CQI-19

Sub-Tier
Supplier Audit
Supplier
Supplier Name Country
Code

Address City State Zip Code

CONTACT INFORMATION

Position Name E-Mail Phone

Plant Manager

Quality Manager

Logistics Manager

After Hours

PLANT INFORMATION

Total Annual Sales Automotive Annual Sales % of Business with RR Cable

Union Affiliation Contract Expiration Date No. of Hourly Employees

Plant Size (Sq. Ft.) Plant Capacity Utilized

RR Cable Plants Supplied No. of Automotive Suppliers

Services Provided Current Yrly SRS Scores Quality WC Delivery CS

Programs Supported 12 Month PPM

CERTIFICATION INFORMATION
Quality Systems / Environmental System Certifications North American Diversity Certificates International Certifications

IATF 16949 ISO 9001:2015 ISO 14001 Other / None MBE WBE CAMSC Export Credit C-TPAT
√ √ √

SCORING
AUDIT SUMMARY Evidence: X (N/A - Not Applicable) Y Yes N No Adequate, Deployed, Measure: 0 None 1 Some 2 Solid
WRKSHT

ACCUMULATIVE
ITEM SECTION SCORE
1 Risk Assessment
1.1 Engineering Function 2

1.2 Manufacturing Systems 2

1.3 Quality Systems 2

1.4 Commercial 2

1.5 Technology 2
2 Supplier Assessment
2.1 Facilities 16

2.2 Profile Information 16

2.3 Logistics 10

2.4 Manufacturing 46

2.5 Quality 50

2.6 Technology 14

Overall Score 152

AUDIT INFORMATION
Last Audit

Date: May.24 Type: Supplier Audit Score: 162

. Audit Date: PAMS#

Auditor Signature: E-Mail: Phone:

Current
Audit

Supplier Rep. Signature: E-Mail: Phone:

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS (Required if overall score is 100 or less)

YES NO
Corrective Actions Corrective Actions
Required? Completion Date

Rev. Lvl: 1 / Date: 03.11.19 Printed Copies are Uncontrolled GF-SPR-

 CQI-19 Supplier Assessment
Score 95
Item Score
Yes / No
Questions
No. NA Comments
Facilities
1 List the square footage by area; e.g. production, warehouse, office - etc.
Yes 2

2 Does the supplier have a formal capacity plan and analysis methodology that is used and
maintained? Yes 2

3 List the current floor space utilization (percentage)

Yes Yes, Available 2

4 List % of impact on quoted business on floor space utilization.

N/A

5 List the capacity utilization for the next 5 yrs. (including forecasted new business)
Yes 2

6 Does the facility build tooling in-house? If so, what percentage

Yes 2

7 Does the facility refurbish tools in house?

N/A

8 List the employee turnover rate for the past two years.
Yes 2

9 Does the supplier document responsibilities and authority?

Yes 2

10 Is the facility unionized?

Yes 2

11 List the facilities language capabilities.

SECTION TOTAL 16

Profile Information
1 How long as the facility been in the business they are quoting?
Yes 35 Years 2

2 What products or services does the facility manufacture?

Yes 2

3 Specify other manufacturing location(s) available for the type of product.

Yes 2

4 If a special process service provider, is the supplier compliant with applicable AIAG
special process assessments (I.e.; CQI-9) Yes 2

5 Is the company publicly owned? If not, who are the owners?

Yes Yes, Company Policy available. 2

6 Is there any pending litigation against the supplier/facility? If yes, explain.

No

7 Does the company anticipate a change of ownership in the next three years? If yes,
explain. No

8 What is the supplier's on-time delivery percentage for production and service parts for
the past two years? Yes 95% 2

9 Does the supplier export product? If yes, to where.

Yes 2

10 Are responsibilities defined for any directed buys?

Yes 2

SECTION TOTAL 16
 CQI-19 Supplier Assessment

Logistics
1 What are the different modes of transportation used to ship product? List current
modes. Yes By Road & By Sea 2

2 Is the supplier capability of electronic data transfer (EDI)?

Yes 2

3 What are the average days of finished product inventory on hand?

Yes 5 Days 2

4 Does the facility use a pull system inventory management with FIFO?
Yes 2

5 Does the supplier have internal packaging design capabilities?

Yes 2

SECTION TOTAL 10

Manufacturing
1 Is all standard work, such as job instructions with appropriate and complete information,
effectively implemented? Yes 2

2 Are SC's, including PTC's identified at the station(s) that produce(s) those characteristics?
Yes 2

3 Are SC's appropriately controlled at the operation(s) that produce them?

Yes 2

4 Is there evidence of appropriate and adequate operator training?

Yes 2

5 Is capacity determined appropriately, including forecasts of new business?

Yes 2

6 Is process capability and performance maintained at levels originally approved by

customer PPAP? Yes 2

7 Are resources available for functional / durability testing?

Yes 2

8 Are resources available for calibration?

yes 2

9 Is the work properly organized (i.e.; 5S, lean, ergonomics)?

Yes 2

10 Is PPE or other safety protections provided?

Yes 2

11 Have there been any major health & safety recordables within the last five years?
No 2

12 Are knowledgeable resources available to carry-out machinery and equipment

maintenance? Yes 2

13 Are PM processes in place for all machinery?

Yes 2

14 Are spare parts readily available to maintain the key machinery and equipment?
Yes 2

15 Are there knowledgeable resources available to design tools and gauges in house?
Yes 2

16 Are there trained resources available for tools / gauges / mold fabrications?
Yes 2

17 Are there trained resources available to carry-out tool / die / mold maintenance?
Yes 2

18 Is there a business contingency plan in place in the event of a disaster?

Yes 2

19 Does the facility has a plan to cover any absenteeism?

Yes 2

SECTION TOTAL 38
 CQI-19 Supplier Assessment

Manufacturing - Continued
20 Does the supplier use effective corrosion protection for products, as applicable?
Yes 2

21 Does the supplier have prototype fabrication capability in house?

N/A

22 Does the supplier select resources based on education, training, experience, and/or
requirements? Yes 2

23 Are skills and competency requirements identified?

Yes 2

24 Is a formal process identified to protect the pipeline supply chain and provide safety
inventory? Yes 2

SECTION TOTAL 8

Quality
1 Does the supplier demonstrate an understanding of Process Validation?
Yes 2

2 Does the supplier have adequate purchased product controls in place for sub-tier
suppliers (i.e.; assessments, metrics, terms & conditions)? Yes 2

3 Does the supplier have a process / system in place to ensure that all design requirements
/ engineering specifications are communicated to their supply base? Yes 2

4 Does the supplier have an effective change management process, including interface
with suppliers? Yes 2

5 Does the supplier ensure early sub-tier supplier involvement in APQP?

Yes 2

6 Does the supplier have an effective internal audit - management review process?
Yes 2

7 Is non-conforming material adequately identified, segregated, and dispositioned?

Yes 2

8 Does the supplier have effective product traceability through sub-tier suppliers, including
for PTC's? To what extent (lot vs part)? Yes 2

9 Does the supplier demonstrate effective use of FMEA to identify risk, SC's for the control
plan and takes appropriate action to reduce ongoing risk? Yes 2

10 Does the supplier demonstrate conformation to requirements specified or referenced in

the control plan? Yes 2

11 Is there linkage between the design record, DFMEA / PFMEA, CP, and operator
instructions? Yes 2

12 Does the supplier have the capability to retrieve current drawings / specifications for use
on floor inspections? Yes 2

13 Does the supplier have appropriate product verification activities from receiving through
product realization and shipping, including material identification? Yes 2

14 Does the supplier company with acceptable MSA practices?

Yes 2

15 Does the supplier maintain effective calibration of test and measurement equipment
used? Yes 2

16 Does the supplier effectively use SPC, addressing both variable and attribute data, as
applicable, for process control? Yes 2

17 Does the supplier have experience using suing AIAG core tools documents (i.e.; MSA,
SPC, APQP, FMEA, PPAP)? Yes 2

18 Does the supplier conduct equipment validation and perform run at rates in preparation
for production? Yes 2

19 Are mistake-proofing and error-proofing provisions effectively used to control SC and

ensure product integrity? Yes 2

SECTION TOTAL 38
 CQI-19 Supplier Assessment
Quality - Continued
20 Does the supplier have an effective problem solving process?
Yes 2

21 Does the supplier have an effective process to engage employees in quality and
innovation? Yes 2

22 What is the facilities current external PPM?

Yes Monitor in % 2

23 Is the facility covered by any third-party certifications? If yes, expiry date, cert number,
and registrar. Obtain copy for file Yes 2

24 Does the supplier have an end-of-life management process (i.e.; controlled ramp downs
to protect customer quality and schedules)? Yes 2

25 Does the supplier have a process to review and reduce warranty costs (i.e.; analysis of
returned parts, use of effective problem solving)? Yes 2

SECTION TOTAL 12

Technology
1 Can the supplier provide prompt technical support to the organization, as needed?
Yes 2

2 Does the supplier inform their supply chain of the application / intended use of their
product? Yes 2

3 Does the supplier have CAD/DAE resources on site? What program / number of licenses?
No

4 Does the supplier demonstrate effective design validation?

No Design not aplicable.

5 Does the supplier have experience with appropriate design evaluation tools (i.e.; FEA,
HALT, CAE simulation)? No Design not aplicable.

6 Does the supplier have experience in developing effective DFMEA?

No Design not aplicable.

7 Is benchmarking effectively used to develop new products and processes?

Yes 2

8 Are formal documented design reviews by the appropriate functions conducted at

appropriate stages of design per a design plan? N/a

9 Is there evidence of regular design and development reviews with customers?

N/a

10 Does the supplier have an effective document control system? Document revision status
readily available? Yes 2

11 Is the supplier capable of supporting our design and development schedule?

N/a

12 Is performance testing, as appropriate, include life, durability, and reliability tracked for
timely completion and conformance? Yes 2

13 Does the supplier have an effective process for capturing and deploying lessons learned?
Yes 2

14 Are technical reviews completed to address all open issues?

Yes 2

SECTION TOTAL 14