[#87773] timer thread [was Re: [ruby-alerts:7905] failure alert on trunk-asserts@silicon-docker (NG (r63844))] — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
> test_all <main>: warning: pthread_create failed for timer: Resource temporarily unavailable, scheduling broken
3 messages
2018/07/04
[#87836] [Ruby trunk Bug#14898] test/lib/test/unit/parallel.rb: TestSocket#test_timestamp stuck sometimes — ko1@...
Issue #14898 has been reported by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
5 messages
2018/07/06
[#87838] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14898] test/lib/test/unit/parallel.rb: TestSocket#test_timestamp stuck sometimes
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/07/06
[email protected] wrote:
[#87842] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14898] test/lib/test/unit/parallel.rb: TestSocket#test_timestamp stuck sometimes
— Koichi Sasada <ko1@...>
2018/07/07
On 2018/07/06 18:47, Eric Wong wrote:
[#87847] undefined symbol: mjit_init_p — Leam Hall <leamhall@...>
I pulled Ruby trunk on 3 Jul and am now getting errors similar to the
10 messages
2018/07/07
[#87849] Re: undefined symbol: mjit_init_p
— Takashi Kokubun <takashikkbn@...>
2018/07/07
QXMgSSB0b2xkIHlvdSwgYG1ha2UgaW5zdGFsbGAgaXMgbmVlZGVkIHRvIG1ha2UgUnVieSB3b3Jr
[#87852] Re: undefined symbol: mjit_init_p
— Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...>
2018/07/07
T25lIG1vcmUgcmVhc29uIGZvciBodHRwczovL2J1Z3MucnVieS1sYW5nLm9yZy9pc3N1ZXMvMTM2
[#87986] [Ruby trunk Feature#14915] Deprecate String#crypt, move implementation to string/crypt — mame@...
Issue #14915 has been updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh).
5 messages
2018/07/18
[#87987] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#14915] Deprecate String#crypt, move implementation to string/crypt
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/07/18
[email protected] wrote:
[#88000] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#14915] Deprecate String#crypt, move implementation to string/crypt
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2018/07/19
normalperson (Eric Wong) wrote:
[#88088] [Ruby trunk Misc#14937] [PATCH] thread_pthread: lazy-spawn timer-thread only on contention — normalperson@...
Issue #14937 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
9 messages
2018/07/24
[#88104] [Ruby trunk Bug#14898] test/lib/test/unit/parallel.rb: TestSocket#test_timestamp stuck sometimes — ko1@...
Issue #14898 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
3 messages
2018/07/25
[#88173] [Ruby trunk Bug#14950] r64109 thread.c: move ppoll wrapper before thread_pthread.c - Windows compile failure - thread.c — Greg.mpls@...
Issue #14950 has been reported by MSP-Greg (Greg L).
3 messages
2018/07/29
[#88189] [Ruby trunk Bug#14950] r64109 thread.c: move ppoll wrapper before thread_pthread.c - Windows compile failure - thread.c — nobu@...
Issue #14950 has been updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada).
3 messages
2018/07/30
[#88199] [Ruby trunk Misc#14937] [PATCH] thread_pthread: lazy-spawn timer-thread only on contention — takashikkbn@...
Issue #14937 has been updated by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun).
7 messages
2018/07/30
[#88213] Re: [Ruby trunk Misc#14937] [PATCH] thread_pthread: lazy-spawn timer-thread only on contention
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/07/30
[email protected] wrote:
[#88219] Re: [Ruby trunk Misc#14937] [PATCH] thread_pthread: lazy-spawn timer-thread only on contention
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/07/30
> yet, sky3 had a failure at
[#88306] Re: [Ruby trunk Misc#14937] [PATCH] thread_pthread: lazy-spawn timer-thread only on contention
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/08/06
> http://ci.rvm.jp/results/trunk@P895/1173951
[#88308] Re: [Ruby trunk Misc#14937] [PATCH] thread_pthread: lazy-spawn timer-thread only on contention
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/08/06
> > http://ci.rvm.jp/results/trunk@P895/1173951
[ruby-core:87817] [Ruby trunk Bug#14895] Inconsistent constant names when using const_set on a singleton class
From:
antoniopedrosilvapinto+ruby-lang@...
Date:
2018-07-05 17:35:05 UTC
List:
ruby-core #87817
Issue #14895 has been updated by silver_phoenix (Pedro Pinto). So, what you're saying is that the singleton class is being assigned to a constant when it creates module `A`, so modules are only named after this step? Is this expected behavior then? ---------------------------------------- Bug #14895: Inconsistent constant names when using const_set on a singleton class https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14895#change-72835 * Author: silver_phoenix (Pedro Pinto) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: * ruby -v: ruby 2.6.0preview2 (2018-05-31 trunk 63539) [x86_64-linux] * Backport: 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: UNKNOWN, 2.5: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- ``` irb(main):001:0> class X; end => nil irb(main):002:0> X.const_set(:Y, Module.new) => X::Y irb(main):003:0> module M; end => nil irb(main):004:0> M.const_set(:N, Module.new) => M::N irb(main):005:0> x = Object.new => #<Object:0x000055886ee2b110> irb(main):006:0> x.singleton_class.const_set(:Z, Module.new) => #<Module:0x000055886ec59a80> irb(main):007:0> x.singleton_class.class_eval "module A; self end" => #<Class:0x000055886ec59d00>::A irb(main):008:0> x.singleton_class.const_set(:B, Module.new) => #<Class:0x000055886ec59d00>::B ``` I would expect module `Z` to be named, but the modules only start being named after creating module `A` through the `module` builtin. For consistency, if module `B` is named, shouldn't module `Z` be named as well? Also happens in these ruby versions: `ruby 2.5.1p57 (2018-03-29 revision 63029) [x86_64-linux]` `ruby 2.5.1p57 (2018-03-29 revision 63029) [i386-mingw32]` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>