[#46049] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6590] Dealing with bigdecimal, etc gems in JRuby — "mrkn (Kenta Murata)" <muraken@...>
[#46078] [ruby-trunk - Feature #2565] adding hooks for better tracing — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...>
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 03:06:59AM +0900, mame (Yusuke Endoh) wrote:
[#46127] [ruby-trunk - Feature #2565] adding hooks for better tracing — "vo.x (Vit Ondruch)" <v.ondruch@...>
[#46160] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6693][Open] Don't warn for unused variables starting with _ — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>
[#46163] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6695][Open] Configuration for Thread/Fiber creation — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
[#46172] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6697][Open] [PATCH] Add Kernel#Symbol conversion method like String(), Array() etc. — "madeofcode (Mark Dodwell)" <mark@...>
[#46236] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6704][Open] Random core dump — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...>
[#46248] building ruby-1.9.3-p194 on AIX 6.1 TL05 SP06 — Perry Smith <pedzsan@...>
I am just now starting to debug this but hoped someone has already =
Hi Perry
Hi Perry,
[#46262] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6710][Open] new special binding specifier :isolated — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
[#46276] Lambdaification of Method Calls — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>
Hi,
[#46320] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6721][Open] Object#yield_self — "alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov)" <redmine@...>
[#46339] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6724][Open] waaaaaaant! ( — "zenspider (Ryan Davis)" <redmine@...>
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 08:58:36AM +0900, zenspider (Ryan Davis) wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Aaron Patterson
[#46377] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6727][Open] Add Array#rest (with implementation) — "duckinator (Nick Markwell)" <nick@...>
[#46420] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6731][Open] add new method "Object.present?" as a counter to #empty? — "rogerdpack (Roger Pack)" <rogerpack2005@...>
[#46500] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6739][Open] One-line rescue statement should support specifying an exception class — Quintus (Marvin Gülker) <sutniuq@...>
[#46535] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6749][Open] rdoc of Time class (incorrect explanation of leap seconds) — "stomar (Marcus Stollsteimer)" <redmine@...>
Hi Eric,
On Jul 23, 2012, at 11:52 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Am 24.07.2012 19:44, schrieb Eric Hodel:
[#46546] Fwd: [ruby-cvs:43609] ko1:r36433 (trunk): * thread.c (rb_thread_call_without_gvl2): added. — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
SASADA Koichi <[email protected]> wrote:
[#46553] [ruby-trunk - Feature #2565] adding hooks for better tracing — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <aaron@...>
[#46564] Ruby under CI - Windows — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
[#46574] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6762][Open] Control interrupt timing — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
I was suggesting "interruptible" as a better alternative for
[#46577] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6763][Open] Introduce Flonum technique to speedup floating computation on th 64bit environment — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
[#46586] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6764][Open] IO#read(size, buf) causes can't set length of shared string in trunk (2.0.0dev) — "nahi (Hiroshi Nakamura)" <nakahiro@...>
[#46641] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6780][Open] cannot compile zlib module, when cross-compiling. — "jinleileiking (lei king)" <jinleileiking@...>
[#46686] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6784][Open] Test failures related to numeric with x64 mingw — "h.shirosaki (Hiroshi Shirosaki)" <h.shirosaki@...>
[#46741] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6789][Open] parse.y compilation error due not updated id.h — "luislavena (Luis Lavena)" <luislavena@...>
[#46744] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6791][Open] ext/js on/generator/generator.c fails to compile on nightly build (AIX 6.1) — "pedz (Perry Smith)" <pedz@...>
Hi Perry,
[#46772] Ruby 1.9.3 release? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
JRuby will soon release 1.7.0pre2, the second preview of 1.7. Perhaps
(2012/07/26 7:07), Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:59 PM, NARUSE, Yui <[email protected]> wrote:
[#46792] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6799][Open] Digest::*.hexdigest returns an ASCII-8BIT String — "Eregon (Benoit Daloze)" <redmine@...>
[#46832] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6807][Open] Can't compile ruby without ruby — "devcurmudgeon (Paul Sherwood)" <storitel@...>
[#46834] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6808][Open] Implicit index for enumerations — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...>
[#46838] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6810][Open] `module A::B; end` is not equivalent to `module A; module B; end; end` with respect to constant lookup (scope) — "alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov)" <redmine@...>
[#46854] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6811][Open] File, Dir and FileUtils should have bang-versions of singleton methods that fails silently — "prijutme4ty (Ilya Vorontsov)" <prijutme4ty@...>
[#46896] (Half-baked DRAFT) new `require' framework — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
2012/7/31 SASADA Koichi <[email protected]>
On 31/07/12 13:29, SASADA Koichi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Alex Young <[email protected]> wrote:
On 01/08/2012, at 5:59 AM, Trans wrote:
(2012/07/31 21:29), SASADA Koichi wrote:
If one is considering importing archive files like zip, tar, jar, or gem, I
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Rocky Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote:
[ruby-core:46340] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6688] Object#replace
Issue #6688 has been updated by kstephens (Kurt Stephens).
How would it behave for immediate VALUEs (Fixnum, Symbol, etc.)?
Or value classes that are immutable or often occur as literals (Float, Rational, Time, etc.)?
This would probably be very difficult to implement in JRuby (and other Ruby implementations) without adding indirection handles between object references and their memory locations; and would reduce performance.
Without indirection, it's difficult to remap references on the stack and other structures that may be opaque to the CRuby GC.
If I recall correctly, early versions of Objective-C (pre-NeXTSTEP) used indirection handles to reduce memory fragmentation, thus it may have been supported there.
This "feature" would constrain low-level memory management decisions in a fundamental way.
----------------------------------------
Feature #6688: Object#replace
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6688#change-27956
Author: prijutme4ty (Ilya Vorontsov)
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Target version:
I suggest that #replace works not only on Enumerables but on any Object. It can make use the same object in different places more consistent. It makes it possible to write
class Egg; end
class Hen; end
class HenHouse; attr_accessor :species; end
class Incubator; def incubate(egg) Hen.new; end
# Here it is!
class IncubatorWithReplace;
def incubate(egg)
egg.replace(Hen.new)
end
end
e1,e2,e3 = Egg.new, Egg.new, Egg.new
h1, h2 = HenHouse.new, HenHouse.new
# One egg is shared between hen houses
h1.species = [e1, e2]
h2.species = [e1, e3]
p h1 # ==> <HenHouse @species = [#<Egg 1>,#<Egg 2>]
p h2 # ==> <HenHouse @species = [#<Egg 1>,#<Egg 3>]
# First option. It's bad choise because it makes two "data structures" HenHouse inconsistent:
# they have different object while must have the same
h1[0] = Incubator.new.incubate(h1[0])
p h1 # ==> <HenHouse @species = [#<Hen>,#<Egg 2>]
p h2 # ==> <HenHouse @species = [#<Egg 1>,#<Egg 3>]
# Second option is ok - now both shared objects're changed.
IncubatorWithReplace.new.incubate(h1[0])
h1 # ==> <HenHouse @species = [#<Hen>,#<Egg 2>]
h2 # ==> <HenHouse @species = [#<Hen>,#<Egg 3>]
# Third option is bad - it wouldn't affect HenHouses at all
e1 = Incubator.new.incubate(e1)
p h1 # ==> <HenHouse @species = [#<Egg 1>,#<Egg 2>]
p h2 # ==> <HenHouse @species = [#<Egg 1>,#<Egg 3>]
# while Fourth option is ok and works as second do
IncubatorWithReplace.new.incubate(e1) ## would affect both HenHouses
p h1 # ==> <HenHouse @species = [#<Hen>,#<Egg 2>]
p h2 # ==> <HenHouse @species = [#<Egg 1>,#<Egg 3>]
I can't imagine how it'd be realized, it looks like some dark magic with ObjectSpace needed to replace one object at a reference with another at the same reference. But I didn't found a solution.
About ret-value. I think it should be two forms:
Object#replace(obj, retain = false)
If retain is false #replace should return a reference to a new object (in fact the same reference as to old object but with other content)
If retain is true, old object should be moved at another place and new reference to it is returned, so:
e1 # ==> <Egg id:1>
e1.replace( Hen.new, true ) # ==> <Egg id:2>
e1 # ==> <Hen id:1>
--
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/