Index3c24

Environmental Claims in Consumer Markets
Summary Report: North America
April 2009

TM

About TerraChoice. As North America’s premier environmental
marketing firm, TerraChoice Environmental Marketing helps grow the world’s
most sustainable companies. TerraChoice’s consulting practice converts
knowledge of environmental science, markets, and marketing into winning,
client-centered solutions to help sustainability leaders deliver results.

About EcoLogo. Founded in 1988, EcoLogo is North America’s most
respected and established multi-attribute environmental standard and
certification mark. EcoLogo is one of only two North American programs
approved by the Global Ecolabelling Network, an international association of
eco-labeling programs, as meeting the ISO 14024 standard. In a skeptical
marketplace, EcoLogo builds trust with third-party, scientific proof of
environmental leadership.

© TerraChoice Group Inc.
For information or permission to reprint, please contact TerraChoice at enquiries@terrachoice.com.

TM

Executive Summary
In November 2008 and January 2009, TerraChoice researchers were sent into category-leading ‘big box’ retailers in the
United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia with instructions to record every product making an
environmental claim. For each product, the researchers recorded product details, claim(s) details, any supporting
information, and any explanatory detail or offers of additional information or support.

In the United States and Canada, a total of 2,219 products making 4,996 green claims were recorded.
These claims were tested against best practices, notably against guidelines provided by the U.S. Federal Trade
Commission, Competition Bureau of Canada, Australian Competition & Consumer Commission, and the ISO 14021
standard for environmental labeling.

Of the 2,219 North American products surveyed, over 98% committed at least one of the previously identified Six Sins of
Greenwashing and a new Seventh Sin emerged. The following are the highlights of the 2009 Seven Sins of Greenwashing
research:

• The emergence of a seventh Sin – the ‘Sin of Worshiping False Labels’. Some marketers are exploiting consumers’
demand for third-party certification by creating fake labels or false suggestions of third-party endorsement. This
development is serious enough to warrant its own category - hence the seventh Sin.

• More products are making environmental claims. The total number
of ‘green’ products increased by an average of 79% (a range

98%
between 40% and 176%) in stores that were visited in both
2007 and 2008. (In a related TerraChoice study, the rate of green
advertising was found to have almost tripled since 2006.)

• Greenwashing is still rampant, with more than 98% of ‘green’ In the 2009 report, over 98% of the
products committing at least one of the Sins. Compared to the 2,219 products surveyed in North
2007 study, there appears to be a small decline in the frequency
America committed at least one of the
of greenwashing, but it is not statistically significant. Of 2,219
products making green claims in the United States and Canada, Sins of Greenwashing.
only 25 products were found to be Sin-free.

• Eco-labeling is on the rise. Legitimate eco-labeling is nearly twice as common as it was last year, increasing from
13.7% to 23.4% on all ‘green’ products in the report.

• Kids (toys and baby products), cosmetics and cleaning products are three categories in which green
claims – and greenwashing – are most common. These products, among the most common products in most
households, deserve particular scrutiny from consumers.

• Greenwashing is an international challenge, with very similar patterns in the United States, Canada, the United
Kingdom, and Australia. The most significant differences between these countries are the environmental issues
associated with the claims made on products. Water conservation was more common in Australia for example, and
recyclability in the United States.

The challenge and call-to-action of the Seven Sins of Greenwashing is to discourage greenwashing by putting
practical tools in the hands of consumers and companies, while still encouraging and rewarding genuine efforts
towards sustainable innovation.

i
www.sinsofgreenwashing.org

TM

Table of Contents

1. Introduction 1
2. Methodology & Findings 3
3. Key Findings 4
3.1
The Seventh Sin: The Sin of Worshiping False Labels 5
3.2
Kids, Cosmetics and Cleaning: Products of Special Risk 7
Kids (Toys and Baby) Products 7
Cosmetics (Health & Beauty Products) 8
Cleaning Products 9
3.3 International Findings 10
4. What Consumers Can Do 12
5. What Marketers Can Do 12
Appendices 15
A - Research Methodology 17
B - United States of America - Country Summary 18
C - Canada - Country Summary 19
D - United Kingdom - Country Summary 20
E - Australia - Country Summary 21
F - Resources 22

ii

TM

1. Introduction
Green∙wash (gren’wosh’,-wôsh’) – verb: the act of misleading consumers regarding
the environmental practices of a company or the environmental benefits of a product or service.

More than ever before, consumers are clamoring for In November of 2007, the first Six Sins of
‘greener’ products. To take better care of their families Greenwashing1 report was published. The reaction was
and their planet, they want goods and services that vocal, global and long-lasting. The report exposed a
are genuinely more sustainable (‘greener’ in other nerve with consumers wanting to do the right thing but
words); products they can find easily, trust implicitly, who were increasingly suspicious of misleading claims.
and use effectively.
Since the first study, consumers, journalists, marketers,
Manufacturers and marketers are trying to meet this policymakers and activists have used the Six Sins of
demand. Green advertising has increased almost Greenwashing as a tool for analyzing and
tenfold in the last 20 years and has nearly tripled understanding environmental claims. Both the U.S.
since 2006. (Refer to Exhibit 1.) Federal Trade Commission and Competition Bureau of
Canada have since announced their intention to
overhaul their environmental consumer protection
activities.

Exhibit 1 - Green Ads on the Rise.

In this as yet unpublished study, TerraChoice researchers surveyed more than 18,000 advertisements in the back
issues of Time, Fortune, National Geographic, Forbes, Sports Illustrated, and Vanity Fair.

Advertisements that made environmental claims were counted and described as a percentage of the total
number of advertisements. For more information on this research, please email ecomarkets@terrachoice.com.

1
The 2007 study can be downloaded at www.sinsofgreenwashing.org.


TM

The purpose of this follow up edition of the study - the
Seven Sins of Greenwashing - is to maintain the pressure
for truth and clarity in environmental marketing. It
features:

• a much larger North American dataset (12 ‘big box’

24
stores in each of the United States and Canada, with
more than 2,000 products in North America);

• first-time research from both Australia and the
United Kingdom, including almost 1,000
products from each country; Number of North American ‘big box’
stores visited by TerraChoice researchers
• product categories of special consumer interest and
high frequency of environmental claims: toys, baby
in 2008/2009.
products, cosmetics, and cleaning products; and

• new and significant trends that have emerged since
the first study, including the discovery of a new Sin
- the Sin of Worshiping False Labels.

Risks of Greenwashing

If more greenwashing means that marketers are • Greenwashing will lead to cynicism and doubt
increasingly responding to the demand for sustainable about all environmental claims. Consumers will
products, this could be a positive trend. If left unchecked, give up on marketers and manufacturers, and
greenwashing creates significant risks: give up on the hope that their spending might be
put to good use.
• Well-intentioned consumers will be misled into
purchases that do not deliver on their • The sustainability movement will lose the power of
environmental promise. When this happens, the the market to accelerate progress towards
consumer’s trust is misplaced and the potential sustainability.
environmental benefit of his or her purchase is
wasted. The challenge and call-to-action of the Seven Sins
of Greenwashing is to discourage greenwashing by
• Competitive pressure from illegitimate putting practical tools in the hands of consumers and
environmental claims will take market share away companies, while still encouraging and rewarding
from products that offer legitimate benefits, thereby genuine efforts towards sustainable innovation.
slowing the spread of real environmental innovation
in the marketplace.


TM

2. Methodology Findings
In the months of November 2008 and January 2009, The resulting list of false or misleading claims was ana-
researchers were sent into category-leading ‘big box’ lyzed for patterns and lessons. The previous Six Sins of
retailers in the United States, Canada, the United Greenwashing (refer to Exhibit 2) were used to sort the
Kingdom, and Australia with instructions to record every claims, and new anomalies and patterns were identified.
product making an environmental claim. The
researchers recorded product details, claim(s) details, Of the 2,219 products, over 98% committed at least one
any supporting information, and any explanatory detail of the Sins of Greenwashing. Notably, a seventh Sin has
or offers of additional information or support. (More emerged.
detail on the research methodology and findings is
provided in Appendix A.)

In the United States and Canada, a total of 2,2192
products making 4,996 green claims were recorded.
These claims were tested against best practices, notably
against guidelines provided by the U.S. Federal Trade
2,219
Commission, Competition Bureau of Canada, Number of products surveyed in North
Australian Consumer and Competition Commission, America. Over 98% of products committed
and the ISO 14021 standard for environmental label- at least one of the Sins of Greenwashing.
ing.

Exhibit 2 - The 2007 Six Sins of Greenwashing: A Primer

The first edition of the Sins of Greenwashing report, published in November 2007, identified the following Six Sins3 :

1. Sin of the Hidden Trade-off, committed by suggesting a product is ‘green’ based on an unreasonably narrow set of attributes
without attention to other important environmental issues. Paper, for example, is not necessarily environmentally-preferable
just because it comes from a sustainably-harvested forest. Other important environmental issues in the paper-making process,
including energy, greenhouse gas emissions, and water and air pollution, may be equally or more significant.

2. Sin of No Proof, committed by an environmental claim that cannot be substantiated by easily accessible supporting
information or by a reliable third-party certification. Common examples are facial or toilet tissue products that claim various
percentages of post-consumer recycled content without providing any evidence.

3. Sin of Vagueness, committed by every claim that is so poorly defined or broad that its real meaning is likely to be
misunderstood by the consumer. ‘All-natural’ is an example. Arsenic, uranium, mercury, and formaldehyde are all naturally
occurring, and poisonous. ‘All natural’ isn’t necessarily ‘green’.

4. Sin of Irrelevance, committed by making an environmental claim that may be truthful but is unimportant or unhelpful for
consumers seeking environmentally preferable products. ‘CFC-free’ is a common example, since it is a frequent claim despite
the fact that CFCs are banned by law.

5. Sin of Lesser of Two Evils, committed by claims that may be true within the product category,
but that risk distracting the consumer from the greater environmental impacts of the category
as a whole. Organic cigarettes are an example of this category, as are fuel-efficient
sport-utility vehicles.

6. Sin of Fibbing, the least frequent Sin, is committed by making environmental claims
that are simply false. The most common examples were products falsely claiming to
be Energy Star certified or registered.

2
In the United States and Canada, 833 products were found in both countries. The
individual country totals are: 1,721 in the U.S. and 1,331 in Canada.
www.sinsofgreenwashing.org 3
TerraChoice Environmental Marketing, The Six Sins of Greenwashing, 2007.

TM

3. Key Findings
The data from the 2009 Seven Sins of Greenwashing • A new Sin has emerged – the Sin of ‘Worshiping
revealed both good news and bad. They also point to False Labels’. This new Sin describes an effort by
early evidence of what may be two significant new trends. some marketers to exploit consumers’ demand for
These are the key findings: third-party certification with fake labels or claims of
third-party endorsement. This is described in detail
• More products are making environmental claims. in Section 3.1.
In stores that were visited in both 2007 and
2008/2009, the number of ‘green’ products4 • Legitimate Eco-Labeling is on the rise.
increased by 40% to 176% per store. This was an Legitimate eco-labeling is almost twice as common
average increase of 79%, providing further evidence in this study (23% of products) as it was last year
that manufacturers and marketers are respond- (14% of products). For this test, we recognized 14
ing to consumer demand for more environmentally labels as ‘legitimate’. Among others, these include
responsible goods. This is good news. Although legitimate ecolabels include EcoLogo, FSC,
greenwashing is still a problem (see below), this Green Guard, GreenSeal, and SFI.
fundamental increase in ‘green’ product selection is
a strong signal that the green consumer movement Proof is a central element of good green marketing,
is having good effect. and a relatively easy one for marketers.
(This increase in ‘green’ products is corroborated • Greenwashing is an international challenge, with
by the increase in green advertising found in other very similar patterns in the United States, Canada,
TerraChoice research. Since 2006, green advertising the United Kingdom, and Australia. This key finding
has almost tripled (Exhibit 1).) is described in detail in Section 3.3.

Additional details, including methodology and
Legitimate eco-labeling is almost twice as nation-specific breakdowns of the results, are
common in this study (23% of products) as it provided in Appendices A through E.
was in the 2007 research (14% of products).

• Kids (toys baby products), cosmetics and cleaning

79%
products (diapers, toothpaste, and window cleaner,
for example) are the three categories where green
claims – and greenwashing – are most common.
These products, among the most common of
products in most households, deserve particular
scrutiny from consumers. Each category is detailed in Average increase in the number of ‘green’
Section 3.2. products among North American stores
visited in both 2007 and 2008/2009.
• Greenwashing is still abundant, with over 98%
of ‘green’ products committing at least one of the
Sins. The data show a minor decline in the overall
frequency of greenwashing, but it does not appear
to be statistically significant. Of the 2,219 products
claiming to be green in the United States and
Canada, only 25, or less than 2%, products were
found to be Sin-free.

4
In this case, and in every case in this report, ‘green’ products is shorthand for ‘products-claiming-to-be-green’
(or other similar language or suggestion). In fact, few if any products can be correctly described as ‘green’. Most
of the best are still only ‘greener’ than the competitors. www.sinsofgreenwashing.org

TM

3.1 The Seventh Sin: The Sin of Worshiping False Labels
The Sin of Worshiping False Labels is committed by a Exhibit 3 details these results for North America.
product that, through either words or images, gives
the impression of third-party endorsement where
no such endorsement actually exists; fake labels,
in other words.

As concern around greenwashing has grown,
many consumers and experts have pointed to the
important role that third-party certification can play in Some examples of false labeling:
legitimate green marketing. This call for certification has
led to an increase in legitimate eco-labeling. • In the United States, there is a brand of aluminum foil
with certification-like images that bear the name of
the company’s own in-house environmental program

23%
without further explanation.

• In Canada, one paper towel product uses a
certification-like image to make the bold (if vague
statement) ‘this product fights global warming’.
Percentage of products
committing the Sin of • Several brands of air fresheners give the impression of
Worshiping False Labels. certification of the claim ‘CFC-free’ (thereby
committing both the Sin of Worshiping False Labels
and the Sin of Irrelevance).
Unfortunately, it has also led some marketers to adopt
the misleading strategy of making claims that look like a • A variety of products in both the US and Canada use
third-party. Usually, these take the form of an image that certification-like images with green jargon including
looks like an official stamp or seal of approval. like ‘eco-safe’, ‘eco-secure’, and ‘eco-preferred’.

In contrast to the ‘false labels’ described by this Sin,
legitimate eco-labels are easy to recognize and
The Sin of Worshiping False Labels is
understand. Appendix F provides references for further
committed by a product that, through either
words or images, gives the impression of third- information on legitimate eco-labels in North America.
party endorsement where no such endorsement Exhibit 4 describes some of the most widely recognized,
actually exists. legitimate eco-labels available to North American
consumers.


TM

A credible eco-label is a great way to find genuinely greener products. This table
identifies some of the most common, credible eco-labels in North America. Please note
that this is not an exhaustive list of ALL credible eco-labels. The checklist under
“Certification or Labelling Process” can be used to determine the credibility of eco-labels
not included in this list. Look for eco-labels that meet the criteria listed: the more
checkmarks the better.


TM

3.2 Kids, Cosmetics and Cleaning: Products of Special Risk
Of the categories of ‘green’ products identified in this

Kids, Cosmetics
study, three have emerged as deserving special
attention. In each of these cases, there is an above-
average frequency of environmental claims (and therefore
higher risk of greenwashing). These products, among the
most common of products in most households, deserve
particular scrutiny from consumers. These priority
Cleaning
categories are:
Product categories with an above-average
• Kids (toys baby products); frequency of environmental claims (and
• Cosmetics (health beauty products);
therefore higher risk of greenwashing).
• Cleaning (both general and paper products)

Kids (Toys Baby) Products The most common environmental claims in this
category are the following:
Toys and baby products attract environmental and health
claims for an excellent reason: parents attend to the • ‘Natural’ (in various forms, such as ‘all natural’, ‘natu-
health of their kids with extraordinary care. Parenting is ral alternative’, ‘naturally-derived’, or ‘based on natural’)
a phase of our lives when we are especially poignantly is the most common claim on kids products. In the USA
conscious of our impact on future generations. and Canada, it was found on 74 baby products and
11 toys (a combined total of 39% of the products in this
Not surprisingly, consumer market research suggests that category).
new parents are more inclined than other consumers to
care about environmental issues. Green marketers are
paying attention and can either help parents, or exploit Greenwashing, naturally.
them. They can either keep the trust of parents, or they
can lose it. ‘Natural’ is a powerfully resonant term. It appeals to us at
a fundamental level and its frequent use by marketers is
Some examples of products from this category: clear evidence of its popularity. It can also be
dramatically misleading, and can contribute to
- ‘natural’ alphabet blocks greenwashing, since most consumers assume it to mean
- ‘Bisphenol A (BPA)-free’ cups and spoons ‘safe’, ‘good’, or ‘green’. Arsenic is natural. So are
- ‘biodegradable’ building blocks cyanide and mercury and formaldehyde. All are
- ‘all-natural’, and ‘certified non-toxic’ cotton toys hazardous. Although a standard definition has been
- ‘99% natural’ baby cream proposed by the Natural Products Association, none of
- ‘eco-friendly’ dyes on ‘100% organic’ baby sheets the products in the study bore that mark. Unexplained, as
- ‘degradable plastic’ diaper bags it was in every case in which it was found in this research,
‘natural’ risks misleading consumers. Therefore, these
Exhibit 5 summarizes the findings in this product claims all commit the Sin of Vagueness.
category.

5
15 toy products and 112 baby products, were found in both Canada and the USA.


TM

• ‘Organic’, in various forms, is the second most Exhibit 6 summarizes the findings in this category.
common claim in this category. It was found on
76 baby products and 1 toy. In all cases, these claims
were made in reference to materials from which the
product was made, usually cotton.

In the US and Canada, organic claims were sup-
ported by certification on only 21 of these products. Some examples of products in this category:
Any claim – organic or otherwise – for which there is
no readily accessible evidence commits the Sin of No - ‘biodegradable’ and ‘organic’ cotton swabs
Proof. More detail on the difficulties with ‘organic’ - ‘earth-friendly’ sponges
claims is provided in the next section, on cosmetics. - ‘100% natural’ and ‘biodegradable’ kids soaps
- ‘100% pure organic’ shampoos and conditioners
• ‘BPA-free’ was claimed by 44 baby products and 5 - ‘all-natural’ hair removal
toys. None of these products offered any certification - ‘100% natural’ bronzer
or verification of the claim and consequently all were - ‘all natural’ and ‘certified oganic’ toothpastes
found to commit the Sin of No Proof.

A total of 44 products, (36 baby care and 8 toys), • By far the most common environmental claim in this
used vague environmental statements such as ‘eco- category, found on 263 products, is ‘natural’. For
friendly’, ‘earth-friendly’, ‘earth-friendlier’, and ‘good example:
for the environment’. Without elaboration, these terms
are meaningless since they are entirely subjective. - ‘naturally pure’ body lotion
These claims all commit the Sin of Vagueness. - ‘naturally-derived’ ingredients in handsoaps
- facial buffs ‘made with natural materials’
- ‘naturally refreshing’ soaps
Cosmetics (Health Beauty Products)
Consumer consciousness of the environmental and Unless a specific definition is offered, claims of ‘natu-
health effects of personal care products – ral’ commit the Sin of Vagueness. The specific chal-
cosmetics, shampoos, and soaps, for example – has lenges with ‘natural’ claims are described above, in
grown steadily over several decades. High profile retail the section entitled Kids (toys baby
positioning at stores like the Body Shop has products).
contributed to this trend.

The simple fact that we put these products on (or in)
our body (products such as toothpaste, shampoos, or

263
lotions) has also contributed to the heightened
consumer awareness. Most recently, the ingredients of
these products have begun to attract increased scrutiny
by advocates and regulators.

It is little surprise, consequently, that this year’s Seven Number of cosmetics claiming to be
Sins of Greenwashing report isolated health and ‘natural’, by far the most common
beauty products as a prominent category for green environmental claim in this category.
claims and greenwashing.


TM

• The second most common claim on cosmetics is Cleaning Products
‘organic’, which was found on 139 products.
These products include everything from facial scrubs Demand for green cleaning in schools, hospitals,
made with certified organic ingredients to shampoos and offices and other commercial buildings has caused a
conditioners. rapid acceleration in greener cleaning formulations,
technologies, and methods. At the same time,
A claim of organic itself is not misleading, as long as cer- connections have been drawn between household
tification or other proof is available. However, more than indoor air quality, chronic illnesses (such as asthma)
half of the claims found in this category were not and home cleaning products. The result is a dramatic
supported by an organic certification scheme, which increase in the number of household cleaning products
means they committed the Sin of No Proof. that claim to be ‘green’.

(Even if these claims had been verified, single-attribute Exhibit 7 describes the findings in this category.
claims such as organic – claims that address
only one aspect of the product’s lifecycle
impacts - risk committing the Sin of the
Hidden Trade-off. This would be true, for
example, of swabs made of organically-
grown cotton if the cotton had been bleached
with chlorine.)
Some examples of products in this category include:
• Fewer products, by claiming to be biodegradable (72)
or by using vague environmental jargon (57), committed - ‘planet-friendly’ glass cleaners
the Sin of Vagueness. - ‘100% compostable’ and ‘naturally-derived’
disposal wipes
- ‘non-toxic’ and ‘chlorine-free’ bleach
- ‘plant-based’ laundry soap
- ‘100% recycled’ paper towels
- ‘biodegradable’ toilet paper

In the absence of a specific explanation, Among general cleaning products, the following are the
‘non-toxic’ is likely to mislead consumers most common sources of greenwashing:
and therefore was determined to be
committing the Sin of Vagueness.
• 124 products were found to make claims of
‘biodegradability’. These varied widely in their
reliability. Many products provide very specific
definitions (such as ‘verified biodegradable
according OECD 301D’). If a verification source was
provided, it was not considered to be misleading.

Other claims continue to use very vague language, such
as ‘biodegradable agents’, or ‘optimal level of
biodegradability’. These were classified as
committing the Sin of Vagueness.

7
91 cleaners and 14 paper products were found in both Canada and the United States.

TM

• General environmental jargon, with many and creative
3.3 International Findings
variations, was the second most common type of claim in Environmental concerns are global. Many issues, climate
this product category. It was found on 110 products and change for example, reach across all borders. Others
included such claims as: – water pollution, exposure to toxics and carcinogens
– are local but experienced around the world. It is not
- ‘planet friendly’; surprising, as a consequence, that demand for greener
- ‘environmentally-sound’; and products is also a global phenomenon; or that
- ‘ecological’. greenwashing is a global concern.

This kind of language may be attention-grabbing, but it To bring some perspective to the global dynamics of the
can be very misleading. Unless ‘green’ jargon (including problem, this research included data from the United
the word ‘green’ itself) was explained, it was determined States (Philadelphia), Canada (Ottawa), Australia
to commit the Sin of Vagueness. (Melbourne), and the United Kingdom (London).

• Variations on the theme of ‘natural’ were found on
97 products, and formed the third most frequent type of
claim. (See the previous two sections for further detail on
‘natural’ claims and the Sin of Vagueness.) Environmental concern is global. Most
issues reach beyond all borders.
• Claims of ‘non-toxic’ were found on 61 products.
‘Non-toxic’ is a legitimate term, with specific and
prescribed meanings provided by various scientific bod-
ies. If the specific meaning or interpretation was given, a Exhibit 8 summarizes the data collection and high level
claim of ‘non-toxic’ was determined to be acceptable. In findings from each country, Appendices B through E
the absence of a specific explanation, ‘non-toxic’ is likely provide more detailed country-specific results.
to mislead consumers and therefore was determined to
be committing the Sin of Vagueness.

None of these markets is immune to greenwashing.

‘Biodegradable’
These results suggest that the prevalence of greenwash-
ing varies little from country to country. Even the
proportionality between the Seven Sins of Greenwashing
varies little between nations, as illustrated in Exhibit 9.
There are several definitions for biodegradability
(e.g ‘readily’ or ‘inherent’) applicable to cleaning
products, each with separate test methods
specified by several credible guidelines9 (OECD,
ISO or ASTM, for example). Consumers should be
wary of ‘biodegradable’ products not providing
specific details, and not referencing one of these
valid guidelines.

8
833 products were found in both the United States and Canada. 1,874 environmental claims were made on these products. 10
9
OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development – Test Guidelines for Biodegradability www.oecd.org
ASTM – American Society for Testing and Materials - Standard Specification for Biodegradability www.astm.org www.sinsofgreenwashing.org
ISO – International Standard Organization – Biodegradability Test Method www.iso.org

TM

Exhibit 9: Sin Frequency, Four Countries.

As Exhibit 10 illustrates, there are significant international • In The United Kingdom, both forestry (14.4% of all
differences in the specific environmental issues that products) and ‘organics’ (17.7% of all products)
marketers use to promote their products. Specifically: are notably more common than in
the other nations studied.
• ‘Natural’ claims are made much more frequently in
the United Kingdom (42.7% of all products) than in • No claims related to Bisphenol A were found
any of the other nations (29.2%, on average). outside of North America.

• ‘Water savings’ is more prevalent in Australia (13.6% • Waste management related claims –
of all products) than elsewhere (0.4% to 1.6%). ‘recyclable’, ‘biodegradable’, for example –
appear to be less common in Australia than
• ‘Energy’ and ‘air quality’-related marketing claims in the other nations studied.
are also more common in Australia (28.9% and
11.3%, respectively).

Exhibit 10: Country by Country Comparison of Environmental Issues Associated with Product Claims.

11

TM

4. What Consumers Can Do 5. What Marketers Can Do
Although governments in the United States, Canada, Green marketing is a vast commercial opportunity, and
Australia, and the United Kingdom discourage so it should be. When it works – when it is scientifically
greenwashing, these efforts clearly are not enough. sound and commercially successful – it is an important
Greenwashing persists, and continues to threaten catalyst toward sustainability. The purpose of the Seven
progress to real sustainability. Sins of Greenwashing report is to encourage green
marketing and to help marketers improve their claims so
If the good intentions of consumers and the that:
environmental benefits of their choices are to be
leveraged, consumers themselves must play a role. With • Genuinely ‘greener’ products excel;
four simple actions, consumers can have a very real • Competitive pressure from illegitimate green claims
impact: is diminished;
• Consumers do not become jaded and unduly
1. Keep supporting greener products. As consumers, skeptical of green claims; and
we have enormous power to shape the marketplace. • Marketers employ environmental concerns to
The worst result of greenwashing would be to give establish honest, trustworthy, and long-lasting
up. dialogue with their customers.

2. Look for, and choose, products with reliable Green marketers and consumers are learning about the
eco-labels. (See Exhibit 4.) pitfalls of greenwashing together. This is a shared
problem and opportunity.
3. In the absence of a reliable eco-label, remember
the Seven Sins of Greenwashing (www.sinsofgre- The Seven Sins of Greenwashing do NOT suggest that
enwashing.org) and choose the product that offers only perfectly ‘green’ products should be marketed as
transparency, information and education. environmentally preferable. There is no such thing as
a perfectly ‘green’ product: environmentally preferable
4. For more information and green-shopping tools, products are ‘greener’ not ‘green’, and marketing them
consult the resources in Appendix F, or visit as such is entirely fair.
www.sinsofgreenwashing.org and www.ecologo.org.
Environmental progress will happen one step at a time.
Not only should gradually ‘greener’ innovations and
products be encouraged, consumers should and will
reward this incremental progress.

Consumers need to continue supporting
greener products.Each of us has enormous
power to shape the marketplace. The worst
result of greenwashing would be if we were
to give up.
Environmental progress will happen one step at
a time. Not only should gradually ‘greener’
innovations and products be encouraged,
consumers should and will reward this
incremental progress.

12

TM

Avoiding greenwashing does not mean waiting for a 6) Avoid the Sin of the Lesser of Two Evils.
perfect product. It does mean that sound science, honesty, a) Help each customer find the product that is right
and transparency are paramount. It means avoiding the for them, based on their needs and wants.
Seven Sins of Greenwashing: b) Don’t try to make a customer feel ‘green’ about a
choice that is harmful or unnecessary.
1) Avoid the Sin of the Hidden Trade-Off.
a) Start with an honest understanding of all of the 7) Avoid the Sin of Fibbing.
environmental impacts of your product across its a) Tell the truth. Always.
entire lifecycle. b) Always tell the truth.
b) Emphasize specific messages (particularly when
you know your audiences care about those issues)
but don’t use single issues to distract attention from

Questions?
other impacts.
c) Don’t make claims about a single environmen-
tal impact or benefit, without knowing how your
product performs in terms of its other impacts, and
without sharing that information with your
customers.
d) Pursue continual improvement of your environ- www.sinsofgreenwashing.org
mental footprint (across the entire lifecycle), and
encourage your customers to join you on that
journey.

2) Avoid the Sin of No Proof.
a) Understand and confirm the scientific case behind
each green marketing claim.
b) Make evidence readily available, or rely on third-
party certifications whose standards are publically
available.

3) Avoid the Sin of Vagueness.
a) Use language that resonates with your customers,
as long as that language is truthful.
b) Don’t use vague names and terms
(e.g. ‘environmentally-friendly’) without providing
precise explanations of your meaning.

4) Avoid the Sin of Worshiping False Labels.
a) If third-party endorsement of your claims is
important: Get it, don’t fake it.
b) Favor eco-labels that are themselves accredited,
and that address the entire lifecycle of the products
(refer to Table 2).

5) Avoid the Sin of Irrelevance.
a) Don’t claim CFC-free, unless it is a legitimate
point of competitive differentiation.
b) Don’t claim any environmental benefit that is
shared by all or most of your competitors.

13

TM

14

TM

APPENDICES

A - Research Methodology
B - United States of America - Country Summary
C - Canada - Country Summary
D - United Kingdom - Country Summary
E - Australia - Country Summary
F - Resources

15

TM

16

TM

APPENDIX A - Research Methodology
1. Data Collection Each claim was tested against best practice, notably
against guidelines provided by the U.S. Federal Trade
During November 2008 and January 2009, Commission, Competition Bureau of Canada, Australian
researchers were sent into category-leading ‘big box’ Competition and Consumer Commission, and the ISO
retailers in the United States, Canada, the United 14021 standard for environmental labeling. Claims that
Kingdom, and Australia with instructions to record every appeared to be inconsistent with these guidelines were
product making an environmental claim. For each, the flagged.
researchers recorded product details, claim(s) details,
any supporting information, and any explanatory detail Flagged claims were tested against the ‘Six Sins of
or offers of additional information or support. Greenwashing’ and sorted accordingly. In addition, the
results were assessed for other emergent patterns.
Tables A.1 through A.3 detail this field work.
3. Quality Control Quality Assurance

Consistency in methods of data collection and analysis
was maximized in several ways:

• The same principal researcher undertook
the fieldwork in all locations.
• Data collection sheets and guidelines were
standardized in advance.
• Trial collections and analyses were under
taken to further assist standardization.

Quality assurance was provided through
review of the preliminary interpretations by
the project leaders. Where there appeared
to be room for differences in interpretation, a
consensus-based solution was reached.

2. Analysis Interpretation

Following the field work, products and claims were
entered, sorted and analyzed using Microsoft Excel.
Specifically:
3,872
Unique products that were recorded
• Claims that might be clarified by further making 8,544 environmental claims
explanation were researched at product web sites. across the four countries observed in
If the product website explained a claim that would
2008/2009.
otherwise be vague, for example, it would not have
been determined to commit the Sin of Vagueness.
• If product labeling offered a website or phone
number for further information, the reference was
checked and its utility was recorded.

17 10
A total of 833 products were found in both the United States and Canada. Therefore this table will not sum to the
2,219 total for the USA and Canada given elsewhere.

TM

APPENDIX B - United States of America
Country Summary

Frequency of Sins Committed (USA)
7%
3%
0%
3%
34% Hidden-Trade Off
No Proof
Vagueness
Irrelevance
26%
Fibbing
Lesser of Two Evils
Worshiping False Labels

27%
denominator: total sins committed

Claims Broken Down by Product Category (USA) Average Claims Per
Product Type (USA)
Health Beauty 23%

Home 18%
Cleaning Paper 3.5
Office Products 17%
Toys 3.2
Cleaning Products 3.0
Cleaning Products 13%
Health Beauty 2.7
Baby Care 11%
Baby Care 2.4
Building Construction 8%
Building Construction 1.9
Cleaning Paper 3%
Electronics 1.9
Electronics 3%
Office Products 1.9
Lawn Garden 2%
Home 1.9
Toys 2%
Lawn Garden 1.8
Other 1%
denominator: total observed claims
Other 1.7

Frequency of Sins Committed (USA) Percentage of Products
Kids Cleaning Committing Each Sin (USA)
4%
7%

73%
10% 25%
23%
34% Hidden Trade Off
8%

No Proof 59%
39%
27%
23%
Vagueness 56%
Worshiping False Labels 24%
Cosmetics
8%
Hidden-Trade Off
2% 5%
No Proof Irrelevance
30% Vagueness

34%
Irrelevance
Fibbing
Lesser of Two Evils 4%
Lesser of Two Evils
Worshiping False Labels Fibbing 0%
denominator: total sins committed per category
29%

18

TM

APPENDIX C - Canada
Country Summary

Frequency of Sins Committed (CAN)
8%
3%
1%
3%
33% Hidden-Trade Off
No Proof
Vagueness
Irrelevance
Fibbing
25%
Lesser of Two Evils

27% denominator: total sins committed

Claims Broken Down by Product Category (CAN) Average Claims Per
Product Type (CAN)
Health Beauty 21%

Cleaning Paper 3.4
Home 14%
Office Products 14%
Toys 3.0
Health Beauty 2.9
Other 2.9
Baby Care 8%
Electronics 2.1
Electronics 4%
Baby Care 2.0
Cleaning Paper 4% Office Products 2.0
Lawn Garden 2% Home 1.9
Toys 2% Building Construction 1.7
Other 1% denominator: total observed claims Lawn Garden 1.4

Frequency of Sins Committed (CAN)
Percentage of Products
Kids Cleaning Committing Each Sin (CAN)
1% 5%
4%
10%

70%
23%

Hidden Trade Off
34% 1%
22%
8%

No Proof 60%
38%
31%
23%
Vagueness 51%
Cosmetics
7%
Hidden-Trade Off
6%
2%
26%
No Proof Irrelevance
Vagueness
Irrelevance
Fibbing
Lesser of Two Evils 5%
Lesser of Two Evils
1%
37%
Worshiping False Labels Fibbing
29% denominator: total sins committed per category

19

TM

APPENDIX D - United Kingdom
Country Summary

Frequency of Sins Committed (UK)
8%
1% 1%

Hidden-Trade Off
No Proof
25%
49% Vagueness
Irrelevance
Fibbing
Lesser of Two Evils

16%

Claims Broken Down by Product Category (UK) Average Claims Per
Product Type (UK)
Health Beauty 40%

Cleaning Products 22% Cleaning Products 3.2
Baby Care 2.7
Home 7%
Health Beauty 2.2
Lawn Garden 1.6
Baby Care 5%
Home 1.6
Lawn Garden 5%
Cleaning Paper 3%
Cleaning Paper 1.5
Toys 3%
Toys 1.5
Office Products 1% Office Products 1.4
Electronics 1% Electronics 1
Other 0%
denominator: total observed claims
Other N/A

Frequency of Sins Committed (UK)
Kids Cleaning Committing Each Sin (UK)
4% 2% 6%
3%
1%

27%
Hidden Trade Off 98%
28% 48%

44%
49%

No Proof

17% 15%
Vagueness 62%
Cosmetics Hidden-Trade Off

1%
1%
11% No Proof
Vagueness
Irrelevance 3%
46%
Irrelevance
Fibbing Lesser of Two Evils 3%
Lesser of Two Evils

0%
26%
Worshiping False Labels Fibbing
15%

20

TM

APPENDIX E - Australia
Country Summary

Frequency of Sins Committed (AUS)
12%
1%
3%
Hidden-Trade Off

45% No Proof
Vagueness
Irrelevance
22% Fibbing
Lesser of Two Evils

17%

Claims Broken Down by Product Category (AUS) Average Claims Per
Product Type (AUS)

Health Beauty 15%
Baby Care 4.2
Lawn Garden 13%
Office Products 12%
Health Beauty 2.5
Lawn Garden 2.1
Baby Care 4%
Office Products 2.1
Home 3%
Other 2.0
Electronics 2%
Home 1.7
Cleaning Paper 1% Cleaning Paper 1.3
Toys 1% Electronics 1.3
Other 1% denominator: total observed claims
Toys 1

Frequency of Sins Committed (AUS)
Kids Cleaning Committing Each Sin (AUS)
6%
6%
5%

94%
14% 4%
Hidden Trade Off
42%
50%

22%
No Proof 43%
30%

21%
Vagueness 57%
Cosmetics
Hidden-Trade Off
9%
No Proof
Vagueness
Irrelevance 11%
4%
Irrelevance
28% 45% Fibbing
Lesser of Two Evils
Lesser of Two Evils
Worshiping False Labels Fibbing 0%
18%

21

TM

APPENDIX F - Resources

22

Index3c24

More Related Content

What's hot

Viewers also liked

Similar to Index3c24

More from Yayasan Perempuan Kaisa Indonesia

Index3c24