Komila Abdusalomova GE 114

📌Topic: Printed newspapers have no future

Before the emergence of digital media, newspapers were very popular among
local communities.But the situation has changed. Printed newspapers are
believed to have no future.
I completely agree with this viewpoint because of 2 main reasons which will be
discussed in this essay.
Firstly, in today's world newspapers are not interactive enough. In that case,
the majority of people prefer to choose TV or online news instead of paper
sources of information. Moreover, having access to read news for free from net,
people do not want to go outside in order to purchase newspapers. As a result,
the usage of newspapers will gradually decrease since people can read news from
net with much cheaper an easier access.
Another point to consider is that newspapers can be detrimental to
environment. In order to produce large amount of newspapers, publishers have
to use a lot of papers to print on it. Also, 24 trees are needed to create 1 tonne of
newspaper. Furthermore, it is unable to sell all newspapers in a day. So, they will
become trash which affect badly to environment.
To sum up, newspapers can be disappeared due to having access to read
news online.
Durdona GE 114
You can’t trust lots of the stuff you read on the internet. The internet takes an
important role in our lives. In the past we didn’t have internet. We use
newspapers for read news.
Exatly with internet everything became esearly. On the we have quite more
sites,apps,chanels wich release news. We often read daily news and learning new
for ourselves. However this news doesn’t always true or happen. Many people
belive this so there are have conflict or misunderstandings.
I think this wrong news share or release from new sites that want to pay
attention so be better than the rest, others. As I heard, many chanels in the
telegram or in advertisements are far from wrong.
Often we can read the news on the newspapers or watch on the TV. There are
correct than on the internet. However not far better
Mahbuba GE 114
 In here talk about printed newspapers are more useful than electronic
newspapers and most people think nowadays some gadgets making
unhealth.Consequently I disagree the opinion,as a lots of humans like and want to
printed newspapers.
Apparently,newspapers from papers are most comfortable.The easy thing
about writing or mark it the important places.Also you can feel it.Whenever take
it,you will understand the pleasure of holding it.It is not only newspapers,it might
all types of books.Again you can touch the letters with your fingers.Essential thing
is:if you need to close the jurnal you can mark and after you will find easly.Besides
it keep a long time if is not fire.
Meanwhile,electronic are comfortable too,but, they have in poor
health.Mainly old residents suffer for read it.It is complex to them.The awful
thing about damaging is everyone's eyes. These days not only old humans,
possibly teenagers have seeing problems. Unfortunately,the issues have been
around three and four ages children too.And young people have been lazy and
they learn subjects slowly. From what I understand people need to interval from
gadgets and they should take care of their health.
To conclusion, We need to relax without gadgets or all electronics. And my
advice,you should walk and read something at outdoors. Cause this relaxing
make pleasure and you feel your body more healthy than before.
ZIlola GE 114
It’s true that nowadays digital media has significantly impacted the publishing
industry, but it has not completely replaced traditional print format. People have
been reading newspapers for decades and will continue to do so. Why?
Firstly, the oldest generations may struggle to use search engines to find the
articles they require and wish to read while young people can easily use laptops in
order to read information digitally.
Secondly, a significant number of senior readers do enjoy attending public
libraries, reading weekly newspapers and sharing their thoughts with each other.
They get great pleasure from it.
And finally, many people buy printed materials because they value the
experience of reading newspapers. Some people love the smell of newspapers.
In conclusion, I can safely say that as our generation grows up online newspapers
are completely replacing traditional ways of reading from printed ones and
switching to online platforms
Otabek GE 114
Printed newspapers have no future
It's not a secret that the newspaper industry faces significant challenges in
recent years because of digital media has been becoming popular and more
available among people. But it would be deception to say newspapers don't
have a future.
In the modern world the majority of people read news in the websites,
Telegram channels , on special apps or in other media networks and we
sometimes forget about newspapers which role is giving us news but we all know
that all people in the 21st century are always in a hurry and not everyone has a
time to sit and read news in a newspapers . Usually our grandparents read
newspapers since they used to do it when there were no social media networks
and they really enjoy when they sitting in a garden , feeling papers and their smell
. Personally I like reading newspaper. When I open this huge papers and just read
everything. Usually it happens when I’m visiting my grandparents.
Another reason why newspapers will not have a future is that to print one
newspaper you need a lot of time but online news sources are giving you real-
time updating , gives you a huge variety of news and you can find and read what
you’re interested in. And now we don’t need a special journalist who will write
news . Recently online news sources use “Crowdsourcing” which can help to get
any news or information from members of the public . For giving information this
news sources reward people with money.
In contrast, we cannot guarantee that newspapers would not exist because
the people behavior is might change and he will want to read newspaper more
than in the screen and I wave away from this fact that newspapers will not have a
future
Iroda 634
There is a longstanding debate regarding whether teenagers should concentrate
on all subjects at school or focus on the subject they excel in or are most
interested in. While some argue that a well-rounded education is essential for
personal development, others contend that specialization allows for greater
mastery and success in the long run. In my opinion, a balance between the two
approaches is crucial to ensure a comprehensive education and individual growth.
On one hand, proponents of the first viewpoint argue that teenagers should be
exposed to a wide range of subjects to develop a diverse skill set. They believe
that this approach fosters critical thinking, creativity, and adaptability. By studying
various subjects such as mathematics, science, literature, and history, teenagers
gain a broader understanding of the world around them. This enables them to
make connections between different disciplines and develop a holistic
perspective. Moreover, a well-rounded education equips students with a wide
range of knowledge and skills, which can be useful in their future careers and
personal lives.
On the other hand, advocates for specialization argue that teenagers should focus
on the subject they excel in or are most passionate about. They contend that by
concentrating on a specific area, individuals can achieve a higher level of expertise
and success. When teenagers are allowed to pursue their interests, they are more
likely to be motivated and engaged in their studies. This can lead to better
academic performance and personal fulfillment. Furthermore, by specializing in a
particular subject, students can develop unique skills that may be in demand in
the job market. This specialization can provide them with a competitive
advantage when seeking employment or pursuing higher education.
While both perspectives have their merits, I believe that a balanced approach is
necessary. Teenagers should be encouraged to explore a variety of subjects
during their early years of education to develop a broad foundation of knowledge.
This exposure allows them to discover their strengths and interests, which can
then guide their academic pursuits later on. However, once these strengths and
interests become apparent, teenagers should have the opportunity to focus more
on those subjects. This specialization enables them to delve deeper into the
subject matter, develop expertise, and pursue their passions.
In conclusion, the question of whether teenagers should concentrate on all
subjects at school or focus on their strengths and interests is a complex one.
While a well-rounded education is important for personal development,
specialization can lead to greater mastery and success. Striking a balance between
the two approaches allows teenagers to explore various subjects initially and then
specialize in the areas they excel in or are most interested in. By doing so, they
can acquire a comprehensive education and foster individual growth.
Mubina Asamjonova GE 634
The growing number of overweight people is putting a strain on the health care
system in an effort to deal with the health problems involved. Some people think
that the best way to deal with this issue is having more physical educations and
exercises in the school curriculum.
I could not agree more yo this idea. First of all, dealing with the problems
surrounding obesity and weight issues is best solved by having a lot of exercises,
introducing more sport activities and of course, physical educations in school. This
method will avouch that the next generation will be healthier and will not have
such health problems in the future. Contariwise, by incorporating more sports
classes into the curriculum as well as encouraging extracurricular sport activities,
they will forsooth become fitter and more active.
Another point to consider is that doing more and more physical exercises,
normally 2 times a day. From my perspective it will will help to be healthy and
strong. And person who does this exercises like this, should eat healthy foods, for
example: salads, vegetables, fruits. He or she should not eat junk foods or
refreshments. Yes, it is agonizing to live without french fries, fizzy waters, burgers,
pizzas and sweets if person wants to be healthy, he will withstand to all of this.
In the final analysis, to deal with an increasing population of faulty, overweight
people, substituting the lifestyle of the coming generation by introducing sport in
schools is the easiest and most effective method to use!
Bilol 635
In the contemporary digital age, the influence of social networking sites, such as
Facebook, on individuals and society has been a subject of extensive debate. This
essay leans towards the belief that these platforms have, indeed, had a
substantial negative impact.
Firstly, the ubiquitous nature of social media has led to increased social isolation
among users. Despite the illusion of connectivity, individuals often find
themselves spending excessive amounts of time online, resulting in decreased
face-to-face interactions. This phenomenon, known as "social displacement,"
hampers genuine human connections.
Moreover, the proliferation of misinformation on social networking sites has far-
reaching societal consequences. The echo chambers created by algorithms and
the ease of spreading false information have eroded trust in traditional
institutions, undermining the very fabric of a well-informed society.
Additionally, the commodification of personal data by these platforms raises
ethical concerns. Users' data is often exploited for profit without their full
understanding or consent.
In conclusion, while social networking sites have undoubtedly brought about
positive changes, it is essential to acknowledge their detrimental effects on
individuals' social lives, the spread of misinformation, and privacy concerns.
Striking a balance between the benefits and drawbacks of these platforms is
crucial to harness their full potential for the betterment of society.
Robiya GE 636
We all love to read books and newspapers, and our grandparents read them
throughout our childhood. Just remember what a fresh newspaper smells like.
But do newspapers have a future? And will newspapers be read in the future?
At a time when there was no World Wide Web and no such “Internet,” reading
newspapers was most preferred, and newspapers were read in every home to
find out the news
Sometimes several issues are published per day. The newspaper contains news
articles from around the world on various topics such as politics, sports,
entertainment, business, education, culture and more.
But in future reading newspapers will no longer be relevant, and there will be no
reason to read paper newspapers; everything is already online, and you can read
it online.
Newspapers are the number one cause of pollution on our planet. Every week,
tons of newspapers are printed in factories and thrown into the trash every day,
and in this way tons of paper end up polluting our planet.
I agree with the above proposal and believe that newspapers are the first thing
that pollutes our planet. But this cannot be a reason not to read
newspapers.Every person has the right to read them on paper.
Diyora GE 636
Many people believe that in the future printed newspapers will become
outmode as online reading materials becoming more common because of its
availability, comfort and unlimited information. However some may argue that
printed media will continue to exist, in my point of view online platforms will
overweight the traditional forms of reading.
One reason why people prefer online reading is its convenience. People can
easily find from internet what they need instead of going outside. In contrast,
purchase of newspapers requires time, money and of course it will more
expensive. In addition, in internet sources easy to select necessary information
and readers can choose themes they interested in.
Another reason for my opinion is that it is not difficult to update the
information on the website in case the data is changed. Contrary to it newspapers
are not available to edit while they printed. For example, we often see on social
networks news which are denied after a while.
Furthermore, nowadays global problem is environmental issues. From this
side digital reading will be more profitable as printed media can become the
causes of pollution and deforestation. According to the Wikipedia worldwide
consumption of paper has risen by 400 % in the past 40 years, with of harvested
trees being used for paper manufacture.
To sum up, I think that after some decades printed newspapers will be
considered as a thing of the past and cannot compete with online platforms. So
people will need more free information in their smartphones.
Shahrizoda GE 637
Now is the 21st century. Everyone has a phone. Nowadays, everyone watches
or hears on the internet or on TV.
All people know how can use internet. The internet has made life much
easier. You can find everything on the internet I search for information about
something internet gives me different information but their topics are same I
don’t know which one to choose because the internet provides so much
information that is why a lot of people forget about newspapers.
However, in the past humans used to newspapers for read news because
they did not have internet. It’s better that everything is online these days because
we use less paper and can save a lot of trees from being cut down. We use 20 or
30 sheets to print one newspaper, for which we have to cut down one or two
trees. It’s harmful for people.
Internet is also harmful for people. But it does not harm nature. The internet
prevents rare trees from disappearing. Therefore, the newspapers have no future.
The newspapers are slowly becoming obsolete.

Mohinur GE 638
In today’s technological era, online publications are becoming more
common, and there is no doubt if they will completely replace the printed ones.
In my point of view, this digitalized way of reading news and finding information
about one or another topic is more convenient and harmless than paper based
data.
To begin with, it is undoubtedly that internet provides almost all
information for people with just one click. And people do not have to go to the
newsstands to get any kind of fresh data and utilize them for their own
professional or other needs. Moreover, from the social platforms people can read
about current news, whereas, newspapers are printed only once a week. This is
one of the most common reason of disappearing printed newspapers.
Secondly, manufacturing of printed newspapers have a significant bad
effect for ecosystem. It is obvious that, paper production requires cutting trees in
its process so, cutting trees and process in factories – they all have a negative
impact for our mother nature. According to the UN, global paper consumption
has increased by 400% over the past 40 years, to 400 million tons per year. A
huge amount of materials in consumed in offices and book publishing houses.
Thus, in the next five decades manufacturing printed publications around the
world will have been come to an end.
 In conclusion, due to being more comfortable and eco-friendly, I believe
that printed newspapers will be completely replaced by digitalized news.
Asilbek GE 638
Printed newspapers started dissapering in the last decends,So,many
teenagers prefer to read news from the internet.In the internet you can get more
information than newspapers.As far as I am concerned I partly agree with the
above statement and the next paragraph I am going to tell my opinions about this
topic.
To begin with,I prefer news from the internet like my teenagers. Because it's
so easy and you can read the news more quickly than newspapers.The best side
of reading news from the internet ,you can read all news in the one website,you
can read important news for you and you can skip unimportant news.These all
news are free and it too attracts a lot of people.
. However,in the other hand the the internet isn't convenienced for elderly
people to read news.Because many elderly people don't know how to read the
news from the internet and it seems complex thing for elderly people.
To conclude, newspapers will disappear one day and many elderly people
too will adjust read news from the internet!
Mubina GE 638
The press has a right to publish photos and information about celebrities private
life.
Press release of images and details about celebrities' personal lives is a sensitive
and complicated matter. Others argue that the press is violating the privacy and
personal space of those who are in the public spotlight, while some claim that the
press has a right to do so.
Celebrities have voluntarily entered the public eye, thus those who defend the
press's freedom to share this information frequently claim that they should be
prepared for some level of attack into their private life. They claim that public
personalities have benefited significantly from their celebrity status, including
increased money, popularity, and opportunities, as a result of their fame and
fortune.
As a result, they contend that the media has a right to cover all facets of their
lives, including their private lives.
Just like any other person, celebrities have the right to live their life free from the
aggressive review of the media.
Furthermore, some believe that a great deal of getting into celebrities' private life
can be harmful to their mental health and wellbeing. Stress, anxiety, and
sometimes dangerous circumstances can result from repeated assault, media
harassment, and attack of personal spaces. They think that superstars need to be
able to maintain a private life in addition to their public persona.
The public's interest in celebrity rumours, according to opponents, does not
justify violating someone's privacy, critics add. They argue that the media's focus
on drama and annoying reporting sometimes hides more important stories and
socially important subjects.
Supporters also claim that the public has a legitimate interest in learning about
celebrities' personal life. They claim that celebrities work as role models for a lot
of people and have an effect on society. It is therefore kept that the journalists
should be allowed to cover any action that could affect public opinion or have
effects on society.
Opponents counter that everyone, including celebrities, has a basic right to
privacy. They contend that having fame does not mean giving up one's right to
privacy and individuality.
In my opinion, we should not pray into celebrities private life because it could
harm their mental and physical health.
Sabina GE 638
Printed newspapers have no future.

The emergence of the digital age has revolutionized the way we receive
information, leading to a widespread belief that print newspapers and books Print
will soon be canceled. Some people argue that with increasing access to free
content online, there will no longer be a need to pay for printed copies of
newspapers or books. However, I completely disagree with this point of view.

First, while it is true that digital media has had a significant impact on the
publishing industry, it has not yet completely replaced traditional print formats.
Many readers still enjoy the tangible experience of reading a physical book or
newspaper, something that digital media cannot replicate. Additionally, physical
copies are not dependent on Internet access or power, making them more
reliable and accessible in areas with poor connectivity.

Second, the value of printed materials goes beyond their content. Books, in
particular, have emotional and sentimental value that cannot be replaced by
digital media. For many people, like me, holding a book, turning the pages, and
feeling the ink and paper is an integral part of the reading experience. Printed
books are often collected and passed down from generation to generation,
becoming valuable things.
Finally, believing that online content is completely free is not real. While it's true
that many websites offer free content. Journalists and writers demand fair
compensation for their work, and without payment from paid subscriptions, the
quality of online content could suffer. This is why all online content being free is
an imperfect concept.

In short, while it is true that technology has promoted access to information

online, the disappearance of printed newspapers and books is impossible. Printed
books will continue to hold a special place in people's hearts, and the experience
of reading a physical book or newspaper cannot be replaced.
Nigina GE 639
Publishing photos and information about celebrities’ lives has become a common
practice in society. While some argue that this trend helps to satisfy people's
natural curiosity about the rich and famous, others question the consequences of
invading the privacy of these individuals.
To begin with it is obvious that celebrities like any other people have a right to
privacy. Despite their public status they deserve the same level of respect and
personal boundaries as any other person. Constantly being exposed by paparazzi,
publishing articles not only puts an amount of pressure on celebrities but also
creates an unhealthy obsession with their lives by some people.
Futhermore, publishing information about celebrities has consequences on their
relationships, career and safety. While some individuals can have a good
relationships with paparazzi others can suffer from constant invasion to their
personal lives, health problems and could not be able to perform their jobs
effectively. Additionally, there are lots of unhealthy people from whom they can
get terrible presents, they also can face with stalking, harassment and even
blackmail.
In conclusion, it is obvious that the media has a powerful role in people's life, but
it is important to have at least a little empathy. Only by respecting fundamental
rights of these individuals people can truly appreciate their talents and
achievements.

Abduqahhorov Abdulaziz GE 639

Theme: In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they
will be able to read everything they want online without paying. To what extent
do you agree or disagree with this statement?
For several years now, various electronic books and websites presenting articles
as well as worldwide news are increasingly predominating in our so-called “hi-
tech” world. Therefore, the prospective of printed newspapers or books is being
abandoned and replaced by modern alternatives such as e-books or Internet.

It seems to me that despite the great comfort arising from an online book, the
printed newspapers or books in fact will not lose their relevance in the near
future.
Shoxrux GE 640
"Printed Newspapers Have No Future"
In today's modern era, the way we obtain and consume news has been
dramatically transformed by technological advancements. Printed newspapers
are struggling to stay relevant due to a decrease in readership and circulation. The
challenges they face are becoming more apparent as more people turn to other
sources for news. Today, we explore both the drawbacks and potential benefits of
their uncertain future. The decline of printed newspapers can lead to a loss of
reliable news sources. As more people turn to digital platforms for news,
traditional newspapers may struggle to stay in business. Without funding for
investigative journalism and fact-checking, there may be more false information.
Without printed newspapers, society may have fewer trustworthy news sources,
which can lead to unreliable news. The decrease in printed newspapers paves the
way for a greener and more accessible way to stay informed. Digital platforms
offer quick access to a variety of news sources and provide immediate updates on
breaking stories. Moreover, online news platforms often engage readers with
interactive features like videos and comment sections, promoting meaningful
discussions. In conclusion, printed newspapers face an uncertain Future due to
declining readership and funding challenges. However, this shift opens doors to
eco‐friendly and accessible news consumption. Digital platforms offer quick
access to dissimilar sources, real-time updates, and interactive features, fostering
engagement and embracing the evolving landscape of news taking.