Reinforced Concrete Project 2
Reinforced Concrete Project 2
0
Summary
1- INTRODUCTION 4
2- PRESENTATION THE BUILDING ..................................................................................................................... 4
Dimensions of the work in plan ......................................................................................................................... 4
Dimensions of the work in elevation ................................................................................................................. 4
Formwork plan:.................................................................................................................................................. 5
3- CHARACTERISTICS MECHANICS OF MATERIALS : .................................................................................. 6
3.1. Concrete
3.2. Armatures ...................................................................................................................................................... 6
3.3. Sol
Part I: Preliminary sizing of the elements
Structural
1- PRE DESIGN OF THE FLOOR ..................................................................................................... 9
1.1 Evaluation of loads and surcharges............................................................................................................. 9
Floor current (except 1)erfloor): ............................................................................................................ 9
Inaccessible terrace floor............................................................................................................................ 10
Double partition .................................................................................................................................................... 10
Operating surcharges10
2- PRE-SIZING BEAMS: .................................................................................................... 11
3- PRE-DIMENSIONING POLES..................................................................................................... 11
Part II: sizing of the elements
Structural
1- DIMENSIONING STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS : .............................................................................. 14
1.1. Sizing of the poles:.................................................................................................................. 14
a) Hypotheses of calculation : ............................................................................................................................ 14
b) Method flat rate of BAEL: ........................................................... 14
c) Example sizing:.16
Longitudinal armatures : ................................................................................................................................. 19
Transverse armatures:................................................................................................................................... 20
Execution plan:21
2- DIMENSIONING FROM THE ISOLATED SOLE:............................................................................................ 21
a) Descent of charge: .............................................................................................................................. 21
b) Pre-sizing of the footing: .................................................................................................... 22
This work involves the study of a building with 4 floors above ground for residential and commercial use, it
consists of two main parts:
All calculations are carried out in accordance with the applicable regulations, namely:
BAEL 91
2- BUILDING PRESENTATION
This is a building intended for residential use with shops on the ground floor.
The building has 5 levels. The first is reserved for shops while the other four
current levels are exclusively for residential use.
3.1. Concrete
3.2. Armatures
The work rate retained was determined by taking into account the studies conducted.
aux
Surroundings of the building in question.
Which gives: = 1.5 Mpa
The values of the sections of the load-bearing elements will be determined in the chapter
next.
Before carrying out the descent of the loads, it is necessary to be able to estimate the self-weight of the
structure, hence the necessity for a preliminary sizing of the components of the floor.
This stage is governed by empirical laws derived from experience. This stage
represents the starting point and the basis for the justification of resistance, stability and
durability of the structure. To do this, we begin the preliminary sizing of the
summit towards the base:
The floors;
The beams;
The poles;
The soles;
Below are some formulas that allow us to get an order of magnitude of the
dimensions of load-bearing elements.
Structural
The floor is a separation between two levels that transmits the loads and the
surcharges directly applied to bearing elements while ensuring
comfort functions such as sound insulation, thermal insulation, and airtightness of levels
extremes.
The thickness of the floors often depends more on the conditions of use than on
Resistance checks. Also, the thickness of the floors is deduced from the conditions.
following:
The different layers and their weights are given in the following table.
Layer G
Tiling 0.50
Setting mortar 0.40
Sand bed 0.36
Partition repartee 1.00
Floor 2.85
Cement coating under the ceiling 0.54
Permanent charge 5.65
Table 1 Permanent load on the terrace due to hollow core slabs
The layers of the terrace floor and their weights are given in the following table.
Layer G
Heavy gravel protection 0.90
Multilayer Sealant 0,12
Liège 0.16
Slope shape 2.64
Floor 2.85
Cement plaster under ceiling 0.54
Permanent charge 7.21
Table 2 Permanent load at the current level due to the floor
hollow body
Double partition
The permanent charges due to the walls are given in the following table.
Layer G
Plaster coating 0.73
Cement plaster 0.73
Hollow bricks 2 X 2.44
Cement plaster 0.73
Permanent charge 7.07
Table 3 Permanent charge due to walls
Operating surcharges
Zone Q [kN/m2]
Current level 1.5
Terrace 1.00
Balcony 3.5
Staircase 2.5
Commercial premises 2.5
Gallery 1.5
2- PRE-DIMENSIONING OF BEAMS:
The beams are internal elements that are not exposed to the weather, these
the last ones are solicited by bending moments that will determine the reinforcements
longitudinal and shear forces that will determine the transverse reinforcements,
the normal effort being neglected.
The preliminary sizing of the beams is given by the following empirical formulas:
é é
<ℎ<
. <ℎ<
30x40
3- PRE-SIZING OF COLUMNS
The poles are pre-sized under vertical loads only, that is N the force. u
normal ultimate applied to the most stressed column.
The maximum normal effort obtained by the load descent must satisfy the inequality
next:
Structural
a) Calculation assumptions:
Calculation parameters:
The lancing:
with: = 0.7 0
. Buckling coefficient:
Coefficient that brings together the parameters mentioned earlier for
take into account the effect of buckling in the column
. determination of steels:
. Constructive dispositions:
Longitudinal armatures:
Minimum diameter:
Spacing:
Overlap length:
c) Example of sizing:
Load descent:
Load descent involves calculating the resulting normal forces from the effect of the
vertical loads on the vertical supporting elements from the terrace to the foundations.
Under 4 the
Beams 28.05 341.29 540.3315 594.36465
floor
Posts 12.24
Under 3 th
Beams 28.05 501.5 799.59 879.549
floor
Posts 12.24
Note: the floor under the 1st level is a solid slab (25 KN/
er
)
In this paragraph, we will discuss the detailed sizing of the column E3.
, . , . . −
=[ − ]. =− .
. .
Note: When the theoretical reinforcement is negative, the concrete can take over.
the effort alone, and we must then verify the minimum reinforcements in the
constructive dispositions.
Longitudinal armatures:
Minimum armatures:
= [ ; (4u); A (2%)] =
6.4 cm²
Minimum diameter:
Spacing:
St ≤ min { 15Φ;
l 40 cm; a + 10 cm} = min { 18 cm; 40 cm; 50 cm } = 18 cm.
With:
And:
Digital application:
, .
= , . = .
. ,
On =
take
We propose to size the most loaded footing in the building located at-
beneath the pole E3.
Load descent:
. Study hypotheses:
. Sole dimensions:
1,53785
1= = = 1.025 m²
1,5
Homothety coefficient:
1 1.025
∁= √ = √ = 2.531
0.4 x 0.4
We choose:
= 1.2 cm at B
= 10.2 cm
− −
> ( ; )+ =
We chooseℎ = 30cm
′ .
So = = , ²
= . < 10.5 MPa.
.
We choose 1= 2h - 5 = 25 cm
′ ( − ) . ( . − . )
Sens x and y: = = = 14.25 cm²
. . ..
= . = . ²
a) Calculation hypothesis:
. Simplified methods:
Flat rate method Q ≤ Max [2G, 500kg/m²].
Caquot Method (high loads Q) Q > Max [2G,
500kg/m²
30cmx40cm
On a: = 25.0,3.0,4 =3 ⁄ .
= 1, 5 kN/m
On a
the diagram
on the
course :
= = ( , + ,) ′
+( ) +( )
( ) ( )
= = ( , + ,′ )
+( ) +( )
5m DP DP
5.9 m DP DP
4.5 m DP 3
It is noted that the first, second, and third spans are parallel.
with the two slabs on the left and right.
DESIGN AND CALCULATION OF THE STRUCTURE OF A R+4 BUILDING MADE OF REINFORCED CONCRETE 28
The first span:
1 3,8
(
ℎ )
= 1,35.4 +1,5.1,5 4 = 10.9 kN/m
3,8 2
1+ ( )
5
1 4
( = 1,35.4 +1,5.1,5
) = 10.85 kN/m
4 42
1+ ( )
5
= . /
= = , /
On a:
= 25.0,3.0,4 = 3 / .
With:
2G
So the method to adopt for the determination of the moments and the
efforts in the continuous beam is the Caquot method.
Illustrative diagram:
We size the beam to Ultimate Limit State (ULS) with 28= 25 MPa; Fe500
= , + , = , /
= , + , = , /
= , + , = . /
On a :
, . + , .( , . , )
= = , .
, ( + , . , )
, .( , . , ) + . . ,
= = , .
, ( , . , + , )
( )= ( )+ − ( −)+
2( )= 02 ( )+ 1(1− )+ 2
2 2
So:
,
= + ( −)+ = , − −
,
= , .
3( )= 0( )+ 2 (1− )
3
So:
,
= + ( −)= , − = , .
+ −
= +
So:
Sharp effort in the vicinity of support 1 to the right:
1- 0 1. 1 36,675.5107,22
1
1 = 0w1 + = + = − = 70.24 kN
1 2 1 2 5
DESIGN AND CALCULATION OF THE STRUCTURE OF A 4-STOREY REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING 32
Shear force near support 2:
Span 1-2:
0.85 28
28 = 25 MPa; Fluid rheology; Fe500; =
3,5
= ; = ; = ; = 0.8 alpha( 1-0.4alpha )
3,5 + epsilon
28
′ = min(0.2 ; 5MPa) = 3,34MPa
And:
113,13. 10−3
= = = 1,3
0,25.0,35
On a:
< ′
≤ 9.77 cm
Non-fragility condition:
(
≤ inf0,9 ; 40 =) inf0.9.35
( ; 40 )
= 31,5cm
One can definitely adopt the spacing of:
=
Reinforcement principle:
We will adopt the following reinforcement:
5 cm 3 HA 10
6HA Ø 10 mm Frame Ø 8 mm
5 cm
Span 2-3:
Pivot A :
. . , . , . ,
From where: = = ,
=
, ²
We will then adopt the nuance 6 HA 12(6.79 cm²)
Reinforcement principle:
We will adopt the following reinforcement:
5 cm 3HA 10
6HA Ø 12 mm Frame Ø 8 mm
5 cm
0.85 28 0.85.25
= = = 141667 Mla
1.1.5
500
== = 434,7826
1,15
500
= = = 2,17 °%
1,15.200000
3,5 3,5
= = = 0.62
3,5 + ε 35 + 217
= 1,25(1− 1-2μ)
√ = 0.29 = 0.8. Hwa= 0.234
. . , . , . ,
= = = , ²
,
We will then adopt the nuance 6 HA 14(9.24 cm²)
Reinforcement principle:
We will adopt the following reinforcement:
3 HA Ø 10 mm Frame Ø 8 mm
5 cm
Support 3:
, . , . , . ,
From where: = = =
,
, ²
We will then adopt the nuance 6 HA 12(6.79 cm²)
5 cm 6 HA 12
3 HA Ø 10 mm Frame Ø 8 mm
5 cm
Formwork plan:
3.8 m 4m
5m DP1 DP2
4.5 m DP5
= . . ² and =
3,8
Avec = = = 0.75 > 0.4
5
Q = 1.5 kN/m²
= , + , = , / ²
Dalle DP1 :
= . ′. ² and =
=( , ). , .81= , .
and
= = , . , = , .
Support moments:
Sens x: = , = , .
= , = , .
Sens y: = , = , .
= , = , .
Condition :
+
+ = ,
= , = , .
Calculation of reinforcements:
With:
= . ².
= 1-0.4α and = 1,25(1− 1-2μ ) √
As =
. .
This project has helped us a lot to put into practice all our
knowledge acquired during our engineering training cycle,
to deepen our knowledge based on technical documents and
even application of regulations and certain methods, to put in
evidence some basic principles that must be taken into consideration in the
design of reinforced concrete structures, thus establishing close links with the
professional world. The fact of handling a real project of considerable scale.