Hamirpur Barrage, Odisha Page 1 Barrage Stability analysis -Hamirpur

Hamirpur Barrage -Stability Analysis

INPUT DATA
1 Density of concrete = 25 kN/m3
2 Density of Submerged Soil= 10 kN/m3
3 Density of water = 10 kN/m3
4 Assumed Residual Cohesion= 0 kPa
5 Angle of internal friction= 25 degree
6 Seismic Zone II,
7 αh=βIαh
8 Basic horizontal seismic coefficient, αo 0.020
9 Importance Factor, I 3.000
10 Foundation Factor, β 1.000
11 αh=βIαh 0.060
12 Horizontal seismic Coefficient, αh= 0.0600
13 Vertical seismic Coefficient, αv=2/3αh 0.040
14 Bottom Slab Width 67.200 m
15 Waterway 50.0 m
16 Slab projection beyond abutment 2.0 m
17 Abutment bottom width 3.0 m
18 Middle pier width 2.4 m

Combination F Fc
Partial Factor of Safety (wrt to friction) F B, & C 1.5 3.6
Partial Factor of Safety (wrt to Cohesion) Fc D, E & M 1.2 2.4

194.2

187

184
183.5

178 178
177.9
175.6 176.2

173 173.8 B

168
0.75 10.25 5.4 34.60 1.00

52.00

1 Width of pier= 11.7 m 11.7

2 Width of Raft= 67.2 m 67.2
4 Length of Raft with cutoff 52.00 m

Stability Calculations
Hamirpur Barrage, Odisha Page 2 Barrage Stability analysis -Hamirpur

Maintenance Condition No water in

FRL and SPF Flood Discharge
Stilling Basin
Minimum TWL

Water level at U/S of barrage (m) 183 189.68 183

TWL at end of stilling basin (m) 177.9 189.2 177.9

GRAVITY LOADS
Load Arm about B (Bottom of Stilling
Area Width Weight basin slab) Moment
Description
X Y Mx My
sq. m. m kN m m kN-m kN-m
Abutment 866.5 2.5 54156.25 26 11.3 1408062.50 611965.63
Pier 618.10 9.20 142163.00 31.10 9.90 4421269.30 1407413.70
Raft 141.10 67.20 237048.00 24.00 1.40 5689152.00 331867.20
Gate Load 1200.00 40 8.2 48000.00 9840.00
Bridge 4.39 67.2 7375.20 33.5 19.3 247069.20 142341.36
Side cutoff 222.50 4.00 22250.00 22.00 -2.20 489500.00 -48950.00
Total 1630.09 464192.45 26.50 3.97 12303053.00 1842512.26

18567.698
Normal Operating Condition (Radial gates closed)
VERTICAL LOAD
Area Width Weight Load Arm X Moment
Description
sq. m. m kN m kN-m
water b/w piers u/s 48.60 50.00 24300.00 47.10 1144530 From Autocad
water b/w piers d/s 59.80 50.00 29900.00 20.60 615940
Total 54200.00 1760470.00

Flood discharge Condition (Radial gates open)

VERTICAL LOAD
Area Width Weight Load Arm X Moment
Description
sq. m. m kN m kN-m
Water b/w piers below pier top 520.90 50.00 260450.00 29.30 7631185 From Autocad
Water above piers u/s 17.30 62.20 10760.60 53.60 576768
water above piers d/s 130.50 62.20 81171.00 11.70 949701

Total 352381.60 9157653.86

Stability Calculations
Hamirpur Barrage, Odisha Page 3 Barrage Stability analysis -Hamirpur

HGL Khosla Theory

HGL Elevation
Level of (Normal HGL Elevation
Location Location Mark Consideration Chainage Condition) (Flood Condition)
Upstream slab a 178 0 183.00 189.68
Upstream cutoff Bottom b 173.00 0 182.03 189.59
Bottom of upstream slab start c 175.6 0.75 182.03 189.57
Bottom of slab slope start d 175.6 11 181.57 189.52
Bottom of slab slope end e 173.8 16.4 181.31 189.50
Bottom of downstrean slab end f 173.8 51 179.64 189.36
Downstream cutoff g 168 52 179.23 189.32
Barrage structure end outside h 177.9 52 177.90 189.20

Horizontal water Pressure (Normal Condition)

Level of
HGL Elevation Consideration Height Head Force CG Load Arm Y Moment
m m m m kN m m kNm
183.00 183 0.00
183.00 178 5 5.00 8400 1.67 5.87 -49280

183 178 5.00

182.03 173 5 9.03 23563 2.26 1.46 -34421.65105574

182.03 173 9.03

182.03 175.60 -2.6 6.43 -13505 -1.37 0.43 5770.559556769

181.57 175.60 5.97

181.31 173.8 1.8 7.51 8152 0.87 0.87 -7056.55481509

179.64 173.80 5.84

179.23 168 5.8 11.23 33251 2.59 -3.21 106578.5190243

179.23 168 11.23

177.90 177.9 -9.9 0.00 -37340 -6.60 -2.50 -93349.17451064

Total 22522 -71758.3018004

Stability Calculations
Hamirpur Barrage, Odisha Page 4 Barrage Stability analysis -Hamirpur

Horizontal water Pressure (Flood Condition)

Level of
HGL Elevation Consideration Height Head Force CG Load Arm Y Moment
m m m m kN m m kNm
189.68 189.68 0.00
189.68 178 11.68 11.68 45838 3.89 8.09 -370981.617664

189.68 178 11.68

189.59 173 5 16.59 47492 2.36 1.56 -73863.92071788

189.59 173 16.59

189.57 175.60 -2.6 13.97 -26696 -1.34 0.46 12355.86671116

189.52 175.60 13.92

189.50 173.8 1.8 15.70 17917 0.88 0.88 -15802.91315649

189.36 173.80 15.56

189.32 168 5.8 21.32 71878 2.75 -3.05 219308.4265803

189.32 168 21.32

189.20 189.2 -21.2 0.00 -151900 -14.13 1.27 192407.0620997

Total 4529 -36577.0961472

UPLIFT
Normal Operating Condition Uplift

Part Length of Lever

Point Chainage Elevations (m) HGL Level Uplift Heads (m) Slab part Uplift Force (kN) Moment
slab Arm
b 0.00 173.00 182.03 9.03
c 0.75 175.60 182.03 6.43 b-c 0.75 -3895.53 51.65 -201188.65
d 11.00 175.60 181.57 5.97 c-d 10.25 -42707.02 46.19 -1972595.98
e 16.40 173.80 181.31 7.51 d-e 5.40 -24454.80 38.20 -934099.70
f 51.00 173.80 179.64 5.84 e-f 34.60 -155172.04 19.02 -2951827.79
g 52.00 168.00 179.23 11.23 f-g 1.00 -5732.94 0.45 -2564.73
-231962.33 -6062276.86
464192.45
Flood Discharge Condition Uplift

Part Length of Lever

Point Chainage Elevations (m) HGL Level Uplift Heads (m) Slab part Uplift Force (kN) Moment
slab Arm
b 0.00 173.00 189.59 16.59
c 0.75 175.60 189.57 13.97 b-c 0.75 -7700.64 51.64 -397628.32
d 11.00 175.60 189.52 13.92 c-d 10.25 -96062.38 46.13 -4431143.39
e 16.40 173.80 189.50 15.70 d-e 5.40 -53751.33 38.25 -2055773.60
f 51.00 173.80 189.36 15.56 e-f 34.60 -363410.08 18.33 -6659974.83
g 52.00 168.00 189.32 21.32 f-g 1.00 -12392.72 0.47 -5873.44
-533317.16 -13550393.58

Stability Calculations
Hamirpur Barrage, Odisha Page 5 Barrage Stability analysis -Hamirpur

EARTHQUAKE INERTIA FORCE

Direction
Force Moment
kN kN-m
Horizontal Earthquake 27851.55 -110551
Vertical Earthquake 18568 492122

HYDRODYNAMIC FORCE (Normal operating Condition)

U/S D/S
Height of water= m 5 1.70000000000002
Width m 67 56
Hydrodynamic pressure kN/m2 2.20 0.75
Vh=0.726pyB 537.59 51.33
Load arm= m -6.3 -3.1
Moment -3364.8 -159.1

LOAD Condition A: Construction Condition: Barrage complete but no water in Basin and no tail water
V H M +ve M -ve
kN kN kN-m kN-m
Self weight 464192.45 0 12303053.00
Total 464192.5 0.00 12303053.00 0.00

Width of Raft= 67.2 m

Net Moment= 12303053.0 Length under compression= 52 m
Eccentricity= -0.5 Ok Floatation -
Stress at B (D/s)= 125.1 kPa Overturning -
Stress at A(U/s)= 140.6 kPa Sliding -

LOAD Condition B: Normal Operation Condition: Gates Closed, FRL, TWL, Uplift, No silt
Item V H M +ve M -ve
kN kN kN-m kN-m
Self weight 464192.45 0.00 12303053.00 0.00
Water load 54200.00 1760470.00
Uplift -231962.33 -6062276.86
Hydrostatic 22521.91 -71758.30
Total 286430.1 22521.9 14063523.0 -6134035.2

Width of Raft= 67.2 m

Net Moment 7929487.84 Length under compression= 52 m
Eccentricity= -1.68 Ok Factor of safety against:
Stress at B (D/s)= 66.0 kPa Floatation 2.23
Stress at A(U/s)= 97.9 kPa Overturning 2.29
ϕ 0.44 Rad Sliding 5.93
Tanϕ 0.47 Deg

Stability Calculations
Hamirpur Barrage, Odisha Page 6 Barrage Stability analysis -Hamirpur

LOAD Condition C: Flood Discharge Condition: Gates Open, SPF, Flood TWL, Uplift, No silt
Item V H M +ve M -ve
kN kN kN-m kN-m
Self weight 464192.45 0 12303053.00 0
Water load 352381.60 9157653.86
Uplift -533317.16 -13550393.58
Hydrostatic (u/s) 4529.13 -36577.10
Total 283256.89 4529.1 21460706.9 -13586970.7

Width of Raft= 67.2 m

Net Moment 7873736.19 Length under compression= 52 m
Eccentricity= -1.80 Ok Factor of safety against:
Stress at B (D/s)= 64.3 kPa Floatation 1.53
Stress at A(U/s)= 97.9 kPa Overturning 1.58
ϕ 0.44 Rad Sliding 29.16
Tanϕ 0.47 Deg

LOAD Condition D: Load Combination-A + Earthquake(U/s Horizontal Force due to EQ + Downward Vertical)
Item V H M +ve M -ve
kN kN kN-m kN-m
Self weight 464192.5 0 12303053.00
EQ Vertical 18567.7 492122
EQ Horizontal -27851.55 110551
Total 482760.15 -27851.5 12905725.9 0.0

Width of Raft= 67.2 m

Net Moment= 12905725.9 Length under compression= 52 m
Eccentricity= -0.73 Ok
Stress at B (D/s)= 126.5 kPa Factor of safety against:
Stress at A(U/s)= 149.8 kPa Floatation -
ϕ 0.44 Rad Overturning -
Tanϕ 0.47 Deg Sliding 8.08

Stability Calculations
Hamirpur Barrage, Odisha Page 7 Barrage Stability analysis -Hamirpur

LOAD Condition E: Load Combination-B+ Earthquake(D/s Horizontal Force due to EQ + Upward)

V H M +ve M -ve
kN kN kN-m kN-m
Self weight 464192 0 12303053
Water load 54200 1760470
EQ Vertical -18568 -492122
Uplift -231962 -6062277
Hydrostatic 22522 -71758
EQ Horizontal 27852 -110551
Hydrodynamic (u/s) 538 -3365
Hydrodynamic (d/s) 51 -159
Total 267862.42 50962.36 14063523.00 -6740231.88

Width of Raft= 67.2 m

Net Moment= 7323291 Length under compression= 52.00 m
Eccentricity= -1.34 Ok Factor of safety against:
Stress at B (D/s)= 64.8 kPa Floatation 2.07
Stress at A(U/s)= 88.5 kPa Overturning 2.09
ϕ 0.44 Rad Sliding 2.45
Tanϕ 0.47 Deg

RESULT SUMMARY SHEET

Factor of safety Base pressure (in kN/m 2)
Load Conditions Floatation Eccentricity (m)
Sliding Overturning Stress at A (U/s) Stress at B (D/s)
A Construction condition - - - -0.50 141 125
B Normal Operation Condition 2.23 5.93 2.29 -1.68 98 66
C Flood Discharge Condition 1.53 29.16 1.58 -1.80 98 64
A+ EQ (D/s Horizontal Force due
8.08 - -0.73 150 126
D to EQ + Downward) -
B+ EQ (D/s Horizontal Force due
E to EQ + Upward) 2.07 2.45 2.09 -1.34 89 65

Stability Calculations
Sono Barrage, Odisha

Hamirpur Barrage -Stability Analysis

Uplift for Normal and Maintenance Condition
183

178 178
E1=a d
C1=c 175.6 177.9
176.2 176.2 C2=h
e
D1=b 173.8 E2=f
173 0.75 10.25 5.4 34.6 1.00

52
168 D2=g

CUTOFF AT UPSTREAM END

Depth of the cutoff (d) 5m

Length of barrage along river (b) 52 m

α 10.40
λ (1+SQRT(1+α*α))/2 5.72
ФE 27.45 %
ФD 19.10 %

Corrections
ФE1 No Correction required
ФD1 No Correction required -
ФC1 Floor Thickness correction and Interference of Intermediate cutoff
Before correction
ФE1 100 %
ФD1 80.90 %
ФC1 72.55 %

* Correction for floor thickness

t 2.4 m
Correction 4.0 % "+ve"
Correction for interference of Downstream cutoff
d= Depth of cutoff 5
b1= distance between the two cutoff 52 `
b= total length of the impervious floor 52
D= the depth of the cutoff, influence of which is considered 10
Intrteference correction=19*sqrt(D/b1*(d+D)/b) 4.47502934 "+ve"

Pressure at respective points after correction

Point
ФE1 100.0% a
ФD1 80.9% b
ФC1 81.0% c
Slope Correction:

Table 6.3 of CBIP Bararge Manual,

Slope Proposed 1V 3H
Correction 4.5 %
Length of Slope Portion 5.4 m
Total length 52
% Correction 0.47 %

Stability Calculations
Sono Barrage, Odisha

CUTOFF AT DOWNSTREAM END POINT

Depth of the cutoff (d) 9.9 m

α 5.25
λ 3.17
ФE2 37.94 %
ФD2 25.99 %
ФC2 0%

Corrections
ФE2 FloorThickness correction and Interference of Upstream cutoff
ФD2 No Correction required
ФC2 No Correction required
* Correction for floor thickness
t 4.1 m
Correction 5.0 % "-ve"
Correction for interference of Upatream cutoff
d= Depth of cutoff 9.9
b1= distance between the two cutoff 52
b= total length of the impervious floor 52
D= the depth of the cutoff, influence of which is considered 1
Intrteference correction=19*sqrt(D/b1*(d+D)/b) -1.0690232 "-ve"
Pressure at respective points after correction
Point
ФE2 34% f
ФD2 26% g
ФC2 0% h

Maximum percolation head 5.1 m

% Pressure
Head with % Pressure
thickness Head with Elevations
and cutoff slope and Net (m)
Distance interference % Slope thickness Seepage Hydraulic
Point between points Chainage correction Correction correction head gradient level
a ФE1=Фa 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 5.10 183.00 178
b ФD1=Фb 0 0.00 80.90% 80.90% 4.13 182.03 173
c ФC1=Фc 0.75 0.75 81.03% 81.03% 4.13 182.03 175.6
d Фd 10.25 11.00 71.45% 0.47% 71.92% 3.67 181.57 175.6
e Фe 5.4 16.40 66.40% 0.47 66.87% 3.41 181.31 173.8
f ФE2=Фf 34.6 51.00 34.06% 34.06% 1.74 179.64 173.8
g ФD2=Фg 1.00 52.00 25.99% 25.99% 1.33 179.23 168
h ФC2=Фg 0.00 52.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 177.90 177.9
Hydraulic Head 5.1 m

Hydraulic gradient levels

U/S Cutoff D/S Cutoff
E1 D1 (A) C1 (B) E2 ( E ) D2 (F) C2
100.0% 80.9% 81.0% 34% 26% 0%
5.10 4.13 4.13 1.74 1.33 0.00
183.00 182.03 182.03 179.64 179.23 177.90

Stability Calculations
Sono Barrage, Odisha

Hamirpur Barrage -Stability Analysis

Uplift for Flood Condition
189.68
189.2

178 178
E1=a d
C1=c 175.6 177.9
176.2 176.2 E2=h
e
D1=b 173.8 C2=f
173 0.75 10.25 5.4 34.6 1.00

52
173.8 D2 168 D2=g

CUTOFF AT UPSTREAM END

Depth of the cutoff(d) 4.9 m

Length of the foundation (b) 52 m

α 10.61
λ 5.83
ФE 27.19 %
ФD 18.92 %

Corrections
ФE1 No Correction required
ФD1 No Correction required -
ФC1 Floor Thickness correction and Interference of Intermediate cutoff
Before correction
ФE1 100 %
ФD1 81.08 %
ФC1 72.81 %

* Correction for floor thickness

t 2.4 m
Correction 4.0 % "+ve"
Pressure at respective points after correction
Point
ФE1 100.0% a
ФD1 81.1% b
ФC1 76.9% c

Slope Correction:

Table 6.3 of CBIP Bararge Manual,

Slope Proposed 1V 3H
Correction 4.5 %
Length of Slope Portion 5.4 m
Total length 52
% Correction 0.47 %

Stability Calculations
Sono Barrage, Odisha

CUTOFF AT DOWNSTREAM END POINT

Depth of the cutoff (d) 9.9 m

α 5.25
λ 3.17
ФE2 37.94 %
ФD2 25.99 %
ФC3 0%

Corrections
ФE2 Floor Thickness correction and Interference of Intermediate cutoff
ФD2 No Correction required
ФC2 No Correction required
* Correction for floor thickness
t 4.1 m
Correction 5.0 % "-ve"
Pressure at respective points after correction
Point
ФE2 33% f
ФD2 26% g
ФC2 0% h

Maximum percolation head 0.48 m

% Pressure
% Pressure Head with Elevations
Head with slope and Net (m)
Distance thickness % Slope thickness Seepage Hydraulic
Point between points Chainage correction Correction correction head gradient lines
a ФE1=Фa 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.48 189.68 178
b ФD1=Фb 0 0.00 81.08% 81.08% 0.39 189.59 173
c ФC1=Фc 0.75 0.75 76.86% 76.86% 0.37 189.57 175.6
d Фd 10.25 11.00 67.91% -0.47% 67.45% 0.32 189.52 175.6
e Фe 5.4 16.40 63.20% -0.47 62.73% 0.30 189.50 173.8
f ФC2=Фf 34.6 51.00 32.99% 32.99% 0.16 189.36 173.8
g ФD2=Фg 1.00 52.00 25.99% 25.99% 0.12 189.32 168
h ФD2=Фg 0.00 52.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 189.20 177.9

Stability Calculations