[#23657] [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Bug #1550: String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes
Hi,
On Jun 1, 2009, at 5:07 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Issue #1550 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
This change seems to break the build on my machine:
[#23683] [Bug #1560] multi core operations are slower on trunk (possible regression) — David Cuadrado <redmine@...>
Bug #1560: multi core operations are slower on trunk (possible regression)
[#23700] Standard Ruby bytecode — Ioannis Nousias <s0238762@...>
I came across this post:
[#23717] [Bug #1573] $0 behaves unexpectedly — Morris Brodersen <redmine@...>
Bug #1573: $0 behaves unexpectedly
[#23727] [Bug #1580] TestIOScanF failure in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Bug #1580: TestIOScanF failure in windows
[#23729] [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Bug #1583: Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError?
Issue #1583 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.
Hi,
Excerpts from Yukihiro Matsumoto's message of Sun Jun 07 17:07:06 +0300 2009:
[#23738] Ducktyping interface — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>
Matz,
[#23753] [Bug #1587] Problem with string sharing — Quet Zal <redmine@...>
Bug #1587: Problem with string sharing
[#23770] [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Robert Gonzalez <redmine@...>
Bug #1595: rake unusable on windows install
[#23815] inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — "Knutaf" <knutaf@...>
Hello,
> This works on Linux by persisting socket.fileno from the parent process a=
Well, I'm already not exactly using pure Ruby, since I'm wrapping
> Besides that, I think using WSADuplicateSocket will suffer from the
I tried that with both the HANDLE value and with an fd value that I
> I tried that with both the HANDLE value and with an fd value that I
[#23842] request for updated ri/rdoc on 1.8.7 branch — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>
would it be possible to get a newer version of ri/rdoc installed on
[#23845] [Bug #1627] Kernel.require Should Canonicalise Paths — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Bug #1627: Kernel.require Should Canonicalise Paths
[#23849] [Bug #1629] [Segfault] z = Zlib::GzipReader.new segfaults — Markus Fischer <redmine@...>
Bug #1629: [Segfault] z = Zlib::GzipReader.new segfaults
[#23850] instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — apeiros <apeiros@...>
Hi folks
Hi,
Am 16.06.2009 um 22:12 schrieb Yusuke ENDOH:
Am 17.06.2009 um 00:01 schrieb Florian Gilcher:
[#23869] [Bug #1640] [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Bug #1640: [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class
[#23878] trouble registering and logging in to the issue tracking system — Knutaf H <knutaf@...>
Hi,
[#23883] Merging recent Ruby threading improvements — Joe Damato <ice799@...>
Hi ruby-core and CC'ed friends -
[#23934] [Bug #1661] RegExp mismatch — Adam Carheden <redmine@...>
Bug #1661: RegExp mismatch
[#23950] [Bug #1668] Error installing ruby gems for 1.9.1 on windows vista — Kristian Mandrup <redmine@...>
Bug #1668: Error installing ruby gems for 1.9.1 on windows vista
[#23977] [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...>
Hi,
Thanks for the update. :-)
On Jun 23, 2009, at 4:23 AM, Run Paint Run Run wrote:
Sorry for late response,
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 12:12 AM, NARUSE, Yui<[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Luis Lavena<[email protected]> wrote:
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
I agree pretty much across the board. I was actually hoping that
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
2009/6/23 Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <[email protected]>
2009/6/23 Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <[email protected]>:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Charles Oliver
[#23986] possible bug with windows `` they don't set $? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>
Looks like a bug? [1.8 or 1.9]
[#23988] [Bug #1680] URI.encode does not encode '+' (by default) — Xuân Baldauf <redmine@...>
Bug #1680: URI.encode does not encode '+' (by default)
[#23997] [Bug #1681] Integer#chr Should Infer Encoding of Given Codepoint — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Bug #1681: Integer#chr Should Infer Encoding of Given Codepoint
Hi,
>> This seems needlessly verbose given that Ruby already knows
[#24007] [Bug #1684] ruby/rubyw.rc still say 1.9.1 — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Bug #1684: ruby/rubyw.rc still say 1.9.1
[#24010] [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — B Kelly <redmine@...>
Bug #1685: Some windows unicode path issues remain
Issue #1685 has been updated by B Kelly.
Issue #1685 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.
Yuki Sonoda wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
U.Nakamura wrote:
Hello,
U.Nakamura wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
Hello,
Hi,
Hello,
[#24025] [Bug #1688] Zlib raises a buffer error when inflating some kinds of data — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>
Bug #1688: Zlib raises a buffer error when inflating some kinds of data
Issue #1688 has been updated by Roger Pack.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Roger Pack<[email protected]> wrote:
[#24032] [Bug #1690] backticks don't set $? in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Bug #1690: backticks don't set $? in windows
[#24033] [Bug #1691] ruby --help doesn't display the "skip rubygems" option — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Bug #1691: ruby --help doesn't display the "skip rubygems" option
[#24050] 1.9.2 Should Pass RubySpec Before Release — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...>
I humbly suggest that a prerequisite of 1.9.2 being released is that
[#24058] [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — Steven Hartland <redmine@...>
Bug #1696: http downloads are unuseably slow
Issue #1696 has been updated by Steven Hartland.
Net/HTTP in 1.9.2dev is already working as you described with two
In article <[email protected]>,
Excerpts from Tanaka Akira's message of Mon Jun 29 21:17:58 +0300 2009:
On Jun 29, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Eero Saynatkari wrote:
[#24063] [Feature #1697] Object#<=> — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>
Feature #1697: Object#<=>
Issue #1697 has been updated by Rick DeNatale.
Excerpts from Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca's message of Sun Jun 28 16:22:45 +0300 2009:
[#24069] [ANN] RubyInstaller: Building installers story and news — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hey guys,
[#24099] [Bug #1708] require 'complex' Causes Unexpected Behaviour — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Bug #1708: require 'complex' Causes Unexpected Behaviour
[ruby-core:23706] Inconsistent behavior on 1.8 and 1.9 of String#[]= with single Fixnum argument
Hi,
String[]= behaves differently on 1.8 and 1.9 when given a single
Fixnum argument == to the size of the string. Given the following
code:
$ cat string.rb
s = ""
p s[0]
s[0,0] = "a"
p s
s = ""
s[0] = "a"
p s
s = "x"
s[1] = "a"
p s
these are the results:
$ ruby -vw string.rb
ruby 1.8.6 (2008-08-11 patchlevel 287) [universal-darwin9.0]
nil
"a"
string.rb:8:in `[]=': index 0 out of string (IndexError)
from string.rb:8
$ ruby1.8 -vw string.rb
ruby 1.8.8dev (2009-06-04 revision 23638) [i386-darwin9.7.0]
nil
"a"
string.rb:8:in `[]=': index 0 out of string (IndexError)
from string.rb:8
$ ruby1.9 -vw string.rb
ruby 1.9.2dev (2009-05-28 trunk 23601) [i386-darwin9.7.0]
nil
"a"
"a"
"xa"
Given any string s of N characters, s[N] == nil, so I understand that
to mean that N is out of the bounds of the string. The RDoc for
String#[]= states that
"The forms that take a +Fixnum+ will raise an +IndexError+ if the value
is out of range; the +Range+ form will raise a +RangeError+, and the
+Regexp+ and +String+ forms will silently ignore the assignment."
The RDoc does not appear to have changed on 1.9.
So, my questions are:
1. should ""[0] = "a" work on 1.8 the way it does on 1.9?
OR
2. should ""[0] = "a" raise an IndexError on 1.9?
If the answer to the above is "it should raise an IndexError on 1.9",
then should ""[0,N] = "a" also raise an IndexError?
If the answer is ""[0] = "a" should work as it does on 1.9, can we
please update the RDoc to somehow explain that while s[N] is out of
bounds of the string, you can "replace" that non-existent character
with an arbitrary length string.
Cheers,
Brian