1

Chapter 1

THE PROBLEM AND ITS SCOPE

Background of the Study

Disaster is an incident that disrupts normal life and causes so many difficulties

that those impacted are unable to cope on their own. The way we cope with disasters now

and in the future is heavily dependent on community involvement. This means that

people must be aware of the potential risks and prepared to take action. Their role

initiates all plans to mitigate the impact. Highlighting this, the essential way to acquire

help and start rescue or safe evacuation arrangements is through rapid response.

The Philippines is particularly prone to natural disasters, making it one of the

most vulnerable countries in the world, ranking third out of 173 in terms of disaster risk

(United Nations University- Institute for Environment and Human Security, 2019). As a

result, the country has prioritized minimizing disaster risk by creating strategies for

Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR). DRR involves a systematic approach to identifying,

assessing, and reducing disaster risk (Onstada et al., 2021). Additionally, it is crucial in

disaster management by strengthening the abilities of communities to handle the risks and

negative impacts of natural hazards. (Saño, 2020). During a disaster, the local community

may not, alone, be able to respond to the event. There is a disruption in the everyday

structure and function of the community. The infrastructure may suffer major damage.

Most of a community may lose electrical power. Water may not be available. Highways

and bridges may be impassable or destroyed. Family members may be separated from

each other, have no food or water, or their homes may be destroyed. Businesses, schools,
 2

and other organizations will be closed due to damage or destruction; customers,

employees, and students will be disaster” (Phillips et al. 2022).

The municipality of Sinacaban in December 2022 suffered heavily from a severe

shear line that brought continuous heavy rains which flooded half of the town. Among

the most affected areas was Barangay Cagay-anon, Misamis Occidental, where the

devastation was keenly felt. Citizens have faced the challenges of late actions by the

barangay level during the flood incidents, which made the Cagayanons desperate during

the incidents. Despite the efforts made by the local barangay disaster management

approaches the people were still not satisfied because of the damages and the loss of lives

of people in barangay Cagay-anon. Thus, this particular study is conducted to explore

how effective community-based interventions in disaster management might be, to

remedy these gaps in and improve the resilience of vulnerable communities, such as

Cagay-anon.

This study aimed to look into the insights of the flood victims of their community

-based approaches disaster management in the perspective of said barangay as recorded

in the municipality of Sinacaban, Misamis Occidental. The multifaceted challenges faced

by Cagay-anon residents during the flood crisis highlighted the importance of holistic

disaster risk management planning and community-driven approaches. The study aimed

to better understand the insights learned from affected flood individuals in this specific

case and emphasises how the collaborative and local initiative is required to build

resilience and mitigate future risks. Exploring the narratives of affected populations could

help extract valuable lessons for better informing disaster response and preparedness

processes in the region. These insights would enable the creation of tailored and
 3

sustainable disaster management solutions that are in tune with the requirements and

challenges present on the ground, achieved by an understanding the specific community

dynamics and local contexts.

Conceptual Framework

The concepts of authors who have written about community-based approaches in

disaster management form the backbone of this study.

There has been a significant shift in attitude in addressing the challenges of

disasters. For too long disasters have been seen as one-off events that were addressed

through humanitarian response and relief efforts Geipel (2024). For a few decades there

was a clear move towards strengthening preparedness and ensuring a more effective and

efficient response which involving of the community is must. Disaster management

agencies invest differing levels of resources into guiding communities to get ready for a

range of hazards and are increasingly turning to community engagement as a way of

increasing preparedness (Ryan et al., 2020). This bottom-up approach is used to assess

and develop policies that come from the efforts of the subordinate, the individual or of

the people's problems itself (Howlett et al, 2023).

Community is a group of people living in the same place or having a particular

characteristic in common. In details, community emerged as a group of people with

diverse characteristics who are linked by social ties, share common perspectives, and
 4

engage in joint action in geographical locations or settings (Kathleen et al, 2021).

Community must be involved and should be encouraged to participate fully in all aspects

of the process of disaster management in order to develop theirs potential and capacities

to cope with disasters on their own (Geekiyanage et al., 2020). Engaging communities in

Early Warning Systems (EWSs) is crucial to saving lives, reducing injuries, and

protecting the environment due to disaster events. Yet, community input is not always

commonly sought in many disasters policy development and implementation processes

(Sufri, 2020).

In addition, Crosweller and Tschakert (2021), stated that disaster management

plays a central role in attempting to minimize and manage these impacts, and many

government institutions posit that shared responsibility with citizens is the most effective

approach to achieving this. However, some scholarship contends that shared approaches

prioritize responsibility too far towards citizens and too far away from government

institutions and are ineffective in lessening and managing such impacts. Hence, Yodmani

(2020) suggested that the failure of a top-down management in addressing the

needs of vulnerable communities in disaster management has brought about the

alternative; involving the vulnerable people themselves in the planning and

implementation of mitigation measures. McLennan (2018) stated that the affected

communities are the best judges of their own vulnerability and can make the best

decisions about their wellbeing.

Thus, the rise of Community-based Approaches (CBA) highlighted the

acknowledgment of local knowledge and organizational capacity, especially in

 5

addressing small to moderate, recurring, and chronic threats (Mercer at al., 2022).

However, the recognized United Nations framework for guiding disaster reduction from

2005-2015 focused on large, catastrophic hazards and maintained a top-down approach

(Mizutori, 2020). It assumed that local people needed to be informed and educated, rather

than listened to (Baudoin et al, 2021). Somewhat greater acknowledgement of active role

of local populations finally appeared in the UN’s successor framework launched in 2015.

Poor people are disproportionally affected by natural hazards and disasters

(Hallegatte et al., 2020) but a well-prepared community actively participating in disaster

events offer numerous benefits. They provide immediate assistance, especially in the

critical first 72 hours when external help is often delayed. As "first responders," they aid

themselves, their families, and their vulnerable neighbors. This effective response is only

possible with high awareness and preparedness (Carafano et al., 2020). Another benefit is

that community involvement in disaster events provides detailed information about the

affected area. Residents typically have in-depth knowledge of their community and

surroundings, which helps identify priority needs and culturally appropriate interventions.

Additionally, community participation encourages people to actively engage in their own

rehabilitation and development effort (Azrina, 2019).

 6

Statement of the Problem

This study aimed to explore the insights by the Flood Victims of Cagay-anon,

Sinacaban, Mis. Occ.

Furthermore, this study sought to answer the following questions:

1. What are the community-based approaches in disaster management utilized by

the local barangay during the flooding?

2. How do flood victims describe the operations of community-based approaches

employed in disaster management within their locality?

3. What are the challenges and experiences of flood victims regarding the

incident happened last December 2022?

 7

4. What intervention programs can be proposed with the suggestions of flood

victims regarding the improvement and sustainability of community-based

disaster management strategies in Cagay-anon Sinacaban Mis Occ?

Significance of the Study

This study will be beneficial to the following individuals and may use this

research in several ways.

Community Leaders and Residents. Gain knowledge about effective

community-based approaches to disaster management and apply them in

local initiatives.

Communities. It will help the communities identify areas where they can actively

contribute to disaster response efforts. This can include community-based

training programs, volunteer initiatives, or establishing communication

channels. Such collaborations can enhance community resilience and

foster a sense of collective responsibility in times of crisis.

Local Government Officials and Emergency Responders. Utilize insights to

improve disaster preparedness plans and response strategies tailored to the

specific needs of the community. Allocate resources more effectively to

address vulnerabilities identified among flood victims. Collaborate with

community members to strengthen local resilience and enhance disaster

response capacity.
 8

Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and Civil Society Groups. Design

and implement targeted programs and interventions to support flood

victims and enhance community resilience.

Participants. By conducting a study, flood victims can gain valuable insights into

their own response strategies and identify areas for improvement. This

knowledge can be used to enhance their training programs, ensuring that

they are better prepared to handle future natural calamities.

Future Researchers. Researchers can build upon the findings of this study to

explore related topics or investigate the effectiveness of specific

interventions and strategies in disaster-prone communities.

Scope and Limitation

The purpose of this study was to determine the insights of the flood victims of

Cagay-anon, Sinacaban Misamis Occidental. The result of this study served as guidance

and give possible recommendations to the community and the agency. The Flood Victims

was the research participants in this study. This research study was conducted in the

second semester in the academic year 2024-2025.

Research Methods
 9

This section contains and discusses the research design, research respondents,

research setting, instrument validation, data gathering procedure, and statistical treatment

of data.

Research Design. The researchers used the descriptive qualitative research

method to explore the challenges encountered by the Flood Victims in

Cagay-anon, Sinacaban, Misamis Occidental. According to Bhandari

(2020), qualitative research involves collecting and analyzing non-

numerical data as perceived by the participants (e.g., text, video, or audio)

to understand concepts, opinions, or experiences. It can be used to gather

in-depth insights into a problem or generate new ideas for research.

Qualitative methods are a valuable tool in implementation research

because they help to answer complex questions such as how and why

efforts to implement best practices may succeed or fail, and how patients

and providers experience and make decisions in care (Hamilton & Finley,

2019). The objective of a qualitative research is to understand human

behavior in a natural setting.

Research Participants. In choosing the participants, the researchers used a

purposive sampling method to represent the research participants in the

study. Purposive sampling is a deliberate process of selecting participants

or cases based on predefined criteria or characteristics most relevant to the

study's focus Memon et al., 2025.The current finding is supported by the

 10

study of the Statistic Solution (2019). Several factors influence the

appropriate sample size for qualitative research. Creswell and Creswell

(2018) suggest that between 10 and 50 participants can be sufficient

depending on the type of research and research question, while Hennink

and Kaiser (2022) state that "9–17 participants can be sufficient to reach

saturation." Moreover, Guest et al. (2016) argue that data saturation can be

attained with as few as six participants, although this may vary based on

the studied population, as highlighted by Laja (2020). The participants of

the study will be ten (10) Flood victims or residents of Cagay-anon,

Sinacaban, Mis. Occ.

Research Setting. This study was conducted in Cagay-anon, Sinacaban, a 5th-

class municipality in the province of Misamis Occidental. Barangay

Cagay-anon is one of the barangays in Sinacaban municipality that was

severely affected by the flooding incidents during the shear line in

December 2022. The flooding displaced more than 5,000 individuals,

leaving the residents homeless and damaging agriculture, land areas, and

infrastructure.

Research Instrument. The instrument used by the researchers to gather data was

a researcher-made interview guide questionnaire. This was used to

determine the insights of the flood victims in Cagay-anon, Sinacaban,

Misamis Occidental. The designed questions were reviewed and validated

by the researchers’ adviser and panelists.

 11

Validation of Instrument. The interview guide questions was reviewed by the

research instructor, research adviser, head of CDRRMO and editor to

ensure it met the required data. The researchers incorporated the

corrections made by the adviser, along with the suggestions and

recommendations provided by the panel members, before conducting the

interviews with the participants. Additionally, the instrument was

subjected to validation by at least three validators who were specialized in

validating questionnaires.

Data Gathering Procedure. The study protocol was approved first by the Dean

of the Institute of Criminal Justice Education. The researchers requested a

letter of permission from the Barangay of Cagay-anon before the conduct

of the study. After the permission has been granted, a letter of permission

was given to the participants before conducting the study. Upon the

approval of the letter that researchers conducted an interview. Questions

was made clear and understandable for the participants. After that, it was

being analyzed, interpreted and transcribed.

Data Analysis. The qualitative phase of the study was analyzed through thematic

analysis to gain insight into the perspectives of the participants regarding

the posed questions in this study. Thematic analysis involves an emergent

and interactive process of interpretation of a set of messages, with some

thematic structure as the typical outcome (Neuendorf, 2018). Researchers

need to read and reread the data, record impressions, search for

significance, and decide which parts are valuable. The primary questions
 12

that the researchers intend to utilize the analysis to address will be used in

this step. The first step taken by the researchers is the identification of

themes or patterns, which include phrases, ideas, concepts, behaviours,

and so on. In order to find explanations from the data, the researchers will

first identify the themes, assess the relative importance of the responses

received, look for connections between themes or data sets, and identify

the themes. Researchers will give the data meaning and relevance after

identifying themes, patterns, connections, and relationships.

Ethical Considerations

In order to avoid issues in the future, the participants' right to privacy and secrecy

was emphasized. Confidentiality, permission, and identity protection were among the

factors that were taken into consideration. To prevent disagreements among the

participants, the questions created by the researcher were written succinctly and plainly.

In order to eliminate inaccuracies in their responses, participants were given enough time

to answer the questions posed to them. They agreed to participate after receiving

assurances that the data acquired would be treated with the strictest confidence. This was

done to encourage confidence among the participants and the researchers.

Trustworthiness of the Research

This research was conducted only with reliability and experts and professionals

were consulted regarding the gathered participants’ data to avoid misinterpretation of the

study.
 13

Definition of Terms

These important terms mentioned below are operationally and theoretically

defined in this study for better understanding.

Calamities. Refers to severe events or disasters that cause widespread damage,

destruction, or distress to individuals, communities, or environments.

Community-Based Approaches. Involve strategies, programs, or interventions

that prioritize the active participation of local communities in addressing

issues or challenges relevant to their well-being or development.

Coping Strategies. Methods, behaviors, or actions that individuals or

communities employ to manage and adapt to stressful situations,

challenges, or adverse circumstances.

Disaster Management. Refers to the systematic process of planning,

coordinating, implementing, and evaluating measures to mitigate, prepare

for, respond to, and recover from disasters, emergencies, or crises, with the

aim of reducing their impact on lives, property, and the environment.

Disaster Preparedness. a range of measures and activities undertaken to enhance

the readiness of individuals, communities, organizations, and governments

to effectively respond to and mitigate the impact of disasters or

emergencies.
 14

Flood Victims. Individuals or communities who have been adversely affected by

flooding, experiencing damage to their homes, loss of possessions,

displacement, or other hardships as a result of inundation by water from

overflowing rivers, heavy rainfall, storm surges, or other water-related

events.

Chapter 2

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This chapter presents the results of the study conducted by the researchers using a

researcher-made interview guide. Ten (10) selected participants, flood victims or

residents of Barangay Cagay-anon, Sinacaban, Misamis Occidental, were interviewed

face-to-face. A few questions were asked in relation to the participants' views and

challenges regarding community-based approaches in disaster management. In the

excerpts below, words in italics represent the participants' responses, originally in Bisaya,

but translated into English.

Problem 1: What are the community-based approaches in disaster management

utilized by the local barangay during the flooding?

Three (3) themes have evolved from the responses of the participants on the

question above. These are: The local barangay conducted force evacuations, the

emergency response teams conducted rescue operations and the local barangay distributes

relief goods. This reason was shown in the answers of the participants as stated below.

Theme 1: Local barangay conducted forced evacuations

 15

The importance of conducting forced evacuations during disasters, such as floods,

fires, or storms, lies in ensuring the immediate safety and well-being of individuals in

high-risk areas. When people are unwilling or unable to evacuate voluntarily due to fear,

lack of awareness, or disbelief in the severity of the situation, forced evacuations become

necessary to prevent loss of life. Stated below is the information related to their

responses.

“The local barangay announced force evacuation during that time.” (P2)
“And also, local barangay enforced forced evacuations to relocate us to a
safe evacuation area.” (P3)
“They also conducted forced evacuations, because of the continuous of
rising of water level.” (P4)
As shown in the responses of the participants, three (3) out of ten (10)

participants, stated that the local barangay also conducted forced evacuations in order to

prevent the loss of lives of the residents of barangay Cagay-anon. The current findings is

supported by the study of Cao et al., (2020), stated that forced evacuations also help

prevent overcrowding in shelters, allowing emergency services to focus on critical areas,

maintain order, and provide adequate resources. By removing people from areas of

immediate danger, forced evacuations allow first responders to focus on saving lives and

executing more coordinated disaster response efforts. Ultimately, conducting forced

evacuations is a vital measure to safeguard public health and safety during a crisis,

especially when people's survival depends on timely intervention.

Theme 2: The emergency response team conducted rescue operations

Rescue operations are critically important during emergencies and disasters. It is

an organized efforts to locate, assist, and remove individuals from dangerous or life-
 16

threatening situations, typically during or after a disaster, accident, or emergency. These

operations are aimed at saving lives by providing timely help to those who are trapped,

injured, or in immediate danger. Stated below is the information related to their

responses.

“During that time, they conducted rescue operations in the barangay,

particularly in areas that were inaccessible to reach due to the flood.”
(P1)
“The local barangay at that time conducted rescue operations in order to
save my family, as we were trapped in our home due to the rising of flood
waters.” (P5)
“Our experience at that time was that the barangay conducted rescue
operations, especially in our area, because it was not passable, and I had
my kids with me, which made it dangerous.” (P6)
“At that time, the local barangay rescued us due to the severity of the
rising waters.”(P10)
As shown in the responses of the participants, four (4) of ten (10) stated that the

local barangay of Cagay-anon conducted rescue operations to save the lives of the

affected flood victims brought by the continuous shear line that resulted to the heavy rain

in the area. The current findings is supported by the study of Matsuki et al. (2024), who

stated that conducting rescue operations is crucial for flood victims as it provides

immediate intervention to save lives and minimize further harm. When floodwater rises

rapidly, many people can become trapped in their homes, on rooftops, or in unsafe areas,

making it impossible for them to escape without assistance. Rescue operations ensure that

these individuals are safely evacuated and transported to safer locations, preventing

potential drownings or injuries.

Theme 3: The local barangay distributed relief goods

 17

The distribution of relief goods to victims is a vital aspect of disaster response,

offering immediate assistance to those affected by the crisis. After a disaster, many

individuals may lose access to basic necessities such as food, clean water, and medical

supplies. Stated below is the information related to their responses.

“The local barangay also distributed relief goods to all flood victims.” (P7)
“They also gave us relief goods, such as clothes, especially to those families
whose houses were destroyed by the flood.” (P8)
“Relief goods is also given to us, particularly the water because water system
that time also affected by the flood and it is not safe to drink.” (P9)
“The local barangay distributed some relief goods.” (P10)
As shown in the responses of the participants, four (4) out of ten (10) participants

stated that the local barangay also distributed relief goods to all affected flood victims.

The current findingss is supported by the study of Arnaldo (2024), who stated that relief

goods, including food packages, water, clothing, and hygiene items, provide much-

needed support to help victims survive in the aftermath of the disaster. These goods also

alleviate some of the immediate burdens faced by affected families, allowing them to

focus on recovery and rebuilding. The timely distribution of relief supplies can help

prevent the spread of diseases, ensure proper nutrition, and support mental well-being by

offering a sense of care and support from the community and relief organizations.

Problem 2: How do flood victims describe the operations of community-based

approaches employed in disaster management within their locality?

Four (4) themes have evolved from the responses of the participants on the

question above. These are: Announced late warning signals, the response teams are well-

trained, the evacuation centers are overcrowded and limited financial support for
 18

recovery of the aftermath of the flood. This reason was shown in the answers of the

participants as stated below.

Theme 1: Late announcement of warning signals

Late early warning system in disaster management, especially during floods, can

have devastating consequences for affected communities. Delays in issuing warnings

reduce the time available for residents to prepare, evacuate, or secure their belongings,

increasing their vulnerability to injury, property loss, and even fatalities. Stated below is

the information related to their responses.

“For me, the early warning signs that time are too late, they announce
force evacuations when the water levels at the bridge are in severe
conditions. And it makes us panic that time.” (P2)
“They fail to announce early warning signs, and I think they did not
properly monitor the water level which causes overflow and spread easily
at the entire barangay.” (P3)
“As a resident in the barangay, they announce warning signs too late.”
(P4)
As shown in the responses of the participants, three (3) of ten (10) stated that the

residents of barangay Cagay-anon perceived that the local barangay announces the early

warning signs too late that time, which causes to the residents to panic and did not

prepare for the incidents. The current findings is supported by the study of Shain (2020),

who stated that without timely alerts, people may be caught off guard by rapidly rising

floodwater, leading to panic, confusion, and uncoordinated evacuations. This lack of

preparation often results in overcrowded evacuation centers, as people rush to safety at

the last minute, overwhelming available resources such as food, water, and medical aid.
 19

Additionally, if warnings come too late, responders may struggle to reach flooded areas

in time, making rescues more dangerous and difficult.

Theme 2: Well-trained response team

A well-trained response team plays a crucial role in disaster management,

particularly during floods, as they are responsible for saving lives, minimizing damage,

and ensuring community resilience. Stated below is the information related to their

responses.

“The response teams that time, ensure our safety and they are well
trained, when it comes to rescue operations.” (P1)
“They are well trained in assess flood risks and escorted our families to
evacuation centers safely.” (P5)
“For me, they also ensure children, elderly, pregnant women, and persons
with disabilities (PWDs) receive priority evacuation.” (P6)
“Well trained responders can rescue stranded individuals from flooded
homes and prioritized those people who are need.” (P10)
As shown in the responses of the participants, four (4) of ten (10) stated that the

residents of barangay Cagay-anon perceived that the response teams are well trained

during that catastrophe. The current findings is supported by the study of Ryan et al.,

(2020), who stated that a well-trained response team strengthens community trust and

confidence in disaster management efforts. When residents witness an organized and

efficient response to flooding, they feel safer and are more likely to cooperate with

authorities and participate in disaster preparedness programs. This fosters a strong

bayanihan spirit, where the community actively engages in risk reduction and response

activities.

Theme 3: Overcrowded evacuation centers

 20

Overcrowded evacuation centers during disasters, such as floods, can lead to

severe humanitarian challenges that affect the health, safety, and well-being of evacuees.

Stated below is the information related to their responses.

“For me, my experience that time is that the evacuation center is crowded
and it so difficult to us. Especially, we have our kids and elders.” (P7)
“The evacuation center is overcrowded and lack of equipments and facility
particularly the comfort room are not having water system.” (P8)
As shown in the responses of the participants, two (2) of ten (10) stated that the

residents of barangay Cagay-anon perceived that evacuation centers that time are

overcrowded which make their situations difficult. The current findings is supported by

the study of Hamama et al. (2024), who stated that one of the most immediate effects is

the lack of adequate space and facilities, forcing families to live in cramped and

uncomfortable conditions. This can lead to increased tension, stress, and conflicts among

evacuees, making it difficult to maintain order and ensure the well-being of everyone in

the shelter. Moreover, overcrowded evacuation centers worsen the impact of a disaster,

prolong recovery efforts, and increase the suffering of affected individuals.

Theme 4: Limited financial support for recovery of the aftermath of the flood

Limited support for recovery in the aftermath of a flood can have long-term

consequences on affected communities, making it difficult for them to rebuild their lives.

Stated below is the information related to their responses.

“For me, as one of the victims of that flood and our house has been
destroyed by the flood. Local barangay has limited financial support to
make us recovered of the aftermath.” (P9)
“The local barangay has an insufficient budget to support the financial
recovery from the effects of the flood, particularly for families whose
homes have been destroyed.” (P10)
 21

As shown in the responses of the participants, two (2) of ten (10) stated that the

residents of barangay Cagay-anon observed that local barangay has a limited financial

support for recovery of the aftermath of the flood particularly those affected families. The

current findings is supported by the study of Soulibouth et al. (2021), who stated that

another consequence is the slow recovery of public services and infrastructure. Limited

financial resources mean that damaged roads, schools, health centers, and drainage

systems remain in poor condition for an extended period. This not only disrupts daily

activities but also makes communities more vulnerable to future disasters, as

unmaintained infrastructure can worsen the impact of subsequent floods. Moreover,

insufficient financial support prolongs the suffering of disaster victims, slows down

economic recovery, and increases vulnerability to future crises.

Problem 3: What are the challenges and experiences of flood victims regarding the

incident happened last December 2022?

Four (4) themes have evolved from the responses of the participants on the

question above. These are: Citizens experienced excessive food shortages, flooding that

caused significant trauma to citizens, The houses are washed away by the flood and local

businesses are ruined and destroyed by the flood. This reason was shown in the answers

of the participants as stated below.

Theme 1: Citizens experienced excessive food shortages

 22

Food shortages can cause psychological and emotional distress. The constant

struggle to find something to eat leads to stress, anxiety, and hopelessness, particularly

for parents who are unable to provide for their families. Stated below is the information

related to their responses.

“One of the challenges during that time, is the shortages of food to eat.
Because there are times that if the relief goods were not enough. We will
ask foods from by-passers at the highway.” (P2)

“For me, at that time, food was the main challenge, especially when the
relief goods were not enough, and we had not yet recovered from the
aftermath of the flood.” (P3)

“There are times that we would ask food for other people, sometimes to
those by-passers of the road. Fortunately, they would offer some.” (P4)

As shown in the responses of the participants, three (3) of ten (10) stated that the

residents of Barangay Cagay-anon encountered challenges such as the shortages of foods

to eat. The current findings is supported by the study of Namita (2024), who stated that

flood survivors often face hunger and malnutrition due to disrupted food supplies,

particularly affecting vulnerable groups such as children, the elderly, and pregnant

women. Chronic food shortages can lead to stunted growth in children and weakened

immune systems, making individuals more susceptible to illness. Furthermore, flood

victims are often displaced and may not have access to sufficient food for days or weeks.

Lack of food leads to hunger, which can result in severe malnutrition, particularly in

children, pregnant women, and the elderly.

 23

Theme 2: The flooding that caused significant trauma to citizens

The trauma caused by flooding can have profound and long-lasting effects on

victims, impacting their physical, emotional, and mental well-being. For many, the

experience of flooding is sudden and overwhelming, causing immediate and intense

stress. Stated below is the information related to their responses.

“One of the challenges I faced during that time was the trauma it caused,
as we were unprepared and overwhelmed by the situation. It was an
incredibly difficult experience.” (P1)

“My experience during that incident was truly terrifying; I was nearly
swept away by the flood, and it caused me trauma.” (P5)

As shown in the responses of the participants, two (2) of ten (10) stated that the residents

of Barangay Cagay-anon faced numerous challenges during the incident, which left them

deeply traumatized by the experience. The current findings is supported by the study of

Noren et al., (2023), who stated that the flood victims experienced profound trauma as a

result of the devastating event. Many survivors faced the sudden loss of their homes,

possessions, and livelihoods, leaving them feeling vulnerable and displaced. The

emotional impact of losing everything they knew was overwhelming, with many

struggling to cope with the loss of family members, homes, and their sense of safety.

Theme 3: Families are left homeless

When houses are swept away by floodwaters, the effects on individuals and

communities are devastating. Families are left homeless and are often forced to flee with

little more than the clothes on their backs. The destruction of homes disrupts the stability
 24

and security of daily life, leaving survivors vulnerable and displaced. Stated below is the

information related to their responses.

“Our challenges that time is that our house, is being swept away by the
floods and our belongings are gone.” (P6)
“For me, the challenges are that seeing that your house being swept away
and destroyed by the flood and our belongings such as clothes, utensils and
appliances are floating.” (P10)
As shown in the responses of the participants, two (2) of ten (10) stated that the

residents of Barangay Cagay-anon faced challenges particularly their houses are being

swept away by the flood and all of their things are gone. The current findings is

supported by the study of Lai (2021), who stated that the destruction of homes further

strains already limited resources, as displaced families often have to rely on temporary

shelters or overcrowded refugee camps for survival. Moreover, the loss of homes also

disrupts social structures, as families may be separated, and communities are fragmented.

The psychological and emotional scars of such destruction often persist long after the

immediate disaster, making it more difficult for individuals and communities to rebuild

their lives.
 25

Theme 4: Local businesses suffered catastrophic losses due to flood

Floods can have devastating effects on local businesses, leading to severe

financial and economic consequences for both business owners and the community.

Stated below is the information related to their responses.

“Our challenge at that time was that our sari-sari store had been destroyed,
and all our merchandise was swept away, leaving nothing behind.” (P7)
“And our rice business was also damaged as it was reached by the flood,
making us feel hopeless about our source of income.” (P8)
“For me, it is difficult to see that our after the flood that our motor shops
was reached by the flood water and unfortunately everything was
damaged.” (P9)
“Our Pump boat which is also one of the sources of income here in our
barangay was also swept away by the flood.”(P2)
As shown in the responses of the participants, four (4) ten (10) stated that the

residents of Barangay Cagay-anon faced challenges in which their local business has

been destroyed by the flood which caused their economic loss. The current findings is

supported by the study of Sun et al., (2022), who stated that when floods destroy stores,

markets, and other establishments, business owners suffer huge financial losses, as they

lose products, equipment, and important records. This disruption forces many businesses

to close temporarily or permanently, cutting off their source of income and leaving

employees unemployed and struggling to meet their daily needs. Without immediate

financial assistance or resources for recovery, small business owners find it difficult to

rebuild, which prolongs economic instability in the area. Therefore, the destruction of
 26

local businesses due to floods weakens the community’s financial stability and long-term

growth. To minimize these effects, stronger disaster preparedness measures, financial aid

for affected businesses, and better urban planning are essential

INTERVENTION PLAN

Tangub City Global College

Maloro, Tangub City

I. Program Title: Strengthening Community Resilience: Effective Intervention

Programs for Disaster Management

II. Program Description: This program was designed by the researchers based on

the findings of the study. The researchers suggest the program as it focuses on

enhancing the ability of communities to prepare for, respond to, and recover from

natural and man-made disasters. These intervention programs are designed to

build local capacity, foster collaboration, and empower individuals and groups to

reduce vulnerability and improve adaptive responses.

III. Rationale: Based on the results of the research, the research employed this

program. This program helps communities by enhancing their ability to

anticipate, respond to, and recover from disasters. It empowers individuals and

groups with the knowledge and tools needed to reduce risks and build resilience.

By promoting disaster preparedness, creating emergency response plans, and

fostering collaboration, it ensures that communities can act quickly and

effectively in times of crisis.

 27

IV. Implementation Scheme: The program is divided into three (3) phases. Phase 1

is the preparation phase; proposal of the intervention plan is to be assessed by the

Head of Municipal Disaster Risk Reduction Management Office. Phase 2 is the

implementation phase wherein the recognized program was put into action. Phase

3 is the evaluation phase wherein the participants are evaluated using the

evaluation form.

The program divided into three (3) classifications namely;

PHASE I PHASE II PHASE III

PREPARATION IMPLEMENTATIO EVALUATION

N
PHASE PHASE
PHASE
Evaluation of the
Endorsement of the Program
Implementation of the
Intervention plan.
Intervention plan

Phase I. Preparation phase

Persons/ Means of
Time Proposed
Objectives Strategies Agency verification
Frame Plan Projects
Involved
Endorsement To ask Request a LGU, Letter of approval
of the approval of meeting documentation
intervention MDRRMO
the proposed with LGU,
June plan and
program MDRRMO
2025 design and Local Local
barangay barangay
response response
team. team.
 28

Phase II. Implementation phase

Persons/ Means of
Time
Proposed Plan Projects Objectives Strategies Agency verificatio
Frame
Involved n
July - Early Warning and
To enhance Request a MDRRMO Document
Decemb Preparedness Training
community letter of ation and
er 2025  Conduct regular
awareness about approval for accomplis
disaster drills and
potential the hment
simulation exercises.
disasters, their implementatio report
 Planning and
causes, and the n of the
Preparation
importance of intervention
 Training and
taking preventive plan.
Briefing
measures. This
 Execution of the
program aims to
Drill
develop an
 Evaluation and
effective early
Feedback
warning system
 Post-Drill Analysis
that ensures
and Report
timely detection,
 Follow-up Actions
monitoring, and
communication of
disaster risks,
allowing residents
to respond
quickly and
appropriately.
Financial Recovery Support
for Disaster-Affected
To help disaster- Affected
Citizens
affected Families
individuals and
 Provide financial aid
communities
or micro-loans to
rebuild their
affected small
sources of income
business owners and
and regain
farmers.
financial stability.
 Assessment of Need
One of its primary
 Design Financial
objectives is to
Assistance Program
provide
 Application Process
immediate
 Review and
financial aid and
Approval
micro-loans to
 Disbursement of
affected small
Funds
business owners,
 Post-Disbursement
farmers, and
Support and Follow-
workers, enabling
Up
them to restart
 Repayment and
their livelihoods.
Reinvestment (For
Micro-Loans)
 Documentation and
 29

Reporting

Disaster-Resilient LGU
To enhance the
Infrastructure Development safety and
 Construct flood- durability of
resistant houses and community
evacuation centers. structures to
 Assessment and withstand natural
Planning disasters and
 Design and minimize their
Engineering impact. One key
 Construction objective is to
 Safety Features and construct and
Amenities reinforce disaster-
 Testing and resistant
Inspection buildings, roads,
 Monitoring and and bridges to
Evaluation ensure the
 Ongoing Support continuity of
and Upgrades essential services
during and after
calamities.

Psychological debriefing Affected

assistance To provide victims
 Assessment of Need comprehensive
 Establish a Safe and support to
Supportive individuals who
Environment have experienced
 Provide Immediate a traumatic event.
Emotional Support The primary goal
 Debriefing Session is to offer
 Assess the Need for immediate
Further emotional support
Psychological by creating a safe
Support space for
 Group Debriefing individuals to
(Optional) express their
 Follow-Up and feelings, helping
Continued them feel heard
Monitoring and understood.
 Evaluation and
Feedback

Coastal Protection and

Erosion Control
 Mangrove planting To prevent the LGU
program degradation of
 Beach Nourishment coastal areas,
 Building and stabilize
Maintaining Sea shorelines, and
Walls protect
 Dune Restoration ecosystems and
 30

 Artificial Reefs and

communities from
Breakwaters
the damaging
 Coastal Zoning and
effects of coastal
Land-Use Planning
erosion and storm
 Coastal Erosion
surges.
Monitoring

Supporting Small
Businesses in Disaster
Recovery Affected
To provide business
 Financial Assistance
immediate owners
and Micro-Loans
financial
 Emergency Relief
assistance,
Fund for Immediate
resources, and
Needs
support services
 Business Continuity
to help small
and Risk
businesses resume
Management
their operations as
Planning
quickly as
 Insurance Support
possible after a
and Claims
disaster.
Assistance
 Inventory and
Equipment
Replacement
 Temporary Business
Spaces and Pop-Up
Locations

Phase III. Evaluation phase

Time Proposed Plan Objectives Strategies Person Means of
Frame Projects s/ verification
Agency
Involve
 31

d
To evaluate the Formulate an LGU, Evaluation form
effectiveness of evaluation MDRR
the form to be MO
Decemb Evaluation of the implementation evaluated by Local
er 2025 intervention plan of the the selected barang
intervention participants. ay
plan respons
e team

Prepared by:

MICHELLE ALTHEA MIRANDA

Researcher

KENT MARK ASWE

Researcher

Noted:

RODRIN C. RIVERA, MSC

Adviser

Approved:

LOVE H. FALLORAN, PhD

Dean, Institute of Criminal Justice Education

UNDERSTANDING THE COMMUNITY-BASED APPROACHES IN

DISASTER MANAGEMENT: INSIGHTS FROM THE FLOOD VICTIMS
OF CAGAY-ANON SINACABAN MIS OCC
 32

COMMUNITY-BASED Descriptions on
APPROACHES
CHALLENGES
operations

Local barangay
Late announcement of Citizens experienced
conducted forced warning signals excessive food shortages
evacuations

The emergency response The flooding that caused

Response teams are well-
team conducted rescue significant trauma to
trained
operations citizens

Local barangay Overcrowded evacuation

Families are left homeless
distributed relief goods centers

Limited financial support Local businesses suffered

for recovery of the catastrophic losses due to
aftermath of the flood flood

Figure 1: Structural Representation of the Prevailing Themes on Understanding the

Community-Based Approaches in Disaster Management: Insights from the Flood Victims
of Cagay-anon, Sinacaban, Mis. Occ.

Chapter 3

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 33

This chapter presents the summary of findings, conclusions, and

recommendations based on the results in Chapter 2.

Summary of findings

The study on “Understanding the Community-Based Approaches in Disaster

Management: Insights from the Flood Victims of Cagay-anon, Sinacaban, Mis. Occ.”

was conducted to explore the perceptions and challenges experienced by the residents

during the flood that occurred in Barangay Cagay-anon. This study was carried out with

ten (10) selected participants using the convenience sampling method, particularly

targeting flood victims in the aforementioned area. A qualitative research method was

employed, utilizing a researcher-made interview questionnaire, which was then analyzed

using thematic analysis.

The study revealed that the community-based approaches perceived by the flood

victims three (3) themes emerged these are: Local barangay conducted forced

evacuations, the emergency response teams conducted rescue operations and local

barangay distributed relief goods. As to the perception perceived by the participants four

(4) themes emerged these are: Late announcement of warning signals, well-trained

response teams, overcrowded evacuations centers and limited financial support for

recovery of the aftermath of the flood. As to the challenges experienced by the

participants four (4) themes emerged these are: Citizens experienced excessive food

shortages, The flooding that caused significant trauma to citizens, families are left

homeless and local businesses suffered catastrophic losses due to flood. The participants

also suggested intervention programs that are suitable when it comes to withstand future
 34

calamities and rebuild security and stability these are: early warning and prepared

training, financial recovery support for disaster-affected communities, disaster resilient

infrastructure development, psychological debriefing assistance and coastal protection

and erosion control and supporting small business in disaster recovery.

Conclusion

The researchers concluded that community-based approaches are essential for

disaster management, especially when it comes to helping flood victims in Barangay

Cagay-anon, Sinacaban, Misamis Occidental. The study emphasizes the importance of

these strategies in empowering local communities, increasing resilience, and enhancing

response efforts' efficiency. By actively involving communities in preparedness,

response, and recovery efforts, community-based strategies make sure that interventions

are customized to meet the specific needs of individuals impacted. Additionally,

addressing issues head-on helps people, groups, and institutions get past barriers that

might otherwise impede advancement and growth. Early problem identification allows

for the proactive implementation of solutions, which stops problems from getting worse

and lessens their long-term effects. These revelations highlight how crucial it is to

improve preparedness for disasters.

 35

Recommendations

The following recommendations are offered based on the general objectives and

the significance of the study.

1. The Local Government may enhance disaster preparedness by investing in

timely early warning systems, conducting community drills, and improving

coordination with meteorological agencies. Moreover, it should allocate resources

for upgrading evacuation centers with adequate facilities and implement

infrastructure and flood mitigation projects, such as improved drainage, riverbank

reinforcement, seawalls, and reforestation, particularly in Barangay Cagay-anon.

2. The Local Barangay level may conduct regular training and capacity-building

programs for emergency responders and volunteers to enhance their disaster

response skills, such as swift water rescue, medical aid, and evacuation

procedures. Moreover, planting more mangrove trees should be prioritized as

natural barriers to reduce the impact of storm surges, flooding, and coastal

erosion.

3. NGOs may collaborate with local government units (LGUs) to improve the

community-based disaster management strategies, enhancing the resilience of

flood-affected communities and ensuring that they are better prepared for future

challenges.

4. Future researchers may consider multiple flood-prone barangays to compare

community-based approaches and identify best practices for disaster management.

 36

REFERENCES

Badrudin, A. R. (2021). Issues of disaster management preparedness: A case study of

Directive 20 of the National Security Council in Malaysia. International Journal
of Business and Social Science, 3(1), 85–86.

Carafano, J. J., Marshall, J. A., & Hammond, L. C. (2020). Grassroots disaster response:
Harnessing the capacities of communities. The Heritage Foundation.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative,

and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.

Crosweller, M., & Tschakert, P. (2021). Disaster management and the need for a
reinstated social contract of shared responsibility. International Journal of
Disaster Risk Reduction, 63, 102440. https://rb.gy/1zpbic

Geekiyanage, D., Fernando, T., & Keraminiyage, K. (2020). Assessing community

engagement for participatory decision-making in disaster risk-sensitive urban
development. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 51, 101847.
https://rb.gy/61dksh

Geipel, R. (2024). Disaster and reconstruction. Taylor & Francis.

Hallegatte, S., Vogt-Schilb, A., Rozenberg, J., Bangalore, M., & Beaudet, C. (2020).
From poverty to disaster and back: A review of the literature. Economics of
Disasters and Climate Change, 4(1), 223–247. https://rb.gy/sa6r1q

Hamama, L., Sarid, O., & Hamama‐Raz, Y. (2024). Psychological distress, resources,
and coping strategies among evacuees and non‐evacuees from an armed conflict
zone: A network analysis. Stress and Health, 41(1). https://rb.gy/3wique
 37

Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research:
A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523.
https://rb.gy/2wecw8

Laja, P. (2020). What’s a good sample size for qualitative research? Wynter.
https://surl.li/xtjjqn

MacQueen, K. M., McLellan, E., Metzger, D. S., Kegeles, S., Strauss, R. P., Scotti, R.,
Blanchard, L., & Trotter, R. T. II. (2021). What is community? An evidence-
based definition for participatory public health. American Journal of Public
Health, 91(12), 1929–1938.

Marshall, J., Wiltshire, J., Delva, J., Bello, T., & Masys, A. J. (2020). Natural and
manmade disasters: Vulnerable populations. Advanced Sciences and
Technologies for Security Applications, 143–161. https://surl.li/ouszux

McLennan, B. J. (2018). Conditions for effective coproduction in community-led disaster

risk management. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit
Organizations, 31. https://surl.li/fcpgqv

Mizutori, M. (2020). Reflections on the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction:
Five years since its adoption. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science,
11(2). https://surl.li/ywnowi

Mohamed Shaluf, I. (2007). An overview of disasters. Disaster Prevention and

Management, 16(5), 687–703. https://surl.li/igkocf

Onstad, P. A., Danes, S. M., Hardman, A. M., Olson, P. D., Marczak, M. S., & Heins, R.
K. (2021). The road to recovery from a natural disaster: Voices from the
community. Community Development, 43(5), 566–580.
 38

Phillips, B., Neal, D., & Webb, G. (2022). Introduction to emergency management. CRC
Press.

Ryan, B., Johnston, K. A., Taylor, M., & McAndrew, R. (2020). Community engagement
for disaster preparedness: A systematic literature review. International Journal of
Disaster Risk Reduction, 49. https://surl.li/jlggie

Saño, E. A. (2020). Primer on the Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM)
Act of 2010. https://surl.li/tzmszj

Shain, S. (2021). How to stay safe during a flash flood. The New York Times.
https://surl.li/ucvfhn

Soulibouth, L., Hwang, H. S., & Shin, D. H. (2021). The impact of flood damage on
farmers, agriculture, and food security in Laos: A case study of Champhone
District, Savannaket Province. Journal of International Development
Cooperation, 16(2), 151–170. https://surl.li/afaclu

Sufri, S., Dwirahmadi, F., Phung, D., & Rutherford, S. (2020). Enhancing community
engagement in disaster early warning systems in Aceh, Indonesia: Opportunities
and challenges. Natural Hazards. https://surl.li/utsupk

Sun, Q., Mann, J., & Skidmore, M. (2022). The impacts of flooding on business activity
and employment: A spatial perspective on small business. Water Economics and
Policy. https://surl.li/oosmdg

Tuladhar, G., Yatabe, R., Dahal, R., & Bhandary, N. (2015). Disaster risk reduction
knowledge of local people in Nepal. Geoenvironmental Disasters, 2(5).
https://surl.li/ojzart

United Nations Development Programme. (2019). Reducing disaster risk: A challenge

for development. Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery.
 39

Vij, R. (2022). Types of disasters. In Management of Animals in Disasters (pp. 3–14).

https://surl.li/scni

APPENDICES
 40

APPENDIX A

Letter to the Management

 41

APPENDIX B
 42

Letter of Permission
 43

APPENDIX C

Letter to the Participants

 44

APPENDIX D

Informed Consent
 45

APPENDIX E

Interview Guide Questionnaire

Tangub City Global College

Maloro, Tangub City

UNDERSTANDING THE COMMUNITY-BASED APPROACHES IN DISASTER

MANAGEMENT: INSIGHTS FROM THE FLOOD VICTIMS OF CAGAY-ANON
SINACABAN MIS OCC

I. Greetings

II. The proponents introduce themselves.

III. The proponents Discuss the purpose of the study.

IV. Provide structure of the interview.

VI. Key Questions:

1. What are the community-based approaches in disaster management

utilized by local barangay during the flooding incident in your barangay?
2. How do flood victims describe the operations of community-based
approaches employed in disaster management within their locality?
3. What are the challenges and experiences of flood victims regarding the
incident happened last December 2022?
4. What intervention programs can be proposed with the suggestions of flood
victims regarding the improvement and sustainability of community-based
disaster management strategies in Cagay-anon Sinacaban Mis Occ?

VII. Probing Questions

1. How does your barangay manage disasters specifically the facilitation of

rescue, distribution of relief, and monitoring of your status during the time
of the flooding incident in your area?
 46

2. Did the community-based disaster management utilized by your barangay

help you during the flooding situation? If yes, how did you benefit from
it? If no, how did it affect your safety?
3. From your perspective, what aspects of these strategies could be improved
to make them more sustainable in the long term?

VIII. ENDING REMARKS.

1.Thank the participants.

2. Ask the participants if they want a copy of the results.

 47

APPENDIX F

Instrument Validation Sheet

48
49
50
 51

APPENDIX G

Transcript of Responses

Participant: Flood Victim number 1

Duration: 9mins, 28 sec
Session Number: 01
Time & Date of interview: January 28,2025
Interviewed and transcribed by: Michelle Althea M. Miranda
Transcript Number: 1
Mode of Interview: Personal Interview
Location: Brgy. Cagay-anon Misamis Occidental

Line Utterances Analysis

Number
1 Researcher 1:
2 Good morning ma’am we are the fourth year students from
3 Tangub City Global College
4 Taking up Bachelor of Science in industrial Security
5 Management. As a requirement for our program, we are
6 currently conducting our research study titled, Understanding,
7 the community based Approaches in Disaster management:
8 Insights from the flood Victims of Cagay-anon Sinacaban
9 Misamis Occidental. Okay ra ba ka ma’am nga ma interview
10 karong adlawa? Can you please introduce yourself first?
11 FV 1: Good morning ma’am/ sir Ako diay c Jocelyn Brioso
12 Barangay Captain deri sa Cagay-anon Sinacaban Misamis
13 Occidental okay ko nga interviewhon ninyo about sa flooding
14 incident katong niaging December Last last December 2022.
15 Researcher 1: So, pwede naba ta ma’am mo proceed sa atong
16 mga key questions ma’am?
17 FV 1: okay
18 Researcher 1: our first question here ma’am is What are the
19 community-based approaches in disaster management utilized
20 by local barangay during the flooding incident in your
21 barangay?
22 FV 1: Okay thank you for your question, ang gibuhat atos mga
23 barangay kay nag rescue operations sila sa amoa atong taas na
24 kaayug tubig ang baha taga li-og najd to.
25 Researcher 1: Thank you ma’am so the second question is Ikaw
 52

26 ma’am as a Flood victim unsa man imohang Nakita sa ge

27 implement nga community-based approaches sa disaster
28 management within sa inyong locality.
29 FV 1: Aw katong kuan ma’am ang mga nag responde kanamo
30 niatong panahona kay mga maayu ba kumbaga mga hanas bitaw
31 sila ma’am.
32 Researcher 1: So atoang number three question is What are the
33 challenges and experiences of flood victims regarding the
34 incident happened last December 2022?
35 FV 1: As a Flood victim dli grabeng trauma jud nako ato
36 ma’am, karun pako ka experience ing ato nga kalit-kalit lang
37 kaayu ba. Bisag karun man gale ma hinunduman jd nako ang
38 kapait sa sitwasyun atong timema.
39 Researcher 1: Ang ika upat nato nga pangutana ma’am is unsa
40 man ang mga possible nga mga programa or interventions ang
41 imohang ika propose, e ka suggest or e ka dungag para sa
42 kaayuhannor improvement regarding sa sustainability of
43 community-based disaster management strategies sa barangay
44 Cagay-anon?
45 FV 1: Kuan ma’am dapat magpahigayun gayud silag
46 panghimangno ahead of time bitaw dapat mag monitor najud
47 perme sa tubig sa tulay.
48 PROBING Questions
49 Researcher 1: So karon ma’am proceed ta sa atong probing
50 questions we have three probing questions ma’am the first one is
51 ge unsa sa inyuhang barangay pag manage ang kato nga disaster
52 or pagbaha specifically ang facilitation of rescue, distribution of
53 relief, and monitoring of your status during the time of the
54 flooding incident?
55 FV 1: Ah okay, ang Kuan barangay nag monitor gyud ug
56 kanang naay mga relief goods, kaming mga barangay council ge
57 by purok gyud namo pero bisag dli tanan pero at least naka
58 tabang gyud, kami pud naglihok sa barangay amo pud ge a pod-
59 apof pero mao lageh nagkulang tungod sa kadaghan sa mga
60 biktima sa baha.
61 Researcher 1: Ang ika duha nga question ma’am is ang
62 community -based disaster management ba nga ge utilized sa
63 inyong barangay nakatabnag during atong pagbaha? If yes
64 imong answer ma’am naka benefit ba mo ato? Then if no imong
65 answer ma’am naka apekto ba to sya sa imong siguridad?
66 FV 1: Yes Of course nakatabang gyud kaayo ang atoang
67 Community – based nagamit gyud namo atong higayunalabinna
68 tong how to evacuate ug katong unsaon pag tabang nato nga
69 maluwas. Mao ang mgaLGUs mga Taga opisina magpahibalo
70 nasab sila sa among barangay.
 53

71 Researcher 1: So proceed ta sa last nato nga question ma’am. Sa

72 imohang perspective ma’am or sa inyuhang panglantaw unsa
73 man or asa nga aspeto sa ilahang strategies ang pwede e
74 improved para mahimong sustainable in the long term?
75 FV 1: Ang kailangan ma improve is ang training more training
76 pa, then budget nga intended anang hitabua or ang quick
77 response.
78 Researcher 1: Daghang salamat ma’am for participating do you
79 want a copy for the result ma’am?
FV 1: No
Participant: Flood Victim number 2
Duration: 7mins, 38 sec
Session Number: 02
Time & Date of interview: January 28,2025
Interviewed and transcribed by: Michelle Althea M. Miranda
Transcript Number: 2
Mode of Interview: Personal Interview
Location: Brgy. Cagay-anon Misamis Occidental
Line Utterances Analysis
Number
1 Researcher 1: Good morning sir, we are the fourth year students
2 from Tangub City Global College. Taking up Bachelor of
3 Science in industrial Security Management. Naa me deri karon
4 Aron mag gather ug data about sa flooding incident last²
5 December 2022 but before that sir pwede ba namo ma ask ug
6 unsa imong pangalan?
7 FV 2: Ako si Jhonny Boy Ducot nag puyo sa Brgy. Cagay-anon
8 Misamis Occidental.
9 Researcher 1: Okay Thank you sir so proceed nata sa first
10 question nato sir
11 FV 2: ok²
12 Researcher 1: So ang number one question nato sir is What are
13 the community-based approaches in disaster management
14 utilized by local barangay during the flooding incident in your
15 barangay?
16 FV 2: That time ma’am sa Akong nahiagum Kay gipa forced
17 evacuation namis sa mga taga barangay kay paspas kaayug saka
18 sa tubig sab aha man gud ma’am. Dayun mag lisud namig gawas
19 sa among balay hilabina nga naa miy mga gagmayng bata bitaw.
20 Researcher 1: How do flood victims perceive the effectiveness
21 of community-based approaches employed in disaster
22 management within their locality?
23 FV 2: Sa akoa ma’am uwahi najud kaayu ang pag announce nila
24 bitaw, like dako na ang tubig arya ra sila nag announce pinakalit
25 kaayu. Maong kami wala kaayu mi ka pangandam like nag
 54

26 karag-karag intawun mi.

27 Researcher 1: Thank you sir, number three question nato sir is
28 What are the challenges and experiences of flood victims
29 regarding the incident happened last December 2022?
30 FV 2: actually ma’am ang pinaka worst nako nga experience
31 nga baha is katong last² December 2022 grabeh gyud to sya
32 naabot nami sa point nga nangayo nami sa bisan kinsay mo
33 labay nga sakyanan sa among dapit para makakaon me ma’am
34 Kay gutom na nahurot tanan mga pagkaon namo na anod tanan
35 pati mga lutuan so dli gyud me Maka Dali Dali ug lihok Kay
36 ang tubig sab naa sa sulod sa among Panimalay. Naa sab me
37 silingan kaayo nga ilahang balay naanod na gyud Akong
38 silingan nga c Maricelle hapit gyud sya ma anod ma’am
39 pasalamat gyud me nga nakhawid pa sya haligi sa balay grabeh
40 gyud ma’am
41 Researcher 1: huhu Pasensya kaayo sir
42 FV 2: okay Ra ma’am makahilak lang ko nadumduman.
43 Researcher 1: So number four question nako sir is What are the
44 possible programs or interventions that you can propose with the
45 suggestions of flood victims regarding the improvement and
46 sustainability of community-based disaster management
47 strategies in Cagay-anon Sinacaban Mis Occ?
48 Researcher 1: Akong ika suggest nga programa ma’am labi na
49 sa Brgy Cagay-anon is dapat permente jd sila mag monitor
50 incase ug naay mga ulan2 nga way hunong-hunong kay para ma
51 alert dayun ang mga katawhan ba, dili na mag karag-karag pa.
52 Probing Questions
53 Researcher 1: So proceed napud ta deri sa atoang Probing
54 questions sir naa Tay mga tulo ka pangutana sir
55 FV 2: okay ma’am
56 Researcher 1: How does your barangay manage disasters
57 specifically the facilitation of rescue, distribution of relief, and
58 monitoring of your status during the time of the flooding
59 incident in your area?
60 FV 2: Amoang barangay gyud sa tinuod lang naa man ang
61 rescue that time pero ulahi na ge tugnaw nami ug ayo, ug mag
62 hisgot ug na monitor Wala na sya atong timema Kay isig
63 paningkamot na ang uban nga mabuhi.
64 Researcher 1: Did the community-based disaster management
65 utilized by your barangay help you during the flooding
66 situation? If yes, how did you benefit from it? If no, how did it
67 affect your safety?
68 FV 2:
69 For me yes , but not totally. Yes Kay naka benefit me ato gamay
70 mga learnings namo ato nagamit ra dli tanan.
 55

71 Researcher 1: From your perspective, what aspects of these

72 strategies could be improved to make them more sustainable in
73 the long term?
74 FV 2: Para lang sa akoa, siguro about sa ilahang strategy kulang
gyud sya need sya nga ma improve pa like dapat naa gyud
immediate action then more Training and Fairness sa tanan
gyud.
 56

Participant: Flood Victim number 3

Duration: 5mins, 36 sec
Session Number: 03
Time & Date of interview: January 28,2025
Interviewed and transcribed by: Michelle Althea M. Miranda
Transcript Number: 3
Mode of Interview: Personal Interview
Location: Brgy. Cagay-anon Misamis Occidental
Line Utterances Analysis
Number
1 Researcher 1: Good morning ma’am we are the fourth year
2 students from Tangub City Global College. Taking up Bachelor
3 of Science in industrial Security Management. Naa me deri
4 karon Aron mag gather ug data about sa flooding incident last²
5 December 2022. Okay Ra ba nimo ma’am nga ma interview ka
6 namo karong adlawa?
7 FV 3: Yes ma’am Way problema.
8 Researcher 1: but before that ma’am pwede ba namo ma ask ug
9 unsa imong pangalan?
10 FV 3: Ako diay si Aiza Rodriguez nag puyo sa Barangay
11 Cagay-anon Mis Occ.
12 Researcher 1: Okay so Thank you ma’am and now mo proceed
13 nata sa atoang first question ma’am. What are the community-
14 based approaches in disaster management utilized by local
15 barangay during the flooding incident?
16 FV 3: Kuan ma’am atong hitaboa gyud, gipa forced evacuation
17 nami ato nila ma’am didtos evacuation area bitaw ma’am.
18 Researcher 1: Okay so ang second question nato deri ma’am
19 Kay How do flood victims perceive the effectiveness of
20 community-based approaches employed in disaster management
21 within their locality?
22 FV 3: Kuan gyud sya ma’am, uwahi na kaayu ang warning signs
23 nila pag announce. Murag wala kaayu nila namonitor ang
24 pagsaka sa tubig sa seawall bitaw maong mi lapaw kini dayun
25 dali ra mi lunop sa barangay gyud nga way undang-undang ang
26 ulan.
27 Researcher 1: What are the challenges and experiences of flood
28 victims regarding the incident happened last December 2022?
29 FV 3: Ang amoang experience ato is grabeh gyud to sya ma’am
30 like pagkaon jud ang pinaka problema ato, bisag naay relief
31 goods pero dili man gud sya enough bitaw like tulo or upat ka
32 adlaw hurot na. Niya wala pami ka recover jud sa epektos baha.
33 Researcher 1: What are the possible programs or interventions
34 that you can propose with the suggestions of flood victims
35 regarding the improvement and sustainability of community-
 57

36 based disaster management strategies in Cagay-anon Sinacaban

37 Mis Occ?
38 FV 3: Mag provide gyud ug mga floating Boats na pwede Maka
39 rescue then evacuation gyud deri MISMO sa Cagay-anon.
40 Probing Questions
41 Researcher 1: So Proceed na sab ta diare sa atong last 3
42 questions ma’am sa probing question. Ang unang pangutana
43 Kay How does your barangay manage disasters specifically the
44 facilitation of rescue, distribution of relief, and monitoring of
45 your status during the time of the flooding incident in your area?
46 FV 3: About sa pag manage sa amoa Wala gyud me na manage
47 ug tarong ma’am sa Barangay ulahi na kaayo. Didto na sila
48 nanghatag atong wa nay baha Humana pila na Ka adlaw or
49 weeks nanglabay. About sa rescue evacuation Wala me ana
50 ma’am walay kabutngan.
51 Researcher 1: Did the community-based disaster management
52 utilized by your barangay help you during the flooding
53 situation? If yes, how did you benefit from it? If no, how did it
54 affect your safety?
55 FV 3: No. As in Wala gyud Kay wa man silay action that time
56 during sa baha naningkamot man sab sila ug ilaha nga
57 maluwas.Naka apekto gyud sya kay wala me ge pang kaon na
58 kay nanga anod nagpa abot nalang me nga naay manglabay sa
59 kalsada manghatag usahay manglimos me sa kanang manglabay
60 kay Hastang paita gyud
61 Researcher 1: From your perspective, what aspects of these
62 strategies could be improved to make them more sustainable in
63 the long term?
64 FV 3: Ang ilahang strategy nga dapat nila e change is Ang
ilahang Planning, initiative ug immediate Action gyud.
 58

Participant: Flood Victim number 4

Duration: 5mins, 48sec
Session Number: 04
Time & Date of interview: January 28,2025
Interviewed and transcribed by: Michelle Althea M. Miranda
Transcript Number: 4
Mode of Interview: Personal Interview
Location: Brgy. Cagay-anon Misamis Occidental
Line Utterances Analysis
Number
1 Researcher 1: Good morning ma’am we are the fourth year
2 students from Tangub City Global College. Taking up Bachelor
3 of Science in industrial Security Management. Naa me deri
4 karon Aron mag gather ug data about sa flooding incident last²
5 December 2022. Okay Ra ba nimo ma’am nga ma interview ka
6 namo karong adlawa?
7 FV 4: Oo okay Ra
8 Researcher 1: Thank you ma’am, so before nato sugdan ma’am
9 pwede ba namo ma ask kung unsa imong Pangalan?
10 FV 4: Ako si Michelle Grace Natinga Ga puyo sa Barangay
11 Cagay-anon Sinacaban Mis Occ
12 Researcher 1: Okay ma’am so proceed nata sa atoang First
13 Question, our first question is What are the community-based
14 approaches in disaster management utilized by local barangay
15 during the flooding incident in your barangay?
16 FV 4: Ang mga community -based ma’am during atong flooding
17 is gipa forced evacuation nagyud mi nila kay gumikan sa
18 pagtaas sa tubig nga way hunong nga ulan bitaw.
19 Researcher 1: Okay ika duha nga question ma’am is How do
20 flood victims perceive the effectiveness of community-based
21 approaches employed in disaster management within their
22 locality?
23 FV 4: Para sa akoa bitaw gyd, uwahi na kaayu ilang
24 panghimangno sa amoa niya kami kampante rapod kaayu.
25 Researcher 1: What are the challenges and experiences of flood
26 victims regarding the incident happened last December 2022?
27 FV 4: Kato sya ma’am kung experience lang ug challenges
28 grabeh gyud to ma’am mangayu nalang gud mig pagkaon sa
29 mga lumalabay sa highway nya but-an pod kaayu sila mohatag
30 rapod biya sila.
31 Researcher 1: Okay so last question sa atong key questions
32 ma’am is what are the possible programs or interventions that
33 you can propose with the suggestions of flood victims regarding
34 the improvement and sustainability of community-based disaster
 59

35 management strategies in Cagay-anon Sinacaban Mis Occ?

36 FV 4: Kuan kanang mag Kuan sila ug programa nga mag tanom
37 ug mangrove tree sa dagat maynalang makapugong sa mga
38 balod nga mo hapak sa mga kabalayan ma’am Kay wa pay
39 seawall deri ni lahos bisan kana nalang Kay louy kaayo mga
40 balay deri na nga anod.
41 Researcher 1: Okay ma’am Thank you nice nga program na
42 ma’am. So karon ma’am proceed ta sa last nga part which is ang
43 atoang Probing questions. So naa Tay tulo ma’am the first
44 question is How does your barangay manage disasters
45 specifically the facilitation of rescue, distribution of relief, and
46 monitoring of your status during the time of the flooding
47 incident in your area?
48 FV 4: Kanang deri sa amoa gyud na less prioritize ang amoang
49 barangay pag abot sa mga rescue² mas na una pa ang Sinonoc ug
50 katong uban na Barangay kami na ulahi kung naa man ang na
51 rescue ug una mao nay ge ingon ngaduol sa luwag pabor kami
52 na rescue me pero daghan pa tawon me ug ge sagubang while ga
53 paabot nga naay mo rescue.
54 Researcher 1: Did the community-based disaster management
55 utilized by your barangay help you during the flooding
56 situation? If yes, how did you benefit from it? If no, how did it
57 affect your safety?
58 FV 4: Yes nakatabang Ra pero dli gyud ta kaingon nga 100% .
59 Researcher 1: From your perspective, what aspects of these
60 strategies could be improved to make them more sustainable in
61 the long term?
62 FV 4: About sa ilahang strategies gyud dapat ang kaning naa sa
63 barangay sila ang nagdumala ilaha gyud dapat aksyonan ilahang
64 ge pangakuan then isa pa Fairness ug immediate action.
 60

Participant: Flood Victim number 5

Duration: 8mins, 49sec
Session Number: 05
Time & Date of interview : January 28,2025
Interviewed and Transcribed by: Michelle Althea M.
Transcript Number: 5
Mode of Interview: Personal Interview
Location: Brgy. Cagay-anon Misamis Occidental
Line Utterances Analysis
Number
1 Researcher 1:Good morning ma’am we are the fourth year
2 students from Tangub City Global College. Taking up Bachelor
3 of Science in industrial Security Management. Naa me deri
4 karon Aron mag gather ug data about sa flooding incident last²
5 December 2022. Okay Ra ba nimo ma’am nga ma interview ka
6 namo karong adlawa?
7 FV 5: Yes ma’am okay Ra
8 Researcher 1: okay ma’am Thank you but before we proceed
9 ma’am Pwede ba namo ma kuha imong pangalan ma’am?
10 FV 5: Ok Ako si Maria Beah Roasol nga nagpuyo sa Barangay
11 Cagay-anon Mis Occ
12 Researcher 1: Let us now Proceed to our first question ma’am.
13 So our first question here is What are the community-based
14 approaches in disaster management utilized by local barangay
15 during the flooding incident?
16 FV 5: Kuan man to ma’am, nag conduct silage rescue operation
17 ato sa amoa kay na trapped naman mis among balay kay
18 gumikan sa taas sa tubig ba.
19 Researcher 1: How do flood victims perceive the effectiveness
20 of community-based approaches employed in disaster
21 management within their locality?
22 FV 5: So far atong flood last December 2022 kuan mga maayu
23 kaayu sila mo rescue hilabina sa pagtabang sa among pamilya
24 ng ana trap intawun padung sa bakwitanan.
25 Researcher 1:What are the challenges and experiences of flood
26 victims regarding the incident happened last December 2022?
27 FV 5: Mao to sya ang feeling na dli nmo expected ang tanan
28 grabeng trauma nga akong na sinati ato ma’am samot na trap
29 mis among pamilya bitaw, inya December pajud kaayu to.
30 Isa pa nanga anod among mga kabtangan balay sa among mga
31 silingan nanga anod mga Baboy nanga anod ug nasabod sa balay
32 mga Pumpboat ug uban grabeh wash out daghan kaayo.
33 Researcher 1: huhu grabeh gyud sya ma’am pasensya kaayo
34 FV 5: Okay Ra no problem
 61

35 Researcher 1: Unsa man ma’am proceed na ta sa next question?

36 FV 5: Okay ma’am
37 Researcher 1: What are the possible programs or interventions
38 that you can propose with the suggestions of flood victims
39 regarding the improvement and sustainability of community-
40 based disaster management strategies in Cagay-anon Sinacaban
41 Mis Occ?
42 FV 5: About sa program is evacuation Center deri sa Cagay-
43 anon then seawall
44 Researcher 1: Okay ma’am Thank you so proceed nata sa atoang
45 first question sa probing ma’am so atoang first question here
46 ma’am Kay How does your barangay manage disasters
47 specifically the facilitation of rescue, distribution of relief, and
48 monitoring of your status during the time of the flooding
49 incident in your area?
50 FV 5: Yes, na monitor especially katong naa sa evacuation area
51 so na manage Ra sya.
52 Researcher 1: Did the community-based disaster management
53 utilized by your barangay help you during the flooding
54 situation? If yes, how did you benefit from it? If no, how did it
55 affect your safety?
56 FV 5: Ang sa mga disaster management yes nag gamit Ra sya
57 pero lageh kulang pa. We need more about ani
58 Researcher 1: From your perspective, what aspects of these
59 strategies could be improved to make them more sustainable in
60 the long term?
61 FV 5: Para nako ilahang strategies nila e change nila mag build
62 sila ug evacuation Center Kay kinahanglanon kaayo. Louy
63 kaayo ang Brgy. Cagay-anon Kay maabot pag laing barangay
64 para maka evacuate or Maka silong unya daghan pud kaayo
65 residente didto nanginahanglan. So mao to ma’am mag pa build
66 sila ug evacuation Center .
67 Researcher 1: Thank you so much for your answer ma’am and
68 thank you also for participating. Do you want a copy of the
69 result ma’am ?
70 FV 5: Okay na ug dli
 62

Participant: Flood Victim number 6

Duration: 8mins, 49sec
Session Number: 06
Time & Date of interview : January 28,2025
Interviewed and Transcribed by: Michelle Althea M. Miranda
Transcript Number: 6
Mode of Interview: Personal Interview
Location: Brgy. Cagay-anon Misamis Occidental
Line Utterances Analysis
Number
1 Researcher 1: Good morning ma’am we are the fourth year
2 students from Tangub City Global College. Taking up Bachelor
3 of Science in industrial Security Management. Naa me deri
4 karon Aron mag gather ug data about sa flooding incident last²
5 December 2022. Okay Ra ba nimo ma’am nga ma interview ka
6 namo karong adlawa?
7 FV 6: Okay Ra Ma’am
8 Researcher 1: Thank you ma’am so let us now proceed to our
9 first question ma’am . Our first question is What are the
10 community-based approaches in disaster management utilized
11 by local barangay during the flooding incident in your
12 barangay?
13 FV 6: Kuan ma’am gi rescue mi nila ato kay dili naman mi
14 maka agi kay tungod sa dako nga tubig ba dayun naa pagyud
15 koy mga bata maong delikado kaayu gyd to sya.
16 Researcher 1: How do flood victims perceive the effectiveness
17 of community-based approaches employed in disaster
18 management within their locality?
19 FV 6: Sa Akong Nakita okay Ra sya Kay maayu man pod ang
20 pag rescue sa amoa hilabina sa mga bata, mga PWD’s bitaw ug
21 mga sa tigulang gina prioritized gyd ang safety ba.
22 Researcher 1: What are the challenges and experiences of flood
23 victims regarding the incident happened last December 2022?
24 FV 6: Mga challenges lisod kaayo pait sa nga tanan Pinaka
25 challenging na nahitabo sa Akong kinabuhi ang Makita ang
26 uban namong silingan iya-iya ug langoy sa tubig nga taman liog
27 sulog kaayo dayun Nakita nako among balay na anod gyd says
28 baha tungod sa sulog kaayu ba. Haskang paeta gyud intawn
29 huna-hunaon tong sitwasyuna,
30 Researcher 1: pasensya kaayo ma’am unsa man e padayon pa
31 nato ma’am?
32 FV 6: Cgeh lang Padayon lang ma’am
33 Researcher 1: okay ma’am Thank you so What are the possible
 63

34 programs or interventions that you can propose with the

35 suggestions of flood victims regarding the improvement and
36 sustainability of community-based disaster management
37 strategies in Cagay-anon Sinacaban Mis Occ?
38 FV 6: About sa program dapat gyud mag build sila ug
39 evacuation then more training sab ma’am then mga drainage sab
40 paga tutokan unta nila na Aron lahos² ang daloy sa tubig.
41 Researcher 1: Thank you ma’am so now mo proceed ta sa
42 Probing questions ma’am We have three questions in probing
43 question ma’am the first one is How does your barangay
44 manage disasters specifically the facilitation of rescue,
45 distribution of relief, and monitoring of your status during the
46 time of the flooding incident in your area?
47 FV 6: Ang pag manage sa barangay lahi ra gyud ma’am dli sya
48 okay naay pili lisod kaayo pag ingon ana nalang pilion ang
49 tawo nga pareha Raman unta me tanan nabahaan.
50 Researcher 1:Did the community-based disaster management
51 utilized by your barangay help you during the flooding
52 situation? If yes, how did you benefit from it? If no, how did it
53 affect your safety?
54 FV 6: Para sa akoa ma’am No, grabeh to nga time sa amoa
55 ma’am naabot me sa point nga nag atang me sa highway nga
56 naay e hatag nga mga foods nga luto na Kay wa nami lutuan
57 Kay na ngabasa ug nanga anod na . Kanang feeling nga ilawom
58 ka pero need nmoangayo Kay no choice ka.
59 Researcher 1: From your perspective, what aspects of these
60 strategies could be improved to make them more sustainable in
61 the long term?
62 FV 6: Ang about sa strategies nila Kay ang Fairness gyud dli
63 mamili ug Kinsay tagaan
64 Dli unta mamaili ug tawo dapat bahin ug patas ang tanan. Uban
65 pa Initiative nila
66 Researcher 1: Thank you so much ma’am for participating in
67 this study
68 DO you want a copy of the result ma’am?
FV 6: Okay ra ma’am
 64

Participant: Flood Victim number 7

Duration: 7mins, 55sec
Session Number: 07
Time & Date of interview : January 28,2025
Interviewed and Transcribed by: Kenth Mark Aswe
Transcript Number: 7
Mode of Interview: Personal Interview
Location: Brgy. Cagay-anon Misamis Occidental
Line Utterances Analysis
Number
1 Greetings: Researcher 2: Maayong buntag ma’am we are the
2 fourth year students from Tangub City Global College. Taking
3 up Bachelor of Science in industrial Security Management. Naa
4 me deri karon Aron mag gather ug data about sa flooding
5 incident last² December 2022. Okay Ra ba nimo ma’am nga ma
6 interview ka namo karong adlawa?
7 FV 7: Yes sir way problema na
8 Researcher 2: Salamat ma’am. So atoang una nga pangutana
9 ma’am kay what are the community based approaches in
10 disaster management utilized by local barangay during the
11 flooding incident?
12 FLOOD VICTIM: Ang community-based approaches Kay ang
13 paghatag nilag relief goods sa amoang mga biktim sa maong
14 pagbaha sir.
15
16 Question # 2
17 Researcher 2: How do flood victims perceive the
18 implementation of community based approaches employed in
19 disaster management within their locality?
20 FLOOD VICTIM: sa Nakita nako jud , labi natng actual na
21 gyod grabe ka guot sa evacuation area that time nya ga siot ang
22 mga tawo, dle kaayu comfortable bitaw.
23 RESEARCHER 1: okay sir, salamat
24 QUESTION # 3
25 RESEARCHER 2: Unsa man Ang mga challenges or
26 experience as a flood victim sir regarding ato nga panghitabo
27 sir? Like unsa ka pait ug ka grabeh para sa imoha?
28 FLOOD VICTIM - Pait kaayo tong panahona Kay among
29 gamay nga tindahan guba jud hurot mga baligya, paet jud kaayu.
30 QUESTION # 4
31 RESEARCHER 2: – what are the possible program or
32 intervention that you can propose with a suggestion of flood
33 victims?
34 FLOOD VICTIM - dapat Ang goberno mag gama og sakto nga
 65

35 structure, labi na dapit sa suba og sa daplin sa dagat. Dapat Ang

36 suba buhatan og dako nga Dike para mag over flow Ang tubig .
37 Dayon seawall para mo pugong sa dako nga balod. Dapat Ang
38 goberno mag buhat og programa para sa mga na apektuhan og
39 maayo matagaan Sila og pamboat Aron mapa dayon Ang
40 panginabuhi.
41 PROBING QUESTION
42 RESEARCHER 2 - Gi unsa pag manage sa barangay sir
43 namonitor ba mo sa mga barangay officials kung unsa na Ang
44 inyong status, na ta Gaan ba mo ug relief goods Ang biktima sa
45 baha?
46 FLOOD VICTIM – Ang monitoring gyud atong hitabo is
47 pagka ugma na gyud pagka buntag na didto na nga time nga naa
48 na Ang mga LGU og ang NDRRMC Ang mga barangay
49 officials alalay nalang pd nag monitor sa mga na damage og
50 pag evacuate Kay pag buntag na.
51 PROBING QUESTION # 2
52 RESEARCHER 2: Did the community-based disaster
53 management utilized by your barangay help you during the
54 flooding situation? If yes, how did you benefit from it? If no,
55 how did it affect your safety?
56 FLOOD VICTIM – during sa pag baha jud maka ingon jud ko
57 nga NO! ngano? Wala gyud na apply Ang training kay kanya
58 kanya nag salbar sa kaugalingon Ang mga tawo. Although na
59 apply pero dle totally.
60 PROBING QUESTION # 3
61 RESEARCHER – sa imong panglantaw sir unsa or asa nga
62 aspeto or mga strategy nga dapat pa ma improve to make them
63 more sustainable in the long term?
64 FLOOD VICTIM - mag gama Ang goberno og dako nga
65 culbert or dike para passable kaayo Ang tubig dele ma stock.
66 Dayon dapat mag tanom og mga mangrove sa kadaplinan sa
67 dagat Kay usa na siya sa mo pugong sa balod.
68 Researcher 2: Salamat kaayo ma’am sa pag hatag ug time ug sa
69 participation
70 Ganahan baka mangayo ug kopya sa result Ani ma’am ?
71 FV 7: dli na sir salamat sab sa pagpaminaw sa among ka agi
 66

Participant: Flood Victim number 8

Duration: 9mins, 49sec
Session Number: 08
Time & Date of interview : January 28,2025
Interviewed and Transcribed by: Kenth Mark Aswe
Transcript Number: 8
Mode of Interview: Personal Interview
Location: Brgy. Cagay-anon Misamis Occidental
Line Utterances Analysis
Number
1 Greetings: Researcher 2: Maayong buntag ma’am we are the
2 fourth year students from Tangub City Global College. Taking
3 up Bachelor of Science in industrial Security Management. Naa
4 me deri karon Aron mag gather ug data about sa flooding
5 incident last² December 2022. Okay Ra ba nimo ma’am nga ma
6 interview ka namo karong adlawa?
7 FV 8: Yes sir okay rako
8 Researcher 2: Salamat ma’am. So atoang una nga pangutana
9 ma’am kay what are the community based approaches in
10 disaster management utilized by local barangay during the
11 flooding incident?
12 FLOOD VICTIM - kuan naghatag silag mga pagkaon, Sanina
13 hilabina nagyud atong mga balay ng ana guba gyd way mga
14 Sanina nga nabilin nahurot ug ka aanod.
15 Questions # 2
16 RESEARCHER- Ikaw ma’am as a flood victim sa Cagay- anon
17 as biktima sa baha unsa man Ang nakita nimo sa gi implement
18 nila nga community based approaches?
19 FV 8: Kuan akong concern kay guot kaau mis evacuation
20 center ato, hastang iganga nya mura namig sardenas bitaw.
21 QUESTIONS # 3
22 RESEARCHER- Ang ikatolo nga pangutana ma’am is unsa man
23 Ang pinaka grabe nimo nga naagian atong bahaa, unsa may
24 challenges sa imong kinabuhi samot na nga tindira ka?
25 FLOOD VICTIM- akong mga paninda ato nga mga bugas
26 damage jud kay nabasa man, makawag gana gyud tong higayuna
27 hilabina mao toy source of income namo. Back to zero jud.
28 QUESTIONS # 4
29 RESEARCHER- Ang ika upat nga question ma’am is unsa man
30 nga mga possible nga programa or intervention ang ika suggest
31 nmo sa barangay nga dapat improve para sa sustainability?
32 FLOOD VICTIM - dapat mag himo ug Evacuation center nga
33 luag.
34 PROBING QUESTION
 67

35 QUESTIONS #1
36 RESEARCHER-gi unsa man pag manage sa inyong barangay
37 atong bahaa specifically ang facilitition of rescue, distribution of
38 relief and monitoring of your status? Na rescue ba nila Ang
39 nanginahanglan og rescue or natagaan ba mo og relief goods?
40 FLOOD VICTIM – Wala man nila na lukop tanan og relief
41 goods Kay nag depende man Sila sa LISTA. May gani naa Ang
42 tv 5 Wala nila gi agi sa barangay maong natagaan Ang tanan.
43 Kasagaraan Private sector ang nagtabang namo. Kanang mga
44 tawo nga ni bisita lang sa mga kada barangay para manghatag
45 QUESTIONS # 2
46 RESEARCHER- Ang ika duha nga question ma’am is Kato
47 bang community based approaches management sa barangay is
48 naka tabang bato sa imoha? If yes ma’am state sa imong reason
49 kung naka benefit ba siya sa imoha? If no maam state pd ka
50 kung naka apekto bato sa imong siguridad?
51 FLOOD VICTIM - na rescue rami sir pero wa na grabeh ulahi
52 na gyud pero maynalang .
53 QUESTIONS # 3
54 RESEARCHER- sa imong panglantaw unsa nga aspeto sa ilang
55 mga strategy ang pwede pa ma improve?
56 FLOOD VICTIM – maayo lge unta og mag gama silag
57 evacuation center dres cagay anon. Then Immediate action
58 gyud nila sir ang kulang then ang fairness sa Tanan.
 68

Participant: Flood Victim number 9

Duration: 8mins, 37Sec
Session Number: 09
Time & Date of interview: January 28,2025
Interviewed and transcribed by: Kenth Mark Aswe
Transcript Number: 9
Mode of Interview: Personal Interview
Location: Brgy. Cagay-anon Misamis Occidental
Line Utterances Analysis
Number
1 Greetings: Researcher 2: Maayong buntag ma’am we are the
2 fourth year students from Tangub City Global College. Taking
3 up Bachelor of Science in industrial Security Management. Naa
4 me deri karon Aron mag gather ug data about sa flooding
5 incident last² December 2022. Okay Ra ba nimo ma’am nga ma
6 interview ka namo karong adlawa?
7 FV 9: Okay ra sir
8 Researcher: Okay Thank you ma’am so Mag start nata sa atoang
9 first question sa key questions ma’am okay ra ba?
10 FV 9: yes sir
11 Researcher: So the first question ma’am is What are the
12 community-based approaches in disaster management utilized
13 by local barangay during the flooding incident ?
14 FV 9: Ang community based nila ma’am Kay about sa rescue²,
15 relief goods, Ayuda pero most of the time ang nakahatag ug
16 tabang is kanang mo agi sa highway mga individuals na gusto
17 mo tabang.
18 Reseacher: How do flood victims perceive the effectiveness of
19 community-based approaches employed in disaster management
20 within their locality?
21 FV 9: if we talk about effectiveness sir kuan limitado kaayu ang
22 financial support nga ilang gihatag bitaw like dili jd sya enough
23 para makarecover pod intawn mis among mga damages.
24 Researcher: What are the challenges and experiences of flood
25 victims regarding the incident happened last December 2022?
26 FV 9: Grabeh gyud to sir ..pait kaayo akong motor shop damage
27 jud tanan mga gamit, baligya like tanan-tanan jud. Dako kaayug
28 damage.
29 Researcher 2: What are the possible programs or interventions
30 that you can propose with the suggestions of flood victims
31 regarding the improvement and sustainability of community-
32 based disaster management strategies in Cagay-anon Sinacaban
33 Mis Occ?
34 FV 9: Dapat sir Evacuation center gyud Kay lisod kaayo nga
 69

35 kami deri sa barangay Cagay-anon kailangan pa moadto ug layo

36 nga dapit para Maka evacuate unya puno² sab didto louy kaayo
37 ming way kasilungan nanguli nalang me ug balik. Paabot nga
38 mo ubos ang tubig. Then another one sir Kay seawall Kay prone
39 me sa dagat Dali Ra kaayo me ma abot Kay ang Lamba sa
40 balod.
41 PROBING QUESTION
42 QUESTIONS #
43 RESEARCHER- namanage ba sa inyong barangay Ang mga
44 katawhan sa barangay cagay anon specially Ang facilitition of
45 rescue , Ang distribution odlf relief goods, og kaning monitoring
46 of status na monitor ba kamo sa barangay during ato nga pag
47 baha or na rescue ba mo?
48 FLOOD VICTIM - naa man Ang rescue ga labay labay
49 man ..dayon og relief goods naay nanghatag mga Army, mga
50 Taga Tangub, lanao, naa sab mga Taga Iligan like murag ge
51 tuyuan Ra gyud tawon me ug anhi dering dapita para ma tagaan
52 nga Aron naa me makaon Kay Wala na gyud tawon nabilin sa
53 among gamit
54 RESEARCHER- so Ang kaning school dere sa cagay anon
55 Wala jud ni nagamit pag evacuate?
56 FLOOD VICTIM – Wala nagamit Kay Ang baha lampas sa
57 bintana sa skwelahan dayon Ang lapok hapit taga paa.
58 Researcher 2: Did the community-based disaster management
59 utilized by your barangay help you during the flooding
60 situation? If yes, how did you benefit from it? If no, how did it
61 affect your safety?
62 FLOOD VICTIM 9: Nakatabang ra sya sir kay kalooy sa taas
63 naa pasab me karon. Thanks God gyud kaay
64 Researcher 2: From your perspective, what aspects of these
65 strategies could be improved to make them more sustainable in
66 the long term?
67 FLOOD VICTIM – About sa strategies ang ilahang planning
68 tarungon nila na Kay murag wa me Nakita nga lihok sa
69 barangay. dapat Ang mga naay katongdanan sa barangay mag
70 monitor gyud unta sa mga na apektuhan sa baha. Pero murag
lain man tong panahuna Kay Wala may action. Ga Iya² naman
ang tanan Abe ko ba ug tinabangay.
 70

Participant: Flood Victim number 10

Duration: 9mins, 59sec
Session Number: 10
Time & Date of interview : January 28,2025
Interviewed and Transcribed by: Kenth Mark Aswe
Transcript Number: 10
Mode of Interview: Personal Interview
Location: Brgy. Cagay-anon Misamis Occidental
Line Utterances Analysis
Number
1 Researcher 2: Good morning ma’am we are the fourth year
2 students from Tangub City Global College. Taking up Bachelor
3 of Science in industrial Security Management. As a requirement
4 for our program, we are currently conducting our research study
5 titled, Understanding, the community based Approaches in
6 Disaster management: Insights from the flood Victims of
7 Cagay-anon Sinacaban Misamis Occidental. Okay ra ba ka
8 ma’am nga ma interview karong adlawa? Can you please
9 introduce yourself first?
10 FV 10: Yes okay Ra
11 Researcher: Salamat ma’am so atoa ng sugdan atoang first
12 question ma’am okay Ra ba na NIMO ma’am ?
13 FV 10: Oo okay Ra cgeh unsa mana
14 Researcher 2: So our First Question ma’am is What are the
15 community-based approaches in disaster management utilized
16 by local barangay during the flooding incident in your
17 barangay?
18 FV 10: para sa Ako ma’am nga nasinati gi rescue mi nila ato
19 kay gasigi namag taas ang tubig daun wala pagyuy undang ang
20 ulan bitaw.
21 Researcher 2:How do flood victims perceive the effectiveness of
22 community-based approaches employed in disaster management
23 within their locality?
24 FV 10: Para sa akoa epektibo pd bya kay kaamo man mo
25 respond ang mga rescuers ilaha gyung gisunod ang mga
26 protocols, gina prioritize nila tong mga tawong nanginahanglan
27 ma rescue. Ug kuan pod limitado rapod kaayu ilang budget
28 financial para support aba, dle jud sya enough.
29 Researcher 2: What are the challenges and experiences of flood
30 victims regarding the incident happened last December 2022?
31 FV 10: Grabeh ka pait ma’am amoang balay gi anod, guba jd
32 nanglutaw intawon mga gamit tanan, haskang lisuda gyud atong
33 sitwasyona.
34 Researcher 2: What are the possible programs or interventions
 71

35 that you can propose with the suggestions of flood victims

36 regarding the improvement and sustainability of community-
37 based disaster management strategies in Cagay-anon Sinacaban
38 Mis Occ?
39 FV 10: Programa ma’am build² gyud mag build sila ug
40 evacuation Center , mag tanom ug mangrove tree sa dagat para
41 ang tubig nga gikan sa dagat dli basta² mo hapak sa mga
42 kabalayan isa pa ang seawall nga e Padayon ta nila maynalang
43 naay barrier tapos mga drainage tarungon nila ug construct. Tas
44 dungagan nila mga budget bitaw para incase mag igo ra.
45 Researcher 2: How does your barangay manage disasters
46 specifically the facilitation of rescue, distribution of relief, and
47 monitoring of your status during the time of the flooding
48 incident in your area?
49 FV 10: ug parte sa facilitation of rescue way mahimo ang
50 barangay kay waman ghapon ka evacuate kayWalay evacuation
51 Center kung naa man gane naa sa lingsod pero pun na tungod sa
52 kadghang nabahaan ug sa silingan pud namo nga barangay
53 kulangon sab naningkamot nalang me ug Amo nga maluwas
54 kanang mga silingan namo nga naay second floor ag balay diara
55 me nakisilong Kay grabeh na gyud katugnaw
56 Researcher 2: Did the community-based disaster management
57 utilized by your barangay help you during the flooding
58 situation? If yes, how did you benefit from it? If no, how did it
59 affect your safety?
60 FV 10: No , Kay Wala man gyud pud ge tugnaw nalang me ug
61 paabot Wala gyud
62
63 Researcher 2: From your perspective, what aspects of these
64 strategies could be improved to make them more sustainable in
65 the long term?
66 FV 10: ilahang strategies dapat nga mag Plano sila ug tarong
67 magkahiusa sila tanan Aron magkasinabot then initiative gyud
68 Kay nanungkulan man ta importante gyud na sya dayon e make
69 sure nila nga kanang ge pang Plano nila dli lang pud taman ras
70 Plano ug storya dapat naay aksyon. Dli Kay didto pa aksyonan
71 Humana ang baha murag C Marcos style mao Ra to sir Akong
72 tubag.
73 Researcher 2: cgeh ma’am salamat kaayo sa inyuhang
74 participasyon ma’am. Unsa man ma’am mangayo ka sa result
75 Ani ma’am ?
FV 10: okay Ra dong ayaw na
 72

APPENDEX H

Editor’s Certification
 73

APPENDIX I

Certification of Similarity Checking

 74

APPENDIX J

Research Certification
 75

CURRICULUM VITAE

Name : Michelle Althea M. Miranda

Nationality : Filipino

Date of Birth : September 2, 2002

Address : P- Garcia, Cagay-anon, Sinacaban, Mis. Occ.

Sex : Female

Civil Status : Single

Religion : Roman Catholic

Father’s Name : Julius M. Miranda

Mother’s Name : Ma. Adesil R. Macalisang

Educational Background

Tertiary : Bachelor of Science in Industrial Security

Management
Tangub City Global College, Maloro, Tangub City
2024-2025

Secondary : Aloran Trade Higschool

Labo, Aloran Misamis Occidental
2020-2021

Elementary : Cagay-anon Elementary School

2014-2015

Organization and Affiliation

Advance ROTC Officer

TCGC ROTC UNIT
ISM Intensive Training Unit
 76

Tangub City Global College

Maloro, Tangub City
 77

Name : Kent Mark R. Aswe

Nationality : Filipino

Date of Birth : December 17, 2000

Address : P- 7, Catagan, Tangub City Mis.Occ.

Sex : Male

Civil Status : Single

Religion : Roman Catholic

Father’s Name : Raiel N. Aswe

Mother’s Name : Analie G. Aswe

Educational Background

Tertiary : Bachelor of Science in Industrial Security Management

Tangub City Global College
Maloro, Tangub City
2024-2025

Secondary : St. Michael High School

Brgy. 2 Tangub City Misamis Occidental
. 2020-2021

Elementary : Sto. Niño Elementary School

2014-2015

Organization and Affiliation

ISM Intensive Training Unit

Tangub City Global College
Maloro, Tangub City
 78

Name : Charmaine N. Calahat

Nationality : Filipino

Date of Birth : November 24, 1998

Sex : Female

Civil Status : Single

Religion : Roman Catholic

Father’s Name : Charito P. Calahat

Mother’s Name : Mary Ann N. Calahat

Educational Background

Graduate : Master of Science in Criminal Justice

Misamis University
Ozamiz City, Misamis Occidental
2023-2024

Tertiary : Bachelor of Science in Criminology

Gov. Alfonso D. Tan College
Maloro, Tangub City Misamis Occidental
2015-2019

Secondary : Labo National High School

Labo, Ozamiz City Philippines
2011-2015

Elementary : Embargo Elementary School

Embargo, Ozamiz City Philippines

Trainings and Seminars

Learning Industrial Security Management Seminar

 79

VIP Room GADTC Tangub City

December 26-30, 2022

E-Journal End User Training

Activity hall, GADTC, Tangub City
March 31,2023