilities
The many ideas and visions expressed throughout the planning process
have resulted in an inspiring and compelling, yet realistic, Campus Gary Libben Associate Vice-President, Research
Plan.
Domenic Maniccia Director, Custodial and Grounds

Neil McCartney Provost and Vice-President, Academic

Roland Mech Associate Director, Space Management and Planning

Kyle Rose President, Brock University Students’ Union

Tom Saint-Ivany Associate Vice-President, Facilities Management

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3
1
INTR O DU C TION

1.3 The Study Process

The 2016 Campus Plan Update began in February 2015 and was The emerging directions were also shared with the broader university

The Planning Timeline

completed in early 2016. Under the continued guidance of the
Steering Committee, the campus planning process provided a variety
community at an Open House in September. The campus planning team
answered questions and gathered valuable input from members of the
of opportunities to engage in a dialogue about the future of Brock university community. A second Open House was held in December to
University with key stakeholders from the University community, share the draft Campus Plan and receive feedback from the campus
including senior administration, deans, faculty, staff and students; and community.
the surrounding community, including landowners and representatives
of the City of St. Catharines, the City of Thorold and the Region of In addition to key milestone consultation sessions, the campus
Niagara. These engagement opportunities included interviews with planning team met with and provided regular updates to senior
University and external stakeholders. A number of themes emerged academic, administrative and Board of Trustee leadership.
based on these interviews and were discussed and confirmed by a
diverse group of University and community stakeholders at a Visioning
Workshop.

Spring 2015 Summer 2015 Fall 2015

Phase  1   Phase  2   Phase  3   Phase  4   Phase  5  

Project Scoping   Analysis   Visioning   Draft Plan   Final Plan  

Steering Committee Coordination

Visioning Open Open

Key Stakeholder Interviews
Workshop House #1 House #2

Campus Plan Study Process

We are here
4 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN
The visioning workshop brought together campus and
community stakeholders to establish a preliminary
campus vision and planning principles that served as the
foundation for the Campus Plan.

The first Campus Plan Open House, held in Market

Hall, invited members of the University community to
learn more about the Plan and provide feedback on the
emerging directions.

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 5
1
INTR O DU C TION

1.4 University Lands and Study Area

The University’s land holdings includes both the St. Catharines and
Hamilton Campuses. The St. Catharines Campus includes the Main
Campus, South Campus, East Campus and the downtown St. Catharines
Marilyn I. Walker School of Fine and Performing Arts. The Campus Plan
focuses on the lands highlighted in study area map. The Hamilton
Campus and Marilyn I. Walker School of Fine and Performing Arts are
geographically separated from the Main Campus and are outside the
scope of this study.

The majority of academic buildings and facilities are located on

the Main Campus. On the other side of Glenridge, the East Campus
continues to evolve into an integral part of the University and it is
home to several academic buildings and retail uses. Just beyond
the East Campus boundary, the Brock Business Park and recently
constructed student residences are beginning to transform the campus
context to a more complete community. To the south, the largely
undeveloped South Campus represents the fourth quadrant of the
district. Together the natural setting and campus context provide a
strong foundation for strengthening the campus’s external relationships
and creating an inspired place.

The study area also contains two peripheral areas that have no direct
linkage to the University’s core areas. Accordingly, the East Lands and
Lockhart Drive Lands are not a significant part of the Campus Plan.

Campus Plan Study Area and Context >

6 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

 EAST LANDS
ENT
AR PM
A ESC
GAR DAR
Y
NIA UN
L BO
IPA
NIC
LOCKHART DRIVE MU
LANDS

GLENRIDGE AVE
EAST
CAMPUS WA
Y

JOH
MAIN CAMPUS

N
CK

MACD
ONELL
RO

ST
ACB
ISA
SIR

MERRITVILLE HIGHWAY

SOUTH
CAMPUS

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 7
500 m
1
INTR O DU C TION

1.5 How to Read the Plan

The Campus Plan is divided into six chapters. Chapters 1 to 5 provide an overview of the Campus Plan, outlining the vision,
framework, and overall campus systems. It is intended to give readers a high-level understanding of the Campus Plan.
Chapter 6 provides design direction for new development, infrastructure and place-making initiatives. It is intended to
support decision-makers to implement the Campus Plan through specific projects.

CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 2 CHAPTER 3

Introduction Campus Evolution Campus Vision
This chapter provides an overview of the This chapter traces the history of campus This chapter outlines the planning principles
process involved in creating this Campus Plan. into the present, outlining the issues and and key moves that served as the foundation
opportunities facing the campus today and for the Plan and illustrates the long-term
in the future that shaped the Campus Plan campus vision.
Update.

EAST LANDS
ENT
PM
ES CAR
G ARA ARY
NIA UND
L BO
IPA
NIC
LOCKHART DRIVE MU
LANDS
GLENRIDGE AVE

EAST
CAMPUS WA
Y
JOHN

MAIN CAMPUS
MACDO

CK
NELL

BRO
ST

AC
ISA
SIR
MERRITVILLE HIGHWAY

SOUTH
CAMPUS

500 m

8 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

CHAPTER 4 CHAPTER 5 CHAPTER 6
Campus Plan Implementation Building Design Guidelines
and Precinct Plans
This chapter provides detailed direction for This chapter outlines how the Campus Plan can This chapter serves as an implementation
the major systems and University Projects that be used and implemented, highlighting the manual for the plan, providing specific design
contribute to the Campus Plan framework, various initiatives that were considered and a direction for decision-makers to ensure that
including land use and development, landscape 10-year demonstration plan. projects are successfully implemented within
and open space, movement and utilities. the larger campus planning framework.

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 9
1
INTR O DU C TION

10 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

CH A P TE R 2

Campus Evolution

Providing guidance for the future, the Campus Plan

reflects the past and is grounded in the present. This
chapter traces the history of the campus to today,
outlining the issues and opportunities facing the
campus now and in the future that have shaped the
Campus Plan.
2
C AM P U S E VO LU TION

2.1 History of Campus Planning at Brock University

The Original Campus Plan

The planning of Brock University’s campus began in 1963 with the
selection of the future site atop the Niagara Escarpment. The original
campus plan, commissioned shortly thereafter, envisioned an inspiring
campus that would embrace its natural setting and take advantage of
the significant views of the City of St. Catharines, Lake Ontario and
the Niagara Region.
The original campus plan called for the creation of a compact and
integrated academic community. The focus of activity on the campus
would be a core group of buildings clustered around the library
and positioned to take advantage of the proximity to the Niagara
Escarpment. This cluster would be the social heart of the University
with a combination of uses, including student services, club offices,
dining halls, recreational facilities, administrative offices and large
lecture halls. The University’s academic functions would extend out
from the core in a linear arrangement along the Escarpment. Student
residences would be located at the edge of the academic functions
and in close proximity to open green spaces beyond. All of this
development was within a 4-minute walk of the centre.
Great emphasis was placed on the importance of a strong public
realm and pedestrian circulation in the original campus plan. The
public realm was seen as a way to experience the University and its
strong connection to the Niagara Escarpment. The pedestrian network
proposed in the plan was designed to facilitate easy and efficient
movement through the campus and address the challenges of the
local climate. The different parts and functions of the campus would
be linked by a series of malls, low-scale buildings with pedestrian
walkways and courts. The malls would terminate at a central podium
wrapping around the base of the library tower, providing an open
terrace. A parking and street system outside of the built-up core of
FIGURE 2.1.  Brock University Master Plan, 1965.
the campus was set out in an effort to ensure that the presence of the
automobile in the core of the University would be minimized.

12 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

 Part One

Brock University has achieved many of the objectives set out in the
original campus plan, specifically, the creation of a compact, intimate
campus with close ties to its immediate natural surroundings. The
quality and level of development envisioned by the plan is evident
today and the students, staff and faculty of Brock University value the
campus, its unique features and the sense of community they have
engendered. Notwithstanding these successes, a number of departures
from the original campus plan are evident today. First, the automobile
8
has a much more pervasive presence and parking lots and service
areas are both larger and closer to academic buildings than originally
envisioned. Second, the focus on connecting buildings to one another
has led to buildings that have large footprints and fewer open spaces
between buildings.

Figure 2: The Original Campus Plan

FIGURE 2.2.  Brock University Original Master Plan

Brock University Campus Plan

CHAPTER 2 CAMPUS EVOLUTION 13

2
C AM P U S E VO LU TION

Part One

The 2003 Campus Plan

As the campus continued to grow, the original campus plan was
essentially “built out” as a result of becoming a comprehensive
university and the arrival of the double cohort. A new plan was needed
to guide the next stage of campus development. The 2003 Campus
Plan identified eight primary initiatives that created and defined
the structure of the campus and provided a strong foundation for
the campus moving forward. Together, the primary initiatives aimed
to strengthen and support important places on the campus during 30a
period of significant expansion and change.

The Eight Primary Initiatives:

1. Re-engage the Niagara Escarpment

2. Reinforce Brock Mall
3. Expand and reinforce the centre
4. Create an east-west campus spine
5. Create a system of new multi-functional campus streets and
gateways
6. Provide for academic expansion to the south
7. Continue residential intensification in the Village
8. Create a comprehensive and integrated infrastructure network

Figure 16: Primary Initiatives on Main Campus

FIGURE 2.3.  Primary Initiatives from 2003 Plan
Brock University Campus Plan

14 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

2.2 The Campus Today

Development since the 2003 Campus Plan • Integrated with the regional and municipal planning initiatives that
are presently underway, including the Brock District Plan and Brock
It has been more than a decade since the completion of the 2003 Business Park Secondary Plan.
Campus Plan. The 2003 Plan served Brock University well through
a period of significant growth by setting the stage for subsequent • Will inform future initiatives, including the Parking Master Plan,
planning policy and development projects. In particular, the Residential Master Plan and Utility Master Plan Update.
transformation of Market Hall and the Matheson Learning Commons
established student oriented services in the heart of campus. The Campus Growth
construction of the Plaza Building and Cairns Complex increased
Brock’s campus footprint has grown dramatically, since its founding
the presence of Brock along University Road and extended the main
more than 50 years ago to support increases in enrolment. Figure 2.4
campus towards Glenridge Avenue, where further academic expansion
summarizes the present campus size and populations of various groups.
occurred on East Campus.
Overall, the small student body and compact character of the campus
As the University continues to evolve, this update to the Campus Plan contribute to an intimate learning environment.
is needed to guide the next phase of campus change and respond to
emerging needs and opportunities. Accordingly, the development of Main Campus (including Lockhart drive lands) 104.98 hectares
this Campus Plan: South Campus 26.00 hectares

• Reviewed major strategies and initiatives of the 2003 Campus Plan East Campus 4.23 hectares
to ensure they were relevant and align with the future evolution of East Lands 36.52 hectares
campus and the University’s strategic objectives. Total Campus Area 171.73 hectares
• Reflected all completed projects and physical changes since 2003, Number of buildings (approx.) 60
such as new facilities, altered roadways and additional parking. Total Square footage (approx.) 225,000 m2
• Responded to the evolving demographic, economic and pedagogical
Full-time undergraduates 14,911
climates and context that the University finds itself in.
Full-time graduates 1,259
• Identified development opportunities and related infrastructure
Part-time undergraduates 2,243
to support emerging partnership initiatives and capitalize on
emerging trends on the University’s peripheral lands and the Part-time graduates 411
surrounding context. Faculty 594
• Continued to refine the campus and setting to support Brock’s Staff 782
evolving academic community. *Based on 2014 enrolment

FIGURE 2.4.  Summary Statistics of Brock University Size and Population

CHAPTER 2 CAMPUS EVOLUTION 15

2
C AM P U S E VO LU TION

16 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

 2.3 Academic and Strategic Planning

Founded in 1964, Brock was a relatively small, mostly undergraduate, From a physical planning perspective, this means that the
student-centred institution with a few areas of research excellence Campus Plan must set the stage for new types of teaching,
and a small number of graduate programs and handful of through its research and learning with a focus on flexible social
first 30 years. In the late 1990s, Brock made a decision to grow its
and group learning spaces, and shared amenities. The
enrolment and become a comprehensive educational and research
institution, offering a full range of undergraduate and graduate campus will need to provide the setting to support Brock’s
programs and growing its research activity. evolving academic community, and the Plan must identify
development opportunities and related infrastructure to
Today, Brock University has established itself as a dynamic support emerging partnership initiatives.
postsecondary educational institution whose strengths include:
undergraduate teaching excellence with foci on work-integrated, The physical directions of the Campus Plan recognize the
service, and small-group learning; continued excellence in research significant potential of aligning the University’s strategic
and associated graduate programs; and being a key contributor to the
priorities with external opportunities in order to achieve
social, economic, and cultural development of the Niagara Region.
Brock’s Strategic Mandate Agreement while addressing the
Accordingly, Brock’s Strategic Mandate Agreement with the Province emerging needs and opportunities.
of Ontario envisions itself as a dynamic postsecondary educational
institution and sets out three priority objectives:

1. Serving the 21st-century learner – putting students first,

efficiencies, productivity and benefits;

2. Establishing transdisciplinary research hubs and developing new

graduate and undergraduate programs; and

3. Building a network of partnerships that promote prosperity through

entrepreneurship, innovation, and creativity.

< The Campus Today

CHAPTER 2 CAMPUS EVOLUTION 17

2
C AM P U S E VO LU TION

2.4 Key Opportunities and Challenges

Brock University will encounter many opportunities and challenges over the coming
decades. Guided by this Plan, the University will be positioned to positively respond
to these challenges and opportunities in a way that supports the academic mission and
promotes the evolution and growth of campus.
Campus Renewal East Campus

Brock has been an effective steward of its built resources, constructing Since the 2003 Campus Plan was completed, the East Campus has
and maintaining campus buildings to ensure a long-term lifespan. emerged as a significant cluster of academic and related uses. The
Despite these efforts, the poor physical conditions of many buildings East Campus also serves as the centre of a growing off-campus student
on campus, including Schmon Tower and the Student-Alumni residential area. However, the prevalence of parking lots and strip
Centre means that they require significant investment or possible mall development reduce the sense of place and limit pedestrian
redevelopment. Renewal projects have a greater potential to be connectivity across the site. The accessible nature of East Campus
realized when they offer transformative opportunities. In addition presents an excellent opportunity to leverage the high-profile location
to addressing facility condition issues, transformative projects also and create a dynamic hub for the both the University and members of
achieve objectives such as addressing high priority university space the broader community.
needs, responding to changing pedagogical needs, enhancing the
usability of buildings and space, and creating operating efficiencies for
the university.

18 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

Campus Setting Movement and Arrival

Brock’s campus is a special place. The unique natural setting and Brock’s campus accommodates thousands of pedestrian, vehicle,
extensive campus landscapes are one of the University’s greatest transit and bike trips every day, but presents several challenges. The
physical assets and set the campus apart from other institutions. At vehicular movement around campus is often congested at a few key
the same time there is an opportunity to create a stronger presence access points; there is a lack of pedestrian and cycling connections
along Glenridge Avenue, to animate Brock Mall and establish a stronger into and around campus; and Brock Mall is overwhelmed by buses and
relationship with the Niagara Escarpment. The campus landscapes drop-off vehicles at peak periods. Investment in campus transportation
provide a significant opportunity to strengthen the overall structure infrastructure is needed to ensure efficient access and movement
and experience of campus and to set the framework for future campus around campus, but it also presents an opportunity to enhance campus
development and renewal. identity and support active transportation.

CHAPTER 2 CAMPUS EVOLUTION 19

2
C AM P U S E VO LU TION

The Campus and the City Partnership Opportunities

Universities and cities have a symbiotic relationship. When the two The Strategic Mandate Agreement identifies “Partnerships that
are engaged, connected and aligned, they have a greater potential to Promote Prosperity” as one of the University’s three priority
thrive. A larger city district has begun to emerge around the campus, objectives. This objective is reflected in Brock’s engagement with the
recognizing the University’s important economic, social and cultural surrounding community. Partnerships with municipalities, neighbours
presence in the Region. Recognizing this potential of Brock University, and other stakeholders provide an opportunity to support community
the City of Thorold and Niagara Region are completing planning engagement and deliver new campus infrastructure. The greatest
initiatives that support the evolution of a Brock District into a regional opportunities for such partnerships lie in the interface between the
node. The campus is not an island and must successfully align its campus and the city.
planning with its context and vice versa. As the owner of most of the
land within the larger Brock District, the University has an opportunity
to shape and inform the long-term intentions of these planning
initiatives, as well as the subsequent development.

University
Strategic City Building
Priorities & Opportunities
Needs

20 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

Enrolment Growth

Over the next five years, the University is anticipating a period of

levelled or even declining enrolment. This suggests that the historic
trend of mostly continuous growth may slow in the coming years, and
that the level of growth beyond this period is uncertain. However, it
is still necessary to plan for current and future needs. Accordingly,
the Campus Plan establishes a development framework that can
accommodate growth, but does not rely on it, ensuring the University
is prepared for the uncertainties of the future.

16,151
16,170
15,009 15,852 Enrolment
15,467

13,943 13,623 14,472 241,685

14,028
13,689 Gross Floor Area (m2)
13,090
225,413
216,986
10,485
203,614

8,470

7,563
167,497

2001 2004 2007 2010 2014

CHAPTER 2 CAMPUS EVOLUTION 21

2
C AM P U S E VO LU TION

22 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

CH A P TE R 3
1

Introduction
Campus Vision
This chapter describes the long-term vision for the
campus. The campus vision, illustrated through
the long-term demonstration plan, is the physical
manifestation of the planning principles and key
directions that played an important role in guiding the
development and physical structure of the Campus
Plan.

CHAPTER 3 CAMPUS VISION 23

3
C AM P U S VISION

3.1 Campus Vision

The future Brock campus will be a vibrant place for both the University
and broader Niagara community to live, work, teach, learn and play. It
will build on its compact, connected and intimate character, ensuring
these essential qualities remain a defining feature of the campus
experience. The campus core will be the focal point of campus life
and will be reinforced through the renewal and development of high
quality academic facilities, and supported by various amenities. The
Schmon Tower Atrium will establish an inviting point of arrival and
meeting place at the heart of campus.

In the near-term, East Campus will emerge as a second centre of

activity and landmark development. This mixed use node will be
closely linked and complement the campus core with a variety of
supporting uses, such as retail, student services and housing.

Extending the network of streets, walks, cycling routes and transit will
ensure that people can access and move around campus safely and
easily while unlocking the development potential of new sites for the
long-term. This investment in infrastructure will prepare the campus
to absorb future growth of the campus and the Brock District as a
whole, and will establish a new front door to campus along Glenridge
Avenue.

Beyond the heart of campus, the significant natural features that

surround the campus will be protected and integrated into the campus
fabric to reinforce the University’s unique and inspiring setting.
The campus open spaces will strengthen Brock’s image, enhance
the relationship to the natural setting and support existing and new
development.

At broader level, the Brock District will be solidified as an important

regional centre that welcomes members of the broader Niagara
community. The University will be a driver of change in the area,
attracting innovative partnerships that will enrich the academic
program and enhance the University’s image.
Long-Term Demonstration Plan >

24 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

 T
EN
ARPM
A ESC
AR

GLENRIDGE AVE
G
NIA

EAST CAMPUS

AY
CKW
BRO
SAAC
S IR I

MAIN CAMPUS

MERRITTVILLE HWY
BROCK BUSINESS PARK
SOUTH CAMPUS

CHAPTER 3 CAMPUS VISION 25

3
C AM P U S VISION

The Long-Term Demonstration Plan is an illustration of

how the campus of the future could look if the vision and
framework of campus systems were fully implemented over
the next 50 or more years.

Illustrated view of the Long-Term >

Demonstration Plan looking north

26 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

GL
EN
RID
GE
AV
E
Y
K WA
CB ROC
S IR ISAA

ME
RR
ITT
VIL
EHL
WY

CHAPTER 3 CAMPUS VISION 27

3 < Illustrated view of East
C AM P U S VISION

Campus looking north

AVE
RIDGE
GLEN

AY
BROCK W
SIR ISAAC
Illustrated view of Main >
Campus looking north

28 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

 GL
EN
RID
G
EA
VE
Y
WA
RO CK
ACB
ISA
SIR

MER
RIT
TVI
LLE H
WY
CHAPTER 3 CAMPUS VISION 29
3
C AM P U S VISION

3.2 Campus Planning Principles

The campus planning principles are broad-based and 1. Support Brock University’s academic mission
mutually supportive to provide comprehensive direction
for Campus Plan and offer a means for evaluating future • Align campus planning decisions with academic and strategic
projects and amendments to the Campus Plan. The planning
principles build on those of the 2003 Campus Plan and • Build for the 21st-Century Learner
reflect the values and priorities of the University’s Senior • Create a supportive environment for transdisciplinary and
Administrative Council. interdisciplinary learning
• Foster the creation of hubs for research, teaching and learning
across disciplines

2. Enhance the campus experience

• Create an environment for student-centred teaching, learning,

working, playing and living
• Expand and enhance social and cultural infrastructure to ensure
vibrant campus life and support learning
• Pursue design excellence in new development, renovation and
place-making initiatives
• Grow and enhance the University’s landscape and setting, and
integrate with surrounding natural areas
• Extend the high-quality campus experience to all campus areas
• Ensure a safe and welcoming campus environment for all users
• Preserve and enhance legacy buildings and settings

30 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

 3. Engage and integrate with the community 5. Foster sustainability

• Enhance the University’s profile and role in the Niagara Region • Support the development of a compact, mixed-use campus
• Engage in integrated, cooperative and transformative planning • Prioritize the maintenance, renewal and transformation of
for campus lands with provincial, municipal and community existing building assets before new construction
partners • Pursue reductions in energy use and emissions through
• Create a supportive environment for partnership opportunities operations, campus renewal and new development
and development • Consider financial impacts and opportunities in campus planning
• Support the provision of services, facilities and amenities for the directions and decision-making
campus and surrounding community • Align campus development with robust and resilient utilities and
infrastructure to provide continuous service and access
• Provide long-term clarity and certainty for campus lands and
4. Support connectivity and accessibility
physical resources
• Support the continued reduction in single-occupant vehicle trips
and increase pedestrian, bicycle and transit trips
• Develop a complete network of pedestrian and bicycle
connections on and off campus, and support all-season
pedestrian connectivity
• Eliminate physical barriers and pursue universal accessibility
• Enhance connectivity, way-finding and gateways to provide an
inviting and accessible campus environment
• Pursue the realization of ‘complete streets’ within the campus
and surroundings
• Enhance connectivity to the surrounding lands and region and
the Greater Golden Horseshoe

CHAPTER 3 CAMPUS VISION 31

3
C AM P U S VISION

3.3 Key Directions for the Campus Plan

Building on the campus planning principles, the seven key 3. Renew facilities
directions provide the foundations of the Campus Plan Continued improvements to existing facilities are required to
by defining the structure of the campus. The key direc- respond to institutional needs, declining building conditions and the
tions align the University’s strategic priorities and needs changing nature of university campuses. In addressing space needs,
with broader city building opportunities in order to real- the university will focus on the renewal and enhancement of existing
ize Brock’s strategic mandate and engage the surrounding facilities to improve their condition, attract prospective students and
support the university’s evolving academic mission. The continued
communities.
renewal of student housing on and near campus will reinforce a
compact and walkable campus that contributes to a more vibrant and
1. Expand and renew the core
complete university community.
The campus core, centred around Schmon Tower and the Thistle Com-
plex, is the heart of the University. It is a focal point of student activi- 4. Renew the campus setting
ty and a critical link in the internal movement network. As the campus Continued investment and enhancement of existing and new
evolves, the university will focus on renewing the campus core as the landscapes along with engaging and reconnecting with the Niagara
focal point for learning, amenity space and student services. With Escarpment are priorities of the Campus Plan. Four major landscapes
learning increasingly taking place outside of the classroom, the expan- contribute to the overall structure and experience of Campus: Brock
sion and renewal of the library, and other amenity or common spaces Mall, the Niagara Escarpment, the frontage along Glenridge and
in the core will provide valuable social and informal learning spaces the pedestrian spine. These landscapes will set the framework for
that enhance the image and identity of Brock. existing and future campus development, and will be a focus of facility
renewal, infrastructure investment and new construction. Other
2. Improve and integrate East Campus campus landscapes and special places will continue to contribute to
Place-making improvements will enhance the experience of East the quality of campus and are the focus of significant pedestrian,
Campus to reflect the high quality campus setting found on the Main landscaping and place-making improvements
Campus. Enhanced street crossings and landscape improvements
along pedestrian axes will increase safety and connectivity. The 5. Improve movement and connections
long-term development along Glenridge would bring the campus core Access, circulation and arrival to campus will continue to be
and East Campus closer together. New development in East Campus enhanced. Pedestrian connections to East Campus and the creation of
could feature a mixed-use hub, including retail, housing, and offices an integrated pedestrian and bicycling network will increase safety
and services to support the University community. Outward focused and support Brock’s health and sustainability objective. Improvement
academic uses may be integrated, but must support the University’s to Brock Mall will reinforce this key point of arrival to campus and
strategic objectives and complement the evolution of the Main support continued growth in transit ridership. Two new entrances
Campus. south of Sir Isaac Brock Way and the development of a complete
vehicular network could improve access and internal circulation while
unlocking development potential.
32 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN
 FIGURE 3.6.  Key Directions for the Campus Plan
6. Integrate with the surrounding cities
The University has a mutually beneficial relationship with the cities
of Thorold and St. Catharines that will continue to be supported.
On-campus programming – recreational facilities, cultural and athletic
events, outreach programs – support community engagement and bring
the city to the campus. The University can strengthen its relationship
within the region through an increased physical and programmatic
presence. Development, landscape and movement improvements at
the edges of campus will support community-oriented uses, programs,
amenities and retail opportunities that encourage integration with the
surrounding community and make campus more welcoming.

7. Create partnership opportunities

Brock will continue to engage the public and private sectors through
research, entrepreneurship and physical infrastructure, and the
campus will support these opportunities. With a high profile and
significant development potential, the campus frontage on Glenridge
Avenue and Merrittville Highway has the greatest potential to
accommodate partnership development and new growth, including
new employment opportunities. The intersection of Sir Isaac Brock Way
and Glenridge Avenue in particular has the potential to accommodate
a landmark mixed use development that supports activities and
amenities for both the university and the community.

CHAPTER 3 CAMPUS VISION 33

3
C AM P U S VISION

34 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

CH A P TE R 4

Campus Plan
The campus vision illustrates the long-term framework
that will guide the growth and evolution of campus.
This chapter provides detailed direction for the major
systems that contribute to this framework, including
land use, movement, open space, and utilities.
Implementation of these systems, including specific
University Projects, will ensure that the vision,
principles and key directions of the Plan are upheld as
the campus grows and evolves.

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 35

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

4.1 Physical Structure - Key Place-Making Moves

Guided by the planning principles and key directions, three 1. Strengthen the relationship with the natural setting
key moves establish the primary physical, place-making The University’s unique natural setting is one of its greatest assets. At
intentions for the Campus Plan. Overlaying the three key the north and west edge of campus, open space improvements and trail
place-making moves illustrates the underlying structure connections could integrate the Niagara Escarpment into the campus
and framework that guides the land use, movement, fabric. To the south, open space improvements would enhance views
open space and utilities systems that are described in the of Lake Moodie while contrasting the campus’s formal and natural
landscapes. Extending the major streetscapes into campus would
following sections. provide a network of greenways that link the major natural features.

U N I V E R S I T Y PR OJ EC T S
Each of the systems in Chapter 4 includes a series of University
Projects that play a significant role in realizing the campus vision.
University Projects are large-scale projects that can be centrally
implemented and managed by the University administration due
to their scale and complexity. Section 5.1 and the Precinct Plans
provide more detail about the potential implementation of these
projects.

Campus structure based on the natural setting and major open spaces

36 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

2. Reinforce and connect the campus centres 3. Engage with the surrounding city
The campus centres represent three important activity nodes that Sir Isaac Brock Way, Glenridge Avenue and Merrittville Highway serve
provide a series meeting places for the Brock community. Each centre as important through streets that extend the city into campus. The
aims to provide an iconic place in their respective parts of campus. land surrounding this important intersection should define this high
The emerging centres on East and South Campus should be linked to profile corner, showcase the University and engage with the city. A
the campus core by two prominent pedestrian walks that extend the complete street network around these high profile lands would enhance
campus setting. circulation and unlock the potential of these lands.

Campus structure based on the natural setting and major open spaces, and the centres Campus structure based on the natural setting and major open spaces, centres and
and walks walks, and connections to the surrounding city

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 37

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

4.2 Land Use, Renewal and Development

The campus land use strategy identifies a broad structure for the
organization and location of academic, athletic and recreation,
residential, partnership and service uses on campus. The land use
distribution, shown in Figure 4.1, supports an integrated campus
and builds on the existing structure and pattern of uses. Academic
activities should continue to be concentrated in the heart of
campus with other supportive functions and services intermixed to
promote learning and campus life.
There are also several opportunities for renewal and new
development. Many of the buildings requiring renewal and
redevelopment are concentrated near the heart of campus and
provide opportunities for intensifying and enhancing the campus
environment. The focus on renewing existing facilities supports
the sustainability objective of maintaining a compact campus and
maximizing existing built assets. At the same time new development
has the potential to expand existing activities or accommodate new
uses while reinforcing and complementing the existing structure of
campus.

38 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

FIGURE 4.1.  Land Use Distribution

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 39

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

4.2.1 Academic Zone

The academic zone is defined by a concentration of academic uses,
supported by student services, administration and amenities. The
academic zone extends from the Walker Complex to Mackenzie Chown
Complex with a few isolated academic buildings on East Campus. For
the most part, the interconnected buildings that support the teaching
and research of various departments create a compact and mixed
academic zone that is fundamental to the Brock experience. Most of
the land in the existing academic area have been developed and some
facilities are in need of renewal.

As the campus evolves, academic disciplines and activities should

continue to intermingle across the heart of campus, encouraging Academic Zone Key Plan
a multi-disciplinary environment. A combination of renewal and
new development will be needed to meet the University’s evolving Recommendations:
academic needs. Future academic uses can be accommodated
immediately south and east of the existing academic buildings with 1. Academic uses should be concentrated in the academic zone,
development organized along University Road, Brock Mall and the new prioritizing the renewal of existing facilities.
Campus Drive. Academic expansion to the east would reinforce the 2. Campus lands on the south side of University Road offer many
relationship with existing and new academic uses on East Campus. This development sites close to the heart of campus for academic
pattern of use would maintain a compact academic zone. development.
3. The University should reinforce existing academic uses in East
A compact academic zone has several advantages: Campus through expansion and investment in amenities. Space
• Clustering academic units facilitates both intra-disciplinary and programming should consider the appropriate location of programs
interdisciplinary collaborations; and departments based on their relationship to other departments
and the surrounding community.
• The unique natural setting is protected from development;
4. The University should prioritize development between the academic
• New and existing infrastructure can be maximized;
zone and Glenridge Avenue to reinforce connections with East
• A denser campus allows students to move around campus quickly Campus.
and easily which promotes walking and cycling; and 5. Where development sites are contemplated for non-academic uses,
• Mixed uses and disciplines promote vibrancy and strengthen the opportunities to integrate academic and administrative functions
sense of community. should be considered in the design and programming phases.

40 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

Social and Amenity Space Administrative Uses
In the 21st century, universities rely on social, communal and Front of house administrative uses could remain in the heart of
dynamic study space to support learning. Brock has invested heavily campus. Student services could continue to be located in central and
in expanded social and amenity space in recent years, including convenient locations, and opportunities for consolidation explored,
the Learning Commons and Market Hall. Demand for such space including the Schmon Towe Atrium Project. Certain administrative
continues to grow despite recent investment, and the campus functions, including a data centre and some offices, may be relocated
community continues to demand more communal space, including to areas beyond the Main Campus, such as the South Campus or East
independent study areas, group study areas, meeting rooms, Campus, to create capacity for academic uses, social and amenity
lounges and eating areas. space, and front of house administrative uses. These administrative
functions should be supported by necessary infrastructure, including
Renewal projects provide an excellent opportunity to integrate services and amenities, and be clustered with related functions where
more communal spaces into the academic zone, particularly at possible.
grade and along the internal pedestrian network. New academic
Recommendations:
buildings also include these types of communal spaces in order to
extend a collective identity to future areas of campus. The East 1. The University could continue to consolidate student services with
Campus, in particular, would provide a complementary centre to the goal of achieving a “one stop shop” for student services in the
the campus core with a range of amenities geared towards the academic zone.
university community.
2. Administrative functions could be rebalanced across campus to
prioritize those that directly contribute to university life and
Recommendations:
provide key services that require proximity to academic uses.
1. The Atrium Project is a priority University Project that will increase
3. The University should anticipate and plan for administrative
the amount of social and amenity space on campus while providing
functions in any major mixed use development in East Campus.
a new front door for the University.
2. The University should plan for social and amenity spaces in new
buildings and in the renewal of existing facilities. These types of
spaces are particularly important in the acdemic zone, East Campus
and the major corridors of the internal pedestrian network. Some
development sites may be identified as requiring social, amenity or
retail space at grade.

Social and Amenity Space, Karolinska Institute

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 41

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

4.2.2 Residential
Student housing is an important part of the academic and social
life. It fosters a sense of community and supports a 24-hour campus
environment. The University provides high quality housing in a variety
of forms and locations across campus, some of which are operated in a
partnership model.
Existing residential uses are located at the west, north and east edges
of campus. DeCew, Vallee, Earp and Lowenberger Residences are
traditional dormitory-style residence halls. The Village and Quarry
View Residence are townhouse-style residences in which several rooms
share a kitchen and common areas. Gateway Suites similarly provides
suites with shared common areas, but it is only for upper-year and
Residential Key Plan
graduate students.
The University should continue to invest in student housing and
guarantee a place to all incoming first-year students. The Village and
DeCew Residence are a priorities for renewal and redevelopment. The
Village provides an independent living arrangement for students close
to the academic zone. Building condition issues, the large footprint
of the complex, and the need to expand streets and parking in the
area suggest that the Village could be redeveloped in a more intensive
form. DeCew Residence also faces building condition issues, and
renewal would provide an opportunity to address accessibility issues
and enhance campus connections through the site to the Niagara
Escarpment.
Recent private sector investments in student residence buildings
close to campus, such as the Student Lofts, present opportunities to
create a larger residential community and critical mass of complementary
uses within the Brock District. As the Brock District evolves into a more
complete community, the area may become more attractive for housing
geared towards graduate students, faculty, staff and seniors. The future
development of East Campus and South Campus could accommodate
a variety of housing types delivered by the University or through a The Village Residence
partnership model.

42 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

Recommendations:
1. The University should undertake a Student Residence Needs Analysis
and Housing Master Plan to clarify the University’s role as a housing
provider and identify priorities for housing reinvestment and
expansion.
2. The University could undertake a detailed financial and physical
assessment of the Village to contribute to the findings of the
Student Residence Needs Analysis and Housing Master Plan. The
assessment would establish a framework for decision-making around
investment, renewal and potential redevelopment.
3. The renewal of DeCew should consider providing greater
physical and visual connections between campus and the Niagara
Escarpment.
4. Undergraduate housing should continue to be located in close
proximity to the academic zone. Graduate, faculty, staff and
Rita Atkinson Residences, UC SanDiego
other housing can be located further afield on East Campus, South
Campus or the peripheral development lands.
5. The South Campus provides an opportunity to develop market
housing for seniors as well as long-term care or other seniors-
related facilities with a programmatic relationship to the Faculty of
Applied Health Sciences.
6. The East Campus mixed use node provides an opportunity for
significant intensification that could integrate market rental
housing.

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 43

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

4.2.3 Mixed Use

The expansive parking lots situated along Glenridge Avenue and
Merrittville Highway provide high value development opportunities
with excellent access and visibility. In general, these lands will
accommodate a wide range of use that enhance the University’s profile Mixed Use
along its urban edge, including outward focused academic programs. Node

The University lands northeast of the Glenridge Avenue and Sir Isaac
Brock Way intersection has the potential to redefine this underutilized
gateway to campus and showcase the University. The mixed use
node recognizes the opportunity to support a variety of uses through
intensification. In particular, Heritage Plaza is a prime location for Mixed Use Area Key Plan
immediate development that would serve as a hub of services and
amenities for the campus community and include a mix retail, support
services, university offices, and university or market housing. • Provide parking for non-university uses.
• Consider the potential to achieve greater heights and densities
Recommendations: through the development approvals process.
1. The mixed use area north of Sir Isaac Brock Way could • Include a program that supports a critical mass of university
accommodate either academic or partnership uses. Buildings functions, including academic and administrative uses.
should frame Glenridge Avenue to provide an urban streetwall
while integrating with the surrounding campus fabric. Where 4. The mixed use area south of Sir Isaac Brock Way is well suited
the mixed use area overlaps with the academic zone, new for partnership uses that do not require immediate adjacency to
development could have a direct programmatic relationship to the the academic zone. The built form may be less dense than the
University, and be considered for externally oriented academic academic zone and could generally reflect the character of the
programs and supportive uses. adjacent Business Park.

2. The intersection of Glenridge Avenue and Sir Isaac Brock Way 5. The relocation of existing parking lots will need to be considered
provide an opportunity to support retail and service uses for the as part of a parking strategy and will rely on increased travel
growing local community. Retail uses could be provided at grade demand management to support a continued reduction in car
along Glenridge in an urban format. parking. Partnership uses will be expected to contribute to the
eventual construction of a parking structure.
3. The development of East Campus should:
• Protect the south portion of East Campus for large-scale,
intensive mixed use development.

44 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

4.2.4 Athletics and Recreation
Athletics and recreational activities are a vital and integral part of
student life on campus and promote an active and healthy lifestyle.
The University provides varsity sports and a wide range of intramural
and recreational programs and facilities. These uses attract members
of the University and surrounding community, ranging from major
athletic events to individual and team activities. The majority of
indoor facilities are conveniently located within the Walker Complex in
close proximity to athletic fields and the academic zone. There are a
number of playing fields situated at the terminus of University Road, as
well as four baseball diamonds south of Isaac Brock Boulevard.
Athletics and recreational uses are priority uses, particularly in the west
Athletics and Recreation Key Plan
part of campus or athletics neighbourhood. Street network and parking
improvements would enhance access for residents in the surrounding
community, providing opportunities for engagement and revenue. In 3. Two of the ball diamonds on South Campus may be relocated to
the South Campus, the University will have to balance the provision vacant field in the northwest corner of the athletics and recreation
of athletic facilities with the need to accommodate surface parking zone to accommodate the proposed South Walk and future
and new development projects. The existing ball diamonds could development.
be moved next to the other playing fields in order to accommodate 4. The largest sites in South Campus could be considered for a
future development of the South Campus. The convenient road access potential athletic and recreation partnership development.
and availability of parking in South Campus provide the potential to 5. The East Lands may provide an opportunity for shared municipal
support athletic and recreational facilities that could equally serve the athletic and recreational facilities, but should not be a priority
University, the City of Thorold and the City of St. Catharines. location for academic, varsity or intramural athletic facilities.

Recommendations:
1. The University should continue to invest in the Walker Complex as
the centre of athletics and recreation.
2. The playing fields at the west edge of campus should be protected
in the long-term for recreational uses. The potential of locating a
stadium in this area would need to resolve issues related to parking,
circulation and access.

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 45

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

4.2.5 Special Use

The large undeveloped areas in South Campus provides flexibility to
accommodate a various types of development to meet the future
needs of the University. Land uses could include athletics and
recreation, housing, servicing and partnership commercial uses.
The development of this area should be planned comprehensively
to establish appropriate land use relationships, provide appropriate
infrastructure and services in an efficient manner, and respond to
existing natural heritage features.

The construction of a future cogeneration plant may also be explored

on South Campus within the Special Use Area. It has the potential to
serve the South Campus and the adjacent Business Park, but requires Special Use Area Key Plan
proximity to development in these areas.

Recommendations:

1. The South Campus should continue to provide surface parking for

the University in the long-term. other uses in the area and mediate adverse impacts through design,
2. A master site plan and servicing plan should be developed prior to screening and buffers if necessary. Service functions, such as the
major development or infrastructure investments in the special potential South Campus cogeneration plant, should be carefully
use area. Natural heritage features, stormwater management and designed to minimize visual and other impacts on existing and
floodplain considerations will need to be evaluated and integrated anticipated uses.
into future development sites. 6. Ensure the design of the future cogen plant is appropriately
3. Large development sites should be retained to maximize flexibility integrated with the surrounding campus environment.
for future uses that cannot be accommodated on the more
intensively developed lands to the north.
4. The natural western edge of the special use area provides
opportunities for residential development that should be sensitively
integrated into the natural features and functions.
5. The siting of new development should ensure compatibility with

46 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

4.2.6 Service
The future campus will require adequate service facilities to maintain
the day-to-day operations of the campus. The Central Utilities Building
and works yards are generally incompatible with other campus uses
and have been situated at the north and south edges of campus to
buffer their noise, dust and other potential impacts.

The need for a campus entrance at the intersection of Schmon

Parkway and Merrittville Highway will necessitate the relocation of the
existing works yards. The utilities and servicing systems are further
discussed in section 4.5.

Recommendations: Service Key Plan

1. Service zones should be protected from development, and should
be screened through vegetation and other buffers to minimize
impacts on surroundings.
2. Secondary utility and service infrastructure could continue to be
located in other parts of campus to ensure efficient and reliable
service.
3. The works yard should be relocated to a permanent home
immediately west of its existing location. The design of this
facility should consider the impacts natural heritage features. An
appropriate buffer around the future works yard could be provided
to minimize the impact on adjacent uses.

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 47

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

4.2.7 Peripheral Development Lands

The University’s additional land holdings on Lockhart Drive and east
of the Glenridge Quarry Naturalization Site are physically separated
from the core campus activities. These areas have been designated
peripheral development lands, which recognizes their unknown use
in the future due to their physical constraints and separation.

East Lands
Uses and development identified for the East Lands should be
compatible with the Niagara Escarpment and the regional park.
Appropriate uses could also take advantage of proximity to both
Highway 406 and Sir Isaac Brock Way.
Peripheral Development Lands Key Plan
Recommendations:
1. Due to its proximity to both Highway 406 and Sir Isaac Brock Way,
development on the East Lands should be of high quality and in
keeping with the University’s image. 4. The design and character of the plantings on the East Lands should
be conceived as an extension of both the Niagara Escarpment and
2. Proposed developments should consider potential environmental the regional park immediately to the west.
constraints related to the Glenridge Quarry Landfill and the
Niagara Escarpment. 5. The natural setting and significant tree specimens should be
preserved.
3. Primary vehicular access to the development could be provided
via a new road that extends from East Lands to the signalized 6. The East Lands may provide an opportunity for shared municipal
intersection at the southbound ramp to Highway 406. Emergency athletic and recreational facilities, but should not be a priority
and pedestrian/bicycle access to the development could be from location for academic, varsity or intramural athletic facilities.
Tremont Drive.

48 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

Lockhart Drive Lands
Future development of the Lockhart Drive Lands recognizes the Recommendations:
environmental significance of this area. The frontage along Lockhart 1. Linkages to trail systems on adjacent lands could be facilitated in
Drive is designated as “Urban” which permits development on a conjunction with development on the Lands where possible.
portion of the lands under certain guidelines intended to protect
the important environmental features. This designation will be of 2. Habitat enhancement and restoration projects could be pursued in
increasing significance as the growth pressures currently facing the conjunction with development on the Lands where possible.
City of St. Catharines are addressed. The recommendations for the
Lockhart Drive Lands outlined below are intended to ensure that
environmental protection is balanced with the need to use all parts of
the City and the campus of Brock University effectively and efficiently
in the future.

Brock University recognizes the interests of the larger St. Catharines’

community and its responsibility for the Niagara Escarpment area
located on its property. The University asserts its right to develop this
property in a responsible manner. Accordingly, development on the
Lockhart Drive Lands should be defined by the need to respect the
established neighborhood to the north and to maintain the integrity of
the Niagara Escarpment. Future development should be placed in the
context of the University’s continued stewardship of this important
site.

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 49

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

4.2.8 Opportunities for Renewal and New Development

Future campus growth will see the evolution of facilities over
time through a combination of renewal, redevelopment and new
development. Figure 4.2 illustrates the various opportunities on
campus for renewing existing buildings and new development.

Renewal New Development

The facility condition report prepared by VFA (2015) identifies a Development areas have also been identified at the edges of academic
number of buildings with a high facility condition index (FCI). FCI is zone, as well as on the East Campus and South Campus. The large
a measure of the deferred maintenance cost of a building divided orange areas identify areas of campus that can accommodate new
by the estimated replacement value. Investment in existing campus development in the near and long-term future. The identification of
buildings to improve their quality and condition is a major priority. The future development opportunities provides structure and clarity for
blue buildings in Figure 4.2 have a FCI over 0.25 and require significant future campus growth. Chapter 6, Building Design Guidelines and
renewal to improve their condition, but may continue to support their Precinct Plans, provides greater detail for implementation of projects
current, or similar, uses. Potential redevelopment areas, shown in red, in these areas based on their relationship to the overall Campus Plan
should be considered in some areas of campus to remove buildings framework.
that have significant building condition issues, are nearing the end of
the life cycle and are located on strategic sites that offer significant Recommendations:
opportunities for more intensive use. 1. The development areas indicated in Figure 4.2 should guide
As campus buildings age, renewal projects can address not only the selection of sites for new development on campus. The
facility condition issues, but also provide transformative opportunities, recommendations provided in the Precinct Plans should be applied
such as addressing high priority university space needs, responding to to the placement and design of all new development.
changing pedagogical needs, enhancing the usability of buildings and 2. Development areas may require investment in new infrastructure
space and creating operating efficiencies. to appropriately serve new buildings and users. Investment in new
streets, open spaces and other infrastructure will be critical to
Recommendations: unlocking the development potential these areas.
1. Some of the buildings identified for renewal or redevelopment
occupy central locations that provide an opportunity for
transformative projects. In some cases, there is also opportunity
to realign space to meet the University’s academic and strategic
priorities, and create spaces to support the 21st century learner.
2. Other opportunities for renewal may be identified. Decisions
and priorities could be established through consideration of the
University’s academic, strategic and financial objectives.

50 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

 D1. Schmon Tower Atrium
D2. Student-Alumni Centre
(BUSU)
D3. East Campus Mixed Use
Development

FIGURE 4.2.  Opportunities for renewal and new development

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 51

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

U N I V E R SI T Y PR OJ EC T D1

Schmon Tower Atrium

Schmon Tower is an essential part of Brock’s campus and identity.
The imposing structure serves as a focal point for the campus and
an anchor to the Brock Mall open space. The ground floor of the
Tower and enclosed plaza area is considered by most to be the
centre of campus. It serves as a primary point of arrival for most
people travelling to campus, particularly for those arriving by transit,
making it the front door to the interconnected academic complex.
The creation of the Learning Commons at the base of the Tower has
further cemented its role as the centre of campus activity. Despite its
importance to the Brock community, the Tower and surrounding plaza
remain uninviting, congested with pedestrian activity and lacking in
amenity space to serve the larger university community.
The proposed Schmon Tower Atrium presents a significant opportunity
to create an inviting focal point on campus. This building renewal
initiative would add a large central indoor space that complements
and engages with the existing Tower building. The transparent
enclosure continues Brock University’s practice of open walls and
serves as an extension to the Brock Mall landscape. The space could
offer further amenities and service space at the heart of the campus,
providing a new hub for students, faculty, staff, visitors and transit
users. At the same time, the Atrium would improve the internal Student Learning Center at Ryerson University
campus circulation by rationalizing pedestrian movement, reinforcing
its role as a campus focal point and crossroads. Ultimately, this
initiative would reinvigorate the base of the iconic Schmon Tower as
a welcoming meeting place for the University.

52 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

U N I V E R S I T Y PR OJ EC T D2

Student-Alumni Centre (BUSU)

The existing BUSU building is an important hub of student and social
activity, but the structure is in poor physical condition. There is strong
potential the campus will need a new home for student life in the
near future. The Campus Plan recognizes the important role that BUSU
plays on campus and identifies a replacement site close to the heart
of campus on Weather Station Field. The new BUSU building should
ensure a strong relationship with Brock Mall to animate this important
open space. Alternative locations may be explored within the D2 D2
academic zone, such as the existing BUSU site or the on the East Walk.
D2

Student Service Space with integrated indoor and outdoor space, Curtain Potential Location for BUSU
University Coffee Yard

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 53

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

U N I V E R SI T Y PR OJ EC T D3

East Campus Mixed Use Development

The mixed use node will bring new life to East Campus and establish it
as a key centre of activity. The combination of services and amenities
will support both the University and surrounding community while
taking advantage of the growing student population living within
walking distance to campus. The University could achieve this project
through two development scenarios.

Scenario 1
In a university-led development, buildings would continue the
existing form of campus development, reaching four to six-storeys in
height along the edges of Glenridge Avenue and Sir Isaac Brock Way.
The development would primarily support university-focused uses,
including student housing with limited parking. The existing heritage
plaza would be replaced in the first phase, but the two free-standing
fast food restaurants would be maintained until phase 2. This scenario
offers a university-controlled scenario based on an economic approach
to construction that moderately intensifies the site.
Scenario 2
The alternative approach would be a joint venture development led by
a private developer. The buildings would establish a more distinguished
form with a five-storey podium and two residential towers reaching
eight to twelve storeys. This development would support a more
urban mix of uses, including residential, retail, office and amenities
with structured parking on site. The residential uses could include
market rental apartments. This development would replace the
existing heritage plaza in the first phase and provides an option to
replace the free-standing fast food restaurants at a later point. This
second scenario provides an economic approach to development that
significantly intensifies the site through a landmark project.

Scenario 1 demonstration

54 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

Scenario 2 - Phase 1 Scenario 2 - Phase 2

150 residential units 150 residential units

– 180,000 [Link] – 180,000 [Link]
160 parking spaces 140 parking spaces
for residential for residential and
and retail uses – retail uses (52,000sq.
74,[Link] ft)
35,000 [Link]. 20,000 [Link] retail
university office uses
space
62,000 [Link] retail
uses

Scenario 2 phase 1 demonstration plan Scenario 2 phase 2 demonstration plan

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 55

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

4.3 Movement Network

As a major hub for education and employment, the campus is the

focal point for thousands of trips every day, made by private car, bus,
bicycle or on foot. The manner in which students, staff and faculty
access campus has changed over time, with growing reliance on bus
transit as well as bicycle and pedestrian travel. Continued growth in
alternative modes of transportation requires that the campus provide
the supporting infrastructure to encourage greater transit, walking and
cycling.
Once on the Main Campus, most trips are made on foot. The compact
footprint of the Main Campus is supported by extensive pedestrian
Hourly peak at Brock Mall North
infrastructure, including an internal circulation network that is a
defining element of the University. Beyond the existing academic
zone, greater pedestrian infrastructure and connectivity is required We are of the opinion that the long-term movement network
to support pedestrian movement to East Campus, as well as future illustrated in Figure 4.3 will facilitate the evolution of the conceptual
campus growth to the south. long-term demonstration plan by providing access to development
The movement network, shown in Figure 4.3, illustrates the long-term parcels as well as new circulation routes into, out of and around the
network of transportation infrastructure that is needed to support campus. The creation of new campus entry points and the expansion
campus access, circulation and new development opportunities. While of the University street network will relieve the pressure on existing
continuing to accommodate all modes of travel to and within the internal streets and intersections. This will reduce the need to
campus, the movement network can expand to better support active signalize any intersections within the campus in the long-term.
and sustainable modes of transportation, including walking, cycling The Campus Plan includes measures that promote transit, walking
and transit use. and cycling to reduce the proportion of trips to, from and within
A connected, walkable and accessible campus supports academic the campus by private automobile. The extent to which these
collaboration, enhances the sense of place, makes efficient use measures are implemented and the degree of modal shift that results
of existing and new infrastructure, supports mobility options and will be critical factors influencing the future interaction between
contributes to campus sustainability. Accordingly, the University should development density and road network capacity.
balance the need to accommodate cars and the demand for parking The Campus Plan provides a flexible framework that can be phased
with the desire for a pedestrian-friendly campus that supports the and adapted as the campus evolves. The density of development will,
growing number of students living close to campus. in turn, be influenced by the constraints and priorities associated with
the transportation network. This iterative process will be the subject
of future operational studies as recommended in this Plan.

56 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

 M1. Brock Mall Transit Centre
M2. University Road
M3. Campus Drive
M4. Ring Road
M5. South Entrances

FIGURE 4.3.  Campus Movement Network and University Projects

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 57

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

4.3.1 Street Network

The existing campus environment is made up of two distinct areas: Recommendations:
a pedestrian-focused academic zone and an auto-oriented network
of roads and parking. The separation of pedestrians from cars has 1. A new access could be constructed opposite 3350 Merrittville
concentrated academic development into a compact and walkable Highway in the near-term to reduce congestion at the two existing
zone north of University Road. Though this pattern serves the campus access points to campus. An additional connection can be made at
well, it also limits opportunities to expand the footprint of the the intersection with Schmon Parkway by relocating the existing
academic zone and has pushed the existing circulation network to works yard and opening the west leg of this intersection.
its limit. The roads and parking lots at the edges of the Main Campus 2. Campus Drive could be constructed to provide new circulation
sufficiently accommodate vehicular circulation, but limited roads and opportunities, support new campus entrances and provide access
access points to Glenridge Avenue and Merrittville Highway has led for future development sites.
to congestion entering and leaving the campus during peak periods.
A major priority for the University is to develop an integrated street 3. A traffic operations study could be undertaken to evaluate existing
network that supports efficient circulation for all modes of travel workings of the campus street network in more detail, taking into
while allowing new development opportunities and the expansion of consideration street network improvements and trip generation
the academic zone in particular. from new developments.

The existing circulation patterns could be improved through 4. The redevelopment of the Village could include improved roadway
investments in an interconnected street network. New streets could connections to University Road, Brock Circle and South Campus.
be constructed to improve circulation in existing areas and provide Near-term rehabilitation works should consider realignment to
connections to South Campus. The construction of two new entrances create a T-intersection at University Road in alignment with the
along Merrittville Highway would have significant benefits by providing existing service road to the west of the Walker Complex.
alternative access points to campus that will lessen congestion
5. Through new construction and repair, the campus street network
on Sir Isaac Brock Boulevard. All campus streets may be designed
could be designed as “complete streets”, providing for continuous
to accommodate pedestrians, cyclists, and all types of motorized
cycling and pedestrian facilities. All new roads could include
vehicles, including transit. The street network also serves as an
pedestrian facilities on both sides and bicycle lanes as identified in
important element of the public realm, contributing to the image of
section 4.3.4. Pedestrian facilities can take the form of sidewalks
the University and linking different parts of campus.
or multi-use trails shared with cyclists. Street improvements
A number of University Projects have been identified that will provide should also be coordinated with landscape initiatives to enhance
strategic improvements to the street network to support more place-making.
efficient and effective circulation patterns, unlock development sites
6. The University should encourage the realization of a
and support place-making opportunities.
comprehensive network of complete streets within surroundings
lands, and particularly the Brock Business Park, to enhance access
to campus and support the continued evolution of the Brock
District.
58 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN
FIGURE 4.4.  Street Network

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 59

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

U N I V E R SI T Y PR OJ EC T M 2
Improvements to University Road could be made in anticipation of future development along
the south side of the street. Development along this street should be planned holistically
University Road
and consider the land use intensities and right-of-way requirements of the ultimate street
configuration. In the interim option, pick-up and drop-off lay-bys can be added to the south
side of the street to accommodate the relocation of these functions from the Brock Mall Transit
Centre. The provision of proposed lay-bys will need to maintain adequate sidewalk width and
ensure that the visibility of pedestrians at crossings is not be impeded by stationary vehicles.
As a critical east-west link in the cycling network, the enhanced configuration of University
Road could include dedicated bicycle infrastructure. Conflicts between cyclists and motorists
moving into and out of pick-up and drop-off bays and opening doors should be mitigated by the
provision of buffered bicycle lanes which are illustrated in the enhanced option below.

Typical University Road Section (interim option)

60 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN Typical University Road Section (enhanced option)
 Pedestrian Pick-up and Drop-off Dedicated Bike Lane Mid-block Pedestrian Crossing
Crossing Lay-bys line up with existing pathway

Brock Mall
Transit
Centre

University Road East

Flora Egerter Way

Brock Mall
South

Long-term Demonstration Plan of University Road East

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 61

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

U N I V E R SI T Y PR OJ EC T M 3

Campus Drive Campus Drive aims to connect each of the campus entries along Glenridge Avenue and
Merrittville Highway, completing the circulation loop established by Schmon Parkway and John
Macdonell Street. This project would improve campus and parking access, and unlock new
development sites. Campus Drive would also serve as an important pedestrian and cycling
connection to South Campus. The separation of Campus Drive from Glenridge Avenue should
consider projected queue lengths. These will be determined by a Traffic Operations Study based
on the planned land uses and densities. Laneways and service access to buildings and parking
lots should be consolidated to minimize conflict with pedestrian and bicycle movements.

Typical Campus Drive section

62 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

U N I V E R S I T Y PR OJ EC T M 4

Ring Road

Typical Ring Road section

West of Brock Mall, University Road does As part of the planned renewal or network and campus circulation. The roadway
not support a connected street network, redevelopment of the Village, Village Road could be two lanes wide, and accommodate
effectively terminating at the small surface could be extended southeast to connect with bicycles could through dedicated lanes.
parking lot south of the artificial turf Isaac Brock Circle and potentially to the
field. This limits opportunities for campus street network on South Campus. This would In the near-term, the realignment of Village
circulation, pick-up and drop-off activities, help mitigate the impact of trips generated by Road to create a T-intersection at University
and the potential for change in the west end any new non-residential development within Road with a straighter road alignment would
of Campus. this part of campus, enhance community improve safety and circulation while supporting
access to athletics and recreation resources, the long-term realization of the Ring Road.
and introduce flexibility into the street

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 63

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

U N I V E R SI T Y PR OJ EC T M 5
South Entrances

The creation of new south entrances would

substantially address existing areas of
congestion on Isaac Brock Boulevard. In the
near-term, the construction of a new access
opposite 3350 Merrittville Highway would
provide a third access to the South Campus.
This driveway could ultimately be signalized
when warranted by future traffic volumes and
in discussions with the Region. Further south,
a new entrance is planned and partially
Existing condition of the access opposite 3350 Merritt-
constructed at the signalized Schmon Parkway ville Highway
intersection. Realization of this entrance
requires the extension of Campus Drive and
relocation of the existing works yard.
The creation of these entrances should
be coordinated with the related gateway
initiatives to ensure that they are designed
to mark the arrival on campus and enhance
the image of campus along its primary public
frontage.

Existing condition of the access at Schmon Parkway

intersection.

64 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

4.3.2 Pedestrian Network & Accessibility
The circulation of pedestrians is fundamental to the quality of the
campus experience at Brock University. All of the university community
relies on walking to move around campus for at least part of their trip
and the pedestrian network provides an important structuring element
for navigating campus. Within the existing academic zone, a robust
pedestrian network exists both inside and outside of buildings.
The extensive interior pedestrian network is a unique and integral
part of the academic zone, and plays an important role in the identity
of campus. The pattern of interconnected academic buildings will
continue with new development. The design process for future Main east-west pedestrian thoroughfare between Brock
buildings should involve detailed consideration of the interior Mall and Glenridge Avenue
pedestrian network. Key nodes provide opportunities to animate these
corridors and provide a meeting place for students, staff and faculty.
Wayfinding improvements to the existing network should focus on
increasing the legibility and navigation of this system, ensuring clear
connections to the exterior walks and open spaces.
Though the existing pedestrian network remains largely inward
focused, there have been significant recent improvements to the
external pedestrian environment. In particular, the extension of
the walkway connecting Brock Mall North and Glenridge Avenue
Existing Mid-block pedestrian crossing over Glenridge
has enhanced pedestrian connectivity beyond the heart of campus. Avenue to/from the East Campus
This walkway and open space could be formalized and expanded to
extend through Parking Lot A and across Glenridge Avenue. The auto-
oriented East Campus could also be enhanced through the addition of
pedestrian mid-block connections to provide a safe route for students
walking through site to the adjacent student residences.
With anticipated campus growth to the south of the existing academic
zone, the southerly extension of higher order pedestrian connections
will be especially important to support future development. In
particular, the South Walk is proposed to connect the Main Campus

Existing internal pedestrian network

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 65

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

with South Campus. This walkway would create a the central

pedestrian spine to South Campus, similar to the role provided by the
East Walk. Where the South Walk meets Flora Egerter Way and Isaac
Brock Boulevard, safe crossings should be ensured for pedestrians. The
creation of additional campus entrances and the completion of Campus
Drive would assist in diverting a large portion of automobiles away
from this crossing.
Throughout campus a continuous multi-use network can be extended
and integrated with new development infrastructure. All new roads
may include pedestrian facilities on both sides, either in the form
of sidewalks or multi-use trails shared with cyclists. Multi-use trails
should only be utilized along corridors where pedestrian activity is
Pedestrian Path at University of Washington
light and there are few pedestrians crossing the trail. Connections to
the Bruce Trail may be made wherever possible.

Accessibility
The ability to arrive at, circulate around and leave the campus should The University’s 2014 Facility Accessibility Design Standards document
not depend on personal levels of mobility. The University should covers access, circulation, parking, transit facilities and streetscape
continue to demonstrate its commitment to accessibility for all. Brock components. These can be applied thoroughly and consistently in
prepares annual Accessibility Status Reports and, in 2013, released consideration of any improvements to the movement network on
a multi-year accessibility plan that outlines the University’s strategy campus.
to prevent or remove barriers, and to meet the requirements of the
Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act.
The built environment of the University must be designed so that it is
accessible to all. Persons with disabilities should be able to approach,
enter, enjoy and make use of an area and its facilities without undue
difficulties or assistance. Changes to the physical environment of
the University to enhance access to the campus and the broader
community must take into consideration the need to provide for the
safe use of these areas by persons with disabilities.

66 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

 East Walk

Sou
th
Wa
lk

FIGURE 4.5.  Pedestrian System

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 67

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

Recommendations:
1. The East Walk could be extended across Glenridge Avenue. The 5. The design of future buildings should allow open views to and from
existing walk through the surface parking lot could be upgraded to the exterior, particularly from the interior pedestrian network.
be consistent with the western portion of the Walk. The East Walk This will help orient pedestrians within the network and emphasize
could also be designed as an important campus open space (See the University’s distinct sense of place. Important social or public
Section 4.4 of this Plan). spaces should have a direct connection to the interior pedestrian
network. Renewal or redevelopment of the Student Alumni Centre
2. The pedestrian environment in the East Campus can be enhanced should consider a southward extension of the network across
in coordination with future development. Connections should University Road.
provide wide, attractive walkways and consider existing pedestrian
desire lines. Access to the Quarryview, Gateway Suites and the 6. A continuous network of pedestrian walks and multi-use trails
Lofts residences could be improved by installing pedestrian could extend across the campus, creating a complete walking
crossings over John Macdonell Street and a sidewalk on the east loop for access and recreational purposes. The University should
side. Connections across Glenridge Avenue will be provided encourage enhanced connections to surrounding destinations,
at ground level, but future development could provide for an including continuous trail links to the Glenridge Quarry
elevated connection. Naturalization Site.
3. A higher order pedestrian linkage could be considered from the 7. Continued access to the Bruce Trail should be protected, and
Main Campus and the South Campus. The crossing on the west trailheads should promote the use of this important recreational
side of Flora Egerter Way should continue to be oriented parallel infrastructure.
to Flora Egerter Way and perpendicular to Isaac Brock Boulevard.
The South Walk could be extended through future development of 8. Both the upper and lower portions of Hydro Road are used as part
Weather Station Field. of the Bruce Trail and other informal trail connections by residents
of the City of St. Catharines. The use of these roads as trail rights-
4. The interior, largely above-grade pedestrian network should of-way may be encouraged by Brock University.
be extended as part future expansion of the academic zone,
but should in no way detract from the quality of the at-grade, 9. The University’s 2014 Facility Accessibility Design Standards and
exterior pedestrian network. Future renewal and development provincial accessibility design guidelines should be aggressively
should identify opportunities to create activity nodes at strategic implemented throughout the campus to ensure a universally
locations and meeting points along this network. accessible environment.

68 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

4.3.3 Transit
In recent years, Brock University has emerged as a significant hub 3. The west and east sides of the Brock Mall could be redesigned with
and destination for the local and regional transit networks. In 2004, sawtooth platform configurations, and minimize encroachement
Brock University joined the U-Pass program, which allows students into Johnston Ravine. This will improve the circulation of buses
unlimited transit use from September to April for a one-off compulsory and provide designated areas for passengers to queue while
surcharge on their tuition fees. This initiative has resulted in a major facilitating the movement of pedestrians. The detailed design
shift to transit as a primary mode of travel to and from the University, and allocation of the stops should be subject to a comprehensive
particularly among students. vehicle maneuvering analysis.
The success of transit has also brought challenges in terms of managing 4. Protected bus shelters could be provided at bus bays or integrated
the volume of buses and riders. The Brock Mall loop continues to be an into building renovation projects around the Brock Mall. Transit
effective transit hub, but its layout and transit operation conflicts with information, including real time vehicle information, could be
other vehicular activity and constrain effective use of the space for provided in appropriate locations throughout transit platforms,
transit purposes. More and formalized bus loading areas are needed to waiting areas and interior public spaces within adjacent buildings.
accommodate the growing number of buses servicing the mall during
peak periods. Improved conditions and information are also needed for 5. In the near-term, the University may consider working with transit
passengers awaiting, boarding and alighting the buses. Through better providers and BUSU to adjust bus timetables to achieve a more
design and management of the Brock Mall loop and coordination with even distribution of arrivals and departures.
transit providesrs, the space can be enhanced as an effective transit 6. In the long-term, and in conjunction with the transit mall
hub and a high quality campus open space centred around the Sir Isaac expansion, the University could engage transit providers,
Brock statue. government agencies and BUSU to increase frequencies on
Recommendations: existing services. The benefits and costs of new routes could be
investigated, as well as the adjustment of existing routes to better
1. Vehicular access to the Brock Mall loop could be restricted to serve the East and South Campuses.
buses, emergency and service vehicles. The existing pick-up/drop-
off and short-term parking spaces could be relocated to University 7. As the expansion occurs into East and South Campus, additional
Road and other appropriate locations. transit stops may be provided to service these areas.

2. Bus bays and stopping areas could be eliminated from the north 8. Investment in transit infrastructure should be coordinated with
edge of the Brock Mall to eliminate congestion at the front door place-making and landscaping to reinforce Brock Mall as a key
of the Schmon Tower and atrium. Additional bus stops could be point of arrival to the University.
provided on the west side of the Brock Mall where short-term
parking is currently located.

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 69

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

U N I V E R SI T Y PR OJ EC T M 1
Brock Mall Transit Centre

The hub status of the University, and the fact that all students
have paid for and are entitled to unlimited transit use, is a strong
justification for enhancing the existing transit infrastructure of
Brock Mall North to increase capacity and streamline operations. The
expansion of transit facilities to the west side of the Mall, including
the relocation of stops from the area immediately south of the Schmon
Tower, and the reconfiguration of all platforms to a sawtooth layout,
would address the existing issues regarding circulation of buses and
passengers. Automobile access may be restricted to encourage safe
and efficient maneuvering of buses. Upgrades to the surrounding
pedestrian environment would provide bus route signage, sheltered
waiting areas and widened walkways. These actions would improve the
transit experience for all, and encourage students who travel by car
but could take the bus (and are paying to do so) to make the modal
switch. The resulting reduction in the proportion of students that
travel to, from and around the campus by automobile, would benefit
the University as a whole. Potential Layout of Brock Mall Transit Centre

70 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

Existing Condition of Brock Mall North Transit Mall, Durham College

Existing Condition of Brock Mall North VIVA bus stop, York University

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 71

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

4.3.4 Bicycle Network and Infrastructure

Encouraging cycling as an alternative mode of transportation supports
the University’s health and sustainability objectives while reducing
congestion and parking demand. Cycling also presents an opportunity
to enhance connections for the growing number of students living near
campus and to the existing communities in Thorold and St. Catharines.
The cycling network could be expanded both on and off campus to
support increased bicycle use.
The University should consider constructing a complete bicycle
network, either as on-road bicycle lanes or in-boulevard multi-use
paths, on appropriate streets identified in Figure 4.6. In particular,
connections to East and South Campus should be coordinated to ensure
future development is linked to the campus core. Coordination with
St. Catharines, Thorold and the Niagara Region would ensure the
Residence Road is used as cycling route
campus bicycle network is integrated with the surrounding bicycle
network and infrastructure, including existing and proposed bicycle
lanes on Glenridge Avenue, Merrittville Highway and Sir Isaac Brock
Way.
Bicycle parking can continue to be monitored and added to meet
demand. New bike parking could be provided in safe and convenient
locations. The facilities and location of bicycle parking should be
carefully designed in campus opens spaces to minimize adverse
physical and visual impacts.

Bikes parking facility outside the Cairns Complex are

afforded some weather protection by the roof overhang

72 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

FIGURE 4.6.  Cycling System

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 73

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

Recommendations:
1. The 2009 Preliminary Bikeways Master Plan could be updated provided near the entrances to all new buildings. Wheel bender
in response to recent off-campus bicycle improvements and racks could be replaced with new racks that allow the bike frame
the proposed on-campus movement network. It would respond to be secured to the rack. Weather protection for existing and
to considerations around future development sites and trip new racks should be considered, and the positioning of all existing
generation, lay-by parking areas, campus access points and the and new racks should be carefully considered to ensure efficient
evolution of the larger Brock District. This would inform the utilization. Bicycle parking should be positioned so as to discourage
selection of cycling facility types in accordance with Book 18 of cyclists from riding into the Transit Mall. Larger bicycle parking
the Ontario Traffic Manual. areas can be coordinated with shower and change facilities, such
as in the Walker Complex.
2. New road construction and upgrades should consider the
incorporation of cycling facilities, either as on-road bicycle lanes 7. Entrances to the University should be designed for the efficient
or in-boulevard multi-use paths shared with pedestrians. transfer of cyclists between campus and external facilities. The
design of the Isaac Brock Boulevard intersection with Merrittville
3. The integration of the East Campus could be improved through the Highway/Glenridge Avenue should be reviewed and modified as
provision of dedicated cycling connections, including upgrading the required to minimize conflicts between cyclists and other vehicles
mid-block crossing over Glenridge Avenue to include a crossride. at transition points. Similar design considerations should be
4. The on-campus bicycle network could be integrated with the applied to proposed South Campus cycling facilities that connect
external network. The University should liaise with government to the existing bicycle lanes on Merrittville Highway and any other
agencies to promote seamless cycling routes between the campus future interfaces.
and external student residential centres. 8. The University should support the enhanced bicycle facilities on
5. Future improvements to University Road could incorporate cycling the portion of Glenridge Avenue that climbs the escarpment. The
facilities. Their design should minimize conflicts with motor west sidewalk could be expanded to accommodate a wider multi-
vehicles, particularly those entering and exiting the lay-bys. use trail that would provide protection for southbound (uphill)
Potential to use painted buffers to separate the lay-bys from the cyclists. This portion of Glenridge cannot be widened and sharrows
bicycle lanes. The roundabouts could include sharrows to guide in the northbound (downhill) lane may be sufficient for cyclists
both cyclists and motorists. The University Road project is further leaving the campus. In conjunction with Niagara Region, more
discussed in section 4.3.1. detailed consideration should be given to this and other routes
connecting the campus to the surrounding communities.
6. Utilization of existing racks may be monitored, and additional
racks could be provided as required. Bicycle racks should be

74 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

4.3.5 Parking, Loading and Servicing
The campus parking lots are the start or end point for a significant can also support investment in ground mounted solar generation
number of vehicular and pedestrian trips to and around campus. projects, as discussed in Section 4.5.
The current supply of parking is sufficient to meet demand, but the
existing surface lots occupy a large amount of centrally located land 2. Development areas close to Glenridge Avenue, including Parcel A3,
on campus. In the near-term, the total amount of parking will be East Campus and Parking Lot M should protect for a large parking
maintained, but a portion of the surface parking will be relocated to structure in the long term.
South Campus to accommodate new streets and development. 3. Parking facilities located close to University buildings could
In the long-term, the University should consider structured parking continue to be priced higher than the lots which are further away
to replace the lost surface parking spaces, particularly if significant to reflect the relative value of parking closer to a destination
partnership developments create new demand for parking areas. and to encourage transit use. Parking rates and supply can be
This should only be considered in areas that have easy access to the reviewed annually to maximize revenue and address travel demand
external road network in order to minimize the infiltration of traffic to management considerations.
the campus and to avoid further internal congestion. 4. Metered parking could be relocated away from Brock Mall North.
The differential charge-for-parking system should be maintained since Consideration should be given to incorporating replacement
it reflects the cost to the University of prime real estate being used for facilities into future University Road improvements or other
parking. It also encourages those who would prefer not to walk long campus streets. Metered parking may also be located within
distances from their car to their destination buildings to take transit convenient surface parking lots throughout campus depending on
rather than driving. need.

Short-term and visitor parking could be conveniently located for those 5. Pick-up and drop-off locations should be formalized in convenient
who may only require parking for a few hours. The metered parking locations across the campus, including University Road and South
on the west side of Brock Mall could be relocated to accommodate the Campus. The University should coordinate pick-up and drop-off
expansion of transit use, and could be located in parking lots or within locations on East Campus with the City of St. Catharines and in
street rights-of-way. conjunction with the broader vision for redevelopment.

Accessible drop-off areas for disabled passengers could be maintained. 6. Building service areas should be oriented to service routes,
The existing pick-up and drop-off activity could be relocated out of screened from view and, where possible, integrated into buildings.
the Brock Mall to the improved University Road. Consolidation of service routes and loading areas should be
considered to ensure appropriate service and truck access to
Recommendations: campus facilities. Where service routes overlap with the pedestrian
network, they should be designed as high quality pedestrian spaces
1. As the built campus expands and existing surface parking to discourage unsafe vehicular movement and to reinforce the
is appropriated for development, surface parking could be pedestrian nature of the entire campus.
consolidated on South Campus. Long-term surface parking areas

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 75

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

4.4 Landscape and Open Space

The campus landscape is one of the University’s most enduring The environmental, town and country and modern zones reflect the
features and contributes significantly to the campus experience. The distinct character and function of the different types of places found
natural beauty of the Niagara Escarpment and Lake Moodie contrast on campus. Recognizing the role of these zones will provide clear
the formal geometry of Brock Mall and the modern architecture of direction on the maintenance and renewal of existing places and
the campus. The vision of the original Campus Plan intended for the provide a clear context for the design and fitting new buildings and
landscape to be closely integrated with the campus buildings and to infrastructure.
soften its bold architecture. Today, the system of landscape and open
space network define the structure of campus, framing the buildings A number of landscape University Projects have been identified within
and movement corridors. each landscape zone. These initiatives may be created through new
development projects or infrastructure, or may evolve incrementally
The landscape and open space strategy plays an important role in over time. Implementation of the initiatives is further described in this
shaping development patterns and reinforcing the movement network. section and supported by the Precinct Plans.
Three landscape zones, shown in Figure 4.7, have been identified to
provide an overall structure and approach to the open space network.

View of Brock Circle from Schmon Tower

76 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

 L1. Escarpment Edge
L2. Memorial Wood
L3. Brock Mall and Circle
L4. East Walk
L5. Jubilee Court
L6. West Common
L7. East Common
L8. South Walk
L9. Glenridge/Merrittville Frontage
L10. Campus Gateways

FIGURE 4.7.  Open Space Network and University Projects

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 77

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

4.4.1 Environmental Zone

The Environmental Zone recognizes the significant natural features
The University and surrounding community have a strong interest surrounding the campus are unique assets that distinguish Brock
in protecting and restoring the natural environment. The presence University from its peers and should be protected. Development is
of the Niagara Escarpment UNESCO World Biosphere Reserve, the not permitted in this zone, but the maintenance of trails, meadows
Bruce Trail and Lake Moodie present an excellent opportunity to and interpretive signage is permitted where appropriate. The
promote the stewardship of the these ecological resources. However, recommendations aim to enhance biodiversity, highlight the value of
the integration of buildings and landscape is limited due to the natural heritage features and strengthen Brock University’s unique
construction of many internalized buildings that turn their backs to the sense of place.
landscape.
Recommendations:

1. Provide sufficient buffers, where possible, between ecologically

sensitive landscape and areas of high disturbance, such as roads.
2. Extend the character of natural areas by reinforcing views and
connections to adjacent buildings and open spaces.
3. Promote the inclusion of environmentally sensitive lands in Brock
University’s academic and research programs.
4. Investigate the potential to further raise the profile of Brock
University through programming and activities related to the
Niagara Escarpment’s natural heritage and status as a UNESCO
World Biosphere Reserve.

Environmental Zone Key Plan

78 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

 Plontain, Sedges
neration Trust has produced a report entitled Restoring Meadows: Aster, Columbine, Cardinal
Flower, Green Head Coneflower
ch has been used as a reference in the development
s and policies. The goals, as outlined in the report,
ould be applied to the naturalization of designated

ect regional identity

ognize the unique ecological character of each site
ect significant natural features
blish
he priorities for restoration efforts P L A NT ING L I S T *Example species
te low-maintenance, ecologically self-sustaining
pe Type: Native species
ions
an.
native species Trees and Shrubs: Honey Locust, Black Walnut,
ommodate human use Hawthorn, Red Oak, Sugar Maple, Striped
Maple, American Elm, Serviceberry, Flowering
Dogwood, White Pine, White Spruce

lities Marshes: Bulrush, Manna Grass, Water

Plantain, Sedges
zone,and character of the Niagara Escarpment
abitat
uc-
egrating it with Main Campus. In most cases this Meadows: Aster, Columbine, Cardinal Flower,
Green Head Coneflower
forms
ing edge of Residence Road.
form Planting List
Type: Native species
nds
and above Trees
the 125-metre contour on North Campus
and Shrubs: Locust, Black Walnut,
create Hawthorn, Red Oak, Sugar Maple, Striped
Maple, Elm, Crabapple, Serviceberry, 49
que Flowering Dogwood, White Pine, Spruce
[Link] ofMarshes:
environmentally sensitive lands in Brock
Bulrush, Manna Grass, Water
and research programs.
Plontain, Sedges
Restoring Meadows: Aster, Columbine, Cardinal
he potential Flower,
ment Green
to further raiseHead Coneflower
the profile of Brock
port,
ogramming and activities related to the Niagara
ted
s a UNESCO World Biosphere Reserve.
ance Ltd. Restoring Natural Habitats. The Waterfront Regeneration TheEnvironmental
The EnvironmentalZone Zone emphasizes
emphasizes natural places,
forms and places,
natural plant materials.
forms and plant materials.
, 1995.

ite

mpus Plan

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 79

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

4.4.2 Town & Country Zone

The Town and Country Zone complements the Environmental Zone by Recommendations
prioritizing the restoration and naturalization of adjacent landscapes. 1. Restore and underplant the stands of mature trees and hedgerows
At the same time, the Town and Country Zone allows for sensitive on the campus with native species, including Memorial Wood,
integration of development and recreational uses. It provides a buffer Johnston Ravine and the hedgerows by the Village and in South
to the Environmental Zone - protecting the habitat of various species, Campus
while drawing the character and feel of the surrounding natural
areas into the campus fabric. The Town and Country Zone emphasizes 2. Maintain and enhance the naturalized meadow along the
environmentally friendly and low-maintenance landscape design and Escarpment Edge for passive uses while preserving the views
management practices that reduce the costs associated with both towards Lake Ontario.
maintenance and construction. 3. Include lighting along pedestrian routes and near building entrances.
Light standards should follow CPTED guidelines to ensure safety while
minimizing disruption of natural habitat.
4. Maintain views to the landscape from buildings and along pedestrian
routes to enhance the presence of the landscape.
5. Where possible, the edge of forested areas in the Environmental
Zone could be managed to ensure a natural edge transition that
mitigates disturbance to habitat.
6. Exotic invasive species should be periodically controlled to limit
competition with native species and prevent spreading in the
Environmental Zone.
7. Edges between naturalized, roads and formal landscapes could
provide a clear edge that contrasts and defines the natural
vegetation.
8. Stormwater can be guided into these areas where appropriate to
maximize infiltration and reduce runoff.

Town & Country Zone Key Plan

80 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

 meadow environment should be introduced
including to accommodate
those in the Memorial both
Wood, West Park and Johnston Falls.
Type: Native species and ornamental native
51
species
recreational activities and woodland regeneration.
Trees and Shrubs: Native species listed in
the Environmental Zone in addition to: 2. Preserve and underplant all hedgerows on the campus, including
Ironwood, Dawn Redwood, Linden, Sugar those south of St. David's Gate, in Village Park and on South Campus.
• Landscape appears neglected where the edges between
Maple, Sassafras, Tulip Tree, Hemlock, Fir
and Larch. These trees may be used as
one zone and another have3. not been
specimen trees within meadows or against Create adequately
two naturalizedconsidered.
meadows alongIn the Niagara Escarpment
stands of other trees. edge for active and passive uses while preserving the views from the
particular, this condition may be of concern between the mani-
Escarpment to downtown St. Catharines and beyond. Selective mowing of
cured lawn of the Modernthese Zoneareasand
will the
allowrough
portionsturf or to
of them meadow
continue to be used for active
of the Town and Countryrecreation.
Zone. Edges should be laid out with
strong lines, as an obviously4.
designed edge looks purposeful. This
Include lighting along pedestrian routes and near building
will create an attractive landscape
entrances. of contrasting
Bollard-type elements,
light standards with
should be considered, as they P L A NT ING L I S T *Example species
the meadow habitat enhancing the mown lawn.
ensure low lighting levels and minimize disruption of natural habitat.
Type: Native species and non-invasive
5. Maintain views to the landscape from buildings and along pedes- ornamental species
• Mowing along road trianedges
routes to maintain
to enhance quality ofturf
the presence the mini- Extensive
landscape and ensure [Link] is proposed in the
mizes chance fires and facilitates litter removal. A variable mow- Campus PlanTrees and wooded
for both Shrubs: areas
Nativeand
species listed in the
meadows. Environmental Zone in addition to: Ironwood,
6. The modification of the present lawn-mowing regime within the
ing line of 3 to 5 metres, depending on the road hierarchy and site
Town and Country Zone will be a significant change to Brock University's Dawn Redwood, Linden, Sugar Maple,
conditions, should be maintained.
landscape management practices. The following guidelines have been Sassafras, Tulip Tree, Hemlock, Fir and Larch.
adapted from Restoring Natural Habitats and should be introduced to the These trees may be used as specimen trees
campus mowing regime: within meadows or against stands of other
trees
• A buffer of 5 to 10 metres should be left unmown and
Natural grasses may be considered as a allowed to naturalize, as mowing near the Environmental Zone
complement to the existing lawns. adjacent to the Town and Country Zone can damage its ecological
diversity and habitat.

Brock University Campus Plan

Development and naturalized areas should

complement each other.

Careful mowing can highlight landforms

and be an important part of the landscape
design.
Natural grasses may be considered as a complement to the lawns

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 81

Brock University Campus Plan
4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

U N I V E R SI T Y PR OJ EC T L 1

Escarpment Edge
The Niagara Escarpment is a valuable natural resource and defining
feature of the campus. There are a series of opportunities to preserve
and enhance the open space between existing buildings and the
Escarpment. Continuing to naturalize the existing landscape would
create more diverse habitat and restore the natural landscape
character to this portion of the campus. The potential creation of
a multi-use trail along the edge of the Escarpment would enhance
bicycle and pedestrian connectivity by providing a continuous
connection that links the larger pedestrian and bike networks while
accomodating smaller service vehicles. This trail would also support
passive recreation and provide connections to the Bruce Trail. Parking
and servicing area could be consolidated to minimize conflicts with
pedestrians. Blank walls and service uses facing this area should be
screened while views from windows and building entrances should
be augmented to enhance views of the Escarpment. Opportunities to
improve open space connectivity to the Escarpment should be explored
in the renewal of the DeCew Residence and service and parking areas
along the Escarpment edge. The Escarpment Edge today

82 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

 continuous multi-use trail

consolidated & screened

servicing and parking area

naturalization area

continuous multi-use trail

Illustration of the Escarpment Edge with continuous pedestrian/cycling route (looking southwest)

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 83

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

U N I V E R SI T Y PR OJ EC T L 2

Memorial Wood
The view from Schmon Tower south towards Brock Circle is an iconic
feature of the Brock landscape and there is a significant opportunity
to emphasize the relationship between the modern campus landscape
and its natural setting. Currently, the area south and west of Brock
Circle is occupied by the Rosalind Blauer Center for Child Care and
parking lot S. This is an overlooked part of the campus and the
University should pursue opportunities to enhance the relationship
to Memorial Wood and the Lake Moodie Landscape. Relocating these
uses to more accessible parts of campus would enrich the vista looking
south from Schmon Tower and Brock Mall. The naturalization of the
existing parking would extend the natural setting of Memorial wood
into campus and contrast the formal landscape of Brock Mall. Trail
connections link the campus’s pedestrian network to the Bruce Trail
and signage could support interpretive learning opportunities.

Existing view of Brock Mall toward Memorial Wood

84 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

Naturalization of existing parking
area with extended pathway
connecting to Bruce Trail

Potential to relocate existing

Center for Child Care

Mundy Wild Flower Garden, Cornell University

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 85

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

4.4.3 Modern Zone

The Modern Zone extends throughout the interior part of campus. plantings and design of the other zones. The modern zone supports
In these areas, the control over nature is evident, even celebrated, intensive use and pedestrian activity while providing and immediate
and an artistic interpretation of planting and landform is developed. setting for buildings. The planting design of streetscapes and walks
Relationships are established through geometry, which is imposed on, could utilize plants and other elements in a manner that emphasizes
or merged with, the landscape. This formalized approach is open to repetition in order to define these linear spaces and support way-
many interpretations and is intended to allow landscape designers a finding. The rows of trees within Jubilee Courtyard and the lawn of
great deal of freedom of expression. The defining characteristic of Brock Mall are classic examples of strong modern landscapes.
the modern landscape is that it stands in contrast to the more natural

Recommendations
1. Establish a formal and consistent landscape treatment for the East
and South Walks. Campus streets should also be landscaped in
consistent manner to create cohesive streetscape experience.
2. Ensure the construction of new buildings on the south side
of University Road are strongly integrated with their central
courtyards.
3. Materials and planting strategy should maximize durability and be
easily maintenaned.
4. Ensure an appropriate balance between hardscape and softscape
materials that respond to the surrounding uses.
5. Utilize formal design, vegetation and materials to distinguish
different parts of campus within the modern zone.
6. Consider potential to enhance space between Taro and BUSU
building as part of future renewal and redevelopment projects
while protecting existing hedgerow.

Modern Zone Key Plan

86 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

hat it stands in contrast to the more natural plantings and Butterfly Bush, Dogwood, Witch Hazel,
Coffee Tree, Black Locust, Mountain Ash,
53
s intended to allow landscape designers a great deal of freedom Nannyberry, Wild Rose
he other zones. The grid of trees within Jubilee Courtyard and Horse Chestnut, Scots Pine
ion. The one defining characteristic of this landscape for the Flowering Shrubs: Rhododendrons, Azaleas,
Brock Mall are classic examples of strong modern landscapes.
that it stands in contrast to the more natural plantings and Butterfly Bush, Dogwood, Witch Hazel,
Nannyberry, Wild Rose
he other zones. The grid of trees within Jubilee Courtyard and
f Brock Mall are classic examples of strong modern landscapes. 53

53

P L A NT ING L I S T *Example species

Type: Ornamental native and non-invasive
exotic species
Trees: Beech, Magnolia, Cedar, Flowering
Dogwood, Oak, Linden, Pagoda Dogwood,
Kentucky Coffee Tree, Horse Chestnut, Scots
Pine
Flowering Shrubs: Fragrant Sumac, Butterfly
Bush, Dogwood, Junipers, Spirea, Witch
Hazel, Nannyberry, Wild Rose

The one defining characteristic of the mod-

The one defining characteristic of the mod-
ernlandscape
ern landscapefor for the campus
the campus is thatis
it that it
stands in contrast to the more
stands in contrast to the more natural natural
plantings
plantings and
and design
design ofother
of the the other
zones. zones.
The one defining characteristic of the mod-
ern landscape for the campus is that it
stands in contrast to the more natural
plantings and design of the other zones.

The one defining characteristic of the modern landscape

for the campus is that it stands in contrast to the more
natural plantings and design of the other zones

ersity Campus Plan

mpus Plan
versity Campus Plan CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 87
4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

U N I V E R SI T Y PR OJ EC T L 3
Brock Mall and Circle
Brock Mall should remain the formal focus of the campus and The willow trees surrounding the Brock Circle are reaching the end of
the physical counterpoint to the natural qualities of the Niagara their lifespan. A regeneration strategy can ensure that a consistent
Escarpment and the Lake Moodie edge. The design of the open spaces and unified ring of mature trees is always part of the character of this
and buildings that comprise the Mall and the Circle should emphasize space. As the willows die they should be replaced with new willows.
this role and reinforce the north-south axis. The location for high Care should be taken to plant and maintain rings of trees that are of a
profile buildings and programs can also reinforce Brock Mall as the consistent size and provide for a vista that runs north-south and east-
highest order place on the campus and. west.
New development should define and provide a formal edge to Brock The North Mall is a key focal point of the Main Campus and its role as a
Mall South. Development should be consistently four-storeys high and transit hub makes it an important point of arrival. The sidewalk paving
create a formal and symmetrical composition around the Mall, framing could be extended and upgraded to accommodate the heavy foot
Schmon Tower and Brock Circle. The buildings should use a consistent traffic and to reflect the North Mall’s pedestrian-oriented nature. The
material and colour palette for all buildings on the Mall. The gray bus stops could be reorganized into designated bus bays. High quality
concrete block of the Alumni Student Centre and Taro Hall will not be bus shelters that fit with the existing architecture should be placed
used. on both sides of the Mall. The design of the central green open space
should reinforce the view towards the Sir Isaac Brock statue.
The landscaping of Brock Mall should reinforce the original design
vision, which proposed a flat, manicured lawn that is open and
bounded on all sides by roadway. Formal stands of trees should occupy
the outside edges of the roadways and provide a contrast to the
formality of the lawns. The hedgerow on the east side of the North
Mall should be protected.

88 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

Brock Mall looking South

Brock Circle Brock Mall looking North

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 89

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

Brock Mall and Circle

90 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

 section 1: Brock Mall Transit Centre

section 2: Brock Mall South

section 3: Brock Circle

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 91

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

U N I V E R SI T Y PR OJ EC T L 4
East Walk
The East Walk is the key pedestrian spine that extends the Main movement. Signage at important nodes will support way-finding. The
Campus, connecting the Transit Mall and the East Campus. Although buildings on both sides should be oriented to the Walk with direct
the landscape treatment varies along this already constructed western ground floor entrances. In particular, the Taro Hall expansion project
portion of the walk, it will be important to establish a cohesive, should enhance the arcade space ensuring the continuation of the
modern landscape treatment along the entire length. The repetition Walk through the Taro Hall is open and inviting. The connection across
of plant material and paving should reinforce the linear form of Glenridge Avenue could be widened with continuous paving. A formal
this open space. The Walk should have a minimum six metre width open space and should anchor the east end of the walk, similar to Sir
with consistent paving and outdoor furniture to support pedestrian Isaac Brock Plaza in the west, and provide clear a focal point.

a prominent pedestrian
potential outdoor event crossing at Glenridge Avenue
space between Taro Hall
and Student Centre
extend the walk with con-
sistent paving material and
planting strategy an entry plaza to East
the arcade space in Taro Hall Campus
could be enhanced through the
Taro Hall expansion Project better ground level con-
nection with Mackenzie a green open space
Chown Complex that anchors the
pedestrian connection terminus of the East
between Jubilee Court Campus Walk
and East Walk could be
enhanced through Taro Hall
expansion Project

East Walk

92 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

 First Street Promenade, Califonia States University

Pedestrian Crossing, Pennsylvania State University

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 93

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

U N I V E R SI T Y PR OJ EC T L 5

Jubilee Court
Jubilee court is one of the most popular open spaces on campus.
However, there is still potential to enhance this place by creating
better connections to adjacent open spaces. Reorganizing the parking
and servicing space to the north would provide three pedestrian
linkages between Jubilee Court and the Escarpment Edge. To the
south, there is an existing connection to the East Walk through A Block
of Mackenzie Chown Complex and an open space east of Taro Hall. The
Taro Hall expansion project and potential renewal of Mackenzie Chown
should consider enhancing these indoor connections, with clear sense
of direction and high quality landscape.

Jubilee Court Today

Farmers’ Market at Jubilee Court

94 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

 potential pedestrian path potential through building pedestrian enhanced pedestrian space between
on the west side of Gordon connection between DeCew Residence DeCew Residence and Schmon Tower
and Betty Valley Residence and Gordon and Betty Valley Residence; by reorganizing the landscape space,
extension of the pathway to Escarpment ramps and parking space
Edge by reorganizing Parking /Loading
Space

Illustration of Jubilee Court with enhanced connection to the Niagara Escarpment (looking southeast)

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 95

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

U N I V E R SI T Y PR OJ EC T L 6

West Common
The redevelopment of the Village, Harrison
Hall and Kenmore Centre could provide a
new campus open space at the intersection
of the academic, housing and recreational
uses. This strategic location means that the
West Common will support a variety of uses
and activities and provide focal points for the
west end of campus. This space should ensure
a mid-block connection for students travelling
between the residences and the heart of
campus and pathways should respond to the
desire lines of pedestrians. An open multi-
use grass could support a variety of uses and
events including pick-up games and picnics.
New buildings that border the Common should
orient their primary facades and entrances to
animate this spaces. The design of the space
should relate strongly to University Road.

View of West Common looking northwest

96 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

U N I V E R S I T Y PR OJ EC T L 7

East Common
As the part of the continued growth and
evolution of campus, the academic zone may
one day expand to the south side of University
Road. As part of this move, the West Common
is proposed on the south side of University
Road to provide focal points for both new
and existing development. The East Common
will become a key point of orientation for
the campus and contribute to the identity
of the University. This space should support
the surrounding academic uses and events. It
can serve as an informal gathering space and
provide mid-block pedestrian connections.
New developments that borders the Common
should orient their primary facades and
entrances to animate this space. The design
of space should relate strongly to University
Road and include hard surfacing that supports
intensive use.

View of East Common looking southwest

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 97

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

U N I V E R SI T Y PR OJ EC T L 8

South Walk
The South Walk provides both a visual and pedestrian connection
between the future South Campus and Main Campus. It provides a
dedicated pedestrian space through the large existing surface parking
area. The alley of trees and widened walkway provides a formal
promenade on one side of the street. New buildings developed along
the corridor should have their primary facade facing the Walk. The
planting and landscape design should reinforce the axis that aligns
with Schmon Tower. The walk should ensure a safe connection for
pedestrians crossing Isaac Brock Way and continue through the
development area on Weather Station Field in the form of internal
courtyard or atrium, with a prominent entrance space. A public art
installation or focal point should anchor the south terminus of the
walk.

Typical section of South Walk

98 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

 provide internal courtyard or atrium space to ex-
tend the South Campus Walk through the develop-
ment parcel

double row of trees and widened sidewalk to

provide protected pedestrian environment through
surface parking area

provide amenity space as a focal point for the

South Campus and an anchor to the South walk

South Walk CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 99

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

U N I V E R SI T Y PR OJ EC T L 9

Glenridge and Merrittville Frontage

Today the campus’s relationship to Glenridge Avenue and Merritville
Highway is characterized by large setbacks and parking lots. North
of Sir Isaac Brock Way, the character of the streetscape could evolve
over time as development occurs along this important arterial.
Glenridge Avenue should serve as the University’s front door and play
an important role in integrating East Campus. This stretch of Glenridge
Avenue should reinforce Brock’s transition to becoming a more urban
place through a consistent linear pattern of planing and trees that
enclose the wide pedestrian paths. New development will have active
at-grade uses to define and animate to the street.
South of Sir Isaac Brock Way, the campus continues to exhibit a
suburban character, but the enhanced streetscape should improve
the experience of this part of campus. The larger building setbacks
could support the creation of a green corridor that would help screen
the large surface parking areas. The existing landscape buffer could
be densely planted to screen the parking lots and provide separation
from the multi-use pathway. Bioswales could also be utilized to
support stormwater management and emphasize the town and country
landscape. The multi-use trail should be separated from the roadway Glenridge and Merrittville Frontage Key Plan
to create a comfortable environment for pedestrians and cyclists.

100 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

Typical Street Section on Glenridge Avenue

Typical Street Section on Merrittville Highway

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 101

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

4.4.5 Gateways

Gateways are places within the larger open space network that mark
the entrance or arrival to campus. They are signature places that
are closely tied to the movement network. When properly designed,
gateways support the identity and image of the University, enhance
the visitor experience and assist in way-finding.
Shaver Gate
Four gateway opportunities are identified as a University Project. The
design of buildings, streetscapes and public spaces should enhance
the sense of arrival (or departure) at these key locations. Unifying
features and treatments could be incorporated into each gateway Sir Isaac Brock Gate
at the detailed design and implementation stage. At the same time,
each gateway varies in prominence and their individual design
should respond appropriately to their context. The following sections
describes the role of each gateway and how their treatment can Norton Gate
reinforce the sense of arrival.

Schmon Gate

Gateways Key Plan

102 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

U N I V E R S I T Y PR OJ EC T L 10

Campus Gateways
Sir Isaac Brock Gate
Sir Isaac Brock Way and Glenridge Avenue is the main intersection
and entry point to campus. It should stand out as the most prominent
gateway that reinforces the sense of arrival to the University. The
west side of the intersection should establish a cohesive and formal
landscape that includes rows of ornamental trees. Brock University
may advocate for the extension of this landscape treatment eastward
on Sir Isaac Brock Way to emphasize the University’s presence and
the role of this gateway as the primary entrance to campus. Future
development should ensure landmark buildings that frame this
intersection and showcase the University.

Schmon Gate
Gateway, University of Toronto
The new entrance at Schmon Parkway and Merrittville Highway should
serve as the primary gateway to South Campus. A formal entrance
plaza and row of trees could mark the north side of this gateway. On
the south side, the existing hedgerow should be preserved and an
extensive planting bed could frame the south edge of the gateway.

Shaver Gate
This existing entrance at John Macdonell Street and Glenridge Avenue
serves as a secondary entrance to campus that also provides direct
pedestrian and cycling connections. This gateway can reinforce the
campus’s natural setting by providing natural plant material along the
edges and within the roundabout.

Norton Gate
Halfway between Sir Isaac Brock Way and Schmon Parkway, this future
secondary entrance would provide and alternative access to South
Campus. As development occurs in this area, the design of buildings to Gateway, Penn State University
the north and south should create a sense of enclosure and a generous
landscape buffer will be densely planted.
CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 103
4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

4.5 Infrastructure, Utilities and Sustainability

The Campus Plan outlines efficient patterns of campus growth and The University has made a commitment to sustainability and
mobility that provide an inherently sustainable framework for campus reductions in carbon emissions. This commitment is captured in the
growth and evolution. The University’s Infrastructure and utilities University’s Integrated Strategic Plan, which identifies sustainability as
provide the means to achieve sustainability objectives by efficiently one of seven core values, and in the University’s Sustainability Policy.
servicing existing and new campus buildings. Campus utilities include a The University’s approach to provide utilities and services to existing
district energy system (hot and chilled water), water and wastewater and new development will help to implement the commitment to
systems, stormwater, electricity and telecommunications networks, sustainability.
and other minor utilities. The extensive below-grade network of
utilities keeps the campus in operation year-round. Recommendations:

Brock’s district energy network provides one of the most efficient and 1. The University should continue to provide efficient and cost
cost-effective means of heating and cooling campus buildings. This effective utilities and services to existing and new campus
network and its central plant also provides a focused opportunity for buildings in a manner that achieves the University’s financial and
improving efficiency and minimizing contributions to climate change. sustainability objectives in the near and long term.
The University could continue to expand and improve the district 2. The University could pursue climate neutrality, and will continue
energy network and other utility systems to support new campus to publicly report its efforts through such means as Energy
development and users. Continued attention to energy conservation, Conservation and Demand Management Plans, annual Carbon
carbon emission reductions, water conservation and on-site Project report and other reporting measures.
stormwater management will minimize downstream impacts.
3. Planning for ongoing replacement and upgrades to services and
The Central Utilities Building (CUB) should continue to be the infrastructure could be part of capital planning process and should
primary home for utility and infrastructure systems. The potential demonstrate alignment with the Campus Plan and Utility Master
to expand this facility to accommodate long-term campus growth is Plan.
limited. New areas of development will require servicing solutions
uniquely tailored to the nature and intensity of uses. This may involve 4. Impacts on utilities and service networks and capacities should be
expansion of existing satellite facilities, such as those located in the regularly assessed as the University’s existing facilities evolve and
Cairns Complex, or the creation of new facilities, such as the proposed new development occurs.
cogeneration plant in the South Campus.

104 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

FIGURE 4.8.  Infrastructure and Utility Strategies

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 105

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

5. Future development in the peripheral development lands, 4.5.1 Utility Corridors and Easements
including the Lockhart Drive Lands and the East Lands, could be
serviced by municipal services independent from the University. The network of utility tunnels has provided for the growth and
evolution of campus over the past decades. The tunnel system has
6. The University may update its Utility Master Plan to incorporate provided an efficient means of servicing campus buildings, expanding
recent infrastructure investments, respond to projected growth the district energy system and adapting to changing technology.
and development needs, and reflect current university priorities. A similar approach, including utility tunnels and dedicated utility
At minimum, the Utility Master Plan should address the following: corridors, should similarly serve new areas of development.
• a strategy for the phased extension of campus infrastructure,
including future tunnels and/or easements for pipes, cables
and roads, balancing cost-efficiency and broader campus Recommendations:
planning objectives; 1. Utility corridors should be located in streets and designated
• a process for evaluating if/when buildings should have stand- utility corridors to minimize conflict for new capital projects,
alone systems; development and open spaces. Utility corridors should be
identified early in the planning and design stages for new areas
• a comprehensive energy audit strategy to identify the most of growth to minimize conflict and to ensure adequate service is
suitable energy-saving devices; available to support the long-term building out of campus.
• opportunities for the introduction of alternative energy 2. The University could continue to expand tunnel network to areas
sources, including wind, solar, geothermal and other potential of the Main Campus that are expected to experience the most
sources; intensive development. Figure 4.8 identifies the approximate
location for utility tunnel network expansion from the Cairns
• a plan for stormwater management that deals with the various Complex, which features an existing tunnel knockout panel along
aspects of stormwater runoff; and, the south face of the building to serve new development to the
• a sanitary drainage scheme that includes a pumping station south and east.
analysis and confirms the available capacities in the St. 3. Where existing utilities and easements conflict with long-term
Catharines and Thorold systems. development opportunities, the University should work to resolve
these issues through more detailed design and planning or through
planning for eventual replacement/relocation of utilities and
infrastructure.

106 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

4.5.2 Mechanical 3. The South Campus provides an opportunity for a second
cogeneration plant to serve new development on South Campus
The CUB will likely continue to be the primary source for hot and and the Brock Business Park. The exact location of the plant is
chilled water on the Main Campus. The Cairns Complex offers flexible, but it should be carefully planned and located to most
additional capacity within an area of anticipated academic growth. effectively serve new development within the South Campus and
Potential development in the South Campus and adjacent lands the Brock Business Park. Planning and design of the cogeneration
provides an opportunity for a second cogeneration plant, which could plant should include the identification and protection of protected
provide heating and chilling services for university, partnership and off corridors for steam and chilled water pipes, including public street
campus uses. crossings.
4. The athletics neighbourhood area could be served by either
Recommendations: standalone heating and chilling or through a satellite facility.
New development in East Campus will not be served by the
1. The CUB and the heating and chilled water network is generally existing campus district energy system. New development and
at capacity. Ongoing upgrades and improvements could be intensification will be served by standalone services, a new
implemented, but largely within the existing footprint. The satellite heating and cooling system for the East Campus lands.
ability to provide heating and cooling to building additions and Planning for development in East Campus and the athletics
renovations within the area served by the CUB should be confirmed neighbourhood should consider the potential to incorporate
in the planning and design process. alternative energy solutions.
2. The Cairns Complex is designed as a secondary hub for hot and
chilled water, and includes expansion areas for a new boiler and
chiller to add capacity to the campus network. New development
in the eastern portion of Main Campus will be served by the
existing or potential capacity in the Cairns Complex, and will
require tunnel/service connections to Cairns as illustrated in
Figure 4.8.

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 107

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

4.5.3 Electrical
The campus has sufficient electrical service from multiple sources and
utility providers. The Main Campus is served by Horizon Utilities. The
South Campus is served by Hydro One. The University has upgraded
electrical service to the Main Campus, which provides for existing uses
and capacity for future development.
Opportunities for alternative electrical generation should be explored,
particularly in the South Campus. Due to the existing structure and
metering of the electrical grid, solar generation is not feasible on
the Main Campus. Opportunities for large scale solar generation are
therefore limited to South Campus. The potential for generating wind
energy will need to be determined though further study.

Recommendations:
Durham College Skill Training Center Expansion with Renewable Energy System
1. Cairns Complex has a 10MW electrical feed, which provides
capacity for Main Campus development to the west and south.
New development in this area of campus could be served through surface parking lots and rooftop solar arrays in new development,
this electrical feed, which will be located in an expanded tunnel including the proposed works yard.
network as illustrated in Figure 4.8.
5. The University and potential development partners may explore
2. New development in the athletics neighbourhood could be served opportunities for micro scale solar generation in new development
by the existing electrical feed extending south from the Walker on the East Campus, particularly through rooftop solar arrays.
Complex.
6. The University may explore opportunities for smaller scale wind
3. The South and East Campus could be served by existing electrical generation, including generators that are integrated into new and
feeds located in the public street rights of way. Electrical service existing buildings.
in the South Campus may be provided by the proposed South
Campus cogeneration system.
4. Large scale solar generation opportunities are primary found in
the South Campus. The University should explore opportunities
to implement large-scale ground-mounted solar fields in large

108 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

4.5.4 Water/Wastewater
The Main Campus is currently well served by municipal water supply
and sanitary drainage. Recent investments have secured a new
watermain loop to provide a strong internal watermain network.
Development on South Campus and East Campus will operate
independently from the Main Campus watermain and sanitary
drainage.

Recommendations:
1. Development on South Campus could be serviced from Merrittville 4. Capacity in the City of Thorold sanitary sewers must be further
Highway or from other nearby watermains, as appropriate. A new investigated before development is undertaken on South Campus.
watermain loop will ensure consistent and reliable service.
5. Future sanitary drainage should be located within utility corridors
2. The University could reduce its reliance on drinking water for and streets to avoid conflict with existing and new development.
non-potable uses. Opportunities to reuse greywater for irrigation,
toilet flushing and other purposes should be explored in new 6. A sanitary drainage study could be updated as part of the Utilities
developments and major building renewal projects. In the Master Plan update in order to provide development guidelines
long term, stormwater could be used as the primary source for and phasing of infrastructure improvements for future campus
irrigation water. development.

3. There are currently no sanitary servicing constraints within the

Main Campus, and there is sufficient capacity in the system to
accommodate some new growth. Actual system capacity should be
confirmed, and downstream capacity should also be confirmed with
the City of St. Catharines.

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 109

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

4.5.5 Stormwater
Despite a large building footprint and significant impermeable surfaces
in the form of streets and parking lots, the University has not required
significant investment in stormwater management infrastructure. The
demand for stormwater quantity and quality controls may increase,
particularly in the undeveloped areas of the South Campus.

Recommendations:
1. The University should pursue opportunities to manage stormwater 4. The existing stormwater facility in South Campus could be
locally, and to reuse stormwater for irrigation purposes. protected or replaced with new development in this area of
Opportunities for stormwater retention and reuse include on site campus.
retention (e.g. roofs, holding tanks), small and large scale surface
5. In keeping with the sustainability objectives of the Campus Plan, a
stormwater holding facilities, and small scale intensive stormwater
comprehensive stormwater management plan could be completed
management and recharge facilities integrated into campus open
as part of the update to the Utilities Master Plan that addresses
spaces.
quantity and quality objectives for the campus as a whole. The
2. Development in South Campus should respond to development stormwater management plan would be developed in coordination
restrictions related to the 100-year floodline for Lake Moodie. with the City of St. Catharines, City of Thorold, Niagara Peninsula
Conservation Authority and Ontario Power Generation (Lake Moodie
3. Open spaces, natural areas and streets offer opportunities landowner).
for stormwater management. For example, the design of the
Glenridge/Merrittville streetscape includes opportunities for
bioswales and/or rain gardens. Small scale and large scale
opportunities for stormwater management should be explored in
the planning and design phases for all aspects of the public realm.

110 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

4.5.6 Communications, Data and Easements
University-owned and third party communications and data networks
extend throughout the campus to provide service to the university
community. Maintenance and expansion of networks should ensure
continued reliable service to campus users.

Recommendations:
1. Information Technology Services should continue to upgrade and
expand communications networks to provide for the growing
demand for connectivity throughout the campus environment,
including more intensively used outdoor spaces.
2. A new purpose-built data centre may be constructed to provide
a permanent home for this important function. The data centre
requires backup power systems, including an on-site electricity
generation. The location for the data centre is flexible, but it
should be integrated into a larger development. The data centre
could share space with other data centres for institutions within
the region.
3. Existing easements on campus for third party utilities, including
communications and water service, should continue to be
protected from development in accordance with the terms of the
easement agreement. The University may negotiate the terms of
these agreements where the long term intentions for the evolution
of the campus may be impeded by easements.

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS PLAN 111

4
THE C AMPU S PLAN

112 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

CH A P TE R 5
1

Introduction
Implementation

The Campus Plan outlines a framework for the evolution

of the Main Campus, East Campus, South Campus
and its peripheral development lands over the next
30 years or more. The guidance provided within this
chapter will enable the University to implement and
realize the future campus setting, demonstrating how
projects and initiatives may be achieved to support
campus planning goals. It also outlines the procedure
and processes to support campus planning decisions
and the evolution of this plan.

CHAPTER 5 IMPLEMENTATION 113

5
IM P LE M E NTATION

5.1 University Projects

5.1.1 Implementation of University Projects
The Campus Plan identifies a series of large-scale projects that Investment in University Projects
could play a significant role in improving the campus environment.
Individual renovation and new construction projects undertaken by
Due to their scale and complexity, these recommended projects
the University offer opportunities to improve the infrastructure of the
should be centrally implemented and managed by the University
campus as a whole, including the network of streets and open spaces.
administration.
The University’s Long Term Capital Plan (LTCP) and Fiscal Framework
The projects include landscape improvements that require investment enable a mix of capital projects to be undertaken for the renewal of
beyond the walls of new or existing buildings. They also include existing buildings, the construction of new buildings/additions, and the
improvements to the movement network, including pedestrian, cycling improvement of campus infrastructure, landscapes and streets.
and vehicular circulation, and transit and parking. Three additional
projects relate to renewal and new development opportunities. Protecting Investment in the Campus Setting
The significant investment in the campus setting that these individual
A full list of University Projects has been compiled here and are
and campus-wide capital projects represent, brings with it the
illustrated in Figure 5.1. University Projects that may be implemented
responsibility of ensuring the stewardship of those infrastructure
in the near-term are identified in Section 5.2. The remaining
(buildings and site) assets over time. Such stewardship includes
recommended University Projects can be implemented over time as
routine preventative inspections and maintenance, facility condition
opportunities arise and in conjunction with adjacent development.
audits of major components and systems, the preparation of capital
Despite the larger University responsibility to implement these asset management plans and reserve fund studies, and the planned
recommended projects, proponents of specific development and life-cycle extension or replacement of equipment, components, and
renewal projects should bear a responsibility to contribute common systems. These actions are made possible by allocations from the
space and local landscape improvements in keeping with the Campus University’s operating and capital budgets. A principal objective is to
Plan framework. ensure that maintenance is planned for, including the allocation of
financial resources, and is not deferred when it comes due.

114 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

 Renewal and New Development
D1. Schmon Tower Atrium
D2. Brock University Students’ Union
(BUSU)
D3. East Campus Mixed Use Node

Movement
M1. Brock Mall Transit Centre
M2. University Road
M3. Campus Drive
M4. Ring Road
M5. South Entrances

Landscape
L1. Escarpment Edge
L2. Memorial Wood
L3. Brock Mall and Circle
L4. East Campus Walk
L5. Jubilee Court
L6. West Common
L7. East Common
L8. South Campus Walk
L9. Glenridge and Merrittville Frontage
L10. Gateways

FIGURE 5.1.  University Projects

CHAPTER 5 IMPLEMENTATION 115

5
IM P LE M E NTATION

5.2 Near-Term Demonstration Plan

The Campus Plan identifies a long-term vision and

framework for growth that can gradually be achieved
over many decades. The series of systems outlined in the
previous chapters illustrated the full range of growth that
could occur as the University evolves over the long-term.
As the campus grows and evolves, ongoing management
and development decisions should be made within the
context of the long-term vision. In the near-term, the
University will need to prioritize which elements of the
plan are implemented.
The Near-Term Demonstration Plan, shown in Figure 5.2, highlights
a series of development opportunities and priority projects that
may be considered to meet the University’s needs over the next 20
years while setting the stage for future development. Today, Brock
University has used much of its existing infrastructure of roads and
parking lots to capacity. Consequently, future development will require
new investments in infrastructure to incrementally extend not only
the campus network of streets and parking, but also utilities and open
spaces in order to unlock the development potential of new areas.
The beige buildings highlight where proposed development could
occur in the near-term. These development sites have been selected
to ensure the continued expansion of a compact academic zone and
provide ample surface parking. These sites are not fixed and there may
be other opportunities that arise that are consistent with the Campus
Plan framework. The near-term plan provides an opportunity to review
the implications of decisions and frame discussion around the location
and extent of investment and infrastructure required to support this
growth.

116 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

FIGURE 5.2.  Near-Term Demonstration Plan

CHAPTER 5 IMPLEMENTATION 117

5
IM P LE M E NTATION

The demonstration plan provides flexibility and choice for Campus Renewal and Development
development decisions. Within the long-term framework, • Renew and/or redevelop buildings with the most pressing deferred
the following list of priority initiatives and University maintenance needs.
Projects have been identified for implementation
• Establish a clear focal point and front door through investment in the
consideration within the next 20 years. Implementation Schmon Tower Atrium project.
of these priority initiatives and projects would ensure the
evolving campus environment supports and protects new • Intensify East Campus through the expansion of academic uses and
development opportunities and reinforces the long-term the development of a mixed use node that may include student and
market housing, retail, and university administrative space. There
vision for the campus.
is an opportunity to partner with a private developer to help realize
this project.
• Integrate renovation of Taro Hall and construction of a new Brock
University Student Union into the campus fabric.
• Accommodate future academic expansion in parking lot A to
strengthen the physical connection between the campus core and
East Campus.
• Pursue partnership development opportunities in South Campus.
• Construct a new works yard in South Campus.

118 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

Campus Movement Campus Open Space
• Improve the Transit Mall through the construction bus bays, shelters, • Extend the East Walk to East Campus, ensuring a consistent
signage and landscaping and by restricting access by private cars and application of paving materials, plantings, street furniture and
bicycles. lighting.
• Construct two new campus entrances on South Campus to relieve • Invest in the South Walk connecting South Campus, ensuring
congestion at the Sir Isaac Brock Way intersection. consistent application of paving material, plantings, street furniture
and lighting. The existing ball diamonds may be relocated to the
• Invest in a secondary vehicular circulation route, including the vacant field in the athletics neighbourhood.
construction of Campus Drive and completion of the Ring Road
passing through the Village and connecting Brock Circle to University
Road.
• Provide surface parking for university uses as needed on South
Campus, but begin planning for a future structured parking garage.
• Invest in on- and off-campus improvements to the cycling network,
including a multi-use trail connection along the Niagara Escarpment
and a complete multi-use campus loop.

CHAPTER 5 IMPLEMENTATION 119

5
IM P LE M E NTATION

5.3 Building Design Guidelines and Precinct Plans

Chapter 6, Building Design Guidelines and Precinct Plans, is an integral The development matrix complements the precinct plan framework
part of the Campus Plan that serves as an implementation manual for drawing, providing a comprehensive table of development parameters
the Campus Plan. It provides design direction for new development and other considerations for each development and renewal
and Campus Plan projects to ensure they are implemented within site. Parameters include minimum and maximum lot coverages,
the larger campus planning framework. This chapter is intended to building heights, and gross floor areas. Permitted land uses are also
assist project managers, decision makers and other members of the indicated, with required land uses shown in bold. Enabling projects
University community to make decisions around development, project are those projects and initiatives that must be completed before
implementation and infrastructure. development takes place, such as replacement or removal of current
uses that occupy the site. Coordinated University Projects are larger
The building design guidelines provide generalized building design projects and initiatives that should be considered and addressed
direction to ensure all campus developments are built to an in the design of the site. These may include landscape projects or
appropriate standard. coordinated streetscape initiatives that should be reflected in the
The precinct plans divide the campus into four precincts in order new development. Figure 5.3 illustrate an example of a development
to provide specific place-based development parameters for framework map and a corresponding development matrix for Precinct
each development site. They consolidate the opportunities and C.
requirements for campus evolution, providing a convenient and The Precinct Plans should be referred and adhered to during all pre-
simplified framework in which to plan and evaluate campus projects construction phases of project planning, including site selection,
within the comprehensive framework of the Plan. programming, schematic and detailed design. Proposals that depart
The precinct development guidelines consist of two major significantly from the precinct plans should be subject to a review
components: a development framework map and a corresponding process where they must demonstrate that they achieve the principles,
development matrix. The precinct plan framework map locates objectives and general intent of the Campus Plan.
development and renewal parcels within the context of the Campus Where large parcels are to be developed in phases, a phasing
Plan. It identifies development sites, site planning considerations for and development plan should be created for the entire parcel in
each development site, major open space initiatives, and movement conjunction with detailed site planning for the proposed development.
infrastructure. This will ensure coordination of pedestrian and vehicular circulation
and address impacts to the larger open space and movement networks.

120 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

 PRECINCT C
Development Parameters Permitted Uses Other Development Considerations
Retained
Parcel Project Type Parcel Min/Max Permitted Uses
Building Min/Max Min/Max
Footprint Height (required in Enabling Projects Coordinated University Projects
Capacity Coverage Gross Floor Area (m2)
(m2) (Floors) bold)
(m2)
C1 New N/A 6,160 40% 60% 2 4 4,928 14,784 • academic, • Renew/redevelop Kenmore Centre • University Road
Development administrative, and Harrison Hall • West Common
athletic /
• Ring Road
recreational
C2 New N/A 5,256 40% 60% 2 4 4,204 12,613 • residential • Renew/redevelop Village Residence • Ring Road
Development

C3 New N/A 10,244 40% 60% 2 4 8,195 24,586 • residential • Renew/redevelop Village Residence • Ring Road
Development
C4 New N/A 5,327 40% 60% 2 4 4,261 12,784 • residential • Renew/redevelop Village Residence • Ring Road
Development • Memorial Wood
TOTAL 26,986 21,589 64,767

FIGURE 5.3.  Precinct Plan key map and examples of detailed precinct plan and development matrix

CHAPTER 5 IMPLEMENTATION 121

5
IM P LE M E NTATION

5.4 Administering the Plan

5.4.1 Campus Plan Implementation
The Campus Plan plays an important role in defining the Once the Board of Trustees has approved and adopted this Campus
future of the institution. This section describes how the Plan. Decisions regarding campus planning and development should
Campus Plan should be used and maintained by Brock have the benefit of the perspectives of both the Board of Trustees
and the Senate; both for general planning and development and for
University to guide decisions about campus development,
individual major capital projects (having a total Project Budget that
landscape and infrastructure improvements. It includes exceeds $1 million in value).
recommendations for how the plan can be implemented,
administered and used to guide specific projects. It also The Charter of the Board of Trustees’ Capital Infrastructure Committee
includes and specifies the actions with respect to the various activities
includes details on how the plan can be amended to ensure
of the University in the area of Planning and Development.
it remains relevant and responds to emerging University
needs. The Campus Plan should be given the highest rec- The Terms of Reference of the Senate’s Information Technology and
ognition through its formal approval and adoption by the Infrastructure Committee includes matters pertaining to policies
Board of Trustees. The Campus Plan should be regularly and standards relating to the development and effective use of the
physical and virtual spaces and resources of the University.
reviewed and updated to ensure that it continues to meet
the needs of the University as they evolve over time. To assure continuity and a shared understanding of planning intent,
purpose, and implementation along with their application to specific
major capital projects, the Office of Campus Planning, Design and
Construction Services is represented on both the Capital Infrastructure
Committee and the Information Technology and Infrastructure
Committee.
The Capital Infrastructure Committee of the Board of Trustees
approves all future elaborations or amendments to the Campus Plan
and receives an Annual Report from the University’s Administration
indicating how the Campus Plan has served the University over the past
year. The Annual Report may detail recommended amendments to be
made to the Campus Plan so that it remains current to the University’s
needs. The Annual Report should be prepared in accordance with a set
of pre-determined benchmarks and indicators to be developed by the
University in conjunction with its stakeholders. Annual reports should
be submitted to the Senate for information through the Information
Technology and Infrastructure Standing Committee.

122 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

The Campus Plan should be subject to a 10-year comprehensive
review, as required. The 10-year review will provide the opportunity
to elaborate and/or amend the Plan to reflect the needs of the
University. The decision to undertake the review should be based in
part on the recommendations contained within the Annual Reports of
the preceding years.
The Office of Campus Planning, Design and Construction Services would
prepare the Annual Reports, along with the planning reports outlined
in Section 5.4.2, and oversee the 10-yearreviews of the Campus Plan.
The University may develop more detailed Built Form Guidelines,
Landscape Standards and Architectural Standards to ensure that
campus building, landscape and architecture projects achieve a
consistent high quality. The more detailed standards would elaborate
on, and be supportive of, the guidelines contained in the Campus Plan.
The Capital Infrastructure Committee and the Information Technology
and Infrastructure Committee would receive these supplementary
guidelines and standards as information.

CHAPTER 5 IMPLEMENTATION 123

5
IM P LE M E NTATION

5.4.2 Administering the Campus Plan

The procedures for campus planning and development should be as Council, an/or the Capital Infrastructure Committee of the Board of
simple and as efficient as possible. Trustees, which would conclude with one of the following four types of
recommendations:
Project Formulation and Design Meeting
• The project is in accordance with the Campus Plan and should
Proponents of all capital building, landscape or infrastructure projects proceed;
and all restoration, upgrading and replacement initiatives should be
required to meet with the Office of Campus Planning, Design and • The project is generally in accordance with, and could be revised
Construction Services. The purpose of the meeting would be to review to be in accordance with the Campus Plan, and should proceed
and shape the plans in the context of all applicable provisions of the with modifications;
Campus Plan, having specific reference to the checklist for Project
Formulation and Review outlined in Section 5.4.4. • The project is not in accordance with certain elements of the
Campus Plan but represents an interesting new direction for the
Preliminary Planning Review and Report University, and should be considered together with appropriate
amendments to the Campus Plan; or
The Office of Campus Planning, Design and Construction Services
would complete a Preliminary Planning Review that would evaluate a • The project is at odds with the Campus Plan and should not
building, landscape or infrastructure project against the principles, proceed until significant alterations are incorporated to better
policies and design objectives of the Campus Plan and the specific align it with the Campus Plan.
considerations set out in the Checklist for Project Formulation and
Review. At this stage, the Office of Campus Planning, Design and Status and Post-Occupancy Evaluation Reports
Construction Services would look for synergies with other proposals The Office of Campus Planning, Design and Construction Services
that have been submitted, or other projects that have been reviewed, would oversee the refinement and implementation of the project upon
approved or are anticipated, to identify opportunities to consolidate approval to move forward. Status Reports and/or Post-Occupancy
design considerations and think ahead to other projects in the same Evaluation Reports documenting the evolution of the project in
area. At the same time, undesirable design solutions that would relation to the recommendations made in the Preliminary Planning
disrupt important circulation networks or spaces on the campus can be Report and the provisions of the Campus Plan would be submitted
identified and avoided or altered to mitigate incompatible features. to the Project Steering Committee (if one is established) and/or the
The Office of Campus Planning, Design and Construction Services Senate Information Technology and Infrastructure Committee and/or
would prepare a Preliminary Planning Report, to be submitted to the the Capital Infrastructure Committee of the Board of Trustees.
Project Steering Committee (if established), Senior Administrative

124 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

 5.4.3 Amending the Campus Plan
Elaborating the Campus Plan: Area Plans / Project and While the campus Plan provides a strong understanding of the present
Design Briefs / Urban Design Guidelines and likely future, it cannot anticipate all potential eventualities. It
is important that Brock University establish a system whereby the
It will occasionally be necessary to elaborate the provisions contained Campus Plan should be regularly reviewed, updated, amended and/or
in the Campus Plan, to provide more detailed specifications regarding elaborated so that it remains a relevant guide to manage growth and
programmatic and design objectives for individual projects, and in change.
particular to achieve coordination between a number of current and/
or future projects. Updates, amendments and elaborations of the Campus Plan would
be consolidated by the Office of Campus Planning, Design and
Construction Services for presentation to and consultation with
internal and/or external stakeholders for approval, as necessary, by
the Board of Trustees.

CHAPTER 5 IMPLEMENTATION 125

5
IM P LE M E NTATION

5.4.4 Checklist for Project Formulation and Review

The Checklist for Project Formulation and Review is intended as a • Appropriate size for the proposed site
key tool in shaping and evaluating all building, renovation, landscape • Creates flexible spaces that can be adapted to changing needs
and/or infrastructure projects, including maintenance, to ensure
that they meet the objectives and provisions of the Campus Plan. The • Accessible to the community, if the project includes uses that are
checklist has several levels of detail and should therefore be revisited shared with the community
as the project progresses to ensure that refinements, alterations and
resolution of project details continue to support the Campus Plan 4. Relationship to Campus Structure
principles, policies and design goals. • Appropriate relationships with the framework of streets, open
spaces and natural features, as detailed in Chapter 4
1. Project Cost/Business Plan
• Business plan detailing the required capital budget and the • Of sufficient architectural prominence to realize the full
source(s) of funds required to support it potential of a key location if the site is identified for a landmark
element
• Creates an appropriate relationship to the setting if the proposed
2. Fit with Principles, Recommendations and Figures of the site is located adjacent to an important natural area
Campus Plan
• Implements the Campus Plan principles
5. Environmental Impacts
• Complies with Campus Plan recommendations regarding access,
• Environmentally appropriate; resource and waste efficient
circulation and parking; overall recommendations for the
campus; area-specific recommendations for the campus
• Complies with all pertinent figures contained within the Campus 6. Fit with Precinct Plan Guidelines
Plan • Achieves the specific objectives detailed in the guidelines and
figures in Chapter 6 related to building footprint and orientation;
pedestrian connections; landmark elements (building, gateway,
3. Use and Location view terminus); service courts; court yards; open spaces; street
• Appropriate use of University lands parking; campus structure/connections and the creation/
• Candidate use for South Campus reinforcement of University Projects
• Appropriate site for the proposed use • Fits with the palette of materials used in its vicinity, to reinforce
the character of a particular campus area
• Fits with important patterns of interaction (existing and
anticipated)

126 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

7. Fit with Design, Built Form, Landscape and Architectural 10. Servicing/Infrastructure/Resource Requirements
Standards • Sufficient utility capacity (campus and municipal) to service the
• Complies with the University’s Building Design Guidelines development
• Complies with the University’s Landscape Standards (if • Sufficient parking supply and shuttle bus capacity to service the
applicable) development
• Complies with the University’s Architectural Standards (if • Sufficient traffic capacity on campus and/or boundary streets to
applicable) service the development

8. Accessibility and User-Friendliness 11. Approval and Permitting Requirements

• Provides measures to ensure convenience and accessibility for all • Meets City, Regional and Niagara Escarpment Commission
users, including the mobility-challenged requirements for approval
• Contributes to enhanced visitor orientation on the campus; if
it is a building, the main entrance is easy to find; if it is near a
campus entrance, if helps to guide first-time users of the campus
and visitors so that they can easily find entrances and exits into
or out of the campus

9. Coordination with Other Current or Anticipated Projects

• Coordinates well with other current or anticipated planning
initiatives or existing buildings and open spaces
• Could be expanded to provide space for other uses; could be
combined with other current or upcoming projects
• If on South Campus, there are other development opportunities
that the project could be combined with, to contribute to a
critical mass of activity

CHAPTER 5 IMPLEMENTATION 127

5
IM P LE M E NTATION

5.5 Municipal and Government Integration

Brock University is committed to being a good neighbour to its Community Relations

surrounding communities, and a good partner to the City of St.
Catharines, the City of Thorold, and the Regional Municipality of One of the key goals of the Campus Plan is to strengthen and support
Niagara by virtue of the University’s lands within the scope of this the flow of information between Brock University and the surrounding
Campus Plan. Strengthened relationships with the surroundings will be communities on matters related to the growth and evolution of the
achieved through improvements that successfully knit the campus into campus. The open process by which the Campus Plan was created
the surrounding urban fabric. These decisions will require coordination should continue through its implementation, as the University
with various municipalities to advance mutually beneficial initiatives is committed to providing timely information to the surrounding
such as integrated bicycle and trail networks, improved streetscapes community regarding upcoming development projects.
surrounding campus, enhanced transit connectivity, new development
at the edges of campus and other means.
To ensure these improvements are aligned with the Campus Plan
framework while supporting municipal objectives, the University may
continue dialogue with municipal staff and its neighbours. This could
include regularly scheduled and coordinated meetings with municipal
staff and targeted implementation studies as required. The University
should also ensure appropriate communication with surrounding
residents to promote awareness of, and receive input on, applicable
campus developments.
The Niagara Escarpment is one of Niagara’s most valued natural
heritage resources, enjoyed by members of the University and
community alike. The campus features many other natural heritage
resources that, while not as large as the Escarpment, play an
important role in the larger natural heritage network. The University
should consider developing appropriate management and development
guidelines to ensure the continued use and the long-term sustainability
of these resources.

128 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

5.6 Land Consolidation and Disposition

As a long-term public sector landowner, the University must manage its

real property assets in a prudent manner and in accordance with the
Brock University Act.
1. As opportunities arise, and where appropriate, Brock University
may acquire land, particularly if it is contiguous or in proximity to
lands currently owned by the University.
2. Within the University’s overall portfolio of properties, there may
opportunities for:
a. The divesture of University property that will avoid needed
re-capitalization of dated infrastructure and/or result in,
and better afford, the accommodation of programs more
effectively.
b. The University’s undeveloped lands to be developed for either
University purposes or non-University purposes.
3. Uses and developments that are complementary to those on the
Main Campus, and which may involve partnership arrangements,
should allow the University to obtain the highest and best use
of its land. The financial merits of such development proposals
should be assessed against the long-term opportunity cost of the
land. Development must be compatible within the overall context
of the Campus Planning Principles and be aligned with design
guidelines and, if and as applicable, Precinct Plans.

CHAPTER 5 IMPLEMENTATION 129

 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN
130
6
BU ILDING DE SIGN GU IDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS
CH A P TE R 6

Building Design
Guidelines and
Precinct Plans
Chapter 6 is an integral part of the Campus Plan,
serving as an implementation manual. It provides
design direction for new development, infrastructure
and place-making initiatives to ensure they are
implemented within the larger campus planning
framework. The building design guidelines provide
widely applicable built form direction to ensure
campus developments are built to an appropriate
standard. The precinct plans divide the campus
into smaller areas in order to provide place-based
development direction and establish specific
parameters for each development site.
CHAPTER 6 BUILDING DESIGN GUIDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS 131
6
BU ILDING DE SIGN GU IDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS

6.1 Building Design Guidelines

One of the most successful images of a university campus is a place

where the buildings and open spaces fit together as a harmonious
whole. Each building and landscape is unique, but forms part of a
larger cohesive place. Buildings of a particular status, such as Schmon
Tower, are located at prominent sites and have an architectural
expression that identifies them as special. Other buildings are of
good design and material quality, but play more of a background or
supporting role in the overall campus.
The following guidelines provide general design direction for all
campus development, including buildings, open spaces and parking
facilities. Site-specific direction and detailed development parameters
for all development sites are provided in Section 6.2, Precinct Plans.
The intent of both the general and site-specific guidelines is to ensure
the creation of high quality, durable buildings and complementary
landscaping that respond to the campus setting and reinforce a
cohesive pattern of campus growth. An overarching goal is to create
safe, attractive, interesting and comfortable spaces, both indoors and
outdoors, by maintaining high standards of architecture, landscape and
urban design, and construction.

The design of trails and walkways offers many

opportunities to enhance the character of the University.

132 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

1. New academic buildings should be 3 to 5-storeys, or a maximum of

KPMB Architects
20 metres high, unless otherwise indicated within the guidelines
specific to the development parcel. This will ensure a consistent
built environment for the campus and provide sufficient building
mass to adequately define open spaces while keeping within
the height restrictions set out in the Niagara Escarpment Plan
and zoning by-law. Most importantly, ensuring that individual
buildings are of maximum height will minimize campus sprawl and
preserve important open spaces and environmentally sensitive
areas. Landmark building elements may exceed the six-storey
limit, provided they are in keeping with the requirements of the
Niagara Escarpment Plan. East Campus is one exception, where
greater building height could be achieved through a zoning by-law
amendment in order to optimize the high profile location.
2. Buildings facing Brock Mall and Brock Circle should be a minimum
of 4-storeys high and of a consistent height, to further articulate
the formal symmetry of this space and emphasize the role and
position of Schmon Tower.
3. Where only a portion of a development parcel is developed, or
target density is not achieved, the planning and design process for
a building should take into consideration the future build-out of
the development site. This will ensure that the full potential of
the site is ultimately realized. A simple conceptual design strategy
should be developed for the entire site concurrent with the initial
building design to ensure that the remaining undeveloped portions
of the parcel can effectively be developed later as another
building or building addition. The location and spatial definition of
adjacent existing and proposed open spaces should also be taken
into consideration. The University should continue to build a bold, modern architecture of stone,
metal,glass, and in the case of the Village, brick.

CHAPTER 6 BUILDING DESIGN GUIDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS 133

6
BU ILDING DE SIGN GU IDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS

4. The material and colour palette used in the construction of the

Walker Complex should be the standard and predominant palette
for academic and administrative buildings. In particular, buildings
facing Brock Mall, Brock Circle and University Road should use this
palette. The use of Tyndall stone of a variety of finishes should be
encouraged. In place of this stone, other materials of the same
or complementary colour should be permitted on facades in less
high profile locations. This consistency of material and colour will
provide the campus with a harmonious ensemble of buildings while
still providing for variation in architectural expression.
5. A bold and modern architectural expression in keeping with the
existing academic buildings should be encouraged for all new
buildings, both academic and residential.
6. Windows and glazed window walls should be transparent, not
mirrored, and the visual connection between both interior and
exterior spaces should be emphasized, except where issues of
personal privacy are of concern. Visual connections between
interior and exterior spaces will also increase the sense of security
and safety on the campus.
7. The construction of new blank walls facing important exterior
spaces should not be permitted. The impact of existing blank walls
should be minimized through the use of plantings.
8. The design of new buildings in the academic zone should be
organized around of spacious corridors flanked with communal uses
and reception areas. These internal connections should be linked
to the larger internal pedestrian network and provide public access
through the building.
Transparency between interior and exterior spaces will add life for both places.
9. Buildings should be organized so that heavily used functions,
such as classrooms, are located close to the interior pedestrian
connections. Restricted departmental uses, offices and private labs
should be located on upper floors.

134 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

10. The ground floor of buildings should be designed to respond to the
design of adjacent landscapes and open spaces and have a direct
relationship to external pedestrian circulation. Building entrances
should be clearly identified through building massing, detailing
or other means. Active uses should be encouraged at grade to
animate adjacent open spaces.
11. Floor levels at entrance ways should align closely with adjacent
ground levels. This should ensure the appropriate connection
between interior and exterior spaces and reduce barriers for the
disabled
12. Service access should be situated and designed to reduce the
impact of the vehicles and activities while providing safe and
convenient access. Specific locations and routes for loading are Exterior pathways should lead directly to building entrances. The first floor of buildings
should be at the same level as the path outside.
identified in the Precinct Plans. Loading and servicing facilities
should be screened from view through landscaping or other means.
13. On many of the development sites, landmark building elements

Holzman Moss Bottino Architecture

are called for. These are parts of the proposed development
that should articulate both the building and the space around it.
These elements may take the form of towers, special roof forms,
highly articulated entrances or other special features of a building
that will act as distinct landmarks. These elements should be
used to highlight the intersection of important streets or open
spaces, articulate corners, or terminate view corridors. In this
way, they assist in way-finding through the campus and make the
architecture more "legible".
14. New buildings should be designed to minimize their environmental
impacts and contribute to the overall sustainability of the campus.
To this end, the university should consider applying high standards Wall elevations should establish a continuity along the facades of new buildings, as well
for sustainability, such as LEED™, to new development proposals. as in relationship to existing buildings.

CHAPTER 6 BUILDING DESIGN GUIDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS 135

6
BU ILDING DE SIGN GU IDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS

15. Buildings should be designed for flexibility, adaptability and

longevity to ensure they continue to support the University’s
evolving mission.
16. Significant new buildings should be designed to support sustainable
roofs, such as ‘green’ or ‘white ‘roofs. Roofs can also be designed
to accommodate small-scale green energy infrastructure, such as
photovoltaic or solar hot water, where appropriate.
17. Wherever possible, HVAC systems should be integrated with the
campus district energy distribution system and central energy
plant.
18. New buildings should be designed to reduce stormwater impacts,
and could incorporate, or contribute to, rainwater capture and re-
use systems.

Landmark building elements include such items as towers, special roof forms and
canopies.

136 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

6.2 Precinct Plans

The precinct plans provide a convenient and simplified framework in The precinct plans operate in two ways: first, they describe the role,
which to plan and evaluate campus projects within the comprehensive use and form of specific places on campus at a scale at which more
framework of the Campus Plan. For the purposes of project planning detailed recommendations can be best illustrated and understood;
and campus plan implementation, the campus has been divided into and second, they describe these places holistically, addressing building
four precincts (Figure 7.1). form, views, circulation, servicing and parking and other aspects of
the physical environment.
While each precinct has its own pattern of buildings, open space
and circulation, they all play an important role in supporting Brock’s
mission. The growth and evolution of each individual precinct should
contribute to achieving the vision for the larger campus. Constantly
relating back to the campus vision and master plan objectives, the
precinct plans provide detailed implementation guidelines for growth
and physical improvement in each part of campus.
The precinct plans essentially establish guidelines for development
and identify the enabling and coordinated University Projects that
must be considered in new building and renewal projects. They
provide direction for the entire campus, with specific focus on areas of
change, including both development and renewal projects.

FIGURE 6.1.  Campus Precincts

CHAPTER 6 BUILDING DESIGN GUIDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS 137

6
BU ILDING DE SIGN GU IDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS

6.2.1 How the Precinct Plans Work

Each precinct plan consists of four major components, all of which are
illustrated with existing conditions images and model illustrations. Where large parcels are to be developed in phases or with multiple
buildings, a phasing and development plan should be created for
1. The General Guidelines include an overview of the precinct and the entire parcel in conjunction with detailed site planning for the
bulleted guidelines to define the character of the area and clarify proposed development. This will ensure coordination of pedestrian
investments in open space and movement networks. and vehicular circulation, and address impacts to the larger open
space and movement networks. Phasing plans should also be
2. The Development Guidelines provide specific direction for the considered where development sites are adjacent or share important
development sites, including renewal, redevelopment and new infrastructure such as service areas. Phasing plans are identified
construction. as enabling for the larger development parcels, but they must be
undertaken in all situations where a project is not developing the
3. The Development Framework Map locates development and re- entire site.
newal parcels within the context of the Campus Plan. It identifies
development sites, site planning considerations for each development The precinct plans should be referred and adhered to during all pre-
site, major open space initiatives, and movement infrastructure and construction phases of project planning, including site selection,
initiatives. Figure 7.2 shows the development framework map for the programming, schematic and detailed design. They establish the
entire campus, and a detailed description of the components of the ground rules for development while outlining the enabling and
framework map is included in Section 7.2. coordinated University Projects that must be considered to ensure
the intended structure and function of campus is achieved. Proposals
4. The Development Matrix complements the precinct plan devel- that depart significantly from the precinct plans should be subject to
opment framework map, providing a comprehensive table of devel- a review process where they must demonstrate that they achieve the
opment parameters and other considerations for each development principles, objectives and general intent of the Campus Plan.
and renewal site. Development parameters include minimum and
maximum lot coverages, building heights and gross floor areas (in
some cases, residential uses may exceed permitted building heights).
Permitted land uses are also indicated, with required land uses shown
in bold. Enabling projects are those projects and initiatives that must
be completed before development takes place, such as replacement
or removal of current uses that occupy the site. Coordinated Univer-
sity Projects are larger projects and initiatives, typically University
Projects, that should be considered and addressed in the design of the
site.

138 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

FIGURE 6.2.  Development Framework Map

CHAPTER 6 BUILDING DESIGN GUIDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS 139

6
BU ILDING DE SIGN GU IDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS

6.2.2 Precinct Plan Elements

The following elements are illustrated Primary Pedestrian Connection Structured Parking – This indicates
in the framework maps and listed in the These are major pedestrian walks, trails development sites that have the
supporting legend for each precinct area. and other connections that establish the potential to accommodate a large parking
underlying framework for the campus structure. Site planning should protect
pedestrian network. Design guidelines will for high-volume vehicular access routes in
ensure consistency in all major pedestrian and around parking structures.
walks, including such elements as paving
materials, furniture and lighting. Where Service and Loading Zone – These
applicable, front entrances of buildings are areas around buildings that must
should be located on primary pedestrian accommodate vehicular traffic for service
connections. and loading purposes. They should
generally be located away from primary
Internal Pedestrian Connections entrances and shielded from view. These
The network of internal pedestrian areas also offer opportunities for small-
connections extends throughout the scale strategic parking lots for people
academic zone. Academic renewal and with disabilities and high-profile visitors.
expansion should continue to reinforce
this important element of the campus by Pickup & Drop-Off Zone – These are areas
ensuring new buildings provide through that will accommodate passenger pickup
connections and drop-off. They should be located in
lay-by bays close to building entrances.
Parking and Service Access
These are routes that support vehicular
access to loading areas and large-scale
parking lots. They generally do not
contribute to the larger street network.
In some cases, these access routes
are shared with important pedestrian
corridors. In these cases, access routes
should be designed primarily as pedestrian
routes with the potential to accommodate
service and loading traffic.

140 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

Development Parcel – These are the sites Primary Entrance – These are the recom- University Project: Open Space – These
that can accommodate development. The mended locations for building entrances, are University Projects (landscape) that
development parcels do not necessarily which are generally located along the represent specific improvements to the
indicate the total floor area of devel- highest order pedestrian route. While open space network. They are identified in
opment. They also include landscaping, there is some flexibility in the location of Section 4.4 of this Plan, and the full list of
courtyards, walkways, service/loading ar- primary entrances, they should be located initiatives is provided in Section 7.3.
eas or other features that extend beyond along key building frontages. In some cas-
the walls of the building. The develop- es, building may require multiple primary University Project: Streetscape – These
ment matrix indicates the specific param- entrances. are University Projects (landscape) that
eters for parcel coverage. represent specific improvements to street-
Landmark Element – These are readily scapes. They are identified in Section 4.4
Renewal Site – These are existing build- identifiable buildings or objects which of this Plan, and the full list of initiatives
ings that require significant investment serve as focal points and support way- is listed in Section 7.3.
to restore building and space conditions. finding and identity. The design of these
Due to the inability of some spaces to elements should reflect their prominent University Project: Movement – These are
accommodate current uses, some renewal locations. University Projects that represent specific
sites should be renewed to accommodate improvements to the movement network.
new uses. In some cases, renewal sites Gateway – These are important points of They are identified in Section 4.3 of this
may also accommodate building additions transition between the city and campus. Plan, and the full list of initiatives is listed
where they are sensitively designed and Gateways should feature a consistent Section 7.3.
do not adversely impact adjacent struc- approach to landscape, street and pedes-
tures. trian network design to signify arrival at
campus and assist with way-finding.
Key Building Frontage – Building front-
ages should generally be aligned with
the key building frontage line to create a
consistent streetwall. Primary entrances
and active uses should be located along
key building frontages, and loading areas
should avoid building frontages.

CHAPTER 6 BUILDING DESIGN GUIDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS 141

6
BU ILDING DE SIGN GU IDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS

6.2.3 Integration of University Projects

The Precinct Plans refer to the University Renewal and New Development Landscape
Projects as described in Section 5.1 of
this Plan. These projects play a direct D1. Schmon Tower Atrium L1. Escarpment Edge
role in improving the larger campus D2. Brock University Students’ Union (BUSU) L2. Memorial Wood
environment and achieving the vision for D3. East Campus Mixed Use Node
the plan. Due to their scale and complexity, L3. Brock Mall and Circle
implementation of these projects will
Movement L4. East Walk
largely be the responsibility of the University
administration, rather than through individual L5. Jubilee Court
M1. Brock Mall Transit Centre
capital projects.
M2. University Road L6. West Common
Figure 7.4 illustrates the following University
Projects. These projects are illustrated in the M3. Campus Drive L7. East Common
framework maps and a list relevant projects
M4. Ring Road L8. South Walk
are included for each precinct area.
M5. South Entrances L9. Glenridge and Merrittville Frontage
New development and infrastructure projects
must support and not restrict implementation L10. Gateways
of larger University Projects. In some
cases, implementation of development,
infrastructure, and University Projects may
be coordinated for cost effectiveness and to
minimize disruption.

142 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

FIGURE 6.3.  University Projects

CHAPTER 6 BUILDING DESIGN GUIDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS 143

6
BU ILDING DE SIGN GU IDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS

Precinct A: East Precinct

General Guidelines • Sir Isaac Brock Gate should emphasize
this intersection as the main entrance
Future development of the East Precinct to campus by ensuring the buildings and
represents an opportunity to establish a new landscape create a heightened sense of
face and front door for the University along arrival. Coordination with the Region and
Glenridge Avenue. The arterial road intersects Cities to reinforce this character along Sir
the precinct, which currently consists of Isaac Brock Way.
academic and retail uses surrounded by
surface parking lots. This suburban pattern of • A series of interconnected open spaces
built form creates a barrier to connectivity. and walkways should be created as part of
The overall character of this precinct will future development. Service access and
evolve considerably over time to become pedestrian routes should be designed to
an urban mixed use node, supporting a mix minimize conflicts and address front to
of academic, partnership, administrative, back relationships.
residential and service uses. Significant
investment in place-making will unlock the • The University may consider the
East Precinct Key Plan development potential of this area. construction of a parking structure on the
existing surface lot at the corner of Isaac
• The East Walk should extend across Brock Boulevard and the future Campus
Glenridge Avenue to new development to Drive. This would address the potential
the heart of campus. The use of similar parking deficiencies for the entire campus
paving materials, plantings, lighting in the long-term.
and street furniture will reinforce the
consistency of this important walk as it • Proposed development west of Glenridge
extends east into East Campus. Avenue should provide internal building
connections linking to the existing internal
• Streetscape improvements along pedestrian network of the academic core.
Glenridge Avenue should provide a
cohesive landscape and serve as a
welcoming front door of University. The
setback should be minimized along East
Campus, but can be wider north of John
Macdonell Street.

144 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

East Precinct Demonstration Plan - View from South

CHAPTER 6 BUILDING DESIGN GUIDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS 145

6
BU ILDING DE SIGN GU IDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS

Precinct A: East Precinct

Development Guidelines • Parcel A3 is a similarly high profile
location that can accommodate a mix
The East Precinct has the potential to of uses. Future development should
accommodate future development and respond to its corner location. The large
provide a continuous built form and across development site should be broken up
Glenridge Avenue. New development should into multiple buildings with frontage on
leverage the emerging opportunities off both Glenridge Avenue and Isaac Brock
campus to grow the existing mix of uses and Boulevard. The site along Campus Drive
create a complementary node of activity. should be reserved for a future parking
Improvements to the movement network garage that should be screened from
and demolition of small existing facilities Brock Mall.
will create large, relatively unconstrained
development sites. • Development of Parcels A1 and A2 should
ensure that buildings are oriented towards
• Parcels A6, A7 and A8 should be the East Walk. The development of parcel
developed as an integrated whole. A2 can integrate a pedestrian bridge over
The high profile site along Sir Isaac Glenridge Avenue to provide an interior
Brock Way should feature a showcase connection to the East Campus Mixed Use
university development. The mixed used Node.
development could accommodate office,
retail and high density residential uses. • The existing East Academic Buildings
Residential uses should be located above Parcel A5 could be redeveloped to support
non-residential uses. Buildings could a higher use. The prominent location at
have a 3 to 5-storey podium with two the terminus of the East-West Pedestrian
residential elements reaching a maximum Walk is well-suited for a landmark
of 12-storeys. Development may be building.
phased to allow the existing pad fast food
restaurants to remain while the remaining • The International Centre (Parcel A4) can
site is redeveloped. Comprehensive be expanded by adding two wings with
site planning for these parcels should a central courtyard that connects to the
coordinate servicing, parking, pedestrian pedestrian circulation network.
circulation and other shared functions. • Consider constructing a structured parking
Structured parking may need to be on the existing Parking Lot M in the long-
provided on site. term as other surface parking lots are
developed.
146 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN
 Glenridge Avenue
Glenridge Avenue

A4
A1
East Academic
Building
East Walk A5

A6
A2

A7 A8 ay
ckW
ay Bro
kW ac
roc Isa
a cB Sir
Isa P
Sir

A3

Glenridge Avenue
Isaac Brock Boulevard
Isaac Brock Boulevard

East Precinct Existing Conditions East Precinct Demonstration Plan

CHAPTER 6 BUILDING DESIGN GUIDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS 147

6
BU ILDING DE SIGN GU IDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS

Precinct A: East Precinct

Coordinated University Projects
M3 Campus Drive
L4 East-West Pedestrian Walk
L9 Glenridge Avenue and Merrittville
Highway Frontage
L10 Gateways

FIGURE 6.4.  Precinct A Development Framework Map

148 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

 PRECINCT A
Development Parameters Permitted Uses Other Development Considerations

Parcel Project Type Parcel Min/Max Permitted Uses

Min/Max Min/Max
Footprint Height (required in Enabling Projects Coordinated University Projects
Coverage Gross Floor Area (m2)
(m2) (Floors) bold)
A1 New 7,072 60% 80% 3 5 12,730 28,288 • academic • Relocate existing surface parking • Campus Drive
Development • partnership • Phasing plan • Campus Gateway
• retail • East Walk
• Glenridge Frontage
A2 New 6,226 60% 80% 3 5 11,207 24,904 • academic • Relocate existing surface parking • Campus Drive
Development • partnership • East Walk
• retail • Glenridge Frontage
• student service
/ amenity

A3 New 16,444 50% 70% 3 5 24,665 57,553 • academic, • Relocate existing surface parking • Campus Drive
Development mixed use • Phasing plan • Campus Gateway
• parking struc- • Glenridge Frontage
ture
A4 Facility 4,240 80% 90% - 3 • academic • Relocate existing surface parking
Renewal and
expansion
A5 New 3,095 70% 90% - 6 2,166 16,712 • academic • Demolish East Academic buildings and • East Campus
Development • administrative relocate current uses • East Walk
• Glenridge Frontage

A6 New 1,633 80% 90% 3 5 3,918 7,347 • academic • Relocate existing surface parking • East Campus
Development • retail • East Walk
• administrative • Glenridge Frontage
• student service
/ amenity
• residential
A7 New 6,627 40% 80% 3 12 7,952 16,567 • academic • Demolish Heritage Place Plaza and • East Campus
Development • retail relocate current uses • Glenridge Frontage
• administrative
• student service
/ amenity
• residential
A8 New 4,910 40% 80% 3 12 5,892 12,275 • academic • Remove existing pad fast food • East Campus
Development • retail restaurants • East Walk
• administrative
• student service
/ amenity
• residential
TOTAL 50,246 68,531 163,647

FIGURE 6.5.  Precinct A Development Matrix

CHAPTER 6 BUILDING DESIGN GUIDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS 149

6
BU ILDING DE SIGN GU IDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS

Precinct B: Centre Precinct

General Guidelines high volumes of pedestrians. Access to
the Mall should be controlled and vehicle
The Centre Precinct is the heart of academic pickup and drop-off areas should be
and social life on campus. The precinct moved to University Road.
is characterized by a complex network of
interconnected buildings that support a mix of • University Road should be improved
academic and supportive uses that serve the to support future development
university community. The Centre Precinct is and movement on campus. Future
bounded by the rugged Niagara Escarpment to improvements to the right-of-way
the north and linked to Lake Moodie by Brock should support vehicle drop-off, cycling
Mall to the south. These large open spaces and pedestrian movement. Landscape
should continue to provide a unique campus treatment should ensure a cohesive
setting and future renewal and investment streetscape that integrates adjacent open
should enhance the relationship to these spaces.
elements. Improvements to the movement
network will strengthen connections to other • The relationship to the Niagara
parts of campus and reinforce its integral role Escarpment and Lake Moodie should be
Centre Precinct Key Plan
in the campus structure. enhanced to integrate the unique campus
setting. These natural heritage features
• Brock Mall is the most iconic open space should continue to be protected and
on campus and it should be a focal point celebrated through trail connections,
for new development. A coordinated opening and framing of views and
planting strategy should ensure that the naturalized landscaping.
mall matures as a single, integrated open • Building renewal and future development
space. The open space should integrate a should continue to provide through
number of adjacent landscapes, including building connections linking to the
Memorial Wood, the East Walk, the South existing internal pedestrian network of
Walk and the East Common. the academic core.
• North Brock Mall should continue to • The space between Taro and the Student
support transit and serve as an important Centre needs could serve as a vibrant
point of arrival. The transit infrastructure and active space that can be used
and landscape should be renewed to spontaneously as well as for outdoor
support this role and accommodate the events.

150 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

Centre Precinct Demonstration Plan - View from South

CHAPTER 6 BUILDING DESIGN GUIDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS 151

6
BU ILDING DE SIGN GU IDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS

Precinct B: Centre Precinct

Development Guidelines Walk that passes through the site as either
an interior or exterior courtyard. Loading
The concentration of buildings in the Centre and service access should be oriented
Precinct means that most change will occur away from Brock Mall.
either through renewal of existing buildings
or by new development south of University • Development Parcel B3 should frame the
Road. Aging facilities should be assessed to East Common and Brock Mall and animate
minimize deferred maintenance. The renewal these open spaces through active uses at
and replacement of buildings provides grade.
an opportunity to meet the University’s
evolving needs and enhance place-making. • Renewal and redevelopment along
Large floorplate development sites south of the East Walk, including Taro Hall and
Mackenzie Chown (Parcels B2 and B6), Existing view of Schmon Tower from Brock Mall South
University Road can accommodate a variety
of high-density and large-scale academic should orientate important building
uses and activities, such as research and entrances towards the walk to strengthen
laboratories. the importance of this major pedestrian
spine. Future development of Taro Hall
• The renewal of Schmon Tower (Parcel B1) and the BUSU site should open up onto the
should strengthen its roles as the focal East Walk.
point of campus and the anchor to Brock
Mall. The existing plaza at the base of the • The renewal of DeCew Residence should
tower will be enclosed to accommodate ensure that views and pedestrian
services and amenities while improving connections to the Niagara Escarpment
the internal campus circulation. are enhanced.

• Parcels B4 and B5 front onto Brock Mall • Development of Parcels B3 and B4 will
which provides a high profile location require extending the utility tunnel Existing view of East Walk Looking East
that should feature showcase buildings network from the Cairns Complex.
that reinforce the prominent open space.
Development should consider the existing
utility easements. Parcels could be
broken up into multiple buildings with key
frontage on both Brock Mall and University
Road. Parcel B4 should integrate the South

152 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

 Niagara Escarpment Niagara Escarpment

Jubilee Court

Jubilee Court
B1
B6
B2 East Walk
Brock Mall
Brock Mall
Transit Centre
Transit Centre

University Road University Road

Weather Station B3 East

B4
Field Brock Mall Common
Brock Mall B5
South
South

Brock Mall Brock Mall

Brock Circle East Brock Circle East

Sou
th
Memorial

Wa
Wood

lk
Centre Precinct Existing Conditions Centre Precinct Demonstration Plan

CHAPTER 6 BUILDING DESIGN GUIDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS 153

6
BU ILDING DE SIGN GU IDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS

Precinct B: Centre Precinct

Coordinated University Projects
M1. Brock Mall Transit Centre
M2. University Road
M3. Campus Drive
L1. The Escarpment Edge
L3. Brock Mall
L5. Jubilee Court
L4. East-west Pedestrian Walk
L7. East Quad

FIGURE 6.6.  Precinct B Development Framework Map

154 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN
 PRECINCT B
Development Parameters Permitted Uses Other Development Considerations

Parcel Project Type Parcel Min/Max Permitted Uses

Min/Max Min/Max
Footprint Height (required in Enabling Projects Coordinated University Projects
Coverage Gross Floor Area (m2)
(m2) (Floors) bold)
B1 Facility Renew, 1,718 100% 1 2 1718 0 • student service • Brock Mall Transit Centre
Capital Project, / amenity
Schmon Tower
Atrium
B2 Facility Renew, 3,237 100% 0 0 • Brock Mall Transit Centre
Capital Project • East Walk

B3 New 11,240 60% 80% 3 5 20232 44960 • academic • Phasing Plan • Brock Mall
Development • students' union • Assess existing utility easements • East Common
• Extend the utility tunnel network • University Road
from the Cairns Complex • South Campus Walk

B4 New 8,101 70% 90% 3 5 17011 36453 • academic • Extend the utility tunnel network • East Common
Development from the Cairns Complex • Campus Drive
• Relocate existing surface parking • University Road

B5 New 8,420 30% 60% 3 5 7578 25259 • academic • Phasing Plan • Brock Mall
Development • Relocate existing surface parking • University Road
• Site servicing • West Common

B6 Facility 4,007 0 0 • academic • East Walk

Renewal • Escarpment Edge

TOTAL 36,722 46,539 106,672

FIGURE 6.7.  Precinct B Development Matrix

CHAPTER 6 BUILDING DESIGN GUIDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS 155

6
BU ILDING DE SIGN GU IDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS

Precinct C: West Precinct

General Guidelines • The East Common should provide an
inviting focal point for the East Campus by
The West Precinct serves as the home of supporting activities and events related to
athletic and recreation facilities, and student the adjacent buildings and smaller scale
housing. Located at the end of University recreational activities. The open space
Road, the precinct is close to the campus should also support pedestrian movement
core, but benefits from a quiet and green from the residence to the heart of
setting. While the precinct offers some campus.
development opportunities, its character and
uses should remain largely the same with • The natural area surrounding Lake Moodie
large portions remaining undeveloped as should be protected through naturalized
outdoor athletic and recreational resources. buffers and other means.
• Completion of the Ring Road would • Consolidate and expand parking close to
improve circulation for vehicles, athletic facilities.
pedestrians and cyclists by connecting the
end of University Road to Brock Circle. • Fields can evolve to support the
West Precinct Key Plan University’s athletic and recreation needs,
The construction of the Ring Road would
require the removal of a small portion of including baseball diamonds.
residences within the proposed right-of-
way.
• University Road should be improved to
provide additional pickup, drop-off and
cycling functions. The landscape should
create a consistent streetscape and
integrate adjacent open spaces, such as
the West Common. A signature public art
installation could be accommodated at
the terminus of University Road.

156 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

West Precinct Demonstration Plan - View from South

CHAPTER 6 BUILDING DESIGN GUIDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS 157

6
BU ILDING DE SIGN GU IDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS

Precinct C: West Precinct

Development Guidelines
While the West Precinct has a limited
number of new development sites, there are
opportunities for renewal and replacement of
existing buildings, including the Village. This
could happen over time in several stages.
• The Village Residence (Parcels C2, C3 and
C4) should continue to evolve to meet the
needs of the University. Intensification
of the existing townhouses provides an
opportunity to provide an alternative
The Village Residence University Road Looking West
model and form of student housing. A
range of housing types can be explored to
accommodate university housing needs.
Building frontages should be oriented
towards the Ring Road. Access to parking
and service should minimize conflict with
pedestrians.
• Harrison Hall, Kenmore Centre, and the
Carnochan and Kirby blocks of Village
townhouses (Parcel C1) provide a large
development site close to the heart of
campus. This site has the potential to
support a variety of uses. Development
should orient key frontages towards the
East Common.

158 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

 University Road
University Road
Harrison Kenmore

Ring Road
Hall Centre

West
C1 Common
C2

The Village
Residence
C3

C4

West Precinct Existing Conditions West Precinct Demonstration Plan

CHAPTER 6 BUILDING DESIGN GUIDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS 159

6
BU ILDING DE SIGN GU IDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS

Precinct C: West Precinct

Coordinated University Projects
M2. University Road
M4. Ring Road
L6. West Common
L2. Memorial Woods

FIGURE 6.8.  Precinct C Development Framework Map

160 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN
 PRECINCT C
Development Parameters Permitted Uses Other Development Considerations

Parcel Project Type Parcel Min/Max Permitted Uses

Min/Max Min/Max
Footprint Height (required in Enabling Projects Coordinated University Projects
Coverage Gross Floor Area (m2)
(m2) (Floors) bold)
C1 New 6,160 40% 60% 3 5 7392 18479 • academic, • Phasing Plan • Ring Road
Development administrative, • Demolish Kenmore Centre, Harrison • University Road
athletic / Hall and 2 courts of Village • West Common
recreational Residences
C2 New 5,256 40% 60% 3 5 6307 15767 • residential • Demolish 3 courts of Village • Ring Road
Development Residences

C3 New 10,244 40% 60% 3 5 12293 30732 • residential • Demolish 4 courts of Village • Ring Road
Development Residences
C4 New 5,327 40% 60% 3 5 6392 15980 • residential • Demolish 2 courts of Village • Memorial Wood
Development Residence • Ring Road
TOTAL 26,986 32,383 80,958

FIGURE 6.9.  Precinct C Development Matrix

CHAPTER 6 BUILDING DESIGN GUIDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS 161

6
BU ILDING DE SIGN GU IDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS

Precinct D: South Precinct

General Guidelines • Streetscape improvements along
Merrittville Highway should enhance the
The South Precinct is characterized by large landscape quality and establish a green
surface parking lots and open space, and corridor along the edge of South Campus.
remains largely undeveloped. It has the
potential to establish new territory and a mix • The creation of two new entrances
of uses that support the University. The South would improve access and circulation on
Precinct aims to provide a flexible foundation campus. The entrances will provide an
for development that could accommodate alternative access to the surface parking
a range of university uses and partnership lots and relieve congestion at the Sir
activity. While the pattern of development Isaac Brock Way intersection. Landscape
may be less dense and accommodate improvements to these gateways should
several surface parking lots, pedestrian and reinforce them as important points of
landscape improvements should be prioritized arrival on campus.
to enhance walkability and create a sense of
place. • Campus Drive should be extended south
to connect to the new campus entrances
South Precinct Key Plan
• The South Walk create a link to the to overall movement network. Campus
heart of campus while framing an iconic drive should be a complete street that
view of Schmon Tower. A focal point, accommodate vehicles, pedestrians and
consisting of public art installation or cyclists.
landmark building, should anchor the
southern terminus of the walk. Consistent • Natural heritage features and stormwater
materials, lighting and planting should management should be evaluated and
reinforce this important pedestrian should be protected and integrated as
axis. Parking and service access should appropriate.
minimize conflicts with pedestrians.

162 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

South Precinct Demonstration Plan - View from South

CHAPTER 6 BUILDING DESIGN GUIDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS 163

6
BU ILDING DE SIGN GU IDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS

Precinct D: South Precinct

Development Guidelines development should create a strong
presence along Merrittville Highway and
The significant opportunities for development should incorporate a landmark building at
in the South Precinct mean that it could see key gateway locations.
major transformations over long-term and
emerge as an important place on campus. • Parcel D6 is a large development parcel
The development potential can be unlocked that could accommodate a variety of
by investing in new infrastructure and uses. The siting of multiple buildings and
landscapes. The large development sites roadways will depend on the integration
provide flexibility to accommodate a wide of existing watercourses and stormwater
variety of uses and activities. management facilities.
• Development in South Campus should be • A future cogen plant could be located on View towards South Precinct from Isaac Brock Boulevard South
planned at a height and density that make parcels D4 to D7, subject to technical
efficient use of the University’s lands. study. The specific location and building
design should be integrated with the
• All development sites will require the surrounding campus environment and
provision of utilities and infrastructure. A minimize the impact of blank walls on
master servicing plan should be completed surrounding uses.
prior to significant development to
determine the servicing capacity and • The existing works yard should be
opportunities for district energy and a relocated to Parcel D7. The works yard
cogen plant. should be sufficiently buffered from
incompatible uses through vegetated
• The high profile frontage along Merrittville buffers, locating loud and disruptive uses
Highway (Parcels D1, D2 and D3) benefits to the west and south edges of the site.
from the good visibility and access and
could accommodate research uses similar
to the adjacent Business Park. Future

164 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

 Sir Isaac Brock Gate

Sou
D4 D1

th
Wa
lk

Merrittv ille Hwy

Potential Cogen

Merrittv ille Hwy

Plant
D5

D6 Nortan
Gate

D2

Potential D7
Works Yard
Existing
Works Yard Schmon
Gate

D3

South Precinct Existing Conditions South Precinct Demonstration Plan

CHAPTER 6 BUILDING DESIGN GUIDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS 165

6
BU ILDING DE SIGN GU IDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS

Precinct D: South Precinct

Coordinated University Projects
M3. Campus Drive
L8. South Walk
L9. Glenridge/Merrittville Frontage
L10. Gateways

FIGURE 6.10.  Precinct D Development Framework Map

166 BROCK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLAN

 PRECINCT D

Permitted Uses Other Development Considerations

Parcel Project Type Parcel Permitted Uses

Footprint (required in Enabling Projects Coordinated University Projects
(m2) bold)
D1 New 26,857 • non-retail • Site servicing • Campus Drive
Development mixed use • Campus Gateways
• partnership • Merrittville Highway Frontage
D2 New 15,138 • non-retail • Relocate existing works yards • Campus Drive
Development mixed use • New entrance • Campus Gateways
• Site servicing • Merrittville Highway Frontage
• South Walk

D3 New 19,373 • non-retail • New entrance • Campus Drive

Development mixed use • Site servicing • Campus Gateway
D4 New 7,590 • non-retail • Campus Drive • Campus Drive
Development mixed use • Site servicing • Memorial Wood
D5 New 6,266 • non-retail • Campus Drive • Campus Drive
Development mixed use • Site servicing • South Walk
• cogen plant

D6 New 57,032 • athletic / • Phasing Plan • Memorial Wood

Development recreational • Street infrastructure • South Walk
• mixed use • Site servicing
• cogen plant
D7 New 34,101 • athletic / • Phasing Plan • Campus Drive
Development recreational • New entrance
• service yard • Campus Drive and street
• cogen plant infrastructure
• Site servicing
TOTAL 394,266

FIGURE 6.11.  Precinct D Development Matrix

CHAPTER 6 BUILDING DESIGN GUIDELINES AND PRECINCT PLANS 167