[#61171] Re: [ruby-changes:33145] normal:r45224 (trunk): gc.c: fix build for testing w/o RGenGC — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
(2014/03/01 16:15), normal wrote:
3 messages
2014/03/01
[#61243] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9425] [PATCH] st: use power-of-two sizes to avoid slow modulo ops — normalperson@...
Issue #9425 has been updated by Eric Wong.
4 messages
2014/03/03
[#61359] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9609] [Open] [PATCH] vm_eval.c: fix misplaced RB_GC_GUARDs — normalperson@...
Issue #9609 has been reported by Eric Wong.
5 messages
2014/03/07
[#61360] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #9609] [Open] [PATCH] vm_eval.c: fix misplaced RB_GC_GUARDs
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/03/07
(2014/03/07 19:09), [email protected] wrote:
[#61362] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #9609] [Open] [PATCH] vm_eval.c: fix misplaced RB_GC_GUARDs
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/03/07
SASADA Koichi <[email protected]> wrote:
[#61424] [REJECT?] xmalloc/xfree: reduce atomic ops w/ thread-locals — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
I'm unsure about this. I _hate_ the extra branches this adds;
13 messages
2014/03/12
[#61466] Re: [REJECT?] xmalloc/xfree: reduce atomic ops w/ thread-locals
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/03/13
Hi Eric,
[#61471] Re: [REJECT?] xmalloc/xfree: reduce atomic ops w/ thread-locals
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/03/13
SASADA Koichi <[email protected]> wrote:
[#61508] Re: [REJECT?] xmalloc/xfree: reduce atomic ops w/ thread-locals
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/03/15
(2014/03/14 2:12), Eric Wong wrote:
[#61509] Re: [REJECT?] xmalloc/xfree: reduce atomic ops w/ thread-locals
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/03/15
SASADA Koichi <[email protected]> wrote:
[#61510] Re: [REJECT?] xmalloc/xfree: reduce atomic ops w/ thread-locals
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/03/15
(2014/03/15 17:34), Eric Wong wrote:
[#61452] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [Open] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan — normalperson@...
Issue #9632 has been reported by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2014/03/13
[#61496] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9638] [Open] [PATCH] limit IDs to 32-bits on 64-bit systems — normalperson@...
Issue #9638 has been reported by Eric Wong.
4 messages
2014/03/14
[#61568] hash function for global method cache — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
I came upon this because I noticed existing st numtable worked poorly
7 messages
2014/03/17
[#61605] Re: hash function for global method cache
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/03/20
(2014/03/18 8:03), Eric Wong wrote:
[#61606] Re: hash function for global method cache
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/03/20
SASADA Koichi <[email protected]> wrote:
[#61631] Re: hash function for global method cache
— =?KOI8-R?B?4NLJyiDzz8vPzM/X?= <funny.falcon@...>
2014/03/22
what's the profit from using binary tree in place of hash?
[#61632] Re: hash function for global method cache
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/03/22
Юрий Соколов <[email protected]> wrote:
[#61687] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9606] Ocassional SIGSEGV inTestException#test_machine_stackoverflow on OpenBSD — normalperson@...
Issue #9606 has been updated by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2014/03/26
[#61760] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan — normalperson@...
Issue #9632 has been updated by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2014/03/30
[ruby-core:61611] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9657] [Open] Segfault in bigdecimal/util.rb Float#to_d
From:
dieter@...
Date:
2014-03-20 14:31:19 UTC
List:
ruby-core #61611
Issue #9657 has been reported by Dieter Komendera. ---------------------------------------- Bug #9657: Segfault in bigdecimal/util.rb Float#to_d https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9657 * Author: Dieter Komendera * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Category: * Target version: * ruby -v: ruby 2.1.1p76 (2014-02-24 revision 45161) [x86_64-linux] * Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- We're seeing some segfaults with ActiveRecord (rails 4-1-0 branch) when running on travis ci. Haven't been able to reproduce yet, but we're seeing about a dozen build failures until now but still wanted to share it. Maybe someone with more clue about that stuff has some idea what's going on and can point in some direction. /home/travis/build/<project>/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.1.0/extensions/x86_64-linux/2.1.0/bigdecimal-1.2.5/bigdecimal/util.rb:39: [BUG] Segmentation fault at 0x000000acde0834 ruby 2.1.1p76 (2014-02-24 revision 45161) [x86_64-linux] -- Control frame information ----------------------------------------------- c:0139 p:---- s:0636 e:000635 CFUNC :BigDecimal c:0138 p:0028 s:0631 e:000630 METHOD /home/travis/build/<project>/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.1.0/extensions/x86_64-linux/2.1.0/bigdecimal-1.2.5/bigdecimal/u c:0137 p:0049 s:0627 e:000626 METHOD /home/travis/build<project>/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.1.0/bundler/gems/rails-00b7a21e592a/activerecord/lib/active_rec c:0136 p:0035 s:0623 e:000622 METHOD /home/travis/build/<project>vendor/bundle/ruby/2.1.0/bundler/gems/rails-00b7a21e592a/activerecord/lib/active_rec c:0135 p:0049 s:0619 e:000618 METHOD /home/travis/build/<project>/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.1.0/bundler/gems/rails-00b7a21e592a/activerecord/lib/active_rec c:0134 p:0105 s:0615 e:000611 BLOCK /home/travis/build/<project>/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.1.0/bundler/gems/rails-00b7a21e592a/activerecord/lib/active_rec [FINISH] -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/